Bupivacaine 0,25% versus ropivacaine 0,25% in brachial plexus block in dogs of beagle breed

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Wakoff, Thiago Ignácio
Data de Publicação: 2013
Outros Autores: Mencalha, Rodrigo, Souza, Natália Soares, Sousa, Carlos Augusto dos Santos, Sousa, Mariana do Desterro Inácio e, Scherer, Paulo Oldemar
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/12906
Resumo: The brachial plexus block (BPB) is a regional anesthesia technique which enables the attainment of surgical procedures distal scapulohumeral articulation. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of ropivacaine and bupivacaine 0.25% without vasoconstrictor in BPB guided by electrical stimulation in dogs. Thirteen male and female beagle dogs underwent a BPB using bupivacaine and ropivacaine 0.25% (4mg/kg), both alone and in different times. The anesthesic block was performed in the right forelimb  and as control group the block proceeded in the left forelimb using a solution of sodium chloride 0.9% in volume corresponding to the drug in the contralateral limb. The block was performed after the localization of the radial nerve with the aid of eletrical stimulation, which was infiltrated half the volume of anesthetic calculated and subsequently the remaining solution was administered on the median nerve. We evaluated sensitive and motor latencies and sensitive and motor block total time by clamping technique. In the present study, a technique for electrical stimulation was effective in 100% of animals. Bupivacaine had lower motor latency period, however, the sensitive latency between the two groups showed no statistically significant differences. In the block total time, bupivacaine obtained time significantly higher. Clinical signs characteristic of Horner’s syndrome were present in 15% of animals treated with bupivacaine. Furthermore, two animals presented signs of cardiotoxicity in bupivacaine group. The use of bupivacaine (4mg/kg) without vasoconstrictor in dogs brachial plexus block provided longer analgesia and motor blockade, however, ropivacaine at the same dose and concentration was found to be free of deleterious effects associated of cardiovascular instability, hemodynamic and respiratory.
id UEL-11_344413133b9d487bb7e43af1ff9393d6
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/12906
network_acronym_str UEL-11
network_name_str Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Bupivacaine 0,25% versus ropivacaine 0,25% in brachial plexus block in dogs of beagle breedBupivacaína 0,25% versus ropivacaína 0,25% no bloqueio do plexo braquial em cães da raça beagleBrachial plexusStimulationBupivacaineRopivacaineDogs.Plexo braquialEstimuladorBupivacaínaRopivacaínaCães.Ciências AgráriasThe brachial plexus block (BPB) is a regional anesthesia technique which enables the attainment of surgical procedures distal scapulohumeral articulation. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of ropivacaine and bupivacaine 0.25% without vasoconstrictor in BPB guided by electrical stimulation in dogs. Thirteen male and female beagle dogs underwent a BPB using bupivacaine and ropivacaine 0.25% (4mg/kg), both alone and in different times. The anesthesic block was performed in the right forelimb  and as control group the block proceeded in the left forelimb using a solution of sodium chloride 0.9% in volume corresponding to the drug in the contralateral limb. The block was performed after the localization of the radial nerve with the aid of eletrical stimulation, which was infiltrated half the volume of anesthetic calculated and subsequently the remaining solution was administered on the median nerve. We evaluated sensitive and motor latencies and sensitive and motor block total time by clamping technique. In the present study, a technique for electrical stimulation was effective in 100% of animals. Bupivacaine had lower motor latency period, however, the sensitive latency between the two groups showed no statistically significant differences. In the block total time, bupivacaine obtained time significantly higher. Clinical signs characteristic of Horner’s syndrome were present in 15% of animals treated with bupivacaine. Furthermore, two animals presented signs of cardiotoxicity in bupivacaine group. The use of bupivacaine (4mg/kg) without vasoconstrictor in dogs brachial plexus block provided longer analgesia and motor blockade, however, ropivacaine at the same dose and concentration was found to be free of deleterious effects associated of cardiovascular instability, hemodynamic and respiratory.O bloqueio do plexo braquial (BPB) é uma técnica de anestesia regional que possibilita a realização de procedimentos cirúrgicos distais a articulação escapulo-umeral. O objetivo deste trabalho visou comparar a eficácia da ropivacaína e bupivacaína a 0,25% sem vasoconstrictor no BPB, guiado por eletroestimulação, em cães. Foram submetidos ao BPB, 13 cães, machos e fêmeas, da raça beagle, utilizando-se bupivacaína ou ropivacaína a 0,25% (4mg/kg), ambos isolados e em períodos distintos. No membro torácico direito foi realizado o bloqueio anestésico e como grupo controle o bloqueio procedeu-se no membro torácico esquerdo com solução de cloreto de sódio 0,9% no volume correspondente ao do fármaco no membro contralateral. O bloqueio consistiu na localização do nervo radial com o eletroestimulador, onde foi infiltrada a metade do volume anestésico calculado e posteriormente o restante da solução foi administrado sobre o nervo mediano. Foram avaliados os tempos de latência sensitiva e motora e tempos totais de bloqueio motor e sensitivo através da técnica de pinçamentos. No presente estudo, a técnica de eletroestimulação nervosa foi eficaz em 100% dos animais. A bupivacaína apresentou menor período de latência motora, entretanto, os tempos de latência sensitiva entre os dois fármacos não apresentaram diferenças estatísticas significativas. O tempos de bloqueio com a bupivacaína foi significativamente maior Sinais clínicos característicos de Síndrome de Horner estiveram presentes em 15% dos animais tratados com bupivacaína. Ademais, dois animais manifestaram sinais de cardiotoxicidade no grupo bupivacaína. O uso da bupivacaína a 0,25% sem vasoconstrictor na dose de 4mg/kg no bloqueio de plexo braquial em cães conferiu maior tempo de analgesia e bloqueio motor, porém, a ropivacaína na mesma dose e concentração mostrou-se livre de efeitos deletérios associados a instabilidade cardiovascular, hemodinâmica e respiratória.UEL2013-06-24info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionpesquisa experimentalapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/1290610.5433/1679-0359.2013v34n3p1259Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 34 No. 3 (2013); 1259-1272Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 34 n. 3 (2013); 1259-12721679-03591676-546Xreponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/12906/pdfCopyright (c) 2013 Semina: Ciências Agráriashttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessWakoff, Thiago IgnácioMencalha, RodrigoSouza, Natália SoaresSousa, Carlos Augusto dos SantosSousa, Mariana do Desterro Inácio eScherer, Paulo Oldemar2023-01-17T11:52:29Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/12906Revistahttp://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrariasPUBhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/oaisemina.agrarias@uel.br1679-03591676-546Xopendoar:2023-01-17T11:52:29Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Bupivacaine 0,25% versus ropivacaine 0,25% in brachial plexus block in dogs of beagle breed
Bupivacaína 0,25% versus ropivacaína 0,25% no bloqueio do plexo braquial em cães da raça beagle
title Bupivacaine 0,25% versus ropivacaine 0,25% in brachial plexus block in dogs of beagle breed
spellingShingle Bupivacaine 0,25% versus ropivacaine 0,25% in brachial plexus block in dogs of beagle breed
Wakoff, Thiago Ignácio
Brachial plexus
Stimulation
Bupivacaine
Ropivacaine
Dogs.
Plexo braquial
Estimulador
Bupivacaína
Ropivacaína
Cães.
Ciências Agrárias
title_short Bupivacaine 0,25% versus ropivacaine 0,25% in brachial plexus block in dogs of beagle breed
title_full Bupivacaine 0,25% versus ropivacaine 0,25% in brachial plexus block in dogs of beagle breed
title_fullStr Bupivacaine 0,25% versus ropivacaine 0,25% in brachial plexus block in dogs of beagle breed
title_full_unstemmed Bupivacaine 0,25% versus ropivacaine 0,25% in brachial plexus block in dogs of beagle breed
title_sort Bupivacaine 0,25% versus ropivacaine 0,25% in brachial plexus block in dogs of beagle breed
author Wakoff, Thiago Ignácio
author_facet Wakoff, Thiago Ignácio
Mencalha, Rodrigo
Souza, Natália Soares
Sousa, Carlos Augusto dos Santos
Sousa, Mariana do Desterro Inácio e
Scherer, Paulo Oldemar
author_role author
author2 Mencalha, Rodrigo
Souza, Natália Soares
Sousa, Carlos Augusto dos Santos
Sousa, Mariana do Desterro Inácio e
Scherer, Paulo Oldemar
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Wakoff, Thiago Ignácio
Mencalha, Rodrigo
Souza, Natália Soares
Sousa, Carlos Augusto dos Santos
Sousa, Mariana do Desterro Inácio e
Scherer, Paulo Oldemar
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Brachial plexus
Stimulation
Bupivacaine
Ropivacaine
Dogs.
Plexo braquial
Estimulador
Bupivacaína
Ropivacaína
Cães.
Ciências Agrárias
topic Brachial plexus
Stimulation
Bupivacaine
Ropivacaine
Dogs.
Plexo braquial
Estimulador
Bupivacaína
Ropivacaína
Cães.
Ciências Agrárias
description The brachial plexus block (BPB) is a regional anesthesia technique which enables the attainment of surgical procedures distal scapulohumeral articulation. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of ropivacaine and bupivacaine 0.25% without vasoconstrictor in BPB guided by electrical stimulation in dogs. Thirteen male and female beagle dogs underwent a BPB using bupivacaine and ropivacaine 0.25% (4mg/kg), both alone and in different times. The anesthesic block was performed in the right forelimb  and as control group the block proceeded in the left forelimb using a solution of sodium chloride 0.9% in volume corresponding to the drug in the contralateral limb. The block was performed after the localization of the radial nerve with the aid of eletrical stimulation, which was infiltrated half the volume of anesthetic calculated and subsequently the remaining solution was administered on the median nerve. We evaluated sensitive and motor latencies and sensitive and motor block total time by clamping technique. In the present study, a technique for electrical stimulation was effective in 100% of animals. Bupivacaine had lower motor latency period, however, the sensitive latency between the two groups showed no statistically significant differences. In the block total time, bupivacaine obtained time significantly higher. Clinical signs characteristic of Horner’s syndrome were present in 15% of animals treated with bupivacaine. Furthermore, two animals presented signs of cardiotoxicity in bupivacaine group. The use of bupivacaine (4mg/kg) without vasoconstrictor in dogs brachial plexus block provided longer analgesia and motor blockade, however, ropivacaine at the same dose and concentration was found to be free of deleterious effects associated of cardiovascular instability, hemodynamic and respiratory.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013-06-24
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
pesquisa experimental
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/12906
10.5433/1679-0359.2013v34n3p1259
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/12906
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/1679-0359.2013v34n3p1259
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/12906/pdf
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2013 Semina: Ciências Agrárias
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2013 Semina: Ciências Agrárias
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 34 No. 3 (2013); 1259-1272
Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 34 n. 3 (2013); 1259-1272
1679-0359
1676-546X
reponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
collection Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv semina.agrarias@uel.br
_version_ 1799306067876773888