Economic viability of implementing an infrastructure for recycling bedding sand from a free-stall facility for dairy cows
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/40433 |
Resumo: | This study proposes to examine the economic viability of implementing the necessary infrastructure for the recycling of bedding sand from a free-stall facility in a milk production system in southern Minas Gerais, Brazil. In specific terms, the total production cost (TC), total operating cost (TOC) and effective operating cost (EOC) of a cubic meter of recycled sand were estimated in order to estimate the total sand consumption for the free-stall system and per bed year-1 as well as the equilibrium point of the amount of recycled sand, in cubic meters. The experiment was carried out on a farm located in the south of Minas Gerais from January 2016 to December 2017. Three scenarios were analyzed by the tree-point estimation method (MOP - most likely, optimistic, and pessimistic). Utilization of 85%, 95% and 75% of the recycled sand was considered for scenarios 1, 2 and 3, respectively. In all of them, the value charged per cubic meter of sand by a supplier close to the farm was considered. Monte Carlo simulation was also carried out with hurdle rates (HR) of up to 90%. Under the studied conditions, sand recycling showed to be economically viable in all scenarios, with positive net present values (NPV), internal rates of return above the HR, simple and discounted payback below the 10-year horizon, and satisfactory cost benefit-1 ratios (greater than 1). The EOC of one cubic meter of recycled sand was estimated at R$5.04, R$4.51 and R$5.72 for scenarios 1, 2 and 3, respectively, whereas the average TC, considering all scenarios, was R$6.84 (+0.81), which is less than the acquisition price of R$28.57 at the sand extraction site. The TC was R$37,219.51 and R$34,637.74 for the scenarios with HR of 8.50 and 6.99%, respectively, whereas TOC was R$22,572.08 in all analyzed scenarios. The estimated total annual sand consumption by the free-stall system was 526.44 m³, with an estimated average of 1.23 m³ (+0.28) bed-1 year-1. All Monte Carlo simulation models showed positive NPV as well as HR of up to 90%, which reflect a high probability of positive NPV. |
id |
UEL-11_4800066bbcc49e798111d96c4e1aa18f |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/40433 |
network_acronym_str |
UEL-11 |
network_name_str |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Economic viability of implementing an infrastructure for recycling bedding sand from a free-stall facility for dairy cowsViabilidade econômica da implantação da infraestrutura para recuperação da areia da cama de uma instalação free stall para vacas leiteirasScenario analysisDairy cattle farmingProfitability indicatorsReuseSustainability.Análise de cenáriosBovinocultura leiteiraIndicadores de rentabilidadeReusoSustentabilidade.This study proposes to examine the economic viability of implementing the necessary infrastructure for the recycling of bedding sand from a free-stall facility in a milk production system in southern Minas Gerais, Brazil. In specific terms, the total production cost (TC), total operating cost (TOC) and effective operating cost (EOC) of a cubic meter of recycled sand were estimated in order to estimate the total sand consumption for the free-stall system and per bed year-1 as well as the equilibrium point of the amount of recycled sand, in cubic meters. The experiment was carried out on a farm located in the south of Minas Gerais from January 2016 to December 2017. Three scenarios were analyzed by the tree-point estimation method (MOP - most likely, optimistic, and pessimistic). Utilization of 85%, 95% and 75% of the recycled sand was considered for scenarios 1, 2 and 3, respectively. In all of them, the value charged per cubic meter of sand by a supplier close to the farm was considered. Monte Carlo simulation was also carried out with hurdle rates (HR) of up to 90%. Under the studied conditions, sand recycling showed to be economically viable in all scenarios, with positive net present values (NPV), internal rates of return above the HR, simple and discounted payback below the 10-year horizon, and satisfactory cost benefit-1 ratios (greater than 1). The EOC of one cubic meter of recycled sand was estimated at R$5.04, R$4.51 and R$5.72 for scenarios 1, 2 and 3, respectively, whereas the average TC, considering all scenarios, was R$6.84 (+0.81), which is less than the acquisition price of R$28.57 at the sand extraction site. The TC was R$37,219.51 and R$34,637.74 for the scenarios with HR of 8.50 and 6.99%, respectively, whereas TOC was R$22,572.08 in all analyzed scenarios. The estimated total annual sand consumption by the free-stall system was 526.44 m³, with an estimated average of 1.23 m³ (+0.28) bed-1 year-1. All Monte Carlo simulation models showed positive NPV as well as HR of up to 90%, which reflect a high probability of positive NPV.Objetivou-se analisar a viabilidade econômica da implantação da infraestrutura necessária para a recuperação da areia da cama de uma instalação free stall, em um sistema de produção de leite no Sul de Minas Gerais. Especificamente, pretendeu-se estimar o custo total de produção (CT), custo operacional total (COT) e custo operacional efetivo (COE) de um metro cúbico de areia recuperada, estimar o consumo total de areia para o sistema free stall, e por cama ano-1 e estimar o ponto de equilíbrio da quantidade de areia recuperada, em metros cúbicos. A pesquisa foi realizada em uma propriedade localizada no Sul de Minas Gerais; no período de janeiro de 2016 a dezembro de 2017. Realizou-se a análise de cenários MOP: mais provável (cenário 1); otimista (cenário 2); e pessimista (cenário 3). Considerou-se o aproveitamento de 85%, 95% e 75% da areia recuperada para os cenários 1, 2 e 3, respectivamente. Em todos eles, foi considerado o valor praticado por metro cúbico da areia em um fornecedor próximo à propriedade. Realizou-se, ainda, simulação de Monte Carlo com taxas mínimas de atratividade de até 90%. A recuperação de areia, nas condições estudadas, apresentou viabilidade econômica em todos os cenários, apresentando valor presente líquido (VLP) positivos, taxas internas de retorno (TIR) acima da taxa mínima de atratividade, payback simples e descontados abaixo do horizonte de 10 anos e relações benefício custo-1 (RBC) satisfatórias (maior que 1). O COE de um metro cúbico de areia recuperada foi estimado em R$5,04; R$4,51 e R$5,72 para os cenários 1; 2 e 3, respectivamente, enquanto que o CT médio, considerando todos os cenários, foi de R$6,84 (+0,81), abaixo dos valores de aquisição no areal, que seria de R$28,57. Os CT foram de R$37.219,51 e R$34.637,74 para os cenários com taxa mínima de atratividade de 8,50 e 6,99%, respectivamente, enquanto que COT foi de R$22.572,08 em todos os cenários analisados. O consumo total de areia anual estimado foi de 526,44m³ e um consumo médio estimado de 1,23m³ (+0,28) cama-1 ano-1. Todos os modelos de simulação de Monte Carlo apresentaram VPL positivos, assim como taxas mínimas de atratividade de até 90%, que refletem alta probabilidade de VPL positivo.UEL2021-01-19info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPesquisaapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/4043310.5433/1679-0359.2021v42n1p361Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 42 No. 1 (2021); 361-374Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 42 n. 1 (2021); 361-3741679-03591676-546Xreponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELenghttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/40433/28516Copyright (c) 2020 Semina: Ciências Agráriashttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLopes, Marcos AurélioDemeu, Fabiana AlvesReis, Eduardo Mitke BrandãoLima, André Luis RibeiroCarvalho, Francisva lde MeloPalhares, Julio Cesar PascaleCosta, Geraldo Márcio daPinheiro, Marcelo Vinícius GontijoDemeu, Andréia Alves2022-10-04T15:39:40Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/40433Revistahttp://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrariasPUBhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/oaisemina.agrarias@uel.br1679-03591676-546Xopendoar:2022-10-04T15:39:40Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Economic viability of implementing an infrastructure for recycling bedding sand from a free-stall facility for dairy cows Viabilidade econômica da implantação da infraestrutura para recuperação da areia da cama de uma instalação free stall para vacas leiteiras |
title |
Economic viability of implementing an infrastructure for recycling bedding sand from a free-stall facility for dairy cows |
spellingShingle |
Economic viability of implementing an infrastructure for recycling bedding sand from a free-stall facility for dairy cows Lopes, Marcos Aurélio Scenario analysis Dairy cattle farming Profitability indicators Reuse Sustainability. Análise de cenários Bovinocultura leiteira Indicadores de rentabilidade Reuso Sustentabilidade. |
title_short |
Economic viability of implementing an infrastructure for recycling bedding sand from a free-stall facility for dairy cows |
title_full |
Economic viability of implementing an infrastructure for recycling bedding sand from a free-stall facility for dairy cows |
title_fullStr |
Economic viability of implementing an infrastructure for recycling bedding sand from a free-stall facility for dairy cows |
title_full_unstemmed |
Economic viability of implementing an infrastructure for recycling bedding sand from a free-stall facility for dairy cows |
title_sort |
Economic viability of implementing an infrastructure for recycling bedding sand from a free-stall facility for dairy cows |
author |
Lopes, Marcos Aurélio |
author_facet |
Lopes, Marcos Aurélio Demeu, Fabiana Alves Reis, Eduardo Mitke Brandão Lima, André Luis Ribeiro Carvalho, Francisva lde Melo Palhares, Julio Cesar Pascale Costa, Geraldo Márcio da Pinheiro, Marcelo Vinícius Gontijo Demeu, Andréia Alves |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Demeu, Fabiana Alves Reis, Eduardo Mitke Brandão Lima, André Luis Ribeiro Carvalho, Francisva lde Melo Palhares, Julio Cesar Pascale Costa, Geraldo Márcio da Pinheiro, Marcelo Vinícius Gontijo Demeu, Andréia Alves |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Lopes, Marcos Aurélio Demeu, Fabiana Alves Reis, Eduardo Mitke Brandão Lima, André Luis Ribeiro Carvalho, Francisva lde Melo Palhares, Julio Cesar Pascale Costa, Geraldo Márcio da Pinheiro, Marcelo Vinícius Gontijo Demeu, Andréia Alves |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Scenario analysis Dairy cattle farming Profitability indicators Reuse Sustainability. Análise de cenários Bovinocultura leiteira Indicadores de rentabilidade Reuso Sustentabilidade. |
topic |
Scenario analysis Dairy cattle farming Profitability indicators Reuse Sustainability. Análise de cenários Bovinocultura leiteira Indicadores de rentabilidade Reuso Sustentabilidade. |
description |
This study proposes to examine the economic viability of implementing the necessary infrastructure for the recycling of bedding sand from a free-stall facility in a milk production system in southern Minas Gerais, Brazil. In specific terms, the total production cost (TC), total operating cost (TOC) and effective operating cost (EOC) of a cubic meter of recycled sand were estimated in order to estimate the total sand consumption for the free-stall system and per bed year-1 as well as the equilibrium point of the amount of recycled sand, in cubic meters. The experiment was carried out on a farm located in the south of Minas Gerais from January 2016 to December 2017. Three scenarios were analyzed by the tree-point estimation method (MOP - most likely, optimistic, and pessimistic). Utilization of 85%, 95% and 75% of the recycled sand was considered for scenarios 1, 2 and 3, respectively. In all of them, the value charged per cubic meter of sand by a supplier close to the farm was considered. Monte Carlo simulation was also carried out with hurdle rates (HR) of up to 90%. Under the studied conditions, sand recycling showed to be economically viable in all scenarios, with positive net present values (NPV), internal rates of return above the HR, simple and discounted payback below the 10-year horizon, and satisfactory cost benefit-1 ratios (greater than 1). The EOC of one cubic meter of recycled sand was estimated at R$5.04, R$4.51 and R$5.72 for scenarios 1, 2 and 3, respectively, whereas the average TC, considering all scenarios, was R$6.84 (+0.81), which is less than the acquisition price of R$28.57 at the sand extraction site. The TC was R$37,219.51 and R$34,637.74 for the scenarios with HR of 8.50 and 6.99%, respectively, whereas TOC was R$22,572.08 in all analyzed scenarios. The estimated total annual sand consumption by the free-stall system was 526.44 m³, with an estimated average of 1.23 m³ (+0.28) bed-1 year-1. All Monte Carlo simulation models showed positive NPV as well as HR of up to 90%, which reflect a high probability of positive NPV. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-01-19 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Pesquisa |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/40433 10.5433/1679-0359.2021v42n1p361 |
url |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/40433 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5433/1679-0359.2021v42n1p361 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/40433/28516 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Semina: Ciências Agrárias http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Semina: Ciências Agrárias http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UEL |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UEL |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 42 No. 1 (2021); 361-374 Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 42 n. 1 (2021); 361-374 1679-0359 1676-546X reponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) instacron:UEL |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
instacron_str |
UEL |
institution |
UEL |
reponame_str |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
collection |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
semina.agrarias@uel.br |
_version_ |
1799306083318104064 |