Economic viability of implementing an infrastructure for recycling bedding sand from a free-stall facility for dairy cows

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Lopes, Marcos Aurélio
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Demeu, Fabiana Alves, Reis, Eduardo Mitke Brandão, Lima, André Luis Ribeiro, Carvalho, Francisva lde Melo, Palhares, Julio Cesar Pascale, Costa, Geraldo Márcio da, Pinheiro, Marcelo Vinícius Gontijo, Demeu, Andréia Alves
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/40433
Resumo: This study proposes to examine the economic viability of implementing the necessary infrastructure for the recycling of bedding sand from a free-stall facility in a milk production system in southern Minas Gerais, Brazil. In specific terms, the total production cost (TC), total operating cost (TOC) and effective operating cost (EOC) of a cubic meter of recycled sand were estimated in order to estimate the total sand consumption for the free-stall system and per bed year-1 as well as the equilibrium point of the amount of recycled sand, in cubic meters. The experiment was carried out on a farm located in the south of Minas Gerais from January 2016 to December 2017. Three scenarios were analyzed by the tree-point estimation method (MOP - most likely, optimistic, and pessimistic). Utilization of 85%, 95% and 75% of the recycled sand was considered for scenarios 1, 2 and 3, respectively. In all of them, the value charged per cubic meter of sand by a supplier close to the farm was considered. Monte Carlo simulation was also carried out with hurdle rates (HR) of up to 90%. Under the studied conditions, sand recycling showed to be economically viable in all scenarios, with positive net present values (NPV), internal rates of return above the HR, simple and discounted payback below the 10-year horizon, and satisfactory cost benefit-1 ratios (greater than 1). The EOC of one cubic meter of recycled sand was estimated at R$5.04, R$4.51 and R$5.72 for scenarios 1, 2 and 3, respectively, whereas the average TC, considering all scenarios, was R$6.84 (+0.81), which is less than the acquisition price of R$28.57 at the sand extraction site. The TC was R$37,219.51 and R$34,637.74 for the scenarios with HR of 8.50 and 6.99%, respectively, whereas TOC was R$22,572.08 in all analyzed scenarios. The estimated total annual sand consumption by the free-stall system was 526.44 m³, with an estimated average of 1.23 m³ (+0.28) bed-1 year-1. All Monte Carlo simulation models showed positive NPV as well as HR of up to 90%, which reflect a high probability of positive NPV.
id UEL-11_4800066bbcc49e798111d96c4e1aa18f
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/40433
network_acronym_str UEL-11
network_name_str Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Economic viability of implementing an infrastructure for recycling bedding sand from a free-stall facility for dairy cowsViabilidade econômica da implantação da infraestrutura para recuperação da areia da cama de uma instalação free stall para vacas leiteirasScenario analysisDairy cattle farmingProfitability indicatorsReuseSustainability.Análise de cenáriosBovinocultura leiteiraIndicadores de rentabilidadeReusoSustentabilidade.This study proposes to examine the economic viability of implementing the necessary infrastructure for the recycling of bedding sand from a free-stall facility in a milk production system in southern Minas Gerais, Brazil. In specific terms, the total production cost (TC), total operating cost (TOC) and effective operating cost (EOC) of a cubic meter of recycled sand were estimated in order to estimate the total sand consumption for the free-stall system and per bed year-1 as well as the equilibrium point of the amount of recycled sand, in cubic meters. The experiment was carried out on a farm located in the south of Minas Gerais from January 2016 to December 2017. Three scenarios were analyzed by the tree-point estimation method (MOP - most likely, optimistic, and pessimistic). Utilization of 85%, 95% and 75% of the recycled sand was considered for scenarios 1, 2 and 3, respectively. In all of them, the value charged per cubic meter of sand by a supplier close to the farm was considered. Monte Carlo simulation was also carried out with hurdle rates (HR) of up to 90%. Under the studied conditions, sand recycling showed to be economically viable in all scenarios, with positive net present values (NPV), internal rates of return above the HR, simple and discounted payback below the 10-year horizon, and satisfactory cost benefit-1 ratios (greater than 1). The EOC of one cubic meter of recycled sand was estimated at R$5.04, R$4.51 and R$5.72 for scenarios 1, 2 and 3, respectively, whereas the average TC, considering all scenarios, was R$6.84 (+0.81), which is less than the acquisition price of R$28.57 at the sand extraction site. The TC was R$37,219.51 and R$34,637.74 for the scenarios with HR of 8.50 and 6.99%, respectively, whereas TOC was R$22,572.08 in all analyzed scenarios. The estimated total annual sand consumption by the free-stall system was 526.44 m³, with an estimated average of 1.23 m³ (+0.28) bed-1 year-1. All Monte Carlo simulation models showed positive NPV as well as HR of up to 90%, which reflect a high probability of positive NPV.Objetivou-se analisar a viabilidade econômica da implantação da infraestrutura necessária para a recuperação da areia da cama de uma instalação free stall, em um sistema de produção de leite no Sul de Minas Gerais. Especificamente, pretendeu-se estimar o custo total de produção (CT), custo operacional total (COT) e custo operacional efetivo (COE) de um metro cúbico de areia recuperada, estimar o consumo total de areia para o sistema free stall, e por cama ano-1 e estimar o ponto de equilíbrio da quantidade de areia recuperada, em metros cúbicos. A pesquisa foi realizada em uma propriedade localizada no Sul de Minas Gerais; no período de janeiro de 2016 a dezembro de 2017. Realizou-se a análise de cenários MOP: mais provável (cenário 1); otimista (cenário 2); e pessimista (cenário 3). Considerou-se o aproveitamento de 85%, 95% e 75% da areia recuperada para os cenários 1, 2 e 3, respectivamente. Em todos eles, foi considerado o valor praticado por metro cúbico da areia em um fornecedor próximo à propriedade. Realizou-se, ainda, simulação de Monte Carlo com taxas mínimas de atratividade de até 90%. A recuperação de areia, nas condições estudadas, apresentou viabilidade econômica em todos os cenários, apresentando valor presente líquido (VLP) positivos, taxas internas de retorno (TIR) acima da taxa mínima de atratividade, payback simples e descontados abaixo do horizonte de 10 anos e relações benefício custo-1 (RBC) satisfatórias (maior que 1). O COE de um metro cúbico de areia recuperada foi estimado em R$5,04; R$4,51 e R$5,72 para os cenários 1; 2 e 3, respectivamente, enquanto que o CT médio, considerando todos os cenários, foi de R$6,84 (+0,81), abaixo dos valores de aquisição no areal, que seria de R$28,57. Os CT foram de R$37.219,51 e R$34.637,74 para os cenários com taxa mínima de atratividade de 8,50 e 6,99%, respectivamente, enquanto que COT foi de R$22.572,08 em todos os cenários analisados. O consumo total de areia anual estimado foi de 526,44m³ e um consumo médio estimado de 1,23m³ (+0,28) cama-1 ano-1. Todos os modelos de simulação de Monte Carlo apresentaram VPL positivos, assim como taxas mínimas de atratividade de até 90%, que refletem alta probabilidade de VPL positivo.UEL2021-01-19info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPesquisaapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/4043310.5433/1679-0359.2021v42n1p361Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 42 No. 1 (2021); 361-374Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 42 n. 1 (2021); 361-3741679-03591676-546Xreponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELenghttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/40433/28516Copyright (c) 2020 Semina: Ciências Agráriashttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLopes, Marcos AurélioDemeu, Fabiana AlvesReis, Eduardo Mitke BrandãoLima, André Luis RibeiroCarvalho, Francisva lde MeloPalhares, Julio Cesar PascaleCosta, Geraldo Márcio daPinheiro, Marcelo Vinícius GontijoDemeu, Andréia Alves2022-10-04T15:39:40Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/40433Revistahttp://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrariasPUBhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/oaisemina.agrarias@uel.br1679-03591676-546Xopendoar:2022-10-04T15:39:40Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Economic viability of implementing an infrastructure for recycling bedding sand from a free-stall facility for dairy cows
Viabilidade econômica da implantação da infraestrutura para recuperação da areia da cama de uma instalação free stall para vacas leiteiras
title Economic viability of implementing an infrastructure for recycling bedding sand from a free-stall facility for dairy cows
spellingShingle Economic viability of implementing an infrastructure for recycling bedding sand from a free-stall facility for dairy cows
Lopes, Marcos Aurélio
Scenario analysis
Dairy cattle farming
Profitability indicators
Reuse
Sustainability.
Análise de cenários
Bovinocultura leiteira
Indicadores de rentabilidade
Reuso
Sustentabilidade.
title_short Economic viability of implementing an infrastructure for recycling bedding sand from a free-stall facility for dairy cows
title_full Economic viability of implementing an infrastructure for recycling bedding sand from a free-stall facility for dairy cows
title_fullStr Economic viability of implementing an infrastructure for recycling bedding sand from a free-stall facility for dairy cows
title_full_unstemmed Economic viability of implementing an infrastructure for recycling bedding sand from a free-stall facility for dairy cows
title_sort Economic viability of implementing an infrastructure for recycling bedding sand from a free-stall facility for dairy cows
author Lopes, Marcos Aurélio
author_facet Lopes, Marcos Aurélio
Demeu, Fabiana Alves
Reis, Eduardo Mitke Brandão
Lima, André Luis Ribeiro
Carvalho, Francisva lde Melo
Palhares, Julio Cesar Pascale
Costa, Geraldo Márcio da
Pinheiro, Marcelo Vinícius Gontijo
Demeu, Andréia Alves
author_role author
author2 Demeu, Fabiana Alves
Reis, Eduardo Mitke Brandão
Lima, André Luis Ribeiro
Carvalho, Francisva lde Melo
Palhares, Julio Cesar Pascale
Costa, Geraldo Márcio da
Pinheiro, Marcelo Vinícius Gontijo
Demeu, Andréia Alves
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Lopes, Marcos Aurélio
Demeu, Fabiana Alves
Reis, Eduardo Mitke Brandão
Lima, André Luis Ribeiro
Carvalho, Francisva lde Melo
Palhares, Julio Cesar Pascale
Costa, Geraldo Márcio da
Pinheiro, Marcelo Vinícius Gontijo
Demeu, Andréia Alves
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Scenario analysis
Dairy cattle farming
Profitability indicators
Reuse
Sustainability.
Análise de cenários
Bovinocultura leiteira
Indicadores de rentabilidade
Reuso
Sustentabilidade.
topic Scenario analysis
Dairy cattle farming
Profitability indicators
Reuse
Sustainability.
Análise de cenários
Bovinocultura leiteira
Indicadores de rentabilidade
Reuso
Sustentabilidade.
description This study proposes to examine the economic viability of implementing the necessary infrastructure for the recycling of bedding sand from a free-stall facility in a milk production system in southern Minas Gerais, Brazil. In specific terms, the total production cost (TC), total operating cost (TOC) and effective operating cost (EOC) of a cubic meter of recycled sand were estimated in order to estimate the total sand consumption for the free-stall system and per bed year-1 as well as the equilibrium point of the amount of recycled sand, in cubic meters. The experiment was carried out on a farm located in the south of Minas Gerais from January 2016 to December 2017. Three scenarios were analyzed by the tree-point estimation method (MOP - most likely, optimistic, and pessimistic). Utilization of 85%, 95% and 75% of the recycled sand was considered for scenarios 1, 2 and 3, respectively. In all of them, the value charged per cubic meter of sand by a supplier close to the farm was considered. Monte Carlo simulation was also carried out with hurdle rates (HR) of up to 90%. Under the studied conditions, sand recycling showed to be economically viable in all scenarios, with positive net present values (NPV), internal rates of return above the HR, simple and discounted payback below the 10-year horizon, and satisfactory cost benefit-1 ratios (greater than 1). The EOC of one cubic meter of recycled sand was estimated at R$5.04, R$4.51 and R$5.72 for scenarios 1, 2 and 3, respectively, whereas the average TC, considering all scenarios, was R$6.84 (+0.81), which is less than the acquisition price of R$28.57 at the sand extraction site. The TC was R$37,219.51 and R$34,637.74 for the scenarios with HR of 8.50 and 6.99%, respectively, whereas TOC was R$22,572.08 in all analyzed scenarios. The estimated total annual sand consumption by the free-stall system was 526.44 m³, with an estimated average of 1.23 m³ (+0.28) bed-1 year-1. All Monte Carlo simulation models showed positive NPV as well as HR of up to 90%, which reflect a high probability of positive NPV.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-01-19
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Pesquisa
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/40433
10.5433/1679-0359.2021v42n1p361
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/40433
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/1679-0359.2021v42n1p361
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/40433/28516
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Semina: Ciências Agrárias
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Semina: Ciências Agrárias
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 42 No. 1 (2021); 361-374
Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 42 n. 1 (2021); 361-374
1679-0359
1676-546X
reponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
collection Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv semina.agrarias@uel.br
_version_ 1799306083318104064