Yield and gross income of marigold, lettuce and radish in monocrop and intercropped with two arrangements of plants
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2012 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/5856 |
Resumo: | The intercropping of plants presents itself as one of most appropriate methods to the olericulture in agroecological molds, with several advantages in the environment, productive and economic aspects. The aim of this work was to evaluate the yield and gross income of marigold, lettuce and radish grown in monocrop and intercropped, in two arrangements of plants. The marigold ‘Bonina’, the lettuce ‘Verônica’ and the radish ‘Crimson Vip-R’ were allocated in the field in an experiment set. Marigold was studied as factorial 2 (monocrop and intercropping) x 2 (two and three rows of plants per plot) + 2 (intercropped with lettuce and intercropped with radish). Lettuce and radish were studied as factorial 2 (monocrop and intercropping with marigold) x 2 (three and four rows of plants per plot). Ten treatments were arranged in randomized block with four repetitions. The values obtained were analyzed by specie. There was significant interaction between cropping systems and plant arrangement for the number and fresh and dry weight of marigold capitula’s. Marigold grown with three rows produced greater number (4,250.75 mil ha-1) and fresh weight (7,578.00 kg ha-1) and dry (928.09 kg ha-1) of marigold capitula’s intercropped with lettuce produced 5,786.25 and 631.03 kg ha-1 of fresh and dry weight of capitula, regardless of the number of rows. The highest fresh weight of commercial heads of lettuce (7,783.33 kg ha-1) was obtained in the monocrop. The highest yield of radish (3,700.25 kg ha-1) was in the intercropping between marigold three rows and radish four rows. Considering the Land Equivalent Ratio (LER) and gross income, it was concluded that the intercropping was better option than monocrop. For the marigold and lettuce producers is recommended the intercropping marigold with two rows and lettuce with three rows and for the radish producer is recommended the intercropping marigold with two rows and radish with three rows, to obtain highest gross income. |
id |
UEL-11_4ebcedf53422d4be57e96b432d9a1033 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/5856 |
network_acronym_str |
UEL-11 |
network_name_str |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Yield and gross income of marigold, lettuce and radish in monocrop and intercropped with two arrangements of plantsProdução e renda bruta da calêndula, alface e rabanete solteiros e consorciados com dois arranjos de plantasCalendula officinalisLactuca sativaRaphanus sativusCropping systemPlant arrangement.Calendula officinalisLactuca sativaRaphanus sativusSistema de cultivoArranjo de plantas.The intercropping of plants presents itself as one of most appropriate methods to the olericulture in agroecological molds, with several advantages in the environment, productive and economic aspects. The aim of this work was to evaluate the yield and gross income of marigold, lettuce and radish grown in monocrop and intercropped, in two arrangements of plants. The marigold ‘Bonina’, the lettuce ‘Verônica’ and the radish ‘Crimson Vip-R’ were allocated in the field in an experiment set. Marigold was studied as factorial 2 (monocrop and intercropping) x 2 (two and three rows of plants per plot) + 2 (intercropped with lettuce and intercropped with radish). Lettuce and radish were studied as factorial 2 (monocrop and intercropping with marigold) x 2 (three and four rows of plants per plot). Ten treatments were arranged in randomized block with four repetitions. The values obtained were analyzed by specie. There was significant interaction between cropping systems and plant arrangement for the number and fresh and dry weight of marigold capitula’s. Marigold grown with three rows produced greater number (4,250.75 mil ha-1) and fresh weight (7,578.00 kg ha-1) and dry (928.09 kg ha-1) of marigold capitula’s intercropped with lettuce produced 5,786.25 and 631.03 kg ha-1 of fresh and dry weight of capitula, regardless of the number of rows. The highest fresh weight of commercial heads of lettuce (7,783.33 kg ha-1) was obtained in the monocrop. The highest yield of radish (3,700.25 kg ha-1) was in the intercropping between marigold three rows and radish four rows. Considering the Land Equivalent Ratio (LER) and gross income, it was concluded that the intercropping was better option than monocrop. For the marigold and lettuce producers is recommended the intercropping marigold with two rows and lettuce with three rows and for the radish producer is recommended the intercropping marigold with two rows and radish with three rows, to obtain highest gross income.O consórcio de plantas se apresenta como um dos métodos mais adequados à prática da olericultura em moldes agroecológicos, com inúmeras vantagens no aspecto ambiental, produtivo e econômico. O objetivo deste trabalho foi avaliar as produtividades e as rendas brutas da calêndula, alface e rabanete cultivados solteiros e consorciados, sob dois arranjos de plantas. A calêndula ‘Bonina’, a alface ‘Verônica’ e o rabanete ‘Crimson Vip-R foram alocados no campo em experimento conjunto. A calêndula foi estudada como fatorial 2 (solteiro e consorciado) x 2 (duas e três fileiras de plantas no canteiro) +2 (consorciado com alface e consorciado com rabanete). A alface e o rabanete foram estudados como fatorial 2 (solteiros e consorciados com calêndula) x 2 (três e quatro fileiras de plantas no canteiro). Os dez tratamentos foram arranjados no delineamento experimental blocos casualizados, com quatro repetições. Os dados obtidos foram analisados por espécie. A calêndula cultivada com três fileiras produziu maiores número (4.250,75 mil ha-1) e massas fresca (7.578,00 kg ha-1) e seca (928,09 kg ha-1) de capítulos florais. A calêndula consorciada com alface produziu 5.786,25 e 631,03 kg ha-1 de massas frescas e secas de capítulos florais, independente do número de fileiras. A maior massa fresca das cabeças comerciais de alface (7.783,33 kg ha-1) foi no cultivo solteiro. A maior produção de rabanete (3.700,25 kg ha-1) foi no consórcio calêndula três fileiras e rabanete quatro fileiras. Considerando a razão de área equivalente e a renda bruta, os consórcios foram melhores que os cultivos solteiros. Para os produtores de calêndula e de alface recomenda-se o consórcio calêndula com duas fileiras e alface com três fileiras e para o produtor de rabanete, recomenda-se o consórcio calêndula com duas fileiras e rabanete com três fileiras, para que obtenham maior renda bruta.UEL2012-05-15info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/585610.5433/1679-0359.2012v33n2p459Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 33 No. 2 (2012); 459-470Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 33 n. 2 (2012); 459-4701679-03591676-546Xreponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/5856/10466Pelloso, Inez Aparecida de OliveiraVieira, Maria do CarmoHeredia Zárate, Néstor AntonioSantos, Maria Carmo dosinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2015-11-19T18:37:34Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/5856Revistahttp://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrariasPUBhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/oaisemina.agrarias@uel.br1679-03591676-546Xopendoar:2015-11-19T18:37:34Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Yield and gross income of marigold, lettuce and radish in monocrop and intercropped with two arrangements of plants Produção e renda bruta da calêndula, alface e rabanete solteiros e consorciados com dois arranjos de plantas |
title |
Yield and gross income of marigold, lettuce and radish in monocrop and intercropped with two arrangements of plants |
spellingShingle |
Yield and gross income of marigold, lettuce and radish in monocrop and intercropped with two arrangements of plants Pelloso, Inez Aparecida de Oliveira Calendula officinalis Lactuca sativa Raphanus sativus Cropping system Plant arrangement. Calendula officinalis Lactuca sativa Raphanus sativus Sistema de cultivo Arranjo de plantas. |
title_short |
Yield and gross income of marigold, lettuce and radish in monocrop and intercropped with two arrangements of plants |
title_full |
Yield and gross income of marigold, lettuce and radish in monocrop and intercropped with two arrangements of plants |
title_fullStr |
Yield and gross income of marigold, lettuce and radish in monocrop and intercropped with two arrangements of plants |
title_full_unstemmed |
Yield and gross income of marigold, lettuce and radish in monocrop and intercropped with two arrangements of plants |
title_sort |
Yield and gross income of marigold, lettuce and radish in monocrop and intercropped with two arrangements of plants |
author |
Pelloso, Inez Aparecida de Oliveira |
author_facet |
Pelloso, Inez Aparecida de Oliveira Vieira, Maria do Carmo Heredia Zárate, Néstor Antonio Santos, Maria Carmo dos |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Vieira, Maria do Carmo Heredia Zárate, Néstor Antonio Santos, Maria Carmo dos |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Pelloso, Inez Aparecida de Oliveira Vieira, Maria do Carmo Heredia Zárate, Néstor Antonio Santos, Maria Carmo dos |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Calendula officinalis Lactuca sativa Raphanus sativus Cropping system Plant arrangement. Calendula officinalis Lactuca sativa Raphanus sativus Sistema de cultivo Arranjo de plantas. |
topic |
Calendula officinalis Lactuca sativa Raphanus sativus Cropping system Plant arrangement. Calendula officinalis Lactuca sativa Raphanus sativus Sistema de cultivo Arranjo de plantas. |
description |
The intercropping of plants presents itself as one of most appropriate methods to the olericulture in agroecological molds, with several advantages in the environment, productive and economic aspects. The aim of this work was to evaluate the yield and gross income of marigold, lettuce and radish grown in monocrop and intercropped, in two arrangements of plants. The marigold ‘Bonina’, the lettuce ‘Verônica’ and the radish ‘Crimson Vip-R’ were allocated in the field in an experiment set. Marigold was studied as factorial 2 (monocrop and intercropping) x 2 (two and three rows of plants per plot) + 2 (intercropped with lettuce and intercropped with radish). Lettuce and radish were studied as factorial 2 (monocrop and intercropping with marigold) x 2 (three and four rows of plants per plot). Ten treatments were arranged in randomized block with four repetitions. The values obtained were analyzed by specie. There was significant interaction between cropping systems and plant arrangement for the number and fresh and dry weight of marigold capitula’s. Marigold grown with three rows produced greater number (4,250.75 mil ha-1) and fresh weight (7,578.00 kg ha-1) and dry (928.09 kg ha-1) of marigold capitula’s intercropped with lettuce produced 5,786.25 and 631.03 kg ha-1 of fresh and dry weight of capitula, regardless of the number of rows. The highest fresh weight of commercial heads of lettuce (7,783.33 kg ha-1) was obtained in the monocrop. The highest yield of radish (3,700.25 kg ha-1) was in the intercropping between marigold three rows and radish four rows. Considering the Land Equivalent Ratio (LER) and gross income, it was concluded that the intercropping was better option than monocrop. For the marigold and lettuce producers is recommended the intercropping marigold with two rows and lettuce with three rows and for the radish producer is recommended the intercropping marigold with two rows and radish with three rows, to obtain highest gross income. |
publishDate |
2012 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2012-05-15 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/5856 10.5433/1679-0359.2012v33n2p459 |
url |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/5856 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5433/1679-0359.2012v33n2p459 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/5856/10466 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UEL |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UEL |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 33 No. 2 (2012); 459-470 Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 33 n. 2 (2012); 459-470 1679-0359 1676-546X reponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) instacron:UEL |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
instacron_str |
UEL |
institution |
UEL |
reponame_str |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
collection |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
semina.agrarias@uel.br |
_version_ |
1799306063687712768 |