Epidemiological situation of bovine brucellosis in the State of Paraiba, Brazil
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/27230 |
Resumo: | This study was performed to characterize the epidemiological status of brucellosis in the State of Paraíba, Brazil. The State was divided into three regions. Herds were randomly sampled in each region and a pre-established number of animals were sampled in each of these herds. A total of 3,489 serum samples from 674 herds were collected. In each herd, an epidemiological questionnaire was conducted. This questionnaire focused on herd traits, as well as husbandry and sanitary practices that could be associated with the risk of infection. The serum samples were screened for antibodies against Brucella spp. by the Rose-Bengal Test (RBT), and all positive sera were confirmed by the 2-mercaptoethanol test (2-ME). The herd was considered positive if at least one animal had positive results for both the RBT and the 2-ME test. The prevalence rates of infected herds and animals in the State were 4.6% [3.2-6.5%] and 2.5% [1.1-3.9%], respectively. The prevalence rates of infected herds and animals in the regions were, respectively: region 1, 3.2% [1.5-6.6%] and 1.7% [0.5-5.7%]; region 2, 2.2% [0.9-5.2%] and 0.7% [0.3-1.7%]; and region 3, 7.9% [5.0-12.2%] and 3.2% [1.6-6.3%]. The risk factor (odds ratio, OR) associated with the presence of the infection was Zebuine as the predominant breed (OR=12.30 [1.32-114.64]). |
id |
UEL-11_5103e06383f871c3ba0a3e6415e57190 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/27230 |
network_acronym_str |
UEL-11 |
network_name_str |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Epidemiological situation of bovine brucellosis in the State of Paraiba, BrazilSituação epidemiológica da brucelose bovina no Estado da Paraíba, BrasilCattleBrucellosisPrevalenceRisk factorsParaíbaBrazil.BovinoBrucelosePrevalênciaFatores de riscoParaíbaBrazil.This study was performed to characterize the epidemiological status of brucellosis in the State of Paraíba, Brazil. The State was divided into three regions. Herds were randomly sampled in each region and a pre-established number of animals were sampled in each of these herds. A total of 3,489 serum samples from 674 herds were collected. In each herd, an epidemiological questionnaire was conducted. This questionnaire focused on herd traits, as well as husbandry and sanitary practices that could be associated with the risk of infection. The serum samples were screened for antibodies against Brucella spp. by the Rose-Bengal Test (RBT), and all positive sera were confirmed by the 2-mercaptoethanol test (2-ME). The herd was considered positive if at least one animal had positive results for both the RBT and the 2-ME test. The prevalence rates of infected herds and animals in the State were 4.6% [3.2-6.5%] and 2.5% [1.1-3.9%], respectively. The prevalence rates of infected herds and animals in the regions were, respectively: region 1, 3.2% [1.5-6.6%] and 1.7% [0.5-5.7%]; region 2, 2.2% [0.9-5.2%] and 0.7% [0.3-1.7%]; and region 3, 7.9% [5.0-12.2%] and 3.2% [1.6-6.3%]. The risk factor (odds ratio, OR) associated with the presence of the infection was Zebuine as the predominant breed (OR=12.30 [1.32-114.64]).Realizou-se um estudo para caracterizar a situação epidemiológica da brucelose bovina no Estado da Paraíba. O Estado foi dividido em três regiões. Em cada região foram amostradas aleatoriamente propriedades e, dentro dessas, foi escolhido de forma aleatória um número pré-estabelecido de animais. No total, foram amostrados 3.489 animais, provenientes de 674 propriedades. Em cada propriedade amostrada foi aplicado um questionário epidemiológico para verificar o tipo de exploração e as práticas de criação e sanitárias que poderiam estar associadas ao risco de infecção pela doença. O protocolo de testes utilizado foi o da triagem com o teste do antígeno acidificado tamponado (AAT) e confirmação dos positivos com o teste do 2-mercaptoetanol (2-ME). O rebanho foi considerado positivo quando pelo menos um animal foi reagente às duas provas sorológicas. Para o Estado, as prevalências de focos e de animais infectados foram, respectivamente, de 4,6% [3,2-6,5%] e 2,5% [1,1-3,9%]. Para as regiões, as prevalências de focos variaram entre 2,2% e 7,9% e 3,2%. O fator de risco associado à condição de foco foi ter a raça Zebu como predominante (OR=12,30 [1,32-114,64]). Concluindo, o estado da paraíba deve concentrar esforços para vacinar, todos os anos, um mínimo de 80% das bezerras com a amostra B19 e estimular a utilização da vacina RB51 em fêmeas não vacinadas com idade superior a 8 meses. Além disso, deve-se estimular a realização de testes sorológicos para brucelose nos bovinos de reprodução antes de introduzi-los nas propriedades.UEL2016-11-09info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/2723010.5433/1679-0359.2016v37n5Supl2p3403Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 37 No. 5Supl2 (2016); 3403-3412Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 37 n. 5Supl2 (2016); 3403-34121679-03591676-546Xreponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELenghttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/27230/19913Copyright (c) 2016 Semina: Ciências Agráriashttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessClementino, Inácio JoséDias, Ricardo AugustoAmaku, MarcosFerreira, FernandoTelles, Evelise OliveiraHeinemann, Marcos BryanGonçalves, Vítor Salvador PicãoGrisi-Filho, José Henrique HildebrandFerreira Neto, José SoaresAlves, Clebert JoséSantos, Carolina de Sousa Américo BatistaAzevedo, Sérgio Santos2022-11-29T16:40:32Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/27230Revistahttp://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrariasPUBhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/oaisemina.agrarias@uel.br1679-03591676-546Xopendoar:2022-11-29T16:40:32Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Epidemiological situation of bovine brucellosis in the State of Paraiba, Brazil Situação epidemiológica da brucelose bovina no Estado da Paraíba, Brasil |
title |
Epidemiological situation of bovine brucellosis in the State of Paraiba, Brazil |
spellingShingle |
Epidemiological situation of bovine brucellosis in the State of Paraiba, Brazil Clementino, Inácio José Cattle Brucellosis Prevalence Risk factors Paraíba Brazil. Bovino Brucelose Prevalência Fatores de risco Paraíba Brazil. |
title_short |
Epidemiological situation of bovine brucellosis in the State of Paraiba, Brazil |
title_full |
Epidemiological situation of bovine brucellosis in the State of Paraiba, Brazil |
title_fullStr |
Epidemiological situation of bovine brucellosis in the State of Paraiba, Brazil |
title_full_unstemmed |
Epidemiological situation of bovine brucellosis in the State of Paraiba, Brazil |
title_sort |
Epidemiological situation of bovine brucellosis in the State of Paraiba, Brazil |
author |
Clementino, Inácio José |
author_facet |
Clementino, Inácio José Dias, Ricardo Augusto Amaku, Marcos Ferreira, Fernando Telles, Evelise Oliveira Heinemann, Marcos Bryan Gonçalves, Vítor Salvador Picão Grisi-Filho, José Henrique Hildebrand Ferreira Neto, José Soares Alves, Clebert José Santos, Carolina de Sousa Américo Batista Azevedo, Sérgio Santos |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Dias, Ricardo Augusto Amaku, Marcos Ferreira, Fernando Telles, Evelise Oliveira Heinemann, Marcos Bryan Gonçalves, Vítor Salvador Picão Grisi-Filho, José Henrique Hildebrand Ferreira Neto, José Soares Alves, Clebert José Santos, Carolina de Sousa Américo Batista Azevedo, Sérgio Santos |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Clementino, Inácio José Dias, Ricardo Augusto Amaku, Marcos Ferreira, Fernando Telles, Evelise Oliveira Heinemann, Marcos Bryan Gonçalves, Vítor Salvador Picão Grisi-Filho, José Henrique Hildebrand Ferreira Neto, José Soares Alves, Clebert José Santos, Carolina de Sousa Américo Batista Azevedo, Sérgio Santos |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Cattle Brucellosis Prevalence Risk factors Paraíba Brazil. Bovino Brucelose Prevalência Fatores de risco Paraíba Brazil. |
topic |
Cattle Brucellosis Prevalence Risk factors Paraíba Brazil. Bovino Brucelose Prevalência Fatores de risco Paraíba Brazil. |
description |
This study was performed to characterize the epidemiological status of brucellosis in the State of Paraíba, Brazil. The State was divided into three regions. Herds were randomly sampled in each region and a pre-established number of animals were sampled in each of these herds. A total of 3,489 serum samples from 674 herds were collected. In each herd, an epidemiological questionnaire was conducted. This questionnaire focused on herd traits, as well as husbandry and sanitary practices that could be associated with the risk of infection. The serum samples were screened for antibodies against Brucella spp. by the Rose-Bengal Test (RBT), and all positive sera were confirmed by the 2-mercaptoethanol test (2-ME). The herd was considered positive if at least one animal had positive results for both the RBT and the 2-ME test. The prevalence rates of infected herds and animals in the State were 4.6% [3.2-6.5%] and 2.5% [1.1-3.9%], respectively. The prevalence rates of infected herds and animals in the regions were, respectively: region 1, 3.2% [1.5-6.6%] and 1.7% [0.5-5.7%]; region 2, 2.2% [0.9-5.2%] and 0.7% [0.3-1.7%]; and region 3, 7.9% [5.0-12.2%] and 3.2% [1.6-6.3%]. The risk factor (odds ratio, OR) associated with the presence of the infection was Zebuine as the predominant breed (OR=12.30 [1.32-114.64]). |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-11-09 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/27230 10.5433/1679-0359.2016v37n5Supl2p3403 |
url |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/27230 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5433/1679-0359.2016v37n5Supl2p3403 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/27230/19913 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2016 Semina: Ciências Agrárias http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2016 Semina: Ciências Agrárias http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UEL |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UEL |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 37 No. 5Supl2 (2016); 3403-3412 Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 37 n. 5Supl2 (2016); 3403-3412 1679-0359 1676-546X reponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) instacron:UEL |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
instacron_str |
UEL |
institution |
UEL |
reponame_str |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
collection |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
semina.agrarias@uel.br |
_version_ |
1799306056384380928 |