Epidemiological situation of bovine brucellosis in the State of Paraiba, Brazil

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Clementino, Inácio José
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Dias, Ricardo Augusto, Amaku, Marcos, Ferreira, Fernando, Telles, Evelise Oliveira, Heinemann, Marcos Bryan, Gonçalves, Vítor Salvador Picão, Grisi-Filho, José Henrique Hildebrand, Ferreira Neto, José Soares, Alves, Clebert José, Santos, Carolina de Sousa Américo Batista, Azevedo, Sérgio Santos
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/27230
Resumo: This study was performed to characterize the epidemiological status of brucellosis in the State of Paraíba, Brazil. The State was divided into three regions. Herds were randomly sampled in each region and a pre-established number of animals were sampled in each of these herds. A total of 3,489 serum samples from 674 herds were collected. In each herd, an epidemiological questionnaire was conducted. This questionnaire focused on herd traits, as well as husbandry and sanitary practices that could be associated with the risk of infection. The serum samples were screened for antibodies against Brucella spp. by the Rose-Bengal Test (RBT), and all positive sera were confirmed by the 2-mercaptoethanol test (2-ME). The herd was considered positive if at least one animal had positive results for both the RBT and the 2-ME test. The prevalence rates of infected herds and animals in the State were 4.6% [3.2-6.5%] and 2.5% [1.1-3.9%], respectively. The prevalence rates of infected herds and animals in the regions were, respectively: region 1, 3.2% [1.5-6.6%] and 1.7% [0.5-5.7%]; region 2, 2.2% [0.9-5.2%] and 0.7% [0.3-1.7%]; and region 3, 7.9% [5.0-12.2%] and 3.2% [1.6-6.3%]. The risk factor (odds ratio, OR) associated with the presence of the infection was Zebuine as the predominant breed (OR=12.30 [1.32-114.64]).
id UEL-11_5103e06383f871c3ba0a3e6415e57190
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/27230
network_acronym_str UEL-11
network_name_str Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Epidemiological situation of bovine brucellosis in the State of Paraiba, BrazilSituação epidemiológica da brucelose bovina no Estado da Paraíba, BrasilCattleBrucellosisPrevalenceRisk factorsParaíbaBrazil.BovinoBrucelosePrevalênciaFatores de riscoParaíbaBrazil.This study was performed to characterize the epidemiological status of brucellosis in the State of Paraíba, Brazil. The State was divided into three regions. Herds were randomly sampled in each region and a pre-established number of animals were sampled in each of these herds. A total of 3,489 serum samples from 674 herds were collected. In each herd, an epidemiological questionnaire was conducted. This questionnaire focused on herd traits, as well as husbandry and sanitary practices that could be associated with the risk of infection. The serum samples were screened for antibodies against Brucella spp. by the Rose-Bengal Test (RBT), and all positive sera were confirmed by the 2-mercaptoethanol test (2-ME). The herd was considered positive if at least one animal had positive results for both the RBT and the 2-ME test. The prevalence rates of infected herds and animals in the State were 4.6% [3.2-6.5%] and 2.5% [1.1-3.9%], respectively. The prevalence rates of infected herds and animals in the regions were, respectively: region 1, 3.2% [1.5-6.6%] and 1.7% [0.5-5.7%]; region 2, 2.2% [0.9-5.2%] and 0.7% [0.3-1.7%]; and region 3, 7.9% [5.0-12.2%] and 3.2% [1.6-6.3%]. The risk factor (odds ratio, OR) associated with the presence of the infection was Zebuine as the predominant breed (OR=12.30 [1.32-114.64]).Realizou-se um estudo para caracterizar a situação epidemiológica da brucelose bovina no Estado da Paraíba. O Estado foi dividido em três regiões. Em cada região foram amostradas aleatoriamente propriedades e, dentro dessas, foi escolhido de forma aleatória um número pré-estabelecido de animais. No total, foram amostrados 3.489 animais, provenientes de 674 propriedades. Em cada propriedade amostrada foi aplicado um questionário epidemiológico para verificar o tipo de exploração e as práticas de criação e sanitárias que poderiam estar associadas ao risco de infecção pela doença. O protocolo de testes utilizado foi o da triagem com o teste do antígeno acidificado tamponado (AAT) e confirmação dos positivos com o teste do 2-mercaptoetanol (2-ME). O rebanho foi considerado positivo quando pelo menos um animal foi reagente às duas provas sorológicas. Para o Estado, as prevalências de focos e de animais infectados foram, respectivamente, de 4,6% [3,2-6,5%] e 2,5% [1,1-3,9%]. Para as regiões, as prevalências de focos variaram entre 2,2% e 7,9% e 3,2%. O fator de risco associado à condição de foco foi ter a raça Zebu como predominante (OR=12,30 [1,32-114,64]). Concluindo, o estado da paraíba deve concentrar esforços para vacinar, todos os anos, um mínimo de 80% das bezerras com a amostra B19 e estimular a utilização da vacina RB51 em fêmeas não vacinadas com idade superior a 8 meses. Além disso, deve-se estimular a realização de testes sorológicos para brucelose nos bovinos de reprodução antes de introduzi-los nas propriedades.UEL2016-11-09info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/2723010.5433/1679-0359.2016v37n5Supl2p3403Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 37 No. 5Supl2 (2016); 3403-3412Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 37 n. 5Supl2 (2016); 3403-34121679-03591676-546Xreponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELenghttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/27230/19913Copyright (c) 2016 Semina: Ciências Agráriashttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessClementino, Inácio JoséDias, Ricardo AugustoAmaku, MarcosFerreira, FernandoTelles, Evelise OliveiraHeinemann, Marcos BryanGonçalves, Vítor Salvador PicãoGrisi-Filho, José Henrique HildebrandFerreira Neto, José SoaresAlves, Clebert JoséSantos, Carolina de Sousa Américo BatistaAzevedo, Sérgio Santos2022-11-29T16:40:32Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/27230Revistahttp://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrariasPUBhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/oaisemina.agrarias@uel.br1679-03591676-546Xopendoar:2022-11-29T16:40:32Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Epidemiological situation of bovine brucellosis in the State of Paraiba, Brazil
Situação epidemiológica da brucelose bovina no Estado da Paraíba, Brasil
title Epidemiological situation of bovine brucellosis in the State of Paraiba, Brazil
spellingShingle Epidemiological situation of bovine brucellosis in the State of Paraiba, Brazil
Clementino, Inácio José
Cattle
Brucellosis
Prevalence
Risk factors
Paraíba
Brazil.
Bovino
Brucelose
Prevalência
Fatores de risco
Paraíba
Brazil.
title_short Epidemiological situation of bovine brucellosis in the State of Paraiba, Brazil
title_full Epidemiological situation of bovine brucellosis in the State of Paraiba, Brazil
title_fullStr Epidemiological situation of bovine brucellosis in the State of Paraiba, Brazil
title_full_unstemmed Epidemiological situation of bovine brucellosis in the State of Paraiba, Brazil
title_sort Epidemiological situation of bovine brucellosis in the State of Paraiba, Brazil
author Clementino, Inácio José
author_facet Clementino, Inácio José
Dias, Ricardo Augusto
Amaku, Marcos
Ferreira, Fernando
Telles, Evelise Oliveira
Heinemann, Marcos Bryan
Gonçalves, Vítor Salvador Picão
Grisi-Filho, José Henrique Hildebrand
Ferreira Neto, José Soares
Alves, Clebert José
Santos, Carolina de Sousa Américo Batista
Azevedo, Sérgio Santos
author_role author
author2 Dias, Ricardo Augusto
Amaku, Marcos
Ferreira, Fernando
Telles, Evelise Oliveira
Heinemann, Marcos Bryan
Gonçalves, Vítor Salvador Picão
Grisi-Filho, José Henrique Hildebrand
Ferreira Neto, José Soares
Alves, Clebert José
Santos, Carolina de Sousa Américo Batista
Azevedo, Sérgio Santos
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Clementino, Inácio José
Dias, Ricardo Augusto
Amaku, Marcos
Ferreira, Fernando
Telles, Evelise Oliveira
Heinemann, Marcos Bryan
Gonçalves, Vítor Salvador Picão
Grisi-Filho, José Henrique Hildebrand
Ferreira Neto, José Soares
Alves, Clebert José
Santos, Carolina de Sousa Américo Batista
Azevedo, Sérgio Santos
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Cattle
Brucellosis
Prevalence
Risk factors
Paraíba
Brazil.
Bovino
Brucelose
Prevalência
Fatores de risco
Paraíba
Brazil.
topic Cattle
Brucellosis
Prevalence
Risk factors
Paraíba
Brazil.
Bovino
Brucelose
Prevalência
Fatores de risco
Paraíba
Brazil.
description This study was performed to characterize the epidemiological status of brucellosis in the State of Paraíba, Brazil. The State was divided into three regions. Herds were randomly sampled in each region and a pre-established number of animals were sampled in each of these herds. A total of 3,489 serum samples from 674 herds were collected. In each herd, an epidemiological questionnaire was conducted. This questionnaire focused on herd traits, as well as husbandry and sanitary practices that could be associated with the risk of infection. The serum samples were screened for antibodies against Brucella spp. by the Rose-Bengal Test (RBT), and all positive sera were confirmed by the 2-mercaptoethanol test (2-ME). The herd was considered positive if at least one animal had positive results for both the RBT and the 2-ME test. The prevalence rates of infected herds and animals in the State were 4.6% [3.2-6.5%] and 2.5% [1.1-3.9%], respectively. The prevalence rates of infected herds and animals in the regions were, respectively: region 1, 3.2% [1.5-6.6%] and 1.7% [0.5-5.7%]; region 2, 2.2% [0.9-5.2%] and 0.7% [0.3-1.7%]; and region 3, 7.9% [5.0-12.2%] and 3.2% [1.6-6.3%]. The risk factor (odds ratio, OR) associated with the presence of the infection was Zebuine as the predominant breed (OR=12.30 [1.32-114.64]).
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-11-09
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/27230
10.5433/1679-0359.2016v37n5Supl2p3403
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/27230
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/1679-0359.2016v37n5Supl2p3403
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/27230/19913
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Semina: Ciências Agrárias
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Semina: Ciências Agrárias
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 37 No. 5Supl2 (2016); 3403-3412
Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 37 n. 5Supl2 (2016); 3403-3412
1679-0359
1676-546X
reponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
collection Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv semina.agrarias@uel.br
_version_ 1799306056384380928