Digestibility and performance of juvenile Nile tilapia fed with diets containing forage palm

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Daniel, Hannah Bandeira Thame
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Cipriano, Filipe dos Santos, Lima, Kauana Santos de, Allaman, Ivan Bezerra, Tonini, William Cristiane Teles, Takishita, Sylvia Sanae, Braga, Luis Gustavo Tavares
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/22834
Resumo: Supplying the nutritional needs of animals in an economical way is essential to the success of any type of production. The forage palm is a cactaceae well-adapted to semiarid regions and commonly used in the feeding of ruminants. However, studies assessing its use in fishes are scarce. We aimed to evaluate the digestibility of bran from five different forage palm cultivars (Opuntia fícus) in juvenile Nile tilapia and the development of juveniles when receiving increasing levels of the cultivar with the best apparent digestibility coefficient of crude protein (ADCCP) (75.2%). We used 90 masculinized juvenile Nile tilapia (with an average weight of 6.02 ± 0.65 g) in the digestibility experiment to determine the apparent digestibility coefficients of dry matter (ADCDM), crude energy (ADCCP), and crude protein of the cultivars (Orelha de onça, Miúda, Gigante, Comum, and IPA 20). The experimental design was completely randomized (CRD) with five treatments and three repetitions. In the development experiment, 300 masculinized juvenile Nile tilapia (with average weight of 1.39 ± 0.12 g) received feed with different inclusion levels (0, 72, 144, and 216 g Kg-1) of IPA 20 palm bran in a CRD with four treatments and five repetitions. We observed significant differences (P < 0.05) for ADCDM and ADCCP between the treatments. The cultivars that presented the highest ADCDM were IPA 20 (41.75%), Orelha de onça (36.41%), and Gigante (32.59%). For ADCCP, the best cultivar was IPA 20 with 75.2%, followed by Orelha de onça (61.5%), and Miúda (56.1%). As for the performance, the inclusion of IPA 20 palm bran at a rate of 113 g/kg-1 provided the best values in terms of weight gain and final weight in juvenile Nile tilapia.
id UEL-11_51ab68596e20b1bab25351e528ca92a8
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/22834
network_acronym_str UEL-11
network_name_str Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Digestibility and performance of juvenile Nile tilapia fed with diets containing forage palmDigestibilidade e desempenho de juvenis de tilápia nilótica alimentadas com dietas contendo palma forrageiraAlternative foodOpuntia fícusOreochromis niloticusNutritional value.Alimento alternativoOpuntia fícusOreochromis niloticusValor nutritivo.Supplying the nutritional needs of animals in an economical way is essential to the success of any type of production. The forage palm is a cactaceae well-adapted to semiarid regions and commonly used in the feeding of ruminants. However, studies assessing its use in fishes are scarce. We aimed to evaluate the digestibility of bran from five different forage palm cultivars (Opuntia fícus) in juvenile Nile tilapia and the development of juveniles when receiving increasing levels of the cultivar with the best apparent digestibility coefficient of crude protein (ADCCP) (75.2%). We used 90 masculinized juvenile Nile tilapia (with an average weight of 6.02 ± 0.65 g) in the digestibility experiment to determine the apparent digestibility coefficients of dry matter (ADCDM), crude energy (ADCCP), and crude protein of the cultivars (Orelha de onça, Miúda, Gigante, Comum, and IPA 20). The experimental design was completely randomized (CRD) with five treatments and three repetitions. In the development experiment, 300 masculinized juvenile Nile tilapia (with average weight of 1.39 ± 0.12 g) received feed with different inclusion levels (0, 72, 144, and 216 g Kg-1) of IPA 20 palm bran in a CRD with four treatments and five repetitions. We observed significant differences (P < 0.05) for ADCDM and ADCCP between the treatments. The cultivars that presented the highest ADCDM were IPA 20 (41.75%), Orelha de onça (36.41%), and Gigante (32.59%). For ADCCP, the best cultivar was IPA 20 with 75.2%, followed by Orelha de onça (61.5%), and Miúda (56.1%). As for the performance, the inclusion of IPA 20 palm bran at a rate of 113 g/kg-1 provided the best values in terms of weight gain and final weight in juvenile Nile tilapia.O suprimento das necessidades nutricionais de forma econômica é essencial para o sucesso de qualquer produção animal. A palma forrageira é uma cactácea bem adaptada as regiões semi-áridas, sendo comumente utilizada na alimentação de ruminantes, entretanto estudos com peixes são escassos. Objetivou-se avaliar a digestibilidade de farelos de cinco cultivares de palma forrageira (Opuntia fícus) para juvenis de tilápia nilótica e posteriormente o desempenho dos juvenis recebendo níveis crescentes da cultivar com melhor coeficiente de digestibilidade aparente da proteína bruta (CDAPB) (75,2%). No experimento de digestibilidade foram utilizados 90 juvenis de tilápia nilótica masculinizadas (com peso médio de 6,02 ± 0,65 g), para determinar os coeficientes de digestibilidade aparente da matéria seca (CDAMS), energia bruta (CDAEB) e proteína bruta dos cultivares (Orelha de onça, Miúda, Gigante, Comum e IPA 20). O delineamento experimental foi inteiramente casualizado (DIC) com cinco tratamentos e três repetições. No experimento de desempenho 300 juvenis de tilápia nilótica masculinizados (peso médio de 1,39 ± 0,12 g) receberam rações com diferentes níveis de inclusão (0, 72, 144 e 216 g Kg-1) do farelo de palma-cultivar IPA 20, em um DIC com quatro tratamentos e cinco repetições. Foram observadas diferenças significativas (P < 0,05) para o CDAMS e o CDAPB entre os tratamentos. As cultivares que apresentaram maiores CDAMS foram a IPA 20 (41,75%), Orelha de onça (36,41%) e Gigante (32,59%). Para o CDAPB a melhor cultivar foi a IPA 20, com 75,2%, seguida da Orelha de onça (61,5%) e Miúda (56,1%). Quanto ao desempenho, a inclusão do farelo de palmacultivar IPA 20 na proporção de 113 g kg-1 promove os melhores valores de ganho de peso e de peso final para juvenis de tilápia nilótica.UEL2016-09-02info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPesquisa laboratorialapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/2283410.5433/1679-0359.2016v37n4Supl1p2417Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 37 No. 4Supl1 (2016); 2417-2426Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 37 n. 4Supl1 (2016); 2417-24261679-03591676-546Xreponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELenghttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/22834/19590http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDaniel, Hannah Bandeira ThameCipriano, Filipe dos SantosLima, Kauana Santos deAllaman, Ivan BezerraTonini, William Cristiane TelesTakishita, Sylvia SanaeBraga, Luis Gustavo Tavares2022-11-30T15:07:18Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/22834Revistahttp://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrariasPUBhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/oaisemina.agrarias@uel.br1679-03591676-546Xopendoar:2022-11-30T15:07:18Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Digestibility and performance of juvenile Nile tilapia fed with diets containing forage palm
Digestibilidade e desempenho de juvenis de tilápia nilótica alimentadas com dietas contendo palma forrageira
title Digestibility and performance of juvenile Nile tilapia fed with diets containing forage palm
spellingShingle Digestibility and performance of juvenile Nile tilapia fed with diets containing forage palm
Daniel, Hannah Bandeira Thame
Alternative food
Opuntia fícus
Oreochromis niloticus
Nutritional value.
Alimento alternativo
Opuntia fícus
Oreochromis niloticus
Valor nutritivo.
title_short Digestibility and performance of juvenile Nile tilapia fed with diets containing forage palm
title_full Digestibility and performance of juvenile Nile tilapia fed with diets containing forage palm
title_fullStr Digestibility and performance of juvenile Nile tilapia fed with diets containing forage palm
title_full_unstemmed Digestibility and performance of juvenile Nile tilapia fed with diets containing forage palm
title_sort Digestibility and performance of juvenile Nile tilapia fed with diets containing forage palm
author Daniel, Hannah Bandeira Thame
author_facet Daniel, Hannah Bandeira Thame
Cipriano, Filipe dos Santos
Lima, Kauana Santos de
Allaman, Ivan Bezerra
Tonini, William Cristiane Teles
Takishita, Sylvia Sanae
Braga, Luis Gustavo Tavares
author_role author
author2 Cipriano, Filipe dos Santos
Lima, Kauana Santos de
Allaman, Ivan Bezerra
Tonini, William Cristiane Teles
Takishita, Sylvia Sanae
Braga, Luis Gustavo Tavares
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Daniel, Hannah Bandeira Thame
Cipriano, Filipe dos Santos
Lima, Kauana Santos de
Allaman, Ivan Bezerra
Tonini, William Cristiane Teles
Takishita, Sylvia Sanae
Braga, Luis Gustavo Tavares
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Alternative food
Opuntia fícus
Oreochromis niloticus
Nutritional value.
Alimento alternativo
Opuntia fícus
Oreochromis niloticus
Valor nutritivo.
topic Alternative food
Opuntia fícus
Oreochromis niloticus
Nutritional value.
Alimento alternativo
Opuntia fícus
Oreochromis niloticus
Valor nutritivo.
description Supplying the nutritional needs of animals in an economical way is essential to the success of any type of production. The forage palm is a cactaceae well-adapted to semiarid regions and commonly used in the feeding of ruminants. However, studies assessing its use in fishes are scarce. We aimed to evaluate the digestibility of bran from five different forage palm cultivars (Opuntia fícus) in juvenile Nile tilapia and the development of juveniles when receiving increasing levels of the cultivar with the best apparent digestibility coefficient of crude protein (ADCCP) (75.2%). We used 90 masculinized juvenile Nile tilapia (with an average weight of 6.02 ± 0.65 g) in the digestibility experiment to determine the apparent digestibility coefficients of dry matter (ADCDM), crude energy (ADCCP), and crude protein of the cultivars (Orelha de onça, Miúda, Gigante, Comum, and IPA 20). The experimental design was completely randomized (CRD) with five treatments and three repetitions. In the development experiment, 300 masculinized juvenile Nile tilapia (with average weight of 1.39 ± 0.12 g) received feed with different inclusion levels (0, 72, 144, and 216 g Kg-1) of IPA 20 palm bran in a CRD with four treatments and five repetitions. We observed significant differences (P < 0.05) for ADCDM and ADCCP between the treatments. The cultivars that presented the highest ADCDM were IPA 20 (41.75%), Orelha de onça (36.41%), and Gigante (32.59%). For ADCCP, the best cultivar was IPA 20 with 75.2%, followed by Orelha de onça (61.5%), and Miúda (56.1%). As for the performance, the inclusion of IPA 20 palm bran at a rate of 113 g/kg-1 provided the best values in terms of weight gain and final weight in juvenile Nile tilapia.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-09-02
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Pesquisa laboratorial
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/22834
10.5433/1679-0359.2016v37n4Supl1p2417
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/22834
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/1679-0359.2016v37n4Supl1p2417
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/22834/19590
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 37 No. 4Supl1 (2016); 2417-2426
Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 37 n. 4Supl1 (2016); 2417-2426
1679-0359
1676-546X
reponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
collection Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv semina.agrarias@uel.br
_version_ 1799306074558300160