Digestibility and performance of juvenile Nile tilapia fed with diets containing forage palm
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/22834 |
Resumo: | Supplying the nutritional needs of animals in an economical way is essential to the success of any type of production. The forage palm is a cactaceae well-adapted to semiarid regions and commonly used in the feeding of ruminants. However, studies assessing its use in fishes are scarce. We aimed to evaluate the digestibility of bran from five different forage palm cultivars (Opuntia fícus) in juvenile Nile tilapia and the development of juveniles when receiving increasing levels of the cultivar with the best apparent digestibility coefficient of crude protein (ADCCP) (75.2%). We used 90 masculinized juvenile Nile tilapia (with an average weight of 6.02 ± 0.65 g) in the digestibility experiment to determine the apparent digestibility coefficients of dry matter (ADCDM), crude energy (ADCCP), and crude protein of the cultivars (Orelha de onça, Miúda, Gigante, Comum, and IPA 20). The experimental design was completely randomized (CRD) with five treatments and three repetitions. In the development experiment, 300 masculinized juvenile Nile tilapia (with average weight of 1.39 ± 0.12 g) received feed with different inclusion levels (0, 72, 144, and 216 g Kg-1) of IPA 20 palm bran in a CRD with four treatments and five repetitions. We observed significant differences (P < 0.05) for ADCDM and ADCCP between the treatments. The cultivars that presented the highest ADCDM were IPA 20 (41.75%), Orelha de onça (36.41%), and Gigante (32.59%). For ADCCP, the best cultivar was IPA 20 with 75.2%, followed by Orelha de onça (61.5%), and Miúda (56.1%). As for the performance, the inclusion of IPA 20 palm bran at a rate of 113 g/kg-1 provided the best values in terms of weight gain and final weight in juvenile Nile tilapia. |
id |
UEL-11_51ab68596e20b1bab25351e528ca92a8 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/22834 |
network_acronym_str |
UEL-11 |
network_name_str |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Digestibility and performance of juvenile Nile tilapia fed with diets containing forage palmDigestibilidade e desempenho de juvenis de tilápia nilótica alimentadas com dietas contendo palma forrageiraAlternative foodOpuntia fícusOreochromis niloticusNutritional value.Alimento alternativoOpuntia fícusOreochromis niloticusValor nutritivo.Supplying the nutritional needs of animals in an economical way is essential to the success of any type of production. The forage palm is a cactaceae well-adapted to semiarid regions and commonly used in the feeding of ruminants. However, studies assessing its use in fishes are scarce. We aimed to evaluate the digestibility of bran from five different forage palm cultivars (Opuntia fícus) in juvenile Nile tilapia and the development of juveniles when receiving increasing levels of the cultivar with the best apparent digestibility coefficient of crude protein (ADCCP) (75.2%). We used 90 masculinized juvenile Nile tilapia (with an average weight of 6.02 ± 0.65 g) in the digestibility experiment to determine the apparent digestibility coefficients of dry matter (ADCDM), crude energy (ADCCP), and crude protein of the cultivars (Orelha de onça, Miúda, Gigante, Comum, and IPA 20). The experimental design was completely randomized (CRD) with five treatments and three repetitions. In the development experiment, 300 masculinized juvenile Nile tilapia (with average weight of 1.39 ± 0.12 g) received feed with different inclusion levels (0, 72, 144, and 216 g Kg-1) of IPA 20 palm bran in a CRD with four treatments and five repetitions. We observed significant differences (P < 0.05) for ADCDM and ADCCP between the treatments. The cultivars that presented the highest ADCDM were IPA 20 (41.75%), Orelha de onça (36.41%), and Gigante (32.59%). For ADCCP, the best cultivar was IPA 20 with 75.2%, followed by Orelha de onça (61.5%), and Miúda (56.1%). As for the performance, the inclusion of IPA 20 palm bran at a rate of 113 g/kg-1 provided the best values in terms of weight gain and final weight in juvenile Nile tilapia.O suprimento das necessidades nutricionais de forma econômica é essencial para o sucesso de qualquer produção animal. A palma forrageira é uma cactácea bem adaptada as regiões semi-áridas, sendo comumente utilizada na alimentação de ruminantes, entretanto estudos com peixes são escassos. Objetivou-se avaliar a digestibilidade de farelos de cinco cultivares de palma forrageira (Opuntia fícus) para juvenis de tilápia nilótica e posteriormente o desempenho dos juvenis recebendo níveis crescentes da cultivar com melhor coeficiente de digestibilidade aparente da proteína bruta (CDAPB) (75,2%). No experimento de digestibilidade foram utilizados 90 juvenis de tilápia nilótica masculinizadas (com peso médio de 6,02 ± 0,65 g), para determinar os coeficientes de digestibilidade aparente da matéria seca (CDAMS), energia bruta (CDAEB) e proteína bruta dos cultivares (Orelha de onça, Miúda, Gigante, Comum e IPA 20). O delineamento experimental foi inteiramente casualizado (DIC) com cinco tratamentos e três repetições. No experimento de desempenho 300 juvenis de tilápia nilótica masculinizados (peso médio de 1,39 ± 0,12 g) receberam rações com diferentes níveis de inclusão (0, 72, 144 e 216 g Kg-1) do farelo de palma-cultivar IPA 20, em um DIC com quatro tratamentos e cinco repetições. Foram observadas diferenças significativas (P < 0,05) para o CDAMS e o CDAPB entre os tratamentos. As cultivares que apresentaram maiores CDAMS foram a IPA 20 (41,75%), Orelha de onça (36,41%) e Gigante (32,59%). Para o CDAPB a melhor cultivar foi a IPA 20, com 75,2%, seguida da Orelha de onça (61,5%) e Miúda (56,1%). Quanto ao desempenho, a inclusão do farelo de palmacultivar IPA 20 na proporção de 113 g kg-1 promove os melhores valores de ganho de peso e de peso final para juvenis de tilápia nilótica.UEL2016-09-02info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPesquisa laboratorialapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/2283410.5433/1679-0359.2016v37n4Supl1p2417Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 37 No. 4Supl1 (2016); 2417-2426Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 37 n. 4Supl1 (2016); 2417-24261679-03591676-546Xreponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELenghttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/22834/19590http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDaniel, Hannah Bandeira ThameCipriano, Filipe dos SantosLima, Kauana Santos deAllaman, Ivan BezerraTonini, William Cristiane TelesTakishita, Sylvia SanaeBraga, Luis Gustavo Tavares2022-11-30T15:07:18Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/22834Revistahttp://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrariasPUBhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/oaisemina.agrarias@uel.br1679-03591676-546Xopendoar:2022-11-30T15:07:18Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Digestibility and performance of juvenile Nile tilapia fed with diets containing forage palm Digestibilidade e desempenho de juvenis de tilápia nilótica alimentadas com dietas contendo palma forrageira |
title |
Digestibility and performance of juvenile Nile tilapia fed with diets containing forage palm |
spellingShingle |
Digestibility and performance of juvenile Nile tilapia fed with diets containing forage palm Daniel, Hannah Bandeira Thame Alternative food Opuntia fícus Oreochromis niloticus Nutritional value. Alimento alternativo Opuntia fícus Oreochromis niloticus Valor nutritivo. |
title_short |
Digestibility and performance of juvenile Nile tilapia fed with diets containing forage palm |
title_full |
Digestibility and performance of juvenile Nile tilapia fed with diets containing forage palm |
title_fullStr |
Digestibility and performance of juvenile Nile tilapia fed with diets containing forage palm |
title_full_unstemmed |
Digestibility and performance of juvenile Nile tilapia fed with diets containing forage palm |
title_sort |
Digestibility and performance of juvenile Nile tilapia fed with diets containing forage palm |
author |
Daniel, Hannah Bandeira Thame |
author_facet |
Daniel, Hannah Bandeira Thame Cipriano, Filipe dos Santos Lima, Kauana Santos de Allaman, Ivan Bezerra Tonini, William Cristiane Teles Takishita, Sylvia Sanae Braga, Luis Gustavo Tavares |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Cipriano, Filipe dos Santos Lima, Kauana Santos de Allaman, Ivan Bezerra Tonini, William Cristiane Teles Takishita, Sylvia Sanae Braga, Luis Gustavo Tavares |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Daniel, Hannah Bandeira Thame Cipriano, Filipe dos Santos Lima, Kauana Santos de Allaman, Ivan Bezerra Tonini, William Cristiane Teles Takishita, Sylvia Sanae Braga, Luis Gustavo Tavares |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Alternative food Opuntia fícus Oreochromis niloticus Nutritional value. Alimento alternativo Opuntia fícus Oreochromis niloticus Valor nutritivo. |
topic |
Alternative food Opuntia fícus Oreochromis niloticus Nutritional value. Alimento alternativo Opuntia fícus Oreochromis niloticus Valor nutritivo. |
description |
Supplying the nutritional needs of animals in an economical way is essential to the success of any type of production. The forage palm is a cactaceae well-adapted to semiarid regions and commonly used in the feeding of ruminants. However, studies assessing its use in fishes are scarce. We aimed to evaluate the digestibility of bran from five different forage palm cultivars (Opuntia fícus) in juvenile Nile tilapia and the development of juveniles when receiving increasing levels of the cultivar with the best apparent digestibility coefficient of crude protein (ADCCP) (75.2%). We used 90 masculinized juvenile Nile tilapia (with an average weight of 6.02 ± 0.65 g) in the digestibility experiment to determine the apparent digestibility coefficients of dry matter (ADCDM), crude energy (ADCCP), and crude protein of the cultivars (Orelha de onça, Miúda, Gigante, Comum, and IPA 20). The experimental design was completely randomized (CRD) with five treatments and three repetitions. In the development experiment, 300 masculinized juvenile Nile tilapia (with average weight of 1.39 ± 0.12 g) received feed with different inclusion levels (0, 72, 144, and 216 g Kg-1) of IPA 20 palm bran in a CRD with four treatments and five repetitions. We observed significant differences (P < 0.05) for ADCDM and ADCCP between the treatments. The cultivars that presented the highest ADCDM were IPA 20 (41.75%), Orelha de onça (36.41%), and Gigante (32.59%). For ADCCP, the best cultivar was IPA 20 with 75.2%, followed by Orelha de onça (61.5%), and Miúda (56.1%). As for the performance, the inclusion of IPA 20 palm bran at a rate of 113 g/kg-1 provided the best values in terms of weight gain and final weight in juvenile Nile tilapia. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-09-02 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Pesquisa laboratorial |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/22834 10.5433/1679-0359.2016v37n4Supl1p2417 |
url |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/22834 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5433/1679-0359.2016v37n4Supl1p2417 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/22834/19590 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UEL |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UEL |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 37 No. 4Supl1 (2016); 2417-2426 Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 37 n. 4Supl1 (2016); 2417-2426 1679-0359 1676-546X reponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) instacron:UEL |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
instacron_str |
UEL |
institution |
UEL |
reponame_str |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
collection |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
semina.agrarias@uel.br |
_version_ |
1799306074558300160 |