Comparative analysis of five DNA isolation protocols and three drying methods for leaves samples of Nectandra megapotamica (Spreng.) Mez

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Costa, Leonardo Severo da
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Reiniger, Lia Rejane Silveira, Stefenon, Valdir Marcos, Heinzmann, Berta Maria, Oliveira, Adriel dos Santos
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/21305
Resumo: The aim of the study was to establish a DNA isolation protocol Nectandra megapotamica (Spreng.) Mez., able to obtain samples of high yield and quality for use in genomic analysis. A commercial kit and four classical methods of DNA extraction were tested, including three cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB)-based and one sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-based methods. Three drying methods for leaves samples were also evaluated including drying at room temperature (RT), in an oven at 40ºC (S40), and in a microwave oven (FMO). The DNA solutions obtained from different types of leaves samples using the five protocols were assessed in terms of cost, execution time, and quality and yield of extracted DNA. The commercial kit did not extract DNA with sufficient quantity or quality for successful PCR reactions. Among the classic methods, only the protocols of Dellaporta and of Khanuja yielded DNA extractions for all three types of foliar samples that resulted in successful PCR reactions and subsequent enzyme restriction assays. Based on the evaluated variables, the most appropriate DNA extraction method for Nectandra megapotamica (Spreng.) Mez. was that of Dellaporta, regardless of the method used to dry the samples. The selected method has a relatively low cost and total execution time. Moreover, the quality and quantity of DNA extracted using this method was sufficient for DNA sequence amplification using PCR reactions and to get restriction fragments.
id UEL-11_57101e2e251f4d34f9a6bf440c3c5e47
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/21305
network_acronym_str UEL-11
network_name_str Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Comparative analysis of five DNA isolation protocols and three drying methods for leaves samples of Nectandra megapotamica (Spreng.) MezAnálise comparativa de cinco protocolos de isolamento de DNA e três métodos de secagem de amostras foliares de Nectandra megapotamica (Spreng.) MezCTABSDSCostQualityYield.CTABSDSCustoQualidadeRendimento.The aim of the study was to establish a DNA isolation protocol Nectandra megapotamica (Spreng.) Mez., able to obtain samples of high yield and quality for use in genomic analysis. A commercial kit and four classical methods of DNA extraction were tested, including three cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB)-based and one sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-based methods. Three drying methods for leaves samples were also evaluated including drying at room temperature (RT), in an oven at 40ºC (S40), and in a microwave oven (FMO). The DNA solutions obtained from different types of leaves samples using the five protocols were assessed in terms of cost, execution time, and quality and yield of extracted DNA. The commercial kit did not extract DNA with sufficient quantity or quality for successful PCR reactions. Among the classic methods, only the protocols of Dellaporta and of Khanuja yielded DNA extractions for all three types of foliar samples that resulted in successful PCR reactions and subsequent enzyme restriction assays. Based on the evaluated variables, the most appropriate DNA extraction method for Nectandra megapotamica (Spreng.) Mez. was that of Dellaporta, regardless of the method used to dry the samples. The selected method has a relatively low cost and total execution time. Moreover, the quality and quantity of DNA extracted using this method was sufficient for DNA sequence amplification using PCR reactions and to get restriction fragments.O objetivo do estudo foi estabelecer um protocolo de isolamento de DNA de Nectandra megapotamica (Spreng.) Mez., capaz de obter amostras de alto rendimento e qualidade para emprego em análises genômicas. Foram testados um kit comercial e quatro métodos clássicos de extração de DNA, incluindo três métodos baseados em brometo de cetiltrimetilamónio (CTAB) e um baseado em dodecil sulfato de sódio (SDS). Três métodos de secagem de amostras de folhas foram também avaliados, incluindo a secagem à temperatura ambiente (RT), em estufa a 40ºC (S40), e em forno microondas (FMO). As soluções de DNA obtidas a partir de diferentes tipos de amostras foliares utilizando os cinco protocolos foram avaliadas em termos de custo, tempo de execução e qualidade e rendimento de DNA extraído. O kit comercial não extraiu DNA com quantidade ou qualidade suficiente para o sucesso das reações de PCR. Entre os métodos clássicos, apenas os protocolos Dellaporta e Khanuja proporcionaram extração de DNA para os três tipos de amostras foliares, que resultaram em reações de PCR e ensaios com enzimas de restrição bem sucedidos. Com base nas variáveis avaliadas, o método de extração de DNA mais apropriado para Nectandra megapotamica (Spreng.) Mez. foi o Dellaporta, independentemente do método utilizado para secar as amostras. O método selecionado apresenta custo e tempo de execução total relativamente baixo. Além disso, a qualidade e quantidade do DNA extraído utilizando o método foram suficientes para amplificação de fragmentos de DNA por meio de reações de PCR e para obter fragmentos de restrição.UEL2016-06-22info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionLaboratory researchPesquisa de laboratórioapplication/pdfapplication/pdfimage/jpegimage/jpegapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheetapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheetapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheetapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheetapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/2130510.5433/1679-0359.2016v37n3p1177Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 37 No. 3 (2016); 1177-1188Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 37 n. 3 (2016); 1177-11881679-03591676-546Xreponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELenghttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/21305/18961https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/21305/35653https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/21305/35654https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/21305/35655https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/21305/35656https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/21305/35657https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/21305/35658https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/21305/35659https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/21305/37218https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/21305/37470Costa, Leonardo Severo daReiniger, Lia Rejane SilveiraStefenon, Valdir MarcosHeinzmann, Berta MariaOliveira, Adriel dos Santosinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2016-06-22T18:29:33Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/21305Revistahttp://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrariasPUBhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/oaisemina.agrarias@uel.br1679-03591676-546Xopendoar:2016-06-22T18:29:33Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparative analysis of five DNA isolation protocols and three drying methods for leaves samples of Nectandra megapotamica (Spreng.) Mez
Análise comparativa de cinco protocolos de isolamento de DNA e três métodos de secagem de amostras foliares de Nectandra megapotamica (Spreng.) Mez
title Comparative analysis of five DNA isolation protocols and three drying methods for leaves samples of Nectandra megapotamica (Spreng.) Mez
spellingShingle Comparative analysis of five DNA isolation protocols and three drying methods for leaves samples of Nectandra megapotamica (Spreng.) Mez
Costa, Leonardo Severo da
CTAB
SDS
Cost
Quality
Yield.
CTAB
SDS
Custo
Qualidade
Rendimento.
title_short Comparative analysis of five DNA isolation protocols and three drying methods for leaves samples of Nectandra megapotamica (Spreng.) Mez
title_full Comparative analysis of five DNA isolation protocols and three drying methods for leaves samples of Nectandra megapotamica (Spreng.) Mez
title_fullStr Comparative analysis of five DNA isolation protocols and three drying methods for leaves samples of Nectandra megapotamica (Spreng.) Mez
title_full_unstemmed Comparative analysis of five DNA isolation protocols and three drying methods for leaves samples of Nectandra megapotamica (Spreng.) Mez
title_sort Comparative analysis of five DNA isolation protocols and three drying methods for leaves samples of Nectandra megapotamica (Spreng.) Mez
author Costa, Leonardo Severo da
author_facet Costa, Leonardo Severo da
Reiniger, Lia Rejane Silveira
Stefenon, Valdir Marcos
Heinzmann, Berta Maria
Oliveira, Adriel dos Santos
author_role author
author2 Reiniger, Lia Rejane Silveira
Stefenon, Valdir Marcos
Heinzmann, Berta Maria
Oliveira, Adriel dos Santos
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Costa, Leonardo Severo da
Reiniger, Lia Rejane Silveira
Stefenon, Valdir Marcos
Heinzmann, Berta Maria
Oliveira, Adriel dos Santos
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv CTAB
SDS
Cost
Quality
Yield.
CTAB
SDS
Custo
Qualidade
Rendimento.
topic CTAB
SDS
Cost
Quality
Yield.
CTAB
SDS
Custo
Qualidade
Rendimento.
description The aim of the study was to establish a DNA isolation protocol Nectandra megapotamica (Spreng.) Mez., able to obtain samples of high yield and quality for use in genomic analysis. A commercial kit and four classical methods of DNA extraction were tested, including three cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB)-based and one sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-based methods. Three drying methods for leaves samples were also evaluated including drying at room temperature (RT), in an oven at 40ºC (S40), and in a microwave oven (FMO). The DNA solutions obtained from different types of leaves samples using the five protocols were assessed in terms of cost, execution time, and quality and yield of extracted DNA. The commercial kit did not extract DNA with sufficient quantity or quality for successful PCR reactions. Among the classic methods, only the protocols of Dellaporta and of Khanuja yielded DNA extractions for all three types of foliar samples that resulted in successful PCR reactions and subsequent enzyme restriction assays. Based on the evaluated variables, the most appropriate DNA extraction method for Nectandra megapotamica (Spreng.) Mez. was that of Dellaporta, regardless of the method used to dry the samples. The selected method has a relatively low cost and total execution time. Moreover, the quality and quantity of DNA extracted using this method was sufficient for DNA sequence amplification using PCR reactions and to get restriction fragments.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-06-22
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Laboratory research
Pesquisa de laboratório
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/21305
10.5433/1679-0359.2016v37n3p1177
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/21305
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/1679-0359.2016v37n3p1177
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/21305/18961
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/21305/35653
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/21305/35654
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/21305/35655
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/21305/35656
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/21305/35657
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/21305/35658
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/21305/35659
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/21305/37218
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/21305/37470
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
image/jpeg
image/jpeg
application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet
application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet
application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet
application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet
application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 37 No. 3 (2016); 1177-1188
Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 37 n. 3 (2016); 1177-1188
1679-0359
1676-546X
reponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
collection Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv semina.agrarias@uel.br
_version_ 1750315422013456384