Agronomical and quality differences of four fig cultivars grown in Brazil
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/41010 |
Resumo: | Figs consumption date back to the beginnings of civilization. Currently, consumers have become more demanding about quality of fruits, and figs are then highly indicated, since it is rich in nutrients, making them a great addition to a healthy diet. Although there is only one commercial fig cultivar that is commonly grown in Brazil, different cultivars should be considered for the diversification of fig production with regards to their yield and fruit quality. This research aimed at evaluating growth, yield, physicochemical characteristics and bioactive compounds of figs grown in Brazil. Then, four cultivars (Roxo de Valinhos, White Genova, PI-189 and Troyano) were studied to determine canopy volume, productive efficiency, soluble solids - SS, pH, titratable acidity - TA, SS/TA ratio, sugars, ascorbic acid, phenolic compounds, pigments and antioxidant activity. The cv. White Genova presented the highest canopy volume, while ‘Roxo de Valinhos’, ‘PI-189’ and ‘Troyano’ performed the greatest productive efficiency. The cvs. Roxo de Valinhos, White Genova and Troyano produced fruits with higher content of SS, reducing sugars and SS/TA ratio, while the fruits of ‘PI-189’ and ‘Roxo de Valinhos’ contained the highest levels of antioxidant activity. PCA enabled to differentiate the studied cultivars, which evidenced that PI-189 was the most different of all. |
id |
UEL-11_5b62d99d1802017059e75e9bb28b2d2b |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/41010 |
network_acronym_str |
UEL-11 |
network_name_str |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Agronomical and quality differences of four fig cultivars grown in BrazilDiferenças agronômicas e qualidade de quatro cultivares de figo cultivados no BrasilAntioxidantsFicus carica L.Phenolic compoundsTree performanceYield.AntioxidantesFicus carica L.Compostos fenólicosDesempenho produtivoProdutividade.Figs consumption date back to the beginnings of civilization. Currently, consumers have become more demanding about quality of fruits, and figs are then highly indicated, since it is rich in nutrients, making them a great addition to a healthy diet. Although there is only one commercial fig cultivar that is commonly grown in Brazil, different cultivars should be considered for the diversification of fig production with regards to their yield and fruit quality. This research aimed at evaluating growth, yield, physicochemical characteristics and bioactive compounds of figs grown in Brazil. Then, four cultivars (Roxo de Valinhos, White Genova, PI-189 and Troyano) were studied to determine canopy volume, productive efficiency, soluble solids - SS, pH, titratable acidity - TA, SS/TA ratio, sugars, ascorbic acid, phenolic compounds, pigments and antioxidant activity. The cv. White Genova presented the highest canopy volume, while ‘Roxo de Valinhos’, ‘PI-189’ and ‘Troyano’ performed the greatest productive efficiency. The cvs. Roxo de Valinhos, White Genova and Troyano produced fruits with higher content of SS, reducing sugars and SS/TA ratio, while the fruits of ‘PI-189’ and ‘Roxo de Valinhos’ contained the highest levels of antioxidant activity. PCA enabled to differentiate the studied cultivars, which evidenced that PI-189 was the most different of all.O consumo de figos remonta ao início da civilização. Nos dias atuais os consumidores se tornam cada vez mais exigentes com a qualidade das frutas, neste cenário, os figos são altamente indicados, pois são ricos em nutrients e um ótimo complemento para uma dieta saudável. Embora exista apenas uma cultivar comercial de figo comumente cultivada no Brasil, diferentes cultivares devem ser consideradas para a diversificação da produção com base no rendimento produtivo e qualidade dos frutos. Portanto, este estudo teve como objetivo avaliar a eficiência produtiva, as características químicas e os compostos bioativos de figos cultivados no Brasil. Para isso, quatro cultivares (Roxo de Valinhos, White Genova, PI-189 e Troyano) foram avaliadas quanto ao volume de copa, eficiência produtiva, sólidos solúveis - SS, pH, acidez titulável - AT, relação SS/AT, açúcares, ácido ascórbico, compostos fenólicos, pigmentos e atividade antioxidante. A partir dos resultados, verifica-se que ‘White Genova’ apresentou o maior volume de copa, enquanto ‘Roxo de Valinhos’, ‘PI-189’ e ‘Troyano’ apresentaram a maior eficiência produtiva. Foi possível verificar também que ‘Roxo de Valinhos’, ‘White Genova’ e ‘Troyano’ produziram frutos com maior teor de SS, açúcares redutores e maior relação SS/AT, enquanto os frutos de ‘PI-189’ e ‘Roxo de Valinhos’ continham níveis mais altos de atividade antioxidante. Por meio da PCA evidenciou-se que a PI-189 é a mais distinta dentre as cultivares avaliadas.UEL2021-02-24info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionResearch paperArtigo científicoapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/4101010.5433/1679-0359.2021v42n2p619Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 42 No. 2 (2021); 619-634Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 42 n. 2 (2021); 619-6341679-03591676-546Xreponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELenghttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/41010/29076Copyright (c) 2021 Semina: Ciências Agráriashttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFerraz, Rafael AugustoLeonel, SaritaSouza, Jackson Mirellys AzevêdoModesto, Joyce HelenaFerreira, Rafael BibianoSilva, Marcelo de Souza2022-10-04T13:43:48Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/41010Revistahttp://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrariasPUBhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/oaisemina.agrarias@uel.br1679-03591676-546Xopendoar:2022-10-04T13:43:48Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Agronomical and quality differences of four fig cultivars grown in Brazil Diferenças agronômicas e qualidade de quatro cultivares de figo cultivados no Brasil |
title |
Agronomical and quality differences of four fig cultivars grown in Brazil |
spellingShingle |
Agronomical and quality differences of four fig cultivars grown in Brazil Ferraz, Rafael Augusto Antioxidants Ficus carica L. Phenolic compounds Tree performance Yield. Antioxidantes Ficus carica L. Compostos fenólicos Desempenho produtivo Produtividade. |
title_short |
Agronomical and quality differences of four fig cultivars grown in Brazil |
title_full |
Agronomical and quality differences of four fig cultivars grown in Brazil |
title_fullStr |
Agronomical and quality differences of four fig cultivars grown in Brazil |
title_full_unstemmed |
Agronomical and quality differences of four fig cultivars grown in Brazil |
title_sort |
Agronomical and quality differences of four fig cultivars grown in Brazil |
author |
Ferraz, Rafael Augusto |
author_facet |
Ferraz, Rafael Augusto Leonel, Sarita Souza, Jackson Mirellys Azevêdo Modesto, Joyce Helena Ferreira, Rafael Bibiano Silva, Marcelo de Souza |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Leonel, Sarita Souza, Jackson Mirellys Azevêdo Modesto, Joyce Helena Ferreira, Rafael Bibiano Silva, Marcelo de Souza |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Ferraz, Rafael Augusto Leonel, Sarita Souza, Jackson Mirellys Azevêdo Modesto, Joyce Helena Ferreira, Rafael Bibiano Silva, Marcelo de Souza |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Antioxidants Ficus carica L. Phenolic compounds Tree performance Yield. Antioxidantes Ficus carica L. Compostos fenólicos Desempenho produtivo Produtividade. |
topic |
Antioxidants Ficus carica L. Phenolic compounds Tree performance Yield. Antioxidantes Ficus carica L. Compostos fenólicos Desempenho produtivo Produtividade. |
description |
Figs consumption date back to the beginnings of civilization. Currently, consumers have become more demanding about quality of fruits, and figs are then highly indicated, since it is rich in nutrients, making them a great addition to a healthy diet. Although there is only one commercial fig cultivar that is commonly grown in Brazil, different cultivars should be considered for the diversification of fig production with regards to their yield and fruit quality. This research aimed at evaluating growth, yield, physicochemical characteristics and bioactive compounds of figs grown in Brazil. Then, four cultivars (Roxo de Valinhos, White Genova, PI-189 and Troyano) were studied to determine canopy volume, productive efficiency, soluble solids - SS, pH, titratable acidity - TA, SS/TA ratio, sugars, ascorbic acid, phenolic compounds, pigments and antioxidant activity. The cv. White Genova presented the highest canopy volume, while ‘Roxo de Valinhos’, ‘PI-189’ and ‘Troyano’ performed the greatest productive efficiency. The cvs. Roxo de Valinhos, White Genova and Troyano produced fruits with higher content of SS, reducing sugars and SS/TA ratio, while the fruits of ‘PI-189’ and ‘Roxo de Valinhos’ contained the highest levels of antioxidant activity. PCA enabled to differentiate the studied cultivars, which evidenced that PI-189 was the most different of all. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-02-24 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Research paper Artigo científico |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/41010 10.5433/1679-0359.2021v42n2p619 |
url |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/41010 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5433/1679-0359.2021v42n2p619 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/41010/29076 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Semina: Ciências Agrárias http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Semina: Ciências Agrárias http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UEL |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UEL |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 42 No. 2 (2021); 619-634 Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 42 n. 2 (2021); 619-634 1679-0359 1676-546X reponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) instacron:UEL |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
instacron_str |
UEL |
institution |
UEL |
reponame_str |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
collection |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
semina.agrarias@uel.br |
_version_ |
1799306083495313408 |