Agronomical and quality differences of four fig cultivars grown in Brazil

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ferraz, Rafael Augusto
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Leonel, Sarita [UNESP], Souza, Jackson Mirellys Azevêdo [UNESP], Modesto, Joyce Helena [UNESP], Ferreira, Rafael Bibiano [UNESP], de Souza Silva, Marcelo [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2021v42n2p619
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/208464
Resumo: Figs consumption date back to the beginnings of civilization. Currently, consumers have become more demanding about quality of fruits, and figs are then highly indicated, since it is rich in nutrients, making them a great addition to a healthy diet. Although there is only one commercial fig cultivar that is commonly grown in Brazil, different cultivars should be considered for the diversification of fig production with regards to their yield and fruit quality. This research aimed at evaluating growth, yield, physicochemical characteristics and bioactive compounds of figs grown in Brazil. Then, four cultivars (Roxo de Valinhos, White Genova, PI-189 and Troyano) were studied to determine canopy volume, productive efficiency, soluble solids - SS, pH, titratable acidity - TA, SS/TA ratio, sugars, ascorbic acid, phenolic compounds, pigments and antioxidant activity. The cv. White Genova presented the highest canopy volume, while 'Roxo de Valinhos', 'PI-189' and 'Troyano' performed the greatest productive efficiency. The cvs. Roxo de Valinhos, White Genova and Troyano produced fruits with higher content of SS, reducing sugars and SS/TA ratio, while the fruits of 'PI-189' and 'Roxo de Valinhos' contained the highest levels of antioxidant activity. PCA enabled to differentiate the studied cultivars, which evidenced that PI-189 was the most different of all.
id UNSP_d57de2643a2b50100d580483d96b9b81
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/208464
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Agronomical and quality differences of four fig cultivars grown in BrazilDiferenças agronômicas e qualidade de quatro cultivares de figo cultivados no BrasilAntioxidantsFicus carica LPhenolic compoundsTree performanceYieldFigs consumption date back to the beginnings of civilization. Currently, consumers have become more demanding about quality of fruits, and figs are then highly indicated, since it is rich in nutrients, making them a great addition to a healthy diet. Although there is only one commercial fig cultivar that is commonly grown in Brazil, different cultivars should be considered for the diversification of fig production with regards to their yield and fruit quality. This research aimed at evaluating growth, yield, physicochemical characteristics and bioactive compounds of figs grown in Brazil. Then, four cultivars (Roxo de Valinhos, White Genova, PI-189 and Troyano) were studied to determine canopy volume, productive efficiency, soluble solids - SS, pH, titratable acidity - TA, SS/TA ratio, sugars, ascorbic acid, phenolic compounds, pigments and antioxidant activity. The cv. White Genova presented the highest canopy volume, while 'Roxo de Valinhos', 'PI-189' and 'Troyano' performed the greatest productive efficiency. The cvs. Roxo de Valinhos, White Genova and Troyano produced fruits with higher content of SS, reducing sugars and SS/TA ratio, while the fruits of 'PI-189' and 'Roxo de Valinhos' contained the highest levels of antioxidant activity. PCA enabled to differentiate the studied cultivars, which evidenced that PI-189 was the most different of all.Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)Amazonas Federal Institute IFAMSchool of Agriculture São Paulo State University UNESP FCAGraduate Students of The Agronomy/Horticulture Graduate Program UNESP FCASchool of Agriculture São Paulo State University UNESP FCAGraduate Students of The Agronomy/Horticulture Graduate Program UNESP FCACNPq: 304455/2017-2IFAMUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Ferraz, Rafael AugustoLeonel, Sarita [UNESP]Souza, Jackson Mirellys Azevêdo [UNESP]Modesto, Joyce Helena [UNESP]Ferreira, Rafael Bibiano [UNESP]de Souza Silva, Marcelo [UNESP]2021-06-25T11:12:32Z2021-06-25T11:12:32Z2021-02-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article619-634http://dx.doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2021v42n2p619Semina:Ciencias Agrarias, v. 42, n. 2, p. 619-634, 2021.1679-03591676-546Xhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/20846410.5433/1679-0359.2021v42n2p6192-s2.0-85101802128Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengSemina:Ciencias Agrariasinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-04-30T14:33:56Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/208464Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-04-30T14:33:56Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Agronomical and quality differences of four fig cultivars grown in Brazil
Diferenças agronômicas e qualidade de quatro cultivares de figo cultivados no Brasil
title Agronomical and quality differences of four fig cultivars grown in Brazil
spellingShingle Agronomical and quality differences of four fig cultivars grown in Brazil
Ferraz, Rafael Augusto
Antioxidants
Ficus carica L
Phenolic compounds
Tree performance
Yield
title_short Agronomical and quality differences of four fig cultivars grown in Brazil
title_full Agronomical and quality differences of four fig cultivars grown in Brazil
title_fullStr Agronomical and quality differences of four fig cultivars grown in Brazil
title_full_unstemmed Agronomical and quality differences of four fig cultivars grown in Brazil
title_sort Agronomical and quality differences of four fig cultivars grown in Brazil
author Ferraz, Rafael Augusto
author_facet Ferraz, Rafael Augusto
Leonel, Sarita [UNESP]
Souza, Jackson Mirellys Azevêdo [UNESP]
Modesto, Joyce Helena [UNESP]
Ferreira, Rafael Bibiano [UNESP]
de Souza Silva, Marcelo [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Leonel, Sarita [UNESP]
Souza, Jackson Mirellys Azevêdo [UNESP]
Modesto, Joyce Helena [UNESP]
Ferreira, Rafael Bibiano [UNESP]
de Souza Silva, Marcelo [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv IFAM
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ferraz, Rafael Augusto
Leonel, Sarita [UNESP]
Souza, Jackson Mirellys Azevêdo [UNESP]
Modesto, Joyce Helena [UNESP]
Ferreira, Rafael Bibiano [UNESP]
de Souza Silva, Marcelo [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Antioxidants
Ficus carica L
Phenolic compounds
Tree performance
Yield
topic Antioxidants
Ficus carica L
Phenolic compounds
Tree performance
Yield
description Figs consumption date back to the beginnings of civilization. Currently, consumers have become more demanding about quality of fruits, and figs are then highly indicated, since it is rich in nutrients, making them a great addition to a healthy diet. Although there is only one commercial fig cultivar that is commonly grown in Brazil, different cultivars should be considered for the diversification of fig production with regards to their yield and fruit quality. This research aimed at evaluating growth, yield, physicochemical characteristics and bioactive compounds of figs grown in Brazil. Then, four cultivars (Roxo de Valinhos, White Genova, PI-189 and Troyano) were studied to determine canopy volume, productive efficiency, soluble solids - SS, pH, titratable acidity - TA, SS/TA ratio, sugars, ascorbic acid, phenolic compounds, pigments and antioxidant activity. The cv. White Genova presented the highest canopy volume, while 'Roxo de Valinhos', 'PI-189' and 'Troyano' performed the greatest productive efficiency. The cvs. Roxo de Valinhos, White Genova and Troyano produced fruits with higher content of SS, reducing sugars and SS/TA ratio, while the fruits of 'PI-189' and 'Roxo de Valinhos' contained the highest levels of antioxidant activity. PCA enabled to differentiate the studied cultivars, which evidenced that PI-189 was the most different of all.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-06-25T11:12:32Z
2021-06-25T11:12:32Z
2021-02-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2021v42n2p619
Semina:Ciencias Agrarias, v. 42, n. 2, p. 619-634, 2021.
1679-0359
1676-546X
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/208464
10.5433/1679-0359.2021v42n2p619
2-s2.0-85101802128
url http://dx.doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2021v42n2p619
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/208464
identifier_str_mv Semina:Ciencias Agrarias, v. 42, n. 2, p. 619-634, 2021.
1679-0359
1676-546X
10.5433/1679-0359.2021v42n2p619
2-s2.0-85101802128
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Semina:Ciencias Agrarias
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 619-634
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799965207057924096