Marandu palisade grass intercropped with densely spaced teak in silvopastoral system
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/26893 |
Resumo: | This study was conducted to evaluate two systems of production: integration between teak and forage (silvopastoral system) and forage only (monoculture). The forage species used was Marandu palisade grass (Urochloa brizantha cv. Marandu). In January 2009, part of the pasture was desiccated and the teak (Tectona grandis) was implemented in a 3 × 4 m spacing arrangement, and at every five rows, a space between rows of 6 m was established, providing a population of 750 trees per hectare. Alongside the development of the trees, the Marandu palisade grass pasture was reestablished. In February 2015, the animals were removed from the experimental area and, in March, the pasture degradation, the density and the mass of tillers was assessed. The following variables were evaluated: sward height; forage mass, percentage of leaf blade, stem+sheath and senescent material; leaf blade:stem+sheath ratio; and live:dead material ratio. The experimental design was completely randomized, with 12 replicates. Treatments consisted of two systems (silvopastoral and monoculture). The total forage accumulation was higher in the monoculture system. The sward height and the percentage of stem+sheath were higher in the integrated system, while the percentage of leaf blade and the leaf blade:stem+sheath ratio were higher in the system exclusively with forage. In conclusion, Marandu palisade grass tolerates shading in a high density spacing silvopastoral system, but the degradation process is more intense compared to grass in monoculture, and the use of Marandu palisade grass in silvopastoral systems changes the forage mass and the structure of the produced forage. |
id |
UEL-11_60f1929d4c7969e049c21ab5b2f08d58 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/26893 |
network_acronym_str |
UEL-11 |
network_name_str |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Marandu palisade grass intercropped with densely spaced teak in silvopastoral systemCapim-Marandu consorciado com Teca adensada em sistema silvipastorilForage participationShadingSoil coverTectona grandisUrochloa brizantha.Cobertura do soloParticipação forrageiraSombreamentoTectona grandisUrochloa brizantha.This study was conducted to evaluate two systems of production: integration between teak and forage (silvopastoral system) and forage only (monoculture). The forage species used was Marandu palisade grass (Urochloa brizantha cv. Marandu). In January 2009, part of the pasture was desiccated and the teak (Tectona grandis) was implemented in a 3 × 4 m spacing arrangement, and at every five rows, a space between rows of 6 m was established, providing a population of 750 trees per hectare. Alongside the development of the trees, the Marandu palisade grass pasture was reestablished. In February 2015, the animals were removed from the experimental area and, in March, the pasture degradation, the density and the mass of tillers was assessed. The following variables were evaluated: sward height; forage mass, percentage of leaf blade, stem+sheath and senescent material; leaf blade:stem+sheath ratio; and live:dead material ratio. The experimental design was completely randomized, with 12 replicates. Treatments consisted of two systems (silvopastoral and monoculture). The total forage accumulation was higher in the monoculture system. The sward height and the percentage of stem+sheath were higher in the integrated system, while the percentage of leaf blade and the leaf blade:stem+sheath ratio were higher in the system exclusively with forage. In conclusion, Marandu palisade grass tolerates shading in a high density spacing silvopastoral system, but the degradation process is more intense compared to grass in monoculture, and the use of Marandu palisade grass in silvopastoral systems changes the forage mass and the structure of the produced forage.Este trabalho foi realizado para avaliar dois sistemas de produção: integração entre teca e forragem (silvipastoril) e somente forragem (monocultivo). A forrageira utilizada foi o capim-Marandu. Em janeiro de 2009, parte do pasto foi dessecado e implantou-se Teca (Tectona grandis) em espaçamento de 3 x 4 m e a cada cinco linhas estabeleceu-se um espaçamento de 6 m entre linhas, o que garantiu uma população de 750 árvores por hectare. Paralelamente ao desenvolvimento das árvores houve o restabelecimento do pasto de capim-Marandu. Em fevereiro de 2015, retirou-se os animais da área e em março avaliou-se o estádio de degradação do pasto, a densidade e a massa de perfilhos. Avaliou-se também a altura do dossel forrageiro, a massa de forragem e as porcentagens de: lâmina foliar, colmo+bainha e material morto, a relação lâmina foliar/colmo+bainha e a relação vivo/não vivo. O delineamento experimental foi inteiramente casualizado, com dois tratamentos (silvipastoril e monocultivo) e doze repetições. A massa de forragem foi maior no sistema com monocultivo de capim-Marandu. A altura da forragem e a porcentagem de colmo + bainha foram maiores no sistema silvipastoril, já a porcentagem de lâmina foliar e a relação lâmina:colmo+bainha foram maiores para o sistema com monocultivo. Conclui-se que o capim-marandu tolera o sombreamento em sistema silvipastoril adensado, contudo o processo de degradação é mais intenso do que o capim em monocultivo e a utilização do capim-Marandu em sistemas silvipastoris altera a massa de forragem e a estrutura da forragem produzida.UEL2017-08-04info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPesquisa empírica de campoapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/2689310.5433/1679-0359.2017v38n4p2075Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 38 No. 4 (2017); 2075-2082Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 38 n. 4 (2017); 2075-20821679-03591676-546Xreponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELenghttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/26893/21383Copyright (c) 2017 Semina: Ciências Agráriashttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCabral, Carlos Eduardo AvelinoBarros, Lívia Vieira deAbreu, Joadil Gonçalves deSilva, Felipe Gomes daCabral, Carla Heloisa AvelinoBehling Neto, ArthurAndrade, Flávio Cunha FerreiraSales, Kyron CabralHerrera, Dayenne MarianeDellarmelinda, Thainara Matilde Muniz2022-10-24T12:45:07Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/26893Revistahttp://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrariasPUBhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/oaisemina.agrarias@uel.br1679-03591676-546Xopendoar:2022-10-24T12:45:07Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Marandu palisade grass intercropped with densely spaced teak in silvopastoral system Capim-Marandu consorciado com Teca adensada em sistema silvipastoril |
title |
Marandu palisade grass intercropped with densely spaced teak in silvopastoral system |
spellingShingle |
Marandu palisade grass intercropped with densely spaced teak in silvopastoral system Cabral, Carlos Eduardo Avelino Forage participation Shading Soil cover Tectona grandis Urochloa brizantha. Cobertura do solo Participação forrageira Sombreamento Tectona grandis Urochloa brizantha. |
title_short |
Marandu palisade grass intercropped with densely spaced teak in silvopastoral system |
title_full |
Marandu palisade grass intercropped with densely spaced teak in silvopastoral system |
title_fullStr |
Marandu palisade grass intercropped with densely spaced teak in silvopastoral system |
title_full_unstemmed |
Marandu palisade grass intercropped with densely spaced teak in silvopastoral system |
title_sort |
Marandu palisade grass intercropped with densely spaced teak in silvopastoral system |
author |
Cabral, Carlos Eduardo Avelino |
author_facet |
Cabral, Carlos Eduardo Avelino Barros, Lívia Vieira de Abreu, Joadil Gonçalves de Silva, Felipe Gomes da Cabral, Carla Heloisa Avelino Behling Neto, Arthur Andrade, Flávio Cunha Ferreira Sales, Kyron Cabral Herrera, Dayenne Mariane Dellarmelinda, Thainara Matilde Muniz |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Barros, Lívia Vieira de Abreu, Joadil Gonçalves de Silva, Felipe Gomes da Cabral, Carla Heloisa Avelino Behling Neto, Arthur Andrade, Flávio Cunha Ferreira Sales, Kyron Cabral Herrera, Dayenne Mariane Dellarmelinda, Thainara Matilde Muniz |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Cabral, Carlos Eduardo Avelino Barros, Lívia Vieira de Abreu, Joadil Gonçalves de Silva, Felipe Gomes da Cabral, Carla Heloisa Avelino Behling Neto, Arthur Andrade, Flávio Cunha Ferreira Sales, Kyron Cabral Herrera, Dayenne Mariane Dellarmelinda, Thainara Matilde Muniz |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Forage participation Shading Soil cover Tectona grandis Urochloa brizantha. Cobertura do solo Participação forrageira Sombreamento Tectona grandis Urochloa brizantha. |
topic |
Forage participation Shading Soil cover Tectona grandis Urochloa brizantha. Cobertura do solo Participação forrageira Sombreamento Tectona grandis Urochloa brizantha. |
description |
This study was conducted to evaluate two systems of production: integration between teak and forage (silvopastoral system) and forage only (monoculture). The forage species used was Marandu palisade grass (Urochloa brizantha cv. Marandu). In January 2009, part of the pasture was desiccated and the teak (Tectona grandis) was implemented in a 3 × 4 m spacing arrangement, and at every five rows, a space between rows of 6 m was established, providing a population of 750 trees per hectare. Alongside the development of the trees, the Marandu palisade grass pasture was reestablished. In February 2015, the animals were removed from the experimental area and, in March, the pasture degradation, the density and the mass of tillers was assessed. The following variables were evaluated: sward height; forage mass, percentage of leaf blade, stem+sheath and senescent material; leaf blade:stem+sheath ratio; and live:dead material ratio. The experimental design was completely randomized, with 12 replicates. Treatments consisted of two systems (silvopastoral and monoculture). The total forage accumulation was higher in the monoculture system. The sward height and the percentage of stem+sheath were higher in the integrated system, while the percentage of leaf blade and the leaf blade:stem+sheath ratio were higher in the system exclusively with forage. In conclusion, Marandu palisade grass tolerates shading in a high density spacing silvopastoral system, but the degradation process is more intense compared to grass in monoculture, and the use of Marandu palisade grass in silvopastoral systems changes the forage mass and the structure of the produced forage. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-08-04 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Pesquisa empírica de campo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/26893 10.5433/1679-0359.2017v38n4p2075 |
url |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/26893 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5433/1679-0359.2017v38n4p2075 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/26893/21383 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Semina: Ciências Agrárias http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Semina: Ciências Agrárias http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UEL |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UEL |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 38 No. 4 (2017); 2075-2082 Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 38 n. 4 (2017); 2075-2082 1679-0359 1676-546X reponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) instacron:UEL |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
instacron_str |
UEL |
institution |
UEL |
reponame_str |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
collection |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
semina.agrarias@uel.br |
_version_ |
1799306076556886016 |