Models predict the proportion of bone, muscle, and fat in ewe lamb carcasses from in vivo measurements of the 9th to 11th rib section and of the 12th rib
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/21663 |
Resumo: | The present work aimed at evaluating models that predict the proportion of bone, muscle, and fat in ewe lamb carcasses using in vivo data obtained from the 9th to 11th rib section and from the 12th rib. A study population of 30 wooled ewe lambs, derived from Texel breed crosses, were fed with different concentrate levels (0%, 20%, 40%, 60%, and 80%) and slaughtered at a weight of 37.70 ± 10.23 kg. Carcass fat content (FC%) and muscle content (MC%) were estimated from models using the proportion of muscle and fat in the 9th to 11th rib section or in the 12th rib, with or without additional data regarding subcutaneous fat thickness (SFT mm) or carcass ribeye area (RA cm2). Carcass bone content (BC%) was predicted based on the proportion of bones in the 9th to 11th rib section or in the 12th rib. Modeling with in vivo data included fasting body weight (FBW), withers height (WH), and ultrasound measurements of SFT and RA. The FC% could be estimated from the carcass SFT and fat content in the 12th rib. The MC% was more accurately predicted from the proportion of muscles in the 9th to 11th rib section and from carcass RA. The 9th to 11th rib section provided the most accurate data for the prediction of BC%. To determine FC% and MC% from in vivo inputs, the model must include FBW and WH. In vivo FBW measurements alone allow for the estimation of BC%. We recommend the use of 12th rib composition for the accurate estimation of carcass fat content, and the use of the 9th and 11th rib section for the prediction of carcass muscle and bone content. Models using in vivo data for the prediction of fat, muscle, and bone in ewe lambs should incorporate FBW and WH. |
id |
UEL-11_72a8a564d3372c7096afddb83fcd7433 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/21663 |
network_acronym_str |
UEL-11 |
network_name_str |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Models predict the proportion of bone, muscle, and fat in ewe lamb carcasses from in vivo measurements of the 9th to 11th rib section and of the 12th ribModelos para predição das proporções de ossos, músculos e gordura da carcaça de borregas por medidas obtidas in vivo, na seção entre a 9ª e 11ª costelas e 12ª costelaRibeye areaBody compositionFat thicknessOvine.Área de olho de lomboComponentes corporaisEspessura de gorduraOvinos.The present work aimed at evaluating models that predict the proportion of bone, muscle, and fat in ewe lamb carcasses using in vivo data obtained from the 9th to 11th rib section and from the 12th rib. A study population of 30 wooled ewe lambs, derived from Texel breed crosses, were fed with different concentrate levels (0%, 20%, 40%, 60%, and 80%) and slaughtered at a weight of 37.70 ± 10.23 kg. Carcass fat content (FC%) and muscle content (MC%) were estimated from models using the proportion of muscle and fat in the 9th to 11th rib section or in the 12th rib, with or without additional data regarding subcutaneous fat thickness (SFT mm) or carcass ribeye area (RA cm2). Carcass bone content (BC%) was predicted based on the proportion of bones in the 9th to 11th rib section or in the 12th rib. Modeling with in vivo data included fasting body weight (FBW), withers height (WH), and ultrasound measurements of SFT and RA. The FC% could be estimated from the carcass SFT and fat content in the 12th rib. The MC% was more accurately predicted from the proportion of muscles in the 9th to 11th rib section and from carcass RA. The 9th to 11th rib section provided the most accurate data for the prediction of BC%. To determine FC% and MC% from in vivo inputs, the model must include FBW and WH. In vivo FBW measurements alone allow for the estimation of BC%. We recommend the use of 12th rib composition for the accurate estimation of carcass fat content, and the use of the 9th and 11th rib section for the prediction of carcass muscle and bone content. Models using in vivo data for the prediction of fat, muscle, and bone in ewe lambs should incorporate FBW and WH.Objetivou-se ajustar e avaliar modelos Pará predição das proporções de Ossos, Músculos e Gordura da Carcaça de Borregas A Partir de Medidas obtidas in vivo, na Seção HH e 12ª costela. Como 30 Borregas lanadas, oriundas de Cruzamentos com ovinos da Raça Texel, foram confinadas, alimentadas com níveis crescentes de Concentrado. (20; 40; 60 e 80%) e abatidas com 37,70 ± 10,23 kg Pará Estimativa da proporção de Gordura (GC%) e músculo (MC%) na Carcaça foram ajustados modelos com SO percentuais de Gordura e músculo da 9ª a 11ª costela (Seção HH) UO da 12ª costela, acompanhados OU NÃO da espessura de Gordura (EGS mm) UO da área de olho de lombo da Carcaça (AOL cm2), respectivamente. a proporção de Ossos da Carcaça (OC%) foi Predito Cabelo percentual de Ossos na Seção HH UO da 12ª costela. Para predição in vivo, foram ajustadas Equações com peso corporal em jejum (PCJ), altura de cernelha (AC), EGS e AOL Medidas POR ultrassom. A GC% PODE Ser Estimada Pela EGS obtida na Carcaça EO Teor de Gordura na 12ª costela. O MC% PODE Ser Predito de forma acurada Mais considerando o Teor de músculo na Seção HH ea AOL da Carcaça. A Seção HH foi o modelo Mais acurado Paragrafo predição da OC%. Para Obtenção da GC% e MC% in vivo OS modelos devem Incluir PCJ e AC. O OC% in vivo PODE Ser Estimado a Partir do PCJ. Recomenda-se a utilização da Composição Física da 12ª costela Paragrafo Estimativa acurada da proporção de Gordura na Carcaça EO USO da Seção HH Paragrafo predição das proporções de músculo e Ossos na Carcaça. Para predição acurada das proporções de Gordura, músculo e Ossos de Borregas in vivo, o modelo DEVE apresentar peso corporal em jejum e Medidas de altura de cernelha.UEL2016-04-26info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPesquisa Empírica de Campoapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/2166310.5433/1679-0359.2016v37n2p1081Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 37 No. 2 (2016); 1081-1090Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 37 n. 2 (2016); 1081-10901679-03591676-546Xreponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELenghttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/21663/18727http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMorais, Maria da GraçaMenezes, Bruna Biava deRibeiro, Caroline BertholiniWalker, Catherine CecíliaFernandes, Henrique JorgeSouza, Andréa Roberto Duarte LopesÍtavo, Camila Celeste Brandão FerreiraFeijó, Gelson Luis Dias2022-12-01T16:52:19Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/21663Revistahttp://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrariasPUBhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/oaisemina.agrarias@uel.br1679-03591676-546Xopendoar:2022-12-01T16:52:19Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Models predict the proportion of bone, muscle, and fat in ewe lamb carcasses from in vivo measurements of the 9th to 11th rib section and of the 12th rib Modelos para predição das proporções de ossos, músculos e gordura da carcaça de borregas por medidas obtidas in vivo, na seção entre a 9ª e 11ª costelas e 12ª costela |
title |
Models predict the proportion of bone, muscle, and fat in ewe lamb carcasses from in vivo measurements of the 9th to 11th rib section and of the 12th rib |
spellingShingle |
Models predict the proportion of bone, muscle, and fat in ewe lamb carcasses from in vivo measurements of the 9th to 11th rib section and of the 12th rib Morais, Maria da Graça Ribeye area Body composition Fat thickness Ovine. Área de olho de lombo Componentes corporais Espessura de gordura Ovinos. |
title_short |
Models predict the proportion of bone, muscle, and fat in ewe lamb carcasses from in vivo measurements of the 9th to 11th rib section and of the 12th rib |
title_full |
Models predict the proportion of bone, muscle, and fat in ewe lamb carcasses from in vivo measurements of the 9th to 11th rib section and of the 12th rib |
title_fullStr |
Models predict the proportion of bone, muscle, and fat in ewe lamb carcasses from in vivo measurements of the 9th to 11th rib section and of the 12th rib |
title_full_unstemmed |
Models predict the proportion of bone, muscle, and fat in ewe lamb carcasses from in vivo measurements of the 9th to 11th rib section and of the 12th rib |
title_sort |
Models predict the proportion of bone, muscle, and fat in ewe lamb carcasses from in vivo measurements of the 9th to 11th rib section and of the 12th rib |
author |
Morais, Maria da Graça |
author_facet |
Morais, Maria da Graça Menezes, Bruna Biava de Ribeiro, Caroline Bertholini Walker, Catherine Cecília Fernandes, Henrique Jorge Souza, Andréa Roberto Duarte Lopes Ítavo, Camila Celeste Brandão Ferreira Feijó, Gelson Luis Dias |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Menezes, Bruna Biava de Ribeiro, Caroline Bertholini Walker, Catherine Cecília Fernandes, Henrique Jorge Souza, Andréa Roberto Duarte Lopes Ítavo, Camila Celeste Brandão Ferreira Feijó, Gelson Luis Dias |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Morais, Maria da Graça Menezes, Bruna Biava de Ribeiro, Caroline Bertholini Walker, Catherine Cecília Fernandes, Henrique Jorge Souza, Andréa Roberto Duarte Lopes Ítavo, Camila Celeste Brandão Ferreira Feijó, Gelson Luis Dias |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Ribeye area Body composition Fat thickness Ovine. Área de olho de lombo Componentes corporais Espessura de gordura Ovinos. |
topic |
Ribeye area Body composition Fat thickness Ovine. Área de olho de lombo Componentes corporais Espessura de gordura Ovinos. |
description |
The present work aimed at evaluating models that predict the proportion of bone, muscle, and fat in ewe lamb carcasses using in vivo data obtained from the 9th to 11th rib section and from the 12th rib. A study population of 30 wooled ewe lambs, derived from Texel breed crosses, were fed with different concentrate levels (0%, 20%, 40%, 60%, and 80%) and slaughtered at a weight of 37.70 ± 10.23 kg. Carcass fat content (FC%) and muscle content (MC%) were estimated from models using the proportion of muscle and fat in the 9th to 11th rib section or in the 12th rib, with or without additional data regarding subcutaneous fat thickness (SFT mm) or carcass ribeye area (RA cm2). Carcass bone content (BC%) was predicted based on the proportion of bones in the 9th to 11th rib section or in the 12th rib. Modeling with in vivo data included fasting body weight (FBW), withers height (WH), and ultrasound measurements of SFT and RA. The FC% could be estimated from the carcass SFT and fat content in the 12th rib. The MC% was more accurately predicted from the proportion of muscles in the 9th to 11th rib section and from carcass RA. The 9th to 11th rib section provided the most accurate data for the prediction of BC%. To determine FC% and MC% from in vivo inputs, the model must include FBW and WH. In vivo FBW measurements alone allow for the estimation of BC%. We recommend the use of 12th rib composition for the accurate estimation of carcass fat content, and the use of the 9th and 11th rib section for the prediction of carcass muscle and bone content. Models using in vivo data for the prediction of fat, muscle, and bone in ewe lambs should incorporate FBW and WH. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-04-26 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Pesquisa Empírica de Campo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/21663 10.5433/1679-0359.2016v37n2p1081 |
url |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/21663 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5433/1679-0359.2016v37n2p1081 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/21663/18727 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UEL |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UEL |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 37 No. 2 (2016); 1081-1090 Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 37 n. 2 (2016); 1081-1090 1679-0359 1676-546X reponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) instacron:UEL |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
instacron_str |
UEL |
institution |
UEL |
reponame_str |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
collection |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
semina.agrarias@uel.br |
_version_ |
1799306073979486208 |