Models predict the proportion of bone, muscle, and fat in ewe lamb carcasses from in vivo measurements of the 9th to 11th rib section and of the 12th rib

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Morais, Maria da Graça
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Menezes, Bruna Biava de, Ribeiro, Caroline Bertholini, Walker, Catherine Cecília, Fernandes, Henrique Jorge, Souza, Andréa Roberto Duarte Lopes, Ítavo, Camila Celeste Brandão Ferreira, Feijó, Gelson Luis Dias
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/21663
Resumo: The present work aimed at evaluating models that predict the proportion of bone, muscle, and fat in ewe lamb carcasses using in vivo data obtained from the 9th to 11th rib section and from the 12th rib. A study population of 30 wooled ewe lambs, derived from Texel breed crosses, were fed with different concentrate levels (0%, 20%, 40%, 60%, and 80%) and slaughtered at a weight of 37.70 ± 10.23 kg. Carcass fat content (FC%) and muscle content (MC%) were estimated from models using the proportion of muscle and fat in the 9th to 11th rib section or in the 12th rib, with or without additional data regarding subcutaneous fat thickness (SFT mm) or carcass ribeye area (RA cm2). Carcass bone content (BC%) was predicted based on the proportion of bones in the 9th to 11th rib section or in the 12th rib. Modeling with in vivo data included fasting body weight (FBW), withers height (WH), and ultrasound measurements of SFT and RA. The FC% could be estimated from the carcass SFT and fat content in the 12th rib. The MC% was more accurately predicted from the proportion of muscles in the 9th to 11th rib section and from carcass RA. The 9th to 11th rib section provided the most accurate data for the prediction of BC%. To determine FC% and MC% from in vivo inputs, the model must include FBW and WH. In vivo FBW measurements alone allow for the estimation of BC%. We recommend the use of 12th rib composition for the accurate estimation of carcass fat content, and the use of the 9th and 11th rib section for the prediction of carcass muscle and bone content. Models using in vivo data for the prediction of fat, muscle, and bone in ewe lambs should incorporate FBW and WH.
id UEL-11_72a8a564d3372c7096afddb83fcd7433
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/21663
network_acronym_str UEL-11
network_name_str Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Models predict the proportion of bone, muscle, and fat in ewe lamb carcasses from in vivo measurements of the 9th to 11th rib section and of the 12th ribModelos para predição das proporções de ossos, músculos e gordura da carcaça de borregas por medidas obtidas in vivo, na seção entre a 9ª e 11ª costelas e 12ª costelaRibeye areaBody compositionFat thicknessOvine.Área de olho de lomboComponentes corporaisEspessura de gorduraOvinos.The present work aimed at evaluating models that predict the proportion of bone, muscle, and fat in ewe lamb carcasses using in vivo data obtained from the 9th to 11th rib section and from the 12th rib. A study population of 30 wooled ewe lambs, derived from Texel breed crosses, were fed with different concentrate levels (0%, 20%, 40%, 60%, and 80%) and slaughtered at a weight of 37.70 ± 10.23 kg. Carcass fat content (FC%) and muscle content (MC%) were estimated from models using the proportion of muscle and fat in the 9th to 11th rib section or in the 12th rib, with or without additional data regarding subcutaneous fat thickness (SFT mm) or carcass ribeye area (RA cm2). Carcass bone content (BC%) was predicted based on the proportion of bones in the 9th to 11th rib section or in the 12th rib. Modeling with in vivo data included fasting body weight (FBW), withers height (WH), and ultrasound measurements of SFT and RA. The FC% could be estimated from the carcass SFT and fat content in the 12th rib. The MC% was more accurately predicted from the proportion of muscles in the 9th to 11th rib section and from carcass RA. The 9th to 11th rib section provided the most accurate data for the prediction of BC%. To determine FC% and MC% from in vivo inputs, the model must include FBW and WH. In vivo FBW measurements alone allow for the estimation of BC%. We recommend the use of 12th rib composition for the accurate estimation of carcass fat content, and the use of the 9th and 11th rib section for the prediction of carcass muscle and bone content. Models using in vivo data for the prediction of fat, muscle, and bone in ewe lambs should incorporate FBW and WH.Objetivou-se ajustar e avaliar modelos Pará predição das proporções de Ossos, Músculos e Gordura da Carcaça de Borregas A Partir de Medidas obtidas in vivo, na Seção HH e 12ª costela. Como 30 Borregas lanadas, oriundas de Cruzamentos com ovinos da Raça Texel, foram confinadas, alimentadas com níveis crescentes de Concentrado. (20; 40; 60 e 80%) e abatidas com 37,70 ± 10,23 kg Pará Estimativa da proporção de Gordura (GC%) e músculo (MC%) na Carcaça foram ajustados modelos com SO percentuais de Gordura e músculo da 9ª a 11ª costela (Seção HH) UO da 12ª costela, acompanhados OU NÃO da espessura de Gordura (EGS mm) UO da área de olho de lombo da Carcaça (AOL cm2), respectivamente. a proporção de Ossos da Carcaça (OC%) foi Predito Cabelo percentual de Ossos na Seção HH UO da 12ª costela. Para predição in vivo, foram ajustadas Equações com peso corporal em jejum (PCJ), altura de cernelha (AC), EGS e AOL Medidas POR ultrassom. A GC% PODE Ser Estimada Pela EGS obtida na Carcaça EO Teor de Gordura na 12ª costela. O MC% PODE Ser Predito de forma acurada Mais considerando o Teor de músculo na Seção HH ea AOL da Carcaça. A Seção HH foi o modelo Mais acurado Paragrafo predição da OC%. Para Obtenção da GC% e MC% in vivo OS modelos devem Incluir PCJ e AC. O OC% in vivo PODE Ser Estimado a Partir do PCJ. Recomenda-se a utilização da Composição Física da 12ª costela Paragrafo Estimativa acurada da proporção de Gordura na Carcaça EO USO da Seção HH Paragrafo predição das proporções de músculo e Ossos na Carcaça. Para predição acurada das proporções de Gordura, músculo e Ossos de Borregas in vivo, o modelo DEVE apresentar peso corporal em jejum e Medidas de altura de cernelha.UEL2016-04-26info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPesquisa Empírica de Campoapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/2166310.5433/1679-0359.2016v37n2p1081Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 37 No. 2 (2016); 1081-1090Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 37 n. 2 (2016); 1081-10901679-03591676-546Xreponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELenghttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/21663/18727http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMorais, Maria da GraçaMenezes, Bruna Biava deRibeiro, Caroline BertholiniWalker, Catherine CecíliaFernandes, Henrique JorgeSouza, Andréa Roberto Duarte LopesÍtavo, Camila Celeste Brandão FerreiraFeijó, Gelson Luis Dias2022-12-01T16:52:19Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/21663Revistahttp://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrariasPUBhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/oaisemina.agrarias@uel.br1679-03591676-546Xopendoar:2022-12-01T16:52:19Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Models predict the proportion of bone, muscle, and fat in ewe lamb carcasses from in vivo measurements of the 9th to 11th rib section and of the 12th rib
Modelos para predição das proporções de ossos, músculos e gordura da carcaça de borregas por medidas obtidas in vivo, na seção entre a 9ª e 11ª costelas e 12ª costela
title Models predict the proportion of bone, muscle, and fat in ewe lamb carcasses from in vivo measurements of the 9th to 11th rib section and of the 12th rib
spellingShingle Models predict the proportion of bone, muscle, and fat in ewe lamb carcasses from in vivo measurements of the 9th to 11th rib section and of the 12th rib
Morais, Maria da Graça
Ribeye area
Body composition
Fat thickness
Ovine.
Área de olho de lombo
Componentes corporais
Espessura de gordura
Ovinos.
title_short Models predict the proportion of bone, muscle, and fat in ewe lamb carcasses from in vivo measurements of the 9th to 11th rib section and of the 12th rib
title_full Models predict the proportion of bone, muscle, and fat in ewe lamb carcasses from in vivo measurements of the 9th to 11th rib section and of the 12th rib
title_fullStr Models predict the proportion of bone, muscle, and fat in ewe lamb carcasses from in vivo measurements of the 9th to 11th rib section and of the 12th rib
title_full_unstemmed Models predict the proportion of bone, muscle, and fat in ewe lamb carcasses from in vivo measurements of the 9th to 11th rib section and of the 12th rib
title_sort Models predict the proportion of bone, muscle, and fat in ewe lamb carcasses from in vivo measurements of the 9th to 11th rib section and of the 12th rib
author Morais, Maria da Graça
author_facet Morais, Maria da Graça
Menezes, Bruna Biava de
Ribeiro, Caroline Bertholini
Walker, Catherine Cecília
Fernandes, Henrique Jorge
Souza, Andréa Roberto Duarte Lopes
Ítavo, Camila Celeste Brandão Ferreira
Feijó, Gelson Luis Dias
author_role author
author2 Menezes, Bruna Biava de
Ribeiro, Caroline Bertholini
Walker, Catherine Cecília
Fernandes, Henrique Jorge
Souza, Andréa Roberto Duarte Lopes
Ítavo, Camila Celeste Brandão Ferreira
Feijó, Gelson Luis Dias
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Morais, Maria da Graça
Menezes, Bruna Biava de
Ribeiro, Caroline Bertholini
Walker, Catherine Cecília
Fernandes, Henrique Jorge
Souza, Andréa Roberto Duarte Lopes
Ítavo, Camila Celeste Brandão Ferreira
Feijó, Gelson Luis Dias
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Ribeye area
Body composition
Fat thickness
Ovine.
Área de olho de lombo
Componentes corporais
Espessura de gordura
Ovinos.
topic Ribeye area
Body composition
Fat thickness
Ovine.
Área de olho de lombo
Componentes corporais
Espessura de gordura
Ovinos.
description The present work aimed at evaluating models that predict the proportion of bone, muscle, and fat in ewe lamb carcasses using in vivo data obtained from the 9th to 11th rib section and from the 12th rib. A study population of 30 wooled ewe lambs, derived from Texel breed crosses, were fed with different concentrate levels (0%, 20%, 40%, 60%, and 80%) and slaughtered at a weight of 37.70 ± 10.23 kg. Carcass fat content (FC%) and muscle content (MC%) were estimated from models using the proportion of muscle and fat in the 9th to 11th rib section or in the 12th rib, with or without additional data regarding subcutaneous fat thickness (SFT mm) or carcass ribeye area (RA cm2). Carcass bone content (BC%) was predicted based on the proportion of bones in the 9th to 11th rib section or in the 12th rib. Modeling with in vivo data included fasting body weight (FBW), withers height (WH), and ultrasound measurements of SFT and RA. The FC% could be estimated from the carcass SFT and fat content in the 12th rib. The MC% was more accurately predicted from the proportion of muscles in the 9th to 11th rib section and from carcass RA. The 9th to 11th rib section provided the most accurate data for the prediction of BC%. To determine FC% and MC% from in vivo inputs, the model must include FBW and WH. In vivo FBW measurements alone allow for the estimation of BC%. We recommend the use of 12th rib composition for the accurate estimation of carcass fat content, and the use of the 9th and 11th rib section for the prediction of carcass muscle and bone content. Models using in vivo data for the prediction of fat, muscle, and bone in ewe lambs should incorporate FBW and WH.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-04-26
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Pesquisa Empírica de Campo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/21663
10.5433/1679-0359.2016v37n2p1081
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/21663
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/1679-0359.2016v37n2p1081
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/21663/18727
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 37 No. 2 (2016); 1081-1090
Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 37 n. 2 (2016); 1081-1090
1679-0359
1676-546X
reponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
collection Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv semina.agrarias@uel.br
_version_ 1799306073979486208