Use of by-products in a total mixed ration silage

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Marocco, Daison Henrique
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Favero, Patrick, Guralski, Rodrigo, Basi, Clovisnei, Zacaron, Wilson, Solivo, Gabriela, Zotti, Claiton André
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/39434
Resumo: The objective of this study was to evaluated fermentation losses and silage quality with the addition of different by-products in TMR. A completely randomized design was used with four treatments: Control (CTL, with hay, corn silage, cracked corn, soybean meal, wheat bran and minerals); CTL plus the addition of fresh orange pulp (FOP); CTL plus soybean hulls (SBH) or CTL plus wet brewery wastes (WBW), with six replicates. The ingredients were mixed and ensiled in 24 PVC experimental silos. After 56 days of ensiling, fermentation losses (effluents, dry matter and gases), and the TMR silage pH and chemical composition were analyzed; aerobic stability was evaluated over seven days after the silos were opened. Lower dry matter (P ? 0.0001) was observed in TMR ensiled with wet (WBW and FOP) compared to dry (SBH) by-products. Greater ADF (P = 0.031) was observed in SBH when compared to others by-products. WBW and FOP increased dry matter (P ? 0.0001) and effluent losses (P ? 0.0001) when compared to CTL and SBH. SBH treatment remained stable after 176-hour, which differ (P = 0.0015) compared with the other treatments (range from 94.5 to 99 hours of exposure to air). The density (kg DM/m3) changed (P ? 0.0001) among treatments. The inclusion of SBH in TMR silages had the greatest density, followed by CTL, WBW and FOP. The density was negatively correlated with DM losses ( r= - 0,81; P ? 0.0001). The pH differ (P = 0.003) among treatments. Highest pH of TMR silage was observed for SBH (3,67) and the lowest (3,56) for FOP. Soybean hulls successful improved aerobic stability and density, whereas aerobic stability and density were decreased and fermentation losses increased when fresh orange pulp and wet brewery were used. Little effects on chemical composition were observed, thereby agro-industrial by-products can be used in TMR silages as long as there is adequate product availability and pricing.
id UEL-11_747f0d7c887c9010baca9bc53327af46
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/39434
network_acronym_str UEL-11
network_name_str Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Use of by-products in a total mixed ration silageUso de subprodutos na silagem de ração total misturadaAerobic stabilityFermentation lossesTotal mixed ration.Estabilidade aeróbicaPerdas fermentativasRação total misturada.The objective of this study was to evaluated fermentation losses and silage quality with the addition of different by-products in TMR. A completely randomized design was used with four treatments: Control (CTL, with hay, corn silage, cracked corn, soybean meal, wheat bran and minerals); CTL plus the addition of fresh orange pulp (FOP); CTL plus soybean hulls (SBH) or CTL plus wet brewery wastes (WBW), with six replicates. The ingredients were mixed and ensiled in 24 PVC experimental silos. After 56 days of ensiling, fermentation losses (effluents, dry matter and gases), and the TMR silage pH and chemical composition were analyzed; aerobic stability was evaluated over seven days after the silos were opened. Lower dry matter (P ? 0.0001) was observed in TMR ensiled with wet (WBW and FOP) compared to dry (SBH) by-products. Greater ADF (P = 0.031) was observed in SBH when compared to others by-products. WBW and FOP increased dry matter (P ? 0.0001) and effluent losses (P ? 0.0001) when compared to CTL and SBH. SBH treatment remained stable after 176-hour, which differ (P = 0.0015) compared with the other treatments (range from 94.5 to 99 hours of exposure to air). The density (kg DM/m3) changed (P ? 0.0001) among treatments. The inclusion of SBH in TMR silages had the greatest density, followed by CTL, WBW and FOP. The density was negatively correlated with DM losses ( r= - 0,81; P ? 0.0001). The pH differ (P = 0.003) among treatments. Highest pH of TMR silage was observed for SBH (3,67) and the lowest (3,56) for FOP. Soybean hulls successful improved aerobic stability and density, whereas aerobic stability and density were decreased and fermentation losses increased when fresh orange pulp and wet brewery were used. Little effects on chemical composition were observed, thereby agro-industrial by-products can be used in TMR silages as long as there is adequate product availability and pricing.Objetivou-se avaliar as perdas fermentativas e qualidade química da ração total misturada (TMR) ensilada com a adição de diferentes subprodutos da indústria. Um delineamento inteiramente casualizado com quatro tratamentos foi utilizado: CTL (Feno, silagem de milho, milho quirera, farelo de soja, farelo de trigo e mistura mineral), FOP (CTL com adição de bagaço de laranja in-natura), ou SBH (CTL com adição de casca de soja) e WBW (CTL com adição de resíduo úmido de cervejaria), utilizando-se seis repetições por tratamento. Os ingredientes foram misturados e armazenados em 24 silos experimentais de PVC. Após 56 dias de armazenamento, as perdas fermentativas (efluentes, perda de matéria seca e produção de gases), e o pH, composição bromatológica e estabilidade aeróbica durante 7 dias das silagens de TMR foram mensuradas. Menor teor de MS (P ? 0,0001) foi observado para TMR ensiladas com resíduos úmidos (WBW e FOP) comparado com SBH. O uso de SBH apresentou maior teor de FDA (P = 0,031) comparado aos demais tratamentos. Adição de WBW e FOP aumentou as perdas de matéria seca (P ? 0,0001) e efluentes (P ? 0,0001) em relação a CTL e SBH. O tratamento SBH não apresentou quebra de estabilidade (176 horas), diferindo (P = 0,0015) em relação aos outros tratamentos (variação de 94,5 a 99 horas de exposição ao ar). A densidade (kg MS/m3) foi diferente (P ? 0.0001) entre os tratamentos. A inclusão de SBH na silagem de TMR apresentou as maiores densidades, seguido pelo tratamento CTL, WBW e FOP. A densidade teve correlação negative com as perdas de MS ( r= - 0,81; P ? 0.0001). O pH diferiu entre tratamento (P = 0,003), sendo maior para CSC (3,67) e menor para BLI (3,56). O tratamento casca de soja apresentou a melhor estabilidade aeróbia e densidade, enquanto a estabilidade e densidade diminuíram e as perdas fermentativas aumentaram quando bagaço de laranja in-natura e resíduo úmido de cervejaria foram utilizados. Apesar das diferenças na composição das TMR ensiladas, a adição dos subprodutos pode ser uma opção adequada desde que haja disponibilidade e preço viável.UEL2020-11-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado por paresapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/3943410.5433/1679-0359.2020v41n6Supl2p3473Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 41 No. 6Supl2 (2020); 3473-3480Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 41 n. 6Supl2 (2020); 3473-34801679-03591676-546Xreponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELenghttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/39434/28303Copyright (c) 2020 Semina: Ciências Agráriashttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMarocco, Daison HenriqueFavero, PatrickGuralski, RodrigoBasi, ClovisneiZacaron, WilsonSolivo, GabrielaZotti, Claiton André2022-10-06T16:43:04Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/39434Revistahttp://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrariasPUBhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/oaisemina.agrarias@uel.br1679-03591676-546Xopendoar:2022-10-06T16:43:04Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Use of by-products in a total mixed ration silage
Uso de subprodutos na silagem de ração total misturada
title Use of by-products in a total mixed ration silage
spellingShingle Use of by-products in a total mixed ration silage
Marocco, Daison Henrique
Aerobic stability
Fermentation losses
Total mixed ration.
Estabilidade aeróbica
Perdas fermentativas
Ração total misturada.
title_short Use of by-products in a total mixed ration silage
title_full Use of by-products in a total mixed ration silage
title_fullStr Use of by-products in a total mixed ration silage
title_full_unstemmed Use of by-products in a total mixed ration silage
title_sort Use of by-products in a total mixed ration silage
author Marocco, Daison Henrique
author_facet Marocco, Daison Henrique
Favero, Patrick
Guralski, Rodrigo
Basi, Clovisnei
Zacaron, Wilson
Solivo, Gabriela
Zotti, Claiton André
author_role author
author2 Favero, Patrick
Guralski, Rodrigo
Basi, Clovisnei
Zacaron, Wilson
Solivo, Gabriela
Zotti, Claiton André
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Marocco, Daison Henrique
Favero, Patrick
Guralski, Rodrigo
Basi, Clovisnei
Zacaron, Wilson
Solivo, Gabriela
Zotti, Claiton André
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Aerobic stability
Fermentation losses
Total mixed ration.
Estabilidade aeróbica
Perdas fermentativas
Ração total misturada.
topic Aerobic stability
Fermentation losses
Total mixed ration.
Estabilidade aeróbica
Perdas fermentativas
Ração total misturada.
description The objective of this study was to evaluated fermentation losses and silage quality with the addition of different by-products in TMR. A completely randomized design was used with four treatments: Control (CTL, with hay, corn silage, cracked corn, soybean meal, wheat bran and minerals); CTL plus the addition of fresh orange pulp (FOP); CTL plus soybean hulls (SBH) or CTL plus wet brewery wastes (WBW), with six replicates. The ingredients were mixed and ensiled in 24 PVC experimental silos. After 56 days of ensiling, fermentation losses (effluents, dry matter and gases), and the TMR silage pH and chemical composition were analyzed; aerobic stability was evaluated over seven days after the silos were opened. Lower dry matter (P ? 0.0001) was observed in TMR ensiled with wet (WBW and FOP) compared to dry (SBH) by-products. Greater ADF (P = 0.031) was observed in SBH when compared to others by-products. WBW and FOP increased dry matter (P ? 0.0001) and effluent losses (P ? 0.0001) when compared to CTL and SBH. SBH treatment remained stable after 176-hour, which differ (P = 0.0015) compared with the other treatments (range from 94.5 to 99 hours of exposure to air). The density (kg DM/m3) changed (P ? 0.0001) among treatments. The inclusion of SBH in TMR silages had the greatest density, followed by CTL, WBW and FOP. The density was negatively correlated with DM losses ( r= - 0,81; P ? 0.0001). The pH differ (P = 0.003) among treatments. Highest pH of TMR silage was observed for SBH (3,67) and the lowest (3,56) for FOP. Soybean hulls successful improved aerobic stability and density, whereas aerobic stability and density were decreased and fermentation losses increased when fresh orange pulp and wet brewery were used. Little effects on chemical composition were observed, thereby agro-industrial by-products can be used in TMR silages as long as there is adequate product availability and pricing.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-11-06
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Avaliado por pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/39434
10.5433/1679-0359.2020v41n6Supl2p3473
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/39434
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/1679-0359.2020v41n6Supl2p3473
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/39434/28303
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Semina: Ciências Agrárias
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Semina: Ciências Agrárias
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 41 No. 6Supl2 (2020); 3473-3480
Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 41 n. 6Supl2 (2020); 3473-3480
1679-0359
1676-546X
reponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
collection Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv semina.agrarias@uel.br
_version_ 1799306082763407360