Sugarcane total mixed ration silage ensiling with chitosan and homolactic microbial inoculant: characteristics of silage and animal digestion

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: GANDRA,Jefferson Rodrigues
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: MACHADO,Fábio Souza, PEDRINI,Cibeli de Almeida, OLIVEIRA,Euclides Reuter, GOES,Rafael Henrique de Tonissi Buschinelli, GANDRA,Erika Rosendo de Sena, TAKIYA,Caio Seiti
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Saúde e Produção Animal
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1519-99402022000100606
Resumo: ABSTRACT This study aimed to evaluate total mixed ration silages with sugarcane and the additives microbial inoculant and chitosan. Thirty mini-silos were used in a completely randomized design, with three treatments and ten replications. Silages were composed of sugarcane mixed with corn bran, whole soybean, urea, and mineral mixtures at a 50:50 roughage to concentrate ratio. Treatments consisted of control silage, microbial additive (Lactobacillus plantarum + Pediococcus acidilactici, 4 g/t of KeraSil, Kera Nutrição Animal), and chitosan (10 g/kg of natural matter). Silages were evaluated for fermentation and microbiological profile, fermentation losses, aerobic stability, chemical-bromatological composition, intake, and digestibility. Fermentation profile showed no significant difference between treatments for pH values, with a mean value of 4.79. Production of acetic and propionic acids showed no difference between treatments, with mean values of 7.34 and 0.053 mmol/kg DM, respectively. Dry matter, organic matter, and crude protein intake of the total mixed ration silage differed statistically from the other treatments (P<0.05), but fresh sugarcane and sugarcane silage intake did not differ from each other (P>0.05). Digestibility values of DM, OM, and NDF were higher in the total mixed ration silage (P<0.05), while sugarcane silage and fresh sugarcane showed no difference from each other (P>0.05). Total mixed ration silage increased nutrient intake and digestibility, with a better fermentation pattern when added with the microbial inoculant.
id UFBA-3_1411a96944ae81f7ce4a86fa9b1772de
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1519-99402022000100606
network_acronym_str UFBA-3
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Saúde e Produção Animal
repository_id_str
spelling Sugarcane total mixed ration silage ensiling with chitosan and homolactic microbial inoculant: characteristics of silage and animal digestiondigestibilityruminantssilageinoculantstotal mixed rationABSTRACT This study aimed to evaluate total mixed ration silages with sugarcane and the additives microbial inoculant and chitosan. Thirty mini-silos were used in a completely randomized design, with three treatments and ten replications. Silages were composed of sugarcane mixed with corn bran, whole soybean, urea, and mineral mixtures at a 50:50 roughage to concentrate ratio. Treatments consisted of control silage, microbial additive (Lactobacillus plantarum + Pediococcus acidilactici, 4 g/t of KeraSil, Kera Nutrição Animal), and chitosan (10 g/kg of natural matter). Silages were evaluated for fermentation and microbiological profile, fermentation losses, aerobic stability, chemical-bromatological composition, intake, and digestibility. Fermentation profile showed no significant difference between treatments for pH values, with a mean value of 4.79. Production of acetic and propionic acids showed no difference between treatments, with mean values of 7.34 and 0.053 mmol/kg DM, respectively. Dry matter, organic matter, and crude protein intake of the total mixed ration silage differed statistically from the other treatments (P<0.05), but fresh sugarcane and sugarcane silage intake did not differ from each other (P>0.05). Digestibility values of DM, OM, and NDF were higher in the total mixed ration silage (P<0.05), while sugarcane silage and fresh sugarcane showed no difference from each other (P>0.05). Total mixed ration silage increased nutrient intake and digestibility, with a better fermentation pattern when added with the microbial inoculant.UFBA - Universidade Federal da Bahia2022-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1519-99402022000100606Revista Brasileira de Saúde e Produção Animal v.23 2022reponame:Revista Brasileira de Saúde e Produção Animalinstname:Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA)instacron:UFBA10.1590/s1519-9940202200142022info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGANDRA,Jefferson RodriguesMACHADO,Fábio SouzaPEDRINI,Cibeli de AlmeidaOLIVEIRA,Euclides ReuterGOES,Rafael Henrique de Tonissi BuschinelliGANDRA,Erika Rosendo de SenaTAKIYA,Caio Seitieng2022-10-24T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1519-99402022000100606Revistahttp://www.rbspa.ufba.br/PUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||rbspa@ufba.br1519-99401519-9940opendoar:2022-10-24T00:00Revista Brasileira de Saúde e Produção Animal - Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Sugarcane total mixed ration silage ensiling with chitosan and homolactic microbial inoculant: characteristics of silage and animal digestion
title Sugarcane total mixed ration silage ensiling with chitosan and homolactic microbial inoculant: characteristics of silage and animal digestion
spellingShingle Sugarcane total mixed ration silage ensiling with chitosan and homolactic microbial inoculant: characteristics of silage and animal digestion
GANDRA,Jefferson Rodrigues
digestibility
ruminants
silage
inoculants
total mixed ration
title_short Sugarcane total mixed ration silage ensiling with chitosan and homolactic microbial inoculant: characteristics of silage and animal digestion
title_full Sugarcane total mixed ration silage ensiling with chitosan and homolactic microbial inoculant: characteristics of silage and animal digestion
title_fullStr Sugarcane total mixed ration silage ensiling with chitosan and homolactic microbial inoculant: characteristics of silage and animal digestion
title_full_unstemmed Sugarcane total mixed ration silage ensiling with chitosan and homolactic microbial inoculant: characteristics of silage and animal digestion
title_sort Sugarcane total mixed ration silage ensiling with chitosan and homolactic microbial inoculant: characteristics of silage and animal digestion
author GANDRA,Jefferson Rodrigues
author_facet GANDRA,Jefferson Rodrigues
MACHADO,Fábio Souza
PEDRINI,Cibeli de Almeida
OLIVEIRA,Euclides Reuter
GOES,Rafael Henrique de Tonissi Buschinelli
GANDRA,Erika Rosendo de Sena
TAKIYA,Caio Seiti
author_role author
author2 MACHADO,Fábio Souza
PEDRINI,Cibeli de Almeida
OLIVEIRA,Euclides Reuter
GOES,Rafael Henrique de Tonissi Buschinelli
GANDRA,Erika Rosendo de Sena
TAKIYA,Caio Seiti
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv GANDRA,Jefferson Rodrigues
MACHADO,Fábio Souza
PEDRINI,Cibeli de Almeida
OLIVEIRA,Euclides Reuter
GOES,Rafael Henrique de Tonissi Buschinelli
GANDRA,Erika Rosendo de Sena
TAKIYA,Caio Seiti
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv digestibility
ruminants
silage
inoculants
total mixed ration
topic digestibility
ruminants
silage
inoculants
total mixed ration
description ABSTRACT This study aimed to evaluate total mixed ration silages with sugarcane and the additives microbial inoculant and chitosan. Thirty mini-silos were used in a completely randomized design, with three treatments and ten replications. Silages were composed of sugarcane mixed with corn bran, whole soybean, urea, and mineral mixtures at a 50:50 roughage to concentrate ratio. Treatments consisted of control silage, microbial additive (Lactobacillus plantarum + Pediococcus acidilactici, 4 g/t of KeraSil, Kera Nutrição Animal), and chitosan (10 g/kg of natural matter). Silages were evaluated for fermentation and microbiological profile, fermentation losses, aerobic stability, chemical-bromatological composition, intake, and digestibility. Fermentation profile showed no significant difference between treatments for pH values, with a mean value of 4.79. Production of acetic and propionic acids showed no difference between treatments, with mean values of 7.34 and 0.053 mmol/kg DM, respectively. Dry matter, organic matter, and crude protein intake of the total mixed ration silage differed statistically from the other treatments (P<0.05), but fresh sugarcane and sugarcane silage intake did not differ from each other (P>0.05). Digestibility values of DM, OM, and NDF were higher in the total mixed ration silage (P<0.05), while sugarcane silage and fresh sugarcane showed no difference from each other (P>0.05). Total mixed ration silage increased nutrient intake and digestibility, with a better fermentation pattern when added with the microbial inoculant.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1519-99402022000100606
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1519-99402022000100606
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/s1519-9940202200142022
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UFBA - Universidade Federal da Bahia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UFBA - Universidade Federal da Bahia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Saúde e Produção Animal v.23 2022
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Saúde e Produção Animal
instname:Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA)
instacron:UFBA
instname_str Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA)
instacron_str UFBA
institution UFBA
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Saúde e Produção Animal
collection Revista Brasileira de Saúde e Produção Animal
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Saúde e Produção Animal - Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||rbspa@ufba.br
_version_ 1750297509083742208