Is just considering texture enough to define compaction on the basis of soil density?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Tavares Filho, João
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Gonçalves, Nathalia Schiavo, Moraes, Juliana Gimenes de
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/47637
Resumo: The bulk density values indicative of compaction in clayey soils correspond to a wide range of values (1.30-1.47 Mg m-3), due to the diverse types of soil management. Our hypothesis is that if we consider bulk density values within similar management groups (those that fall to the ground and those that do not fall), the values will be more accurate within each management group. Our objective in this work was to analyze using the concepts of (Yates & Cochran, 1938; Whitehead, 2002) what is a suitable statistical way of grouping these results to reach a consensus regarding a tested hypothesis, the greatest number of density values surveyed between 1977 and 2021, considered for the study of compaction in clayey Oxisols under different managements, to verify whether our hypothesis will be confirmed. We selected 1,521 studies with bulk densities in the literature, corresponding to 44 years (1977 and 2021), which were analyzed by a statistical technique that integrates the results of two or more independent studies on the same subject and combines them into a summary measure (portion forestry). From the data collected in the literature, it was possible to separate two groups of bulk density and management in clayey soils indicative of compaction: the managements that perform little or no manipulation of the soil, such as pasture and no-tillage, densities between 1.41-1.45 Mg.m-3 (average 1.43 Mg m-3), and for the others, such as conventional plowing and minimum tillage, soil densities between 1.31-1.38 Mg.m-3 (average 1.35 Mg m-3). Finally, we conclude that compaction must be analyzed considering the texture and type of soil management.
id UEL-11_9f7a9cabe15495a33b817bfd93a77d14
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/47637
network_acronym_str UEL-11
network_name_str Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Is just considering texture enough to define compaction on the basis of soil density?Considerar apenas a textura é suficiente para definir a compactação a patir da densidade do solo?CompactionBulk densityPastureNo-tillageConventional tillageMinimum tillage.CompactaçãoDensidade do soloPastagemPlantio diretoPreparo convencionalCultivo mínimo.The bulk density values indicative of compaction in clayey soils correspond to a wide range of values (1.30-1.47 Mg m-3), due to the diverse types of soil management. Our hypothesis is that if we consider bulk density values within similar management groups (those that fall to the ground and those that do not fall), the values will be more accurate within each management group. Our objective in this work was to analyze using the concepts of (Yates & Cochran, 1938; Whitehead, 2002) what is a suitable statistical way of grouping these results to reach a consensus regarding a tested hypothesis, the greatest number of density values surveyed between 1977 and 2021, considered for the study of compaction in clayey Oxisols under different managements, to verify whether our hypothesis will be confirmed. We selected 1,521 studies with bulk densities in the literature, corresponding to 44 years (1977 and 2021), which were analyzed by a statistical technique that integrates the results of two or more independent studies on the same subject and combines them into a summary measure (portion forestry). From the data collected in the literature, it was possible to separate two groups of bulk density and management in clayey soils indicative of compaction: the managements that perform little or no manipulation of the soil, such as pasture and no-tillage, densities between 1.41-1.45 Mg.m-3 (average 1.43 Mg m-3), and for the others, such as conventional plowing and minimum tillage, soil densities between 1.31-1.38 Mg.m-3 (average 1.35 Mg m-3). Finally, we conclude that compaction must be analyzed considering the texture and type of soil management.Os valores de densidade do solo indicativos de compactação em solos argilosos correspondem a uma ampla faixa de valores (1,30-1,47 Mg m-3), devido aos diversos tipos de manejo do solo. Nossa hipótese é que se considerarmos os valores de densidade do solo dentro de grupos de manejo semelhantes (os que caem no chão e os que não caem), os valores serão mais precisos dentro de cada grupo de manejo. Nosso objetivo neste trabalho foi analisar usando os conceitos de (Yates & Cochran, 1938; Whitehead, 2002) qual é uma forma estatística adequada de agrupar esses resultados para chegar a um consenso sobre uma hipótese testada, o maior número dos valores de densidade levantados entre 1977 e 2021, considerados para o estudo da compactação em Latossolos argilosos sob diferentes manejos, para verificar se nossa hipótese será confirmada. Selecionamos 1.521 estudos com densidades do solo na literatura, correspondentes a 44 anos (1977 e 2021), que foram analisados por uma técnica estatística que integra os resultados de dois ou mais estudos independentes sobre o mesmo assunto e os combina em uma medida resumida (forest plot). A partir dos dados levantados na literatura, foi possível separar dois grupos de densidade do solo e manejo em solos argilosos indicativos de compactação: os manejos que realizam pouca ou nenhuma manipulação do solo, como pastagem e plantio direto, densidades entre 1,41 -1,45 Mg.m-3 (média 1,43 Mg m-3), e para as demais, como aração convencional e preparo mínimo, densidades de solo entre 1,31-1,38 Mg.m-3 (média 1,35 Mg m-3). Por fim, concluímos que a compactação deve ser analisada considerando a textura e o tipo de manejo do solo.UEL2023-06-26info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/4763710.5433/1679-0359.2023v44n2p895Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 44 No. 2 (2023); 895-910Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 44 n. 2 (2023); 895-9101679-03591676-546Xreponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELenghttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/47637/48998Copyright (c) 2023 Semina: Ciências Agráriashttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessTavares Filho, JoãoGonçalves, Nathalia SchiavoMoraes, Juliana Gimenes de2023-07-04T19:57:32Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/47637Revistahttp://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrariasPUBhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/oaisemina.agrarias@uel.br1679-03591676-546Xopendoar:2023-07-04T19:57:32Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Is just considering texture enough to define compaction on the basis of soil density?
Considerar apenas a textura é suficiente para definir a compactação a patir da densidade do solo?
title Is just considering texture enough to define compaction on the basis of soil density?
spellingShingle Is just considering texture enough to define compaction on the basis of soil density?
Tavares Filho, João
Compaction
Bulk density
Pasture
No-tillage
Conventional tillage
Minimum tillage.
Compactação
Densidade do solo
Pastagem
Plantio direto
Preparo convencional
Cultivo mínimo.
title_short Is just considering texture enough to define compaction on the basis of soil density?
title_full Is just considering texture enough to define compaction on the basis of soil density?
title_fullStr Is just considering texture enough to define compaction on the basis of soil density?
title_full_unstemmed Is just considering texture enough to define compaction on the basis of soil density?
title_sort Is just considering texture enough to define compaction on the basis of soil density?
author Tavares Filho, João
author_facet Tavares Filho, João
Gonçalves, Nathalia Schiavo
Moraes, Juliana Gimenes de
author_role author
author2 Gonçalves, Nathalia Schiavo
Moraes, Juliana Gimenes de
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Tavares Filho, João
Gonçalves, Nathalia Schiavo
Moraes, Juliana Gimenes de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Compaction
Bulk density
Pasture
No-tillage
Conventional tillage
Minimum tillage.
Compactação
Densidade do solo
Pastagem
Plantio direto
Preparo convencional
Cultivo mínimo.
topic Compaction
Bulk density
Pasture
No-tillage
Conventional tillage
Minimum tillage.
Compactação
Densidade do solo
Pastagem
Plantio direto
Preparo convencional
Cultivo mínimo.
description The bulk density values indicative of compaction in clayey soils correspond to a wide range of values (1.30-1.47 Mg m-3), due to the diverse types of soil management. Our hypothesis is that if we consider bulk density values within similar management groups (those that fall to the ground and those that do not fall), the values will be more accurate within each management group. Our objective in this work was to analyze using the concepts of (Yates & Cochran, 1938; Whitehead, 2002) what is a suitable statistical way of grouping these results to reach a consensus regarding a tested hypothesis, the greatest number of density values surveyed between 1977 and 2021, considered for the study of compaction in clayey Oxisols under different managements, to verify whether our hypothesis will be confirmed. We selected 1,521 studies with bulk densities in the literature, corresponding to 44 years (1977 and 2021), which were analyzed by a statistical technique that integrates the results of two or more independent studies on the same subject and combines them into a summary measure (portion forestry). From the data collected in the literature, it was possible to separate two groups of bulk density and management in clayey soils indicative of compaction: the managements that perform little or no manipulation of the soil, such as pasture and no-tillage, densities between 1.41-1.45 Mg.m-3 (average 1.43 Mg m-3), and for the others, such as conventional plowing and minimum tillage, soil densities between 1.31-1.38 Mg.m-3 (average 1.35 Mg m-3). Finally, we conclude that compaction must be analyzed considering the texture and type of soil management.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-06-26
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/47637
10.5433/1679-0359.2023v44n2p895
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/47637
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/1679-0359.2023v44n2p895
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/47637/48998
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Semina: Ciências Agrárias
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Semina: Ciências Agrárias
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 44 No. 2 (2023); 895-910
Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 44 n. 2 (2023); 895-910
1679-0359
1676-546X
reponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
collection Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv semina.agrarias@uel.br
_version_ 1799306086960857088