Economic impacts of space allowance per animal on beef cattle feedlot

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Montelli, Natalia Ludmila Lins Lima
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Macitelli, Fernanda, Braga, Janaina da Silva, Costa, Mateus José Rodrigues Paranhos da
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/35352
Resumo: The objective of this study was to assess the economic outcomes of three space allowances (6, 12, and 24 m2 per animal) for outdoor feedlots-finished beef cattle. Simulations considered confinement systems with a static capacity of 5,000 animals per cycle and two 86-day cycles per year. Performance data were obtained from 1,350 uncastrated bovine males. An increase in space allowance elevated the fixed cost per animal. Fixed and variable costs represented 3% and 93% of the total operating cost, respectively. For variable costs, around 70% was used for purchasing cattle and 17% for purchasing feed. The operating profit per animal increased as space allowance increased (R$ 80.90, R$ 102.00, and R$ 109.00 for 6, 12, and 24 m2 per animal, respectively). The three feedlot systems recovered the initial investment and had a positive net present value. In addition, the internal rates of return were 22%, 27%, and 25%, and the probabilities of financial loss were 33%, 29%, and 26% for pen sizes of 6, 12, and 24 m2 per animal, respectively. Therefore, larger space allowances improve profitability and reduce the risk of financial loss.
id UEL-11_a8f16ba3d15da854959f2b93e4541e5d
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/35352
network_acronym_str UEL-11
network_name_str Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Economic impacts of space allowance per animal on beef cattle feedlotImpactos econômicos do espaço disponível por animal em confinamentos bovinosInvestment analysisRisk analysisBeef cattleNelloreFinishing system.Análise de investimentoAnálise de riscoBovinos de corteNeloreSistema de terminação.The objective of this study was to assess the economic outcomes of three space allowances (6, 12, and 24 m2 per animal) for outdoor feedlots-finished beef cattle. Simulations considered confinement systems with a static capacity of 5,000 animals per cycle and two 86-day cycles per year. Performance data were obtained from 1,350 uncastrated bovine males. An increase in space allowance elevated the fixed cost per animal. Fixed and variable costs represented 3% and 93% of the total operating cost, respectively. For variable costs, around 70% was used for purchasing cattle and 17% for purchasing feed. The operating profit per animal increased as space allowance increased (R$ 80.90, R$ 102.00, and R$ 109.00 for 6, 12, and 24 m2 per animal, respectively). The three feedlot systems recovered the initial investment and had a positive net present value. In addition, the internal rates of return were 22%, 27%, and 25%, and the probabilities of financial loss were 33%, 29%, and 26% for pen sizes of 6, 12, and 24 m2 per animal, respectively. Therefore, larger space allowances improve profitability and reduce the risk of financial loss.O objetivo com este estudo foi avaliar os resultados econômicos de confinamento de bovinos com três espaços disponíveis por animal (6, 12 e 24 m2 por animal). Para as simulações considerou-se confinamentos com capacidade estática de 5.000 animais por ciclo e dois ciclos de 86 dias por ano. Os dados de desempenho foram obtidos de 1.350 bovinos não castrados. O aumento no espaço elevou o custo fixo por animal. Os custos fixos e variáveis representaram 3% e 93% do custo operacional total, respectivamente. Dos custos variáveis, cerca de 70% foi utilizado para a compra de gado e 17% para a compra de alimentos. O lucro operacional por animal foi crescente com o aumento na disponibilidade de espaço (R$ 80,90; R$ 102,00 e R$ 109,00 para 6, 12 e 24 m2 por animal, respectivamente). Os três sistemas de confinamento recuperaram o investimento inicial e apresentaram valor presente líquido positivo. Além disso, as taxas internas de retorno foram de 22%, 27% e 25%, e as probabilidades de perdas financeiras foram de 33%, 29% e 26% para as dimensões de 6, 12 e 24 m2 por animal, respectivamente. Portanto, maior concessão de espaço nos currais de confinamento melhora a rentabilidade e reduz o risco de perda financeira.UEL2019-10-16info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/3535210.5433/1679-0359.2019v40n6Supl3p3665Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 40 No. 6Supl3 (2019); 3665-3678Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 40 n. 6Supl3 (2019); 3665-36781679-03591676-546Xreponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELenghttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/35352/26247Copyright (c) 2019 Semina: Ciências Agráriashttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMontelli, Natalia Ludmila Lins LimaMacitelli, FernandaBraga, Janaina da SilvaCosta, Mateus José Rodrigues Paranhos da2022-10-10T15:32:20Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/35352Revistahttp://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrariasPUBhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/oaisemina.agrarias@uel.br1679-03591676-546Xopendoar:2022-10-10T15:32:20Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Economic impacts of space allowance per animal on beef cattle feedlot
Impactos econômicos do espaço disponível por animal em confinamentos bovinos
title Economic impacts of space allowance per animal on beef cattle feedlot
spellingShingle Economic impacts of space allowance per animal on beef cattle feedlot
Montelli, Natalia Ludmila Lins Lima
Investment analysis
Risk analysis
Beef cattle
Nellore
Finishing system.
Análise de investimento
Análise de risco
Bovinos de corte
Nelore
Sistema de terminação.
title_short Economic impacts of space allowance per animal on beef cattle feedlot
title_full Economic impacts of space allowance per animal on beef cattle feedlot
title_fullStr Economic impacts of space allowance per animal on beef cattle feedlot
title_full_unstemmed Economic impacts of space allowance per animal on beef cattle feedlot
title_sort Economic impacts of space allowance per animal on beef cattle feedlot
author Montelli, Natalia Ludmila Lins Lima
author_facet Montelli, Natalia Ludmila Lins Lima
Macitelli, Fernanda
Braga, Janaina da Silva
Costa, Mateus José Rodrigues Paranhos da
author_role author
author2 Macitelli, Fernanda
Braga, Janaina da Silva
Costa, Mateus José Rodrigues Paranhos da
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Montelli, Natalia Ludmila Lins Lima
Macitelli, Fernanda
Braga, Janaina da Silva
Costa, Mateus José Rodrigues Paranhos da
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Investment analysis
Risk analysis
Beef cattle
Nellore
Finishing system.
Análise de investimento
Análise de risco
Bovinos de corte
Nelore
Sistema de terminação.
topic Investment analysis
Risk analysis
Beef cattle
Nellore
Finishing system.
Análise de investimento
Análise de risco
Bovinos de corte
Nelore
Sistema de terminação.
description The objective of this study was to assess the economic outcomes of three space allowances (6, 12, and 24 m2 per animal) for outdoor feedlots-finished beef cattle. Simulations considered confinement systems with a static capacity of 5,000 animals per cycle and two 86-day cycles per year. Performance data were obtained from 1,350 uncastrated bovine males. An increase in space allowance elevated the fixed cost per animal. Fixed and variable costs represented 3% and 93% of the total operating cost, respectively. For variable costs, around 70% was used for purchasing cattle and 17% for purchasing feed. The operating profit per animal increased as space allowance increased (R$ 80.90, R$ 102.00, and R$ 109.00 for 6, 12, and 24 m2 per animal, respectively). The three feedlot systems recovered the initial investment and had a positive net present value. In addition, the internal rates of return were 22%, 27%, and 25%, and the probabilities of financial loss were 33%, 29%, and 26% for pen sizes of 6, 12, and 24 m2 per animal, respectively. Therefore, larger space allowances improve profitability and reduce the risk of financial loss.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-10-16
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/35352
10.5433/1679-0359.2019v40n6Supl3p3665
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/35352
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/1679-0359.2019v40n6Supl3p3665
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/35352/26247
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Semina: Ciências Agrárias
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Semina: Ciências Agrárias
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 40 No. 6Supl3 (2019); 3665-3678
Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 40 n. 6Supl3 (2019); 3665-3678
1679-0359
1676-546X
reponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
collection Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv semina.agrarias@uel.br
_version_ 1799306081033256960