Economic impacts of space allowance per animal on beef cattle feedlot
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/35352 |
Resumo: | The objective of this study was to assess the economic outcomes of three space allowances (6, 12, and 24 m2 per animal) for outdoor feedlots-finished beef cattle. Simulations considered confinement systems with a static capacity of 5,000 animals per cycle and two 86-day cycles per year. Performance data were obtained from 1,350 uncastrated bovine males. An increase in space allowance elevated the fixed cost per animal. Fixed and variable costs represented 3% and 93% of the total operating cost, respectively. For variable costs, around 70% was used for purchasing cattle and 17% for purchasing feed. The operating profit per animal increased as space allowance increased (R$ 80.90, R$ 102.00, and R$ 109.00 for 6, 12, and 24 m2 per animal, respectively). The three feedlot systems recovered the initial investment and had a positive net present value. In addition, the internal rates of return were 22%, 27%, and 25%, and the probabilities of financial loss were 33%, 29%, and 26% for pen sizes of 6, 12, and 24 m2 per animal, respectively. Therefore, larger space allowances improve profitability and reduce the risk of financial loss. |
id |
UEL-11_a8f16ba3d15da854959f2b93e4541e5d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/35352 |
network_acronym_str |
UEL-11 |
network_name_str |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Economic impacts of space allowance per animal on beef cattle feedlotImpactos econômicos do espaço disponível por animal em confinamentos bovinosInvestment analysisRisk analysisBeef cattleNelloreFinishing system.Análise de investimentoAnálise de riscoBovinos de corteNeloreSistema de terminação.The objective of this study was to assess the economic outcomes of three space allowances (6, 12, and 24 m2 per animal) for outdoor feedlots-finished beef cattle. Simulations considered confinement systems with a static capacity of 5,000 animals per cycle and two 86-day cycles per year. Performance data were obtained from 1,350 uncastrated bovine males. An increase in space allowance elevated the fixed cost per animal. Fixed and variable costs represented 3% and 93% of the total operating cost, respectively. For variable costs, around 70% was used for purchasing cattle and 17% for purchasing feed. The operating profit per animal increased as space allowance increased (R$ 80.90, R$ 102.00, and R$ 109.00 for 6, 12, and 24 m2 per animal, respectively). The three feedlot systems recovered the initial investment and had a positive net present value. In addition, the internal rates of return were 22%, 27%, and 25%, and the probabilities of financial loss were 33%, 29%, and 26% for pen sizes of 6, 12, and 24 m2 per animal, respectively. Therefore, larger space allowances improve profitability and reduce the risk of financial loss.O objetivo com este estudo foi avaliar os resultados econômicos de confinamento de bovinos com três espaços disponíveis por animal (6, 12 e 24 m2 por animal). Para as simulações considerou-se confinamentos com capacidade estática de 5.000 animais por ciclo e dois ciclos de 86 dias por ano. Os dados de desempenho foram obtidos de 1.350 bovinos não castrados. O aumento no espaço elevou o custo fixo por animal. Os custos fixos e variáveis representaram 3% e 93% do custo operacional total, respectivamente. Dos custos variáveis, cerca de 70% foi utilizado para a compra de gado e 17% para a compra de alimentos. O lucro operacional por animal foi crescente com o aumento na disponibilidade de espaço (R$ 80,90; R$ 102,00 e R$ 109,00 para 6, 12 e 24 m2 por animal, respectivamente). Os três sistemas de confinamento recuperaram o investimento inicial e apresentaram valor presente líquido positivo. Além disso, as taxas internas de retorno foram de 22%, 27% e 25%, e as probabilidades de perdas financeiras foram de 33%, 29% e 26% para as dimensões de 6, 12 e 24 m2 por animal, respectivamente. Portanto, maior concessão de espaço nos currais de confinamento melhora a rentabilidade e reduz o risco de perda financeira.UEL2019-10-16info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/3535210.5433/1679-0359.2019v40n6Supl3p3665Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 40 No. 6Supl3 (2019); 3665-3678Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 40 n. 6Supl3 (2019); 3665-36781679-03591676-546Xreponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELenghttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/35352/26247Copyright (c) 2019 Semina: Ciências Agráriashttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMontelli, Natalia Ludmila Lins LimaMacitelli, FernandaBraga, Janaina da SilvaCosta, Mateus José Rodrigues Paranhos da2022-10-10T15:32:20Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/35352Revistahttp://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrariasPUBhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/oaisemina.agrarias@uel.br1679-03591676-546Xopendoar:2022-10-10T15:32:20Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Economic impacts of space allowance per animal on beef cattle feedlot Impactos econômicos do espaço disponível por animal em confinamentos bovinos |
title |
Economic impacts of space allowance per animal on beef cattle feedlot |
spellingShingle |
Economic impacts of space allowance per animal on beef cattle feedlot Montelli, Natalia Ludmila Lins Lima Investment analysis Risk analysis Beef cattle Nellore Finishing system. Análise de investimento Análise de risco Bovinos de corte Nelore Sistema de terminação. |
title_short |
Economic impacts of space allowance per animal on beef cattle feedlot |
title_full |
Economic impacts of space allowance per animal on beef cattle feedlot |
title_fullStr |
Economic impacts of space allowance per animal on beef cattle feedlot |
title_full_unstemmed |
Economic impacts of space allowance per animal on beef cattle feedlot |
title_sort |
Economic impacts of space allowance per animal on beef cattle feedlot |
author |
Montelli, Natalia Ludmila Lins Lima |
author_facet |
Montelli, Natalia Ludmila Lins Lima Macitelli, Fernanda Braga, Janaina da Silva Costa, Mateus José Rodrigues Paranhos da |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Macitelli, Fernanda Braga, Janaina da Silva Costa, Mateus José Rodrigues Paranhos da |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Montelli, Natalia Ludmila Lins Lima Macitelli, Fernanda Braga, Janaina da Silva Costa, Mateus José Rodrigues Paranhos da |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Investment analysis Risk analysis Beef cattle Nellore Finishing system. Análise de investimento Análise de risco Bovinos de corte Nelore Sistema de terminação. |
topic |
Investment analysis Risk analysis Beef cattle Nellore Finishing system. Análise de investimento Análise de risco Bovinos de corte Nelore Sistema de terminação. |
description |
The objective of this study was to assess the economic outcomes of three space allowances (6, 12, and 24 m2 per animal) for outdoor feedlots-finished beef cattle. Simulations considered confinement systems with a static capacity of 5,000 animals per cycle and two 86-day cycles per year. Performance data were obtained from 1,350 uncastrated bovine males. An increase in space allowance elevated the fixed cost per animal. Fixed and variable costs represented 3% and 93% of the total operating cost, respectively. For variable costs, around 70% was used for purchasing cattle and 17% for purchasing feed. The operating profit per animal increased as space allowance increased (R$ 80.90, R$ 102.00, and R$ 109.00 for 6, 12, and 24 m2 per animal, respectively). The three feedlot systems recovered the initial investment and had a positive net present value. In addition, the internal rates of return were 22%, 27%, and 25%, and the probabilities of financial loss were 33%, 29%, and 26% for pen sizes of 6, 12, and 24 m2 per animal, respectively. Therefore, larger space allowances improve profitability and reduce the risk of financial loss. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-10-16 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/35352 10.5433/1679-0359.2019v40n6Supl3p3665 |
url |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/35352 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5433/1679-0359.2019v40n6Supl3p3665 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/35352/26247 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Semina: Ciências Agrárias http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Semina: Ciências Agrárias http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UEL |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UEL |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 40 No. 6Supl3 (2019); 3665-3678 Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 40 n. 6Supl3 (2019); 3665-3678 1679-0359 1676-546X reponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) instacron:UEL |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
instacron_str |
UEL |
institution |
UEL |
reponame_str |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
collection |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
semina.agrarias@uel.br |
_version_ |
1799306081033256960 |