Evaluation of two liver biopsy and rectal sealing techniques in dog cadavers undergoing Natural Orifices Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) by transrectal access
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2024 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/48670 |
Resumo: | The aim of this study was to evaluate two liver biopsy techniques by transrectal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) and compare tensiometric parameters of rectal sealing using 2-octyl cyanoacrylate glue or conventional rectal sutures in a dog cadaver model. In sixteen dog cadavers two liver biopsy techniques were performed via transrectal NOTES using either polypectomy diathermy forceps or endoscopic oval biopsy forceps. The cadavers were divided into two groups: Glue Group (GG) where rectal sealing was performed with 2-octyl cyanoacrylate glue and Suture Group (SG) with the rectal defect sealed with simple continuous extracorporeal 3-0 polydioxanone sutures. The rupture pressure of the seals was measured on a rectal burst test. The diathermy polypectomy endoscopic forceps biopsy technique was significantly faster (p<0.001) and provided larger diameter samples. Rectal sealing was significantly faster (p<0.001) in the GG. There was no difference between the two groups with regard to rupture pressure (258.5 mmHg) with air insufflation. Using endoscopic oval biopsy forceps, biopsy samples can only be collected from the surface of the liver, whereas polypectomy forceps with a diathermy loop can be used to collect samples from the tip of the hepatic lobe. There was no difference in rectal rupture pressure in the burst test between the cadavers where sealing was performed with rectal sutures and those where cyanoacrylate adhesive was used. |
id |
UEL-11_adebdc9a89188b7bc4313b0bc8e63b9f |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/48670 |
network_acronym_str |
UEL-11 |
network_name_str |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Evaluation of two liver biopsy and rectal sealing techniques in dog cadavers undergoing Natural Orifices Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) by transrectal accessAvaliação de duas técnicas de biopsia hepática e selamento retal em cadáveres de cães submetidos a cirurgia endoscópica por orifícios naturais transretalAdhesiveExperimental studyLiverRectal accessRectumSurgery. AdesivoEstudo experimentalFígadoAcesso retalCirurgia. The aim of this study was to evaluate two liver biopsy techniques by transrectal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) and compare tensiometric parameters of rectal sealing using 2-octyl cyanoacrylate glue or conventional rectal sutures in a dog cadaver model. In sixteen dog cadavers two liver biopsy techniques were performed via transrectal NOTES using either polypectomy diathermy forceps or endoscopic oval biopsy forceps. The cadavers were divided into two groups: Glue Group (GG) where rectal sealing was performed with 2-octyl cyanoacrylate glue and Suture Group (SG) with the rectal defect sealed with simple continuous extracorporeal 3-0 polydioxanone sutures. The rupture pressure of the seals was measured on a rectal burst test. The diathermy polypectomy endoscopic forceps biopsy technique was significantly faster (p<0.001) and provided larger diameter samples. Rectal sealing was significantly faster (p<0.001) in the GG. There was no difference between the two groups with regard to rupture pressure (258.5 mmHg) with air insufflation. Using endoscopic oval biopsy forceps, biopsy samples can only be collected from the surface of the liver, whereas polypectomy forceps with a diathermy loop can be used to collect samples from the tip of the hepatic lobe. There was no difference in rectal rupture pressure in the burst test between the cadavers where sealing was performed with rectal sutures and those where cyanoacrylate adhesive was used. O objetivo do presente estudo foi avaliar duas técnicas de biopsia hepática realizadas por cirurgia endoscópica transluminal por orifícios naturais (NOTES) transretal e parâmetros tensiométricos do selamento retal usando adesivo de 2-octil cianoacrilato ou sutura retal convencional em cadáveres de cães. Em 16 cadáveres de cães, foram realizadas duas técnicas de biopsias hepáticas usando pinça diatérmica de polipectomia e pinça de biopsia oval. Os cadáveres foram divididos em dois grupos: sendo que o Glue Group (GG) recebeu o adesivo de 2-octil cianoacrilato para selamento retal e o Suture Group (SG), recebeu sutura contínua simples extracorpórea com fio polidioxanona 3-0. A pressão de ruptura retal foi mensurada por meio do teste de pressão intra-retal. A técnica de biopsia hepática com pinça diatérmica de polipectomia foi mais rápida (p<0.001) e providenciou amostras maiores. O selamento retal foi mais rápido no GG (p<0.001). Não houve diferença entre os grupos com relação a pressão de ruptura retal com insuflação de ar (258.5 mmHg). A biopsia hepática com pinça oval é limitada a colheita de fragmentos superficiais do fígado, já a pinça de polipectomia permite a colheita de fragmentos nas extremidades. Os parâmetros tensiométricos do reto, avaliados por meio da pressão de ruptura retal foram semelhantes em todos cães, no entanto estudos com animais vivos são necessários para avaliar os efeitos de outros fatores como fluxo sanguíneo local, isquemia e cicatrização tecidual.UEL2024-03-27info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/4867010.5433/1679-0359.2024v44n2p449Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 44 No. 2 (2024); 449-460Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 44 n. 2 (2024); 449-4601679-03591676-546Xreponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELenghttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/48670/50165Copyright (c) 2024 Semina: Ciências Agráriashttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessTrindade-Gerardi, Anelise BonillaCima, IdaliniGerardi, Daniel GuimarãesBeck, Carlos Afonso Castro2024-04-16T17:01:37Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/48670Revistahttp://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrariasPUBhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/oaisemina.agrarias@uel.br1679-03591676-546Xopendoar:2024-04-16T17:01:37Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Evaluation of two liver biopsy and rectal sealing techniques in dog cadavers undergoing Natural Orifices Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) by transrectal access Avaliação de duas técnicas de biopsia hepática e selamento retal em cadáveres de cães submetidos a cirurgia endoscópica por orifícios naturais transretal |
title |
Evaluation of two liver biopsy and rectal sealing techniques in dog cadavers undergoing Natural Orifices Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) by transrectal access |
spellingShingle |
Evaluation of two liver biopsy and rectal sealing techniques in dog cadavers undergoing Natural Orifices Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) by transrectal access Trindade-Gerardi, Anelise Bonilla Adhesive Experimental study Liver Rectal access Rectum Surgery. Adesivo Estudo experimental Fígado Acesso retal Cirurgia. |
title_short |
Evaluation of two liver biopsy and rectal sealing techniques in dog cadavers undergoing Natural Orifices Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) by transrectal access |
title_full |
Evaluation of two liver biopsy and rectal sealing techniques in dog cadavers undergoing Natural Orifices Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) by transrectal access |
title_fullStr |
Evaluation of two liver biopsy and rectal sealing techniques in dog cadavers undergoing Natural Orifices Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) by transrectal access |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evaluation of two liver biopsy and rectal sealing techniques in dog cadavers undergoing Natural Orifices Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) by transrectal access |
title_sort |
Evaluation of two liver biopsy and rectal sealing techniques in dog cadavers undergoing Natural Orifices Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) by transrectal access |
author |
Trindade-Gerardi, Anelise Bonilla |
author_facet |
Trindade-Gerardi, Anelise Bonilla Cima, Idalini Gerardi, Daniel Guimarães Beck, Carlos Afonso Castro |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Cima, Idalini Gerardi, Daniel Guimarães Beck, Carlos Afonso Castro |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Trindade-Gerardi, Anelise Bonilla Cima, Idalini Gerardi, Daniel Guimarães Beck, Carlos Afonso Castro |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Adhesive Experimental study Liver Rectal access Rectum Surgery. Adesivo Estudo experimental Fígado Acesso retal Cirurgia. |
topic |
Adhesive Experimental study Liver Rectal access Rectum Surgery. Adesivo Estudo experimental Fígado Acesso retal Cirurgia. |
description |
The aim of this study was to evaluate two liver biopsy techniques by transrectal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) and compare tensiometric parameters of rectal sealing using 2-octyl cyanoacrylate glue or conventional rectal sutures in a dog cadaver model. In sixteen dog cadavers two liver biopsy techniques were performed via transrectal NOTES using either polypectomy diathermy forceps or endoscopic oval biopsy forceps. The cadavers were divided into two groups: Glue Group (GG) where rectal sealing was performed with 2-octyl cyanoacrylate glue and Suture Group (SG) with the rectal defect sealed with simple continuous extracorporeal 3-0 polydioxanone sutures. The rupture pressure of the seals was measured on a rectal burst test. The diathermy polypectomy endoscopic forceps biopsy technique was significantly faster (p<0.001) and provided larger diameter samples. Rectal sealing was significantly faster (p<0.001) in the GG. There was no difference between the two groups with regard to rupture pressure (258.5 mmHg) with air insufflation. Using endoscopic oval biopsy forceps, biopsy samples can only be collected from the surface of the liver, whereas polypectomy forceps with a diathermy loop can be used to collect samples from the tip of the hepatic lobe. There was no difference in rectal rupture pressure in the burst test between the cadavers where sealing was performed with rectal sutures and those where cyanoacrylate adhesive was used. |
publishDate |
2024 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2024-03-27 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/48670 10.5433/1679-0359.2024v44n2p449 |
url |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/48670 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5433/1679-0359.2024v44n2p449 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/48670/50165 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2024 Semina: Ciências Agrárias http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2024 Semina: Ciências Agrárias http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UEL |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UEL |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 44 No. 2 (2024); 449-460 Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 44 n. 2 (2024); 449-460 1679-0359 1676-546X reponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) instacron:UEL |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
instacron_str |
UEL |
institution |
UEL |
reponame_str |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
collection |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
semina.agrarias@uel.br |
_version_ |
1799306055218364416 |