Evaluation of two liver biopsy and rectal sealing techniques in dog cadavers undergoing Natural Orifices Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) by transrectal access

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Trindade-Gerardi, Anelise Bonilla
Data de Publicação: 2024
Outros Autores: Cima, Idalini, Gerardi, Daniel Guimarães, Beck, Carlos Afonso Castro
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/48670
Resumo: The aim of this study was to evaluate two liver biopsy techniques by transrectal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) and compare tensiometric parameters of rectal sealing using 2-octyl cyanoacrylate glue or conventional rectal sutures in a dog cadaver model. In sixteen dog cadavers two liver biopsy techniques were performed via transrectal NOTES using either polypectomy diathermy forceps or endoscopic oval biopsy forceps. The cadavers were divided into two groups: Glue Group (GG) where rectal sealing was performed with 2-octyl cyanoacrylate glue and Suture Group (SG) with the rectal defect sealed with simple continuous extracorporeal 3-0 polydioxanone sutures. The rupture pressure of the seals was measured on a rectal burst test. The diathermy polypectomy endoscopic forceps biopsy technique was significantly faster (p<0.001) and provided larger diameter samples. Rectal sealing was significantly faster (p<0.001) in the GG. There was no difference between the two groups with regard to rupture pressure (258.5 mmHg) with air insufflation. Using endoscopic oval biopsy forceps, biopsy samples can only be collected from the surface of the liver, whereas polypectomy forceps with a diathermy loop can be used to collect samples from the tip of the hepatic lobe. There was no difference in rectal rupture pressure in the burst test between the cadavers where sealing was performed with rectal sutures and those where cyanoacrylate adhesive was used.  
id UEL-11_adebdc9a89188b7bc4313b0bc8e63b9f
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/48670
network_acronym_str UEL-11
network_name_str Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Evaluation of two liver biopsy and rectal sealing techniques in dog cadavers undergoing Natural Orifices Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) by transrectal accessAvaliação de duas técnicas de biopsia hepática e selamento retal em cadáveres de cães submetidos a cirurgia endoscópica por orifícios naturais transretalAdhesiveExperimental studyLiverRectal accessRectumSurgery. AdesivoEstudo experimentalFígadoAcesso retalCirurgia. The aim of this study was to evaluate two liver biopsy techniques by transrectal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) and compare tensiometric parameters of rectal sealing using 2-octyl cyanoacrylate glue or conventional rectal sutures in a dog cadaver model. In sixteen dog cadavers two liver biopsy techniques were performed via transrectal NOTES using either polypectomy diathermy forceps or endoscopic oval biopsy forceps. The cadavers were divided into two groups: Glue Group (GG) where rectal sealing was performed with 2-octyl cyanoacrylate glue and Suture Group (SG) with the rectal defect sealed with simple continuous extracorporeal 3-0 polydioxanone sutures. The rupture pressure of the seals was measured on a rectal burst test. The diathermy polypectomy endoscopic forceps biopsy technique was significantly faster (p<0.001) and provided larger diameter samples. Rectal sealing was significantly faster (p<0.001) in the GG. There was no difference between the two groups with regard to rupture pressure (258.5 mmHg) with air insufflation. Using endoscopic oval biopsy forceps, biopsy samples can only be collected from the surface of the liver, whereas polypectomy forceps with a diathermy loop can be used to collect samples from the tip of the hepatic lobe. There was no difference in rectal rupture pressure in the burst test between the cadavers where sealing was performed with rectal sutures and those where cyanoacrylate adhesive was used.  O objetivo do presente estudo foi avaliar duas técnicas de biopsia hepática realizadas por cirurgia endoscópica transluminal por orifícios naturais (NOTES) transretal e parâmetros tensiométricos do selamento retal usando adesivo de 2-octil cianoacrilato ou sutura retal convencional em cadáveres de cães. Em 16 cadáveres de cães, foram realizadas duas técnicas de biopsias hepáticas usando pinça diatérmica de polipectomia e pinça de biopsia oval. Os cadáveres foram divididos em dois grupos: sendo que o Glue Group (GG) recebeu o adesivo de 2-octil cianoacrilato para selamento retal e o Suture Group (SG), recebeu sutura contínua simples extracorpórea com fio polidioxanona 3-0. A pressão de ruptura retal foi mensurada por meio do teste de pressão intra-retal. A técnica de biopsia hepática com pinça diatérmica de polipectomia foi mais rápida (p<0.001) e providenciou amostras maiores. O selamento retal foi mais rápido no GG (p<0.001). Não houve diferença entre os grupos com relação a pressão de ruptura retal com insuflação de ar (258.5 mmHg). A biopsia hepática com pinça oval é limitada a colheita de fragmentos superficiais do fígado, já a pinça de polipectomia permite a colheita de fragmentos nas extremidades. Os parâmetros tensiométricos do reto, avaliados por meio da pressão de ruptura retal foram semelhantes em todos cães, no entanto estudos com animais vivos são necessários para avaliar os efeitos de outros fatores como fluxo sanguíneo local, isquemia e cicatrização tecidual.UEL2024-03-27info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/4867010.5433/1679-0359.2024v44n2p449Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 44 No. 2 (2024); 449-460Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 44 n. 2 (2024); 449-4601679-03591676-546Xreponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELenghttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/48670/50165Copyright (c) 2024 Semina: Ciências Agráriashttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessTrindade-Gerardi, Anelise BonillaCima, IdaliniGerardi, Daniel GuimarãesBeck, Carlos Afonso Castro2024-04-16T17:01:37Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/48670Revistahttp://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrariasPUBhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/oaisemina.agrarias@uel.br1679-03591676-546Xopendoar:2024-04-16T17:01:37Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Evaluation of two liver biopsy and rectal sealing techniques in dog cadavers undergoing Natural Orifices Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) by transrectal access
Avaliação de duas técnicas de biopsia hepática e selamento retal em cadáveres de cães submetidos a cirurgia endoscópica por orifícios naturais transretal
title Evaluation of two liver biopsy and rectal sealing techniques in dog cadavers undergoing Natural Orifices Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) by transrectal access
spellingShingle Evaluation of two liver biopsy and rectal sealing techniques in dog cadavers undergoing Natural Orifices Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) by transrectal access
Trindade-Gerardi, Anelise Bonilla
Adhesive
Experimental study
Liver
Rectal access
Rectum
Surgery.
Adesivo
Estudo experimental
Fígado
Acesso retal
Cirurgia.
title_short Evaluation of two liver biopsy and rectal sealing techniques in dog cadavers undergoing Natural Orifices Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) by transrectal access
title_full Evaluation of two liver biopsy and rectal sealing techniques in dog cadavers undergoing Natural Orifices Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) by transrectal access
title_fullStr Evaluation of two liver biopsy and rectal sealing techniques in dog cadavers undergoing Natural Orifices Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) by transrectal access
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of two liver biopsy and rectal sealing techniques in dog cadavers undergoing Natural Orifices Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) by transrectal access
title_sort Evaluation of two liver biopsy and rectal sealing techniques in dog cadavers undergoing Natural Orifices Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) by transrectal access
author Trindade-Gerardi, Anelise Bonilla
author_facet Trindade-Gerardi, Anelise Bonilla
Cima, Idalini
Gerardi, Daniel Guimarães
Beck, Carlos Afonso Castro
author_role author
author2 Cima, Idalini
Gerardi, Daniel Guimarães
Beck, Carlos Afonso Castro
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Trindade-Gerardi, Anelise Bonilla
Cima, Idalini
Gerardi, Daniel Guimarães
Beck, Carlos Afonso Castro
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Adhesive
Experimental study
Liver
Rectal access
Rectum
Surgery.
Adesivo
Estudo experimental
Fígado
Acesso retal
Cirurgia.
topic Adhesive
Experimental study
Liver
Rectal access
Rectum
Surgery.
Adesivo
Estudo experimental
Fígado
Acesso retal
Cirurgia.
description The aim of this study was to evaluate two liver biopsy techniques by transrectal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) and compare tensiometric parameters of rectal sealing using 2-octyl cyanoacrylate glue or conventional rectal sutures in a dog cadaver model. In sixteen dog cadavers two liver biopsy techniques were performed via transrectal NOTES using either polypectomy diathermy forceps or endoscopic oval biopsy forceps. The cadavers were divided into two groups: Glue Group (GG) where rectal sealing was performed with 2-octyl cyanoacrylate glue and Suture Group (SG) with the rectal defect sealed with simple continuous extracorporeal 3-0 polydioxanone sutures. The rupture pressure of the seals was measured on a rectal burst test. The diathermy polypectomy endoscopic forceps biopsy technique was significantly faster (p<0.001) and provided larger diameter samples. Rectal sealing was significantly faster (p<0.001) in the GG. There was no difference between the two groups with regard to rupture pressure (258.5 mmHg) with air insufflation. Using endoscopic oval biopsy forceps, biopsy samples can only be collected from the surface of the liver, whereas polypectomy forceps with a diathermy loop can be used to collect samples from the tip of the hepatic lobe. There was no difference in rectal rupture pressure in the burst test between the cadavers where sealing was performed with rectal sutures and those where cyanoacrylate adhesive was used.  
publishDate 2024
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024-03-27
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/48670
10.5433/1679-0359.2024v44n2p449
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/48670
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/1679-0359.2024v44n2p449
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/48670/50165
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2024 Semina: Ciências Agrárias
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2024 Semina: Ciências Agrárias
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 44 No. 2 (2024); 449-460
Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 44 n. 2 (2024); 449-460
1679-0359
1676-546X
reponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
collection Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv semina.agrarias@uel.br
_version_ 1799306055218364416