Production and profitability of crop rotation systems in southern Brazil
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/38512 |
Resumo: | Crop rotation is one of the pillars of conservation agriculture. This practice has offered a series of advantages in terms of improving soil physical, chemical, and biological conditions. These advantages result in yield increases for all economic crops involved in the rotation systems and may also reduce production costs. In this context, the aim of this study was to compare the profitability of crop rotation systems with different levels of crop diversification. The experimental design was randomized blocks, with five treatments and four replications. The treatments included one less diversified crop rotation system (control) with soybean and wheat and four more diversified crop rotation systems (involving three or more species), including soybean, wheat, black oats, maize, canola, barley, blue lupine, white oats, beans, radish, triticale, rye, hairy vetch, and sorghum, under no-tillage conducted during a three-year cycle. Analyses were conducted considering productivity, operating cost, and economic profit. The highest accumulated gross yields were obtained in the more diversified crop rotation systems. The results show that the more diversified crop rotation systems were more profitable. When the opportunity cost was included, the most diversified crop rotations presented greater economic feasibility. The less diversified crop rotation system presented a negative economic profit. The crop rotation systems including beans presented the highest economic profit. |
id |
UEL-11_beccd1a628eb96206de1563a6a979a6a |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/38512 |
network_acronym_str |
UEL-11 |
network_name_str |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Production and profitability of crop rotation systems in southern BrazilProdução e rentabilidade de sistemas de rotação de culturas no sul do BrasilConservation agricultureNo-tillageCover cropsSoil conservationSustainable agriculture.Agricultura conservacionistaPlantio diretoPlantas de cobertura.Crop rotation is one of the pillars of conservation agriculture. This practice has offered a series of advantages in terms of improving soil physical, chemical, and biological conditions. These advantages result in yield increases for all economic crops involved in the rotation systems and may also reduce production costs. In this context, the aim of this study was to compare the profitability of crop rotation systems with different levels of crop diversification. The experimental design was randomized blocks, with five treatments and four replications. The treatments included one less diversified crop rotation system (control) with soybean and wheat and four more diversified crop rotation systems (involving three or more species), including soybean, wheat, black oats, maize, canola, barley, blue lupine, white oats, beans, radish, triticale, rye, hairy vetch, and sorghum, under no-tillage conducted during a three-year cycle. Analyses were conducted considering productivity, operating cost, and economic profit. The highest accumulated gross yields were obtained in the more diversified crop rotation systems. The results show that the more diversified crop rotation systems were more profitable. When the opportunity cost was included, the most diversified crop rotations presented greater economic feasibility. The less diversified crop rotation system presented a negative economic profit. The crop rotation systems including beans presented the highest economic profit.A rotação de culturas é um dos pilares da agricultura de conservacionista. Esta prática tem uma série de vantagens, melhorando as condições físicas, químicas e biológicas do solo. Isto resulta em aumentos de produtividade de todas as culturas econômicas envolvidas nos sistemas de rotação, podendo também reduzir os custos de produção. Neste contexto, o objetivo deste estudo foi comparar a rentabilidade dos sistemas de rotação de culturas com diferentes níveis de diversificação. O desenho experimental foi de blocos ao acaso, com cinco tratamentos e quatro repetições. Os tratamentos foram compostos de um sistema de rotação de culturas pouco diversificado (controle), com trigo no inverno, seguido de soja no verão, e quatro sistemas de rotação de culturas diversificados (envolvendo três ou mais espécies), incluindo soja, trigo, aveia preta, milho, canola, cevada, tremoço azul, aveia branca, feijão, rabanete, triticale, centeio, ervilhaca peluda, sorgo e trigo mourisco, conduzido em plantio direto, por um ciclo de três anos. Para as análises foram considerados a produtividade, a receita, o custo operacional, a margem bruta e o lucro econômico. Os maiores rendimentos brutos foram obtidos em sistemas de rotação de culturas mais diversificados. Os resultados mostram que sistemas mais diversificados de rotação de culturas são mais rentáveis e economicamente mais vantajosos. Quando considerado o custo de oportunidade, apenas as rotações de culturas mais diversificadas apresentaram viabilidade econômica. O sistema de rotação de culturas menos diversificado não apresentou lucro econômico. Os sistemas de rotação de culturas que incluíam o feijão foram os apresentaram o melhor desempenho econômico.UEL2020-09-19info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/3851210.5433/1679-0359.2020v41n6p2541Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 41 No. 6 (2020); 2541-2554Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 41 n. 6 (2020); 2541-25541679-03591676-546Xreponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELenghttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/38512/28057Copyright (c) 2020 Semina: Ciências Agráriashttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCanalli, Lutécia Beatriz dos SantosCosta, Gustavo Vaz daVolsi, BrunoLeocádio, André Luís MendesNeves, Carmen Silvia Vieira JaneiroTelles, Tiago Santos2022-10-06T16:50:50Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/38512Revistahttp://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrariasPUBhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/oaisemina.agrarias@uel.br1679-03591676-546Xopendoar:2022-10-06T16:50:50Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Production and profitability of crop rotation systems in southern Brazil Produção e rentabilidade de sistemas de rotação de culturas no sul do Brasil |
title |
Production and profitability of crop rotation systems in southern Brazil |
spellingShingle |
Production and profitability of crop rotation systems in southern Brazil Canalli, Lutécia Beatriz dos Santos Conservation agriculture No-tillage Cover crops Soil conservation Sustainable agriculture. Agricultura conservacionista Plantio direto Plantas de cobertura. |
title_short |
Production and profitability of crop rotation systems in southern Brazil |
title_full |
Production and profitability of crop rotation systems in southern Brazil |
title_fullStr |
Production and profitability of crop rotation systems in southern Brazil |
title_full_unstemmed |
Production and profitability of crop rotation systems in southern Brazil |
title_sort |
Production and profitability of crop rotation systems in southern Brazil |
author |
Canalli, Lutécia Beatriz dos Santos |
author_facet |
Canalli, Lutécia Beatriz dos Santos Costa, Gustavo Vaz da Volsi, Bruno Leocádio, André Luís Mendes Neves, Carmen Silvia Vieira Janeiro Telles, Tiago Santos |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Costa, Gustavo Vaz da Volsi, Bruno Leocádio, André Luís Mendes Neves, Carmen Silvia Vieira Janeiro Telles, Tiago Santos |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Canalli, Lutécia Beatriz dos Santos Costa, Gustavo Vaz da Volsi, Bruno Leocádio, André Luís Mendes Neves, Carmen Silvia Vieira Janeiro Telles, Tiago Santos |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Conservation agriculture No-tillage Cover crops Soil conservation Sustainable agriculture. Agricultura conservacionista Plantio direto Plantas de cobertura. |
topic |
Conservation agriculture No-tillage Cover crops Soil conservation Sustainable agriculture. Agricultura conservacionista Plantio direto Plantas de cobertura. |
description |
Crop rotation is one of the pillars of conservation agriculture. This practice has offered a series of advantages in terms of improving soil physical, chemical, and biological conditions. These advantages result in yield increases for all economic crops involved in the rotation systems and may also reduce production costs. In this context, the aim of this study was to compare the profitability of crop rotation systems with different levels of crop diversification. The experimental design was randomized blocks, with five treatments and four replications. The treatments included one less diversified crop rotation system (control) with soybean and wheat and four more diversified crop rotation systems (involving three or more species), including soybean, wheat, black oats, maize, canola, barley, blue lupine, white oats, beans, radish, triticale, rye, hairy vetch, and sorghum, under no-tillage conducted during a three-year cycle. Analyses were conducted considering productivity, operating cost, and economic profit. The highest accumulated gross yields were obtained in the more diversified crop rotation systems. The results show that the more diversified crop rotation systems were more profitable. When the opportunity cost was included, the most diversified crop rotations presented greater economic feasibility. The less diversified crop rotation system presented a negative economic profit. The crop rotation systems including beans presented the highest economic profit. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-09-19 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/38512 10.5433/1679-0359.2020v41n6p2541 |
url |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/38512 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5433/1679-0359.2020v41n6p2541 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/38512/28057 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Semina: Ciências Agrárias http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Semina: Ciências Agrárias http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UEL |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UEL |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 41 No. 6 (2020); 2541-2554 Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 41 n. 6 (2020); 2541-2554 1679-0359 1676-546X reponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) instacron:UEL |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
instacron_str |
UEL |
institution |
UEL |
reponame_str |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
collection |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
semina.agrarias@uel.br |
_version_ |
1799306082637578240 |