Production and profitability of crop rotation systems in southern Brazil

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Canalli, Lutécia Beatriz dos Santos
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Costa, Gustavo Vaz da, Volsi, Bruno, Leocádio, André Luís Mendes, Neves, Carmen Silvia Vieira Janeiro, Telles, Tiago Santos
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/38512
Resumo: Crop rotation is one of the pillars of conservation agriculture. This practice has offered a series of advantages in terms of improving soil physical, chemical, and biological conditions. These advantages result in yield increases for all economic crops involved in the rotation systems and may also reduce production costs. In this context, the aim of this study was to compare the profitability of crop rotation systems with different levels of crop diversification. The experimental design was randomized blocks, with five treatments and four replications. The treatments included one less diversified crop rotation system (control) with soybean and wheat and four more diversified crop rotation systems (involving three or more species), including soybean, wheat, black oats, maize, canola, barley, blue lupine, white oats, beans, radish, triticale, rye, hairy vetch, and sorghum, under no-tillage conducted during a three-year cycle. Analyses were conducted considering productivity, operating cost, and economic profit. The highest accumulated gross yields were obtained in the more diversified crop rotation systems. The results show that the more diversified crop rotation systems were more profitable. When the opportunity cost was included, the most diversified crop rotations presented greater economic feasibility. The less diversified crop rotation system presented a negative economic profit. The crop rotation systems including beans presented the highest economic profit.
id UEL-11_beccd1a628eb96206de1563a6a979a6a
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/38512
network_acronym_str UEL-11
network_name_str Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Production and profitability of crop rotation systems in southern BrazilProdução e rentabilidade de sistemas de rotação de culturas no sul do BrasilConservation agricultureNo-tillageCover cropsSoil conservationSustainable agriculture.Agricultura conservacionistaPlantio diretoPlantas de cobertura.Crop rotation is one of the pillars of conservation agriculture. This practice has offered a series of advantages in terms of improving soil physical, chemical, and biological conditions. These advantages result in yield increases for all economic crops involved in the rotation systems and may also reduce production costs. In this context, the aim of this study was to compare the profitability of crop rotation systems with different levels of crop diversification. The experimental design was randomized blocks, with five treatments and four replications. The treatments included one less diversified crop rotation system (control) with soybean and wheat and four more diversified crop rotation systems (involving three or more species), including soybean, wheat, black oats, maize, canola, barley, blue lupine, white oats, beans, radish, triticale, rye, hairy vetch, and sorghum, under no-tillage conducted during a three-year cycle. Analyses were conducted considering productivity, operating cost, and economic profit. The highest accumulated gross yields were obtained in the more diversified crop rotation systems. The results show that the more diversified crop rotation systems were more profitable. When the opportunity cost was included, the most diversified crop rotations presented greater economic feasibility. The less diversified crop rotation system presented a negative economic profit. The crop rotation systems including beans presented the highest economic profit.A rotação de culturas é um dos pilares da agricultura de conservacionista. Esta prática tem uma série de vantagens, melhorando as condições físicas, químicas e biológicas do solo. Isto resulta em aumentos de produtividade de todas as culturas econômicas envolvidas nos sistemas de rotação, podendo também reduzir os custos de produção. Neste contexto, o objetivo deste estudo foi comparar a rentabilidade dos sistemas de rotação de culturas com diferentes níveis de diversificação. O desenho experimental foi de blocos ao acaso, com cinco tratamentos e quatro repetições. Os tratamentos foram compostos de um sistema de rotação de culturas pouco diversificado (controle), com trigo no inverno, seguido de soja no verão, e quatro sistemas de rotação de culturas diversificados (envolvendo três ou mais espécies), incluindo soja, trigo, aveia preta, milho, canola, cevada, tremoço azul, aveia branca, feijão, rabanete, triticale, centeio, ervilhaca peluda, sorgo e trigo mourisco, conduzido em plantio direto, por um ciclo de três anos. Para as análises foram considerados a produtividade, a receita, o custo operacional, a margem bruta e o lucro econômico. Os maiores rendimentos brutos foram obtidos em sistemas de rotação de culturas mais diversificados. Os resultados mostram que sistemas mais diversificados de rotação de culturas são mais rentáveis e economicamente mais vantajosos. Quando considerado o custo de oportunidade, apenas as rotações de culturas mais diversificadas apresentaram viabilidade econômica. O sistema de rotação de culturas menos diversificado não apresentou lucro econômico. Os sistemas de rotação de culturas que incluíam o feijão foram os apresentaram o melhor desempenho econômico.UEL2020-09-19info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/3851210.5433/1679-0359.2020v41n6p2541Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 41 No. 6 (2020); 2541-2554Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 41 n. 6 (2020); 2541-25541679-03591676-546Xreponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELenghttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/38512/28057Copyright (c) 2020 Semina: Ciências Agráriashttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCanalli, Lutécia Beatriz dos SantosCosta, Gustavo Vaz daVolsi, BrunoLeocádio, André Luís MendesNeves, Carmen Silvia Vieira JaneiroTelles, Tiago Santos2022-10-06T16:50:50Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/38512Revistahttp://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrariasPUBhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/oaisemina.agrarias@uel.br1679-03591676-546Xopendoar:2022-10-06T16:50:50Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Production and profitability of crop rotation systems in southern Brazil
Produção e rentabilidade de sistemas de rotação de culturas no sul do Brasil
title Production and profitability of crop rotation systems in southern Brazil
spellingShingle Production and profitability of crop rotation systems in southern Brazil
Canalli, Lutécia Beatriz dos Santos
Conservation agriculture
No-tillage
Cover crops
Soil conservation
Sustainable agriculture.
Agricultura conservacionista
Plantio direto
Plantas de cobertura.
title_short Production and profitability of crop rotation systems in southern Brazil
title_full Production and profitability of crop rotation systems in southern Brazil
title_fullStr Production and profitability of crop rotation systems in southern Brazil
title_full_unstemmed Production and profitability of crop rotation systems in southern Brazil
title_sort Production and profitability of crop rotation systems in southern Brazil
author Canalli, Lutécia Beatriz dos Santos
author_facet Canalli, Lutécia Beatriz dos Santos
Costa, Gustavo Vaz da
Volsi, Bruno
Leocádio, André Luís Mendes
Neves, Carmen Silvia Vieira Janeiro
Telles, Tiago Santos
author_role author
author2 Costa, Gustavo Vaz da
Volsi, Bruno
Leocádio, André Luís Mendes
Neves, Carmen Silvia Vieira Janeiro
Telles, Tiago Santos
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Canalli, Lutécia Beatriz dos Santos
Costa, Gustavo Vaz da
Volsi, Bruno
Leocádio, André Luís Mendes
Neves, Carmen Silvia Vieira Janeiro
Telles, Tiago Santos
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Conservation agriculture
No-tillage
Cover crops
Soil conservation
Sustainable agriculture.
Agricultura conservacionista
Plantio direto
Plantas de cobertura.
topic Conservation agriculture
No-tillage
Cover crops
Soil conservation
Sustainable agriculture.
Agricultura conservacionista
Plantio direto
Plantas de cobertura.
description Crop rotation is one of the pillars of conservation agriculture. This practice has offered a series of advantages in terms of improving soil physical, chemical, and biological conditions. These advantages result in yield increases for all economic crops involved in the rotation systems and may also reduce production costs. In this context, the aim of this study was to compare the profitability of crop rotation systems with different levels of crop diversification. The experimental design was randomized blocks, with five treatments and four replications. The treatments included one less diversified crop rotation system (control) with soybean and wheat and four more diversified crop rotation systems (involving three or more species), including soybean, wheat, black oats, maize, canola, barley, blue lupine, white oats, beans, radish, triticale, rye, hairy vetch, and sorghum, under no-tillage conducted during a three-year cycle. Analyses were conducted considering productivity, operating cost, and economic profit. The highest accumulated gross yields were obtained in the more diversified crop rotation systems. The results show that the more diversified crop rotation systems were more profitable. When the opportunity cost was included, the most diversified crop rotations presented greater economic feasibility. The less diversified crop rotation system presented a negative economic profit. The crop rotation systems including beans presented the highest economic profit.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-09-19
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/38512
10.5433/1679-0359.2020v41n6p2541
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/38512
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/1679-0359.2020v41n6p2541
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/38512/28057
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Semina: Ciências Agrárias
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Semina: Ciências Agrárias
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 41 No. 6 (2020); 2541-2554
Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 41 n. 6 (2020); 2541-2554
1679-0359
1676-546X
reponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
collection Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv semina.agrarias@uel.br
_version_ 1799306082637578240