Energy balance and efficiency in crop rotation systems

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ferreira, Henrique Giordani Martini
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Bordin, Ivan, Buratto, Osmar Maziero, Pontes, Laíse da Silveira
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/43678
Resumo: The production system model that has been adopted in most Brazilian regions, the soybean/second corn crop succession, has led to problems in water and soil conservation and favorable conditions for diseases, pests, and weeds in the agricultural system and, consequently, increasing its energy use. Crop rotation is an alternative to this production model, directly interfering with the problematic aspects of the crop succession system and, consequently, its energy balance. Therefore, this study aimed to identify the crop rotation system with the best energy balance and efficiency. The data on the quantity of inputs (seeds, fertilizers, pesticides, and fuel), labor, and grain yield used in the study were collected from a crop rotation experiment conducted at the experimental station of the Rural Development Institute of Paraná - IAPAR-EMATER, Londrina, PR, Brazil, from 2014 to 2020. The experimental design consisted of randomized blocks, with six treatments and four replications. The treatments consisted of T1 (second corn crop/soybean), T2 (white oat/soybean, triticale/corn, and wheat/soybean), T3 (rye + black oat/soybean, black oat + fodder radish/corn, and congo grass/soybean), T4 (canola/corn, crambe/corn; canola/soybean); T5 (buckwheat-fodder radish/corn, bean/soybean, and buckwheat-white oat/ soybean), and T6 (wheat/corn, canola/corn + congo grass, and bean/soybean). The different crop rotations and the traditional second corn crop/soybean system provided positive energy balance and efficiency, that is, they produced more energy than they consumed. The canola/corn, crambe/corn, and canola/soybean rotation systems had the highest energy balance and efficiency, with values of 866,442.27 MJ ha -1 and 10.27, respectively, mainly due to corn cultivation in the summer, which resulted in a higher energy return than the other grain-producing crops.
id UEL-11_caa811f521c68d7dc86ac2fc6f4b86e4
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/43678
network_acronym_str UEL-11
network_name_str Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Energy balance and efficiency in crop rotation systemsBalanço e eficiência energética em sistemas de rotação de culturasConservation agricultureCrop diversificationCrop successionEnergy balanceEnergy in agriculture.Agricultura conservacionistaBalanço energéticoDiversificação de culturasEnergia na agriculturaSucessão de culturas.The production system model that has been adopted in most Brazilian regions, the soybean/second corn crop succession, has led to problems in water and soil conservation and favorable conditions for diseases, pests, and weeds in the agricultural system and, consequently, increasing its energy use. Crop rotation is an alternative to this production model, directly interfering with the problematic aspects of the crop succession system and, consequently, its energy balance. Therefore, this study aimed to identify the crop rotation system with the best energy balance and efficiency. The data on the quantity of inputs (seeds, fertilizers, pesticides, and fuel), labor, and grain yield used in the study were collected from a crop rotation experiment conducted at the experimental station of the Rural Development Institute of Paraná - IAPAR-EMATER, Londrina, PR, Brazil, from 2014 to 2020. The experimental design consisted of randomized blocks, with six treatments and four replications. The treatments consisted of T1 (second corn crop/soybean), T2 (white oat/soybean, triticale/corn, and wheat/soybean), T3 (rye + black oat/soybean, black oat + fodder radish/corn, and congo grass/soybean), T4 (canola/corn, crambe/corn; canola/soybean); T5 (buckwheat-fodder radish/corn, bean/soybean, and buckwheat-white oat/ soybean), and T6 (wheat/corn, canola/corn + congo grass, and bean/soybean). The different crop rotations and the traditional second corn crop/soybean system provided positive energy balance and efficiency, that is, they produced more energy than they consumed. The canola/corn, crambe/corn, and canola/soybean rotation systems had the highest energy balance and efficiency, with values of 866,442.27 MJ ha -1 and 10.27, respectively, mainly due to corn cultivation in the summer, which resulted in a higher energy return than the other grain-producing crops.O modelo de sistema de produção que vem sendo adotado na maioria das regiões brasileiras, a sucessão de soja/milho segunda safra, é um sistema que vem acarretando problemas na conservação da água e dos solos, e também levando a condições favoráveis para doenças, pragas e plantas daninhas no sistema agrícola e consequentemente elevando o uso de energia no sistema. A alternativa para esse modelo de produção é a rotação de cultura, no qual, pode interferir diretamente nos pontos problemáticos do sistema de sucessão de culturas e consequentemente no balanço de energia dos sistemas. Portanto, o objetivo do presente estudo é identificar o sistema de rotação de culturas, com melhor balanço e eficiência energética. Os dados de quantidade de insumos (sementes, adubos, defensivos e combustível), mão de obra homem e rendimento de grãos utilizados no estudo, foram coletados de um experimento de rotação de culturas conduzido na estação experimental do Instituto de Desenvolvimento Rural do Paraná – IAPAR-EMATER, Londrina-PR, durante os anos de 2014 a 2020. O delineamento experimental utilizado foi o de blocos ao acaso, com seis tratamentos e quatro repetições. Os tratamentos do experimento são: T1 (milho segunda safra/soja); T2 (aveia branca/soja; triticale/milho; trigo/soja); T3 (centeio + aveia preta/soja; aveia preta + nabo forrageiro/milho; braquiária/soja); T4 (canola/milho; crambe/milho; canola/soja); T5 (trigo mourisco - nabo forrageiro/milho; feijão/soja; trigo mourisco - aveia branca/soja) e T6 (trigo/milho; canola/milho + braquiária; feijão/soja). As diferentes rotações, bem como o sistema tradicional milho segunda safra/soja, proporcionaram balanço e eficiência energética positiva, ou seja, produziram mais energia do que consumiram. O sistema de rotação com canola/milho; crambe/milho; canola/soja apresentou o maior balanço e maior eficiência energética, com 866.442,27 MJ ha-1 e 10,27, respectivamente, em decorrência principalmente do cultivo do milho no verão, que resultou maior retorno energético em relação às demais culturas produtoras de grãos.UEL2021-10-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionBalanço e eficiência energéticaapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/4367810.5433/1679-0359.2021v42n6SUPL2p3651Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 42 No. 6SUPL2 (2021); 3651-3666Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 42 n. 6SUPL2 (2021); 3651-36661679-03591676-546Xreponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELenghttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/43678/30394Copyright (c) 2021 Semina: Ciências Agráriashttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFerreira, Henrique Giordani MartiniBordin, IvanBuratto, Osmar MazieroPontes, Laíse da Silveira2022-09-29T16:25:31Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/43678Revistahttp://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrariasPUBhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/oaisemina.agrarias@uel.br1679-03591676-546Xopendoar:2022-09-29T16:25:31Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Energy balance and efficiency in crop rotation systems
Balanço e eficiência energética em sistemas de rotação de culturas
title Energy balance and efficiency in crop rotation systems
spellingShingle Energy balance and efficiency in crop rotation systems
Ferreira, Henrique Giordani Martini
Conservation agriculture
Crop diversification
Crop succession
Energy balance
Energy in agriculture.
Agricultura conservacionista
Balanço energético
Diversificação de culturas
Energia na agricultura
Sucessão de culturas.
title_short Energy balance and efficiency in crop rotation systems
title_full Energy balance and efficiency in crop rotation systems
title_fullStr Energy balance and efficiency in crop rotation systems
title_full_unstemmed Energy balance and efficiency in crop rotation systems
title_sort Energy balance and efficiency in crop rotation systems
author Ferreira, Henrique Giordani Martini
author_facet Ferreira, Henrique Giordani Martini
Bordin, Ivan
Buratto, Osmar Maziero
Pontes, Laíse da Silveira
author_role author
author2 Bordin, Ivan
Buratto, Osmar Maziero
Pontes, Laíse da Silveira
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ferreira, Henrique Giordani Martini
Bordin, Ivan
Buratto, Osmar Maziero
Pontes, Laíse da Silveira
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Conservation agriculture
Crop diversification
Crop succession
Energy balance
Energy in agriculture.
Agricultura conservacionista
Balanço energético
Diversificação de culturas
Energia na agricultura
Sucessão de culturas.
topic Conservation agriculture
Crop diversification
Crop succession
Energy balance
Energy in agriculture.
Agricultura conservacionista
Balanço energético
Diversificação de culturas
Energia na agricultura
Sucessão de culturas.
description The production system model that has been adopted in most Brazilian regions, the soybean/second corn crop succession, has led to problems in water and soil conservation and favorable conditions for diseases, pests, and weeds in the agricultural system and, consequently, increasing its energy use. Crop rotation is an alternative to this production model, directly interfering with the problematic aspects of the crop succession system and, consequently, its energy balance. Therefore, this study aimed to identify the crop rotation system with the best energy balance and efficiency. The data on the quantity of inputs (seeds, fertilizers, pesticides, and fuel), labor, and grain yield used in the study were collected from a crop rotation experiment conducted at the experimental station of the Rural Development Institute of Paraná - IAPAR-EMATER, Londrina, PR, Brazil, from 2014 to 2020. The experimental design consisted of randomized blocks, with six treatments and four replications. The treatments consisted of T1 (second corn crop/soybean), T2 (white oat/soybean, triticale/corn, and wheat/soybean), T3 (rye + black oat/soybean, black oat + fodder radish/corn, and congo grass/soybean), T4 (canola/corn, crambe/corn; canola/soybean); T5 (buckwheat-fodder radish/corn, bean/soybean, and buckwheat-white oat/ soybean), and T6 (wheat/corn, canola/corn + congo grass, and bean/soybean). The different crop rotations and the traditional second corn crop/soybean system provided positive energy balance and efficiency, that is, they produced more energy than they consumed. The canola/corn, crambe/corn, and canola/soybean rotation systems had the highest energy balance and efficiency, with values of 866,442.27 MJ ha -1 and 10.27, respectively, mainly due to corn cultivation in the summer, which resulted in a higher energy return than the other grain-producing crops.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-10-08
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Balanço e eficiência energética
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/43678
10.5433/1679-0359.2021v42n6SUPL2p3651
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/43678
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/1679-0359.2021v42n6SUPL2p3651
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/43678/30394
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Semina: Ciências Agrárias
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Semina: Ciências Agrárias
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 42 No. 6SUPL2 (2021); 3651-3666
Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 42 n. 6SUPL2 (2021); 3651-3666
1679-0359
1676-546X
reponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
collection Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv semina.agrarias@uel.br
_version_ 1799306085425741824