Buffering capacity and fecal pH in healthy horses submitted to experimental enteral nutrition
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
DOI: | 10.5433/1679-0359.2021v42n6SUPL2p3793 |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/43099 |
Resumo: | This study set out to determine the impacts of a commercial equine enteral nutrition product on fecal pH, buffering capacity (BC) and physical examination variables. Eight healthy horses were randomly allocated to one of two simultaneous experimental groups in a 4×4 Latin square design. Horses were submitted to 12 hours of solid fasting, then fed increasing doses of the test product via nasogastric tube, as follows: 0% (pure water), 50%, 75% and 100% of the daily recommended dose. Test product doses were diluted in water (1:3) and delivered by bolus feeding. Fecal samples were taken directly from the rectal ampulla prior to (T0) and within 3, 6, 12, 24, 36 and 48 hours of product administration (T3, T6, T12, T24, T36 and T48 respectively). Within 24 to 36 hours of product administration, fecal pH was near 6 (p = 0.01). However, dose variation had no effect on pH. Product dose and sample collection time had a significant impact (p = 0.00) on buffering capacity at pH 6. The more dramatic drop in pH occurred within 24 to 36 hours of product administration, except in horses receiving the 0% dose (water). At pH 5, buffering capacity was affected by dose but not by sample collection time. Soft fecal consistency, increased intestinal motility and fat droplets in fecal samples were noted in most horses. Fecal pH and buffering capacity assessment are indirect tests. Still, results obtained from these tests were deemed useful for detection of intestinal changes, particularly when combined with physical examination. The product had an impact on faecal pH, buffering capacity and intestinal motility, therefore, it is recommended that the formulation be revised. |
id |
UEL-11_c01ebd0912e754f48c6db4e3d87dd3cc |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/43099 |
network_acronym_str |
UEL-11 |
network_name_str |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
spelling |
Buffering capacity and fecal pH in healthy horses submitted to experimental enteral nutritionCapacidade tamponante e pH fecal de equinos sadios submetidos a teste clínico de nutrição enteralAcidosisCarbohydratesColicEquineIntestine.AcidoseCarboidratosCólicaEquinosIntestino.This study set out to determine the impacts of a commercial equine enteral nutrition product on fecal pH, buffering capacity (BC) and physical examination variables. Eight healthy horses were randomly allocated to one of two simultaneous experimental groups in a 4×4 Latin square design. Horses were submitted to 12 hours of solid fasting, then fed increasing doses of the test product via nasogastric tube, as follows: 0% (pure water), 50%, 75% and 100% of the daily recommended dose. Test product doses were diluted in water (1:3) and delivered by bolus feeding. Fecal samples were taken directly from the rectal ampulla prior to (T0) and within 3, 6, 12, 24, 36 and 48 hours of product administration (T3, T6, T12, T24, T36 and T48 respectively). Within 24 to 36 hours of product administration, fecal pH was near 6 (p = 0.01). However, dose variation had no effect on pH. Product dose and sample collection time had a significant impact (p = 0.00) on buffering capacity at pH 6. The more dramatic drop in pH occurred within 24 to 36 hours of product administration, except in horses receiving the 0% dose (water). At pH 5, buffering capacity was affected by dose but not by sample collection time. Soft fecal consistency, increased intestinal motility and fat droplets in fecal samples were noted in most horses. Fecal pH and buffering capacity assessment are indirect tests. Still, results obtained from these tests were deemed useful for detection of intestinal changes, particularly when combined with physical examination. The product had an impact on faecal pH, buffering capacity and intestinal motility, therefore, it is recommended that the formulation be revised.O objetivo desse estudo foi avaliar o desempenho de uma formulação comercial para nutrição enteral em equinos quanto aos aspectos de pH fecal, capacidade tamponante (CT) nas fezes e exame físico. Para tal, utilizaram-se 8 equinos hígidos, distribuídos aleatoriamente em dois Quadrados Latinos 4 X 4 simultâneos, que permaneceram em jejum alimentar 12 horas antes de receberem via sonda nasogástrica doses crescentes de 0% (somente água), 50%, 75% e 100% da quantidade total diária recomendada do produto, com a diluição estabelecida de três partes de água para cada parte de produto. Foram colhidas amostras de fezes diretamente da ampola retal antes da administração do produto (T0), 3 (T3), 6 (T6), 12 (T12), 24 (T24), 36 (36) e 48 (T48) horas após. Entre 24 a 36 horas após a administração do produto, o pH fecal estava próximo a 6 (p = 0,01). No entanto, a variação da dose não teve efeito sobre o pH. A dose do produto e o tempo de coleta da amostra tiveram um impacto significativo (p = 0,00) na capacidade tamponante das fezes em pH 6. A queda mais dramática no pH ocorreu dentro de 24 a 36 horas da administração do produto, exceto em cavalos que receberam a dose de 0% (água). Em pH 5, a capacidade tamponante das fezes foi afetada pela dose, mas não pelo tempo de coleta da amostra. Consistência fecal mole, aumento da motilidade intestinal e gotículas de gordura nas amostras fecais foram observados na maioria dos cavalos. A avaliação do pH fecal e da capacidade de tamponante são testes indiretos. Ainda assim, os resultados obtidos com essas análises foram considerados úteis para a detecção de alterações intestinais, principalmente quando combinados com o exame físico. O produto teve impacto no pH fecal, capacidade tamponante das fezes e motilidade intestinal, portanto, recomenda-se que a formulação seja revisada.UEL2021-10-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/4309910.5433/1679-0359.2021v42n6SUPL2p3793Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 42 No. 6SUPL2 (2021); 3793-3802Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 42 n. 6SUPL2 (2021); 3793-38021679-03591676-546Xreponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELenghttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/43099/30365Copyright (c) 2021 Semina: Ciências Agráriashttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBaumhak, Marina JulianiMichima, Lilian Emy dos SantosAndrioli, Beatriz MoreiraBrandi, Roberta AriboniWeigel, Rebeca AlvesNichi, MarcílioBelli, Carla BargiSiqueira, Renata Farinelli de2022-09-29T16:38:18Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/43099Revistahttp://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrariasPUBhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/oaisemina.agrarias@uel.br1679-03591676-546Xopendoar:2022-09-29T16:38:18Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Buffering capacity and fecal pH in healthy horses submitted to experimental enteral nutrition Capacidade tamponante e pH fecal de equinos sadios submetidos a teste clínico de nutrição enteral |
title |
Buffering capacity and fecal pH in healthy horses submitted to experimental enteral nutrition |
spellingShingle |
Buffering capacity and fecal pH in healthy horses submitted to experimental enteral nutrition Buffering capacity and fecal pH in healthy horses submitted to experimental enteral nutrition Baumhak, Marina Juliani Acidosis Carbohydrates Colic Equine Intestine. Acidose Carboidratos Cólica Equinos Intestino. Baumhak, Marina Juliani Acidosis Carbohydrates Colic Equine Intestine. Acidose Carboidratos Cólica Equinos Intestino. |
title_short |
Buffering capacity and fecal pH in healthy horses submitted to experimental enteral nutrition |
title_full |
Buffering capacity and fecal pH in healthy horses submitted to experimental enteral nutrition |
title_fullStr |
Buffering capacity and fecal pH in healthy horses submitted to experimental enteral nutrition Buffering capacity and fecal pH in healthy horses submitted to experimental enteral nutrition |
title_full_unstemmed |
Buffering capacity and fecal pH in healthy horses submitted to experimental enteral nutrition Buffering capacity and fecal pH in healthy horses submitted to experimental enteral nutrition |
title_sort |
Buffering capacity and fecal pH in healthy horses submitted to experimental enteral nutrition |
author |
Baumhak, Marina Juliani |
author_facet |
Baumhak, Marina Juliani Baumhak, Marina Juliani Michima, Lilian Emy dos Santos Andrioli, Beatriz Moreira Brandi, Roberta Ariboni Weigel, Rebeca Alves Nichi, Marcílio Belli, Carla Bargi Siqueira, Renata Farinelli de Michima, Lilian Emy dos Santos Andrioli, Beatriz Moreira Brandi, Roberta Ariboni Weigel, Rebeca Alves Nichi, Marcílio Belli, Carla Bargi Siqueira, Renata Farinelli de |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Michima, Lilian Emy dos Santos Andrioli, Beatriz Moreira Brandi, Roberta Ariboni Weigel, Rebeca Alves Nichi, Marcílio Belli, Carla Bargi Siqueira, Renata Farinelli de |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Baumhak, Marina Juliani Michima, Lilian Emy dos Santos Andrioli, Beatriz Moreira Brandi, Roberta Ariboni Weigel, Rebeca Alves Nichi, Marcílio Belli, Carla Bargi Siqueira, Renata Farinelli de |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Acidosis Carbohydrates Colic Equine Intestine. Acidose Carboidratos Cólica Equinos Intestino. |
topic |
Acidosis Carbohydrates Colic Equine Intestine. Acidose Carboidratos Cólica Equinos Intestino. |
description |
This study set out to determine the impacts of a commercial equine enteral nutrition product on fecal pH, buffering capacity (BC) and physical examination variables. Eight healthy horses were randomly allocated to one of two simultaneous experimental groups in a 4×4 Latin square design. Horses were submitted to 12 hours of solid fasting, then fed increasing doses of the test product via nasogastric tube, as follows: 0% (pure water), 50%, 75% and 100% of the daily recommended dose. Test product doses were diluted in water (1:3) and delivered by bolus feeding. Fecal samples were taken directly from the rectal ampulla prior to (T0) and within 3, 6, 12, 24, 36 and 48 hours of product administration (T3, T6, T12, T24, T36 and T48 respectively). Within 24 to 36 hours of product administration, fecal pH was near 6 (p = 0.01). However, dose variation had no effect on pH. Product dose and sample collection time had a significant impact (p = 0.00) on buffering capacity at pH 6. The more dramatic drop in pH occurred within 24 to 36 hours of product administration, except in horses receiving the 0% dose (water). At pH 5, buffering capacity was affected by dose but not by sample collection time. Soft fecal consistency, increased intestinal motility and fat droplets in fecal samples were noted in most horses. Fecal pH and buffering capacity assessment are indirect tests. Still, results obtained from these tests were deemed useful for detection of intestinal changes, particularly when combined with physical examination. The product had an impact on faecal pH, buffering capacity and intestinal motility, therefore, it is recommended that the formulation be revised. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-10-08 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/43099 10.5433/1679-0359.2021v42n6SUPL2p3793 |
url |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/43099 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5433/1679-0359.2021v42n6SUPL2p3793 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/43099/30365 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Semina: Ciências Agrárias http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Semina: Ciências Agrárias http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UEL |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UEL |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 42 No. 6SUPL2 (2021); 3793-3802 Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 42 n. 6SUPL2 (2021); 3793-3802 1679-0359 1676-546X reponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) instacron:UEL |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
instacron_str |
UEL |
institution |
UEL |
reponame_str |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
collection |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
semina.agrarias@uel.br |
_version_ |
1822182691805593600 |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
10.5433/1679-0359.2021v42n6SUPL2p3793 |