Buffering capacity and fecal pH in healthy horses submitted to experimental enteral nutrition

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Baumhak, Marina Juliani
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Michima, Lilian Emy dos Santos, Andrioli, Beatriz Moreira, Brandi, Roberta Ariboni, Weigel, Rebeca Alves, Nichi, Marcílio, Belli, Carla Bargi, Siqueira, Renata Farinelli de
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
DOI: 10.5433/1679-0359.2021v42n6SUPL2p3793
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/43099
Resumo: This study set out to determine the impacts of a commercial equine enteral nutrition product on fecal pH, buffering capacity (BC) and physical examination variables. Eight healthy horses were randomly allocated to one of two simultaneous experimental groups in a 4×4 Latin square design. Horses were submitted to 12 hours of solid fasting, then fed increasing doses of the test product via nasogastric tube, as follows: 0% (pure water), 50%, 75% and 100% of the daily recommended dose. Test product doses were diluted in water (1:3) and delivered by bolus feeding. Fecal samples were taken directly from the rectal ampulla prior to (T0) and within 3, 6, 12, 24, 36 and 48 hours of product administration (T3, T6, T12, T24, T36 and T48 respectively). Within 24 to 36 hours of product administration, fecal pH was near 6 (p = 0.01). However, dose variation had no effect on pH. Product dose and sample collection time had a significant impact (p = 0.00) on buffering capacity at pH 6. The more dramatic drop in pH occurred within 24 to 36 hours of product administration, except in horses receiving the 0% dose (water). At pH 5, buffering capacity was affected by dose but not by sample collection time. Soft fecal consistency, increased intestinal motility and fat droplets in fecal samples were noted in most horses. Fecal pH and buffering capacity assessment are indirect tests. Still, results obtained from these tests were deemed useful for detection of intestinal changes, particularly when combined with physical examination. The product had an impact on faecal pH, buffering capacity and intestinal motility, therefore, it is recommended that the formulation be revised.
id UEL-11_c01ebd0912e754f48c6db4e3d87dd3cc
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/43099
network_acronym_str UEL-11
network_name_str Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
spelling Buffering capacity and fecal pH in healthy horses submitted to experimental enteral nutritionCapacidade tamponante e pH fecal de equinos sadios submetidos a teste clínico de nutrição enteralAcidosisCarbohydratesColicEquineIntestine.AcidoseCarboidratosCólicaEquinosIntestino.This study set out to determine the impacts of a commercial equine enteral nutrition product on fecal pH, buffering capacity (BC) and physical examination variables. Eight healthy horses were randomly allocated to one of two simultaneous experimental groups in a 4×4 Latin square design. Horses were submitted to 12 hours of solid fasting, then fed increasing doses of the test product via nasogastric tube, as follows: 0% (pure water), 50%, 75% and 100% of the daily recommended dose. Test product doses were diluted in water (1:3) and delivered by bolus feeding. Fecal samples were taken directly from the rectal ampulla prior to (T0) and within 3, 6, 12, 24, 36 and 48 hours of product administration (T3, T6, T12, T24, T36 and T48 respectively). Within 24 to 36 hours of product administration, fecal pH was near 6 (p = 0.01). However, dose variation had no effect on pH. Product dose and sample collection time had a significant impact (p = 0.00) on buffering capacity at pH 6. The more dramatic drop in pH occurred within 24 to 36 hours of product administration, except in horses receiving the 0% dose (water). At pH 5, buffering capacity was affected by dose but not by sample collection time. Soft fecal consistency, increased intestinal motility and fat droplets in fecal samples were noted in most horses. Fecal pH and buffering capacity assessment are indirect tests. Still, results obtained from these tests were deemed useful for detection of intestinal changes, particularly when combined with physical examination. The product had an impact on faecal pH, buffering capacity and intestinal motility, therefore, it is recommended that the formulation be revised.O objetivo desse estudo foi avaliar o desempenho de uma formulação comercial para nutrição enteral em equinos quanto aos aspectos de pH fecal, capacidade tamponante (CT) nas fezes e exame físico. Para tal, utilizaram-se 8 equinos hígidos, distribuídos aleatoriamente em dois Quadrados Latinos 4 X 4 simultâneos, que permaneceram em jejum alimentar 12 horas antes de receberem via sonda nasogástrica doses crescentes de 0% (somente água), 50%, 75% e 100% da quantidade total diária recomendada do produto, com a diluição estabelecida de três partes de água para cada parte de produto. Foram colhidas amostras de fezes diretamente da ampola retal antes da administração do produto (T0), 3 (T3), 6 (T6), 12 (T12), 24 (T24), 36 (36) e 48 (T48) horas após. Entre 24 a 36 horas após a administração do produto, o pH fecal estava próximo a 6 (p = 0,01). No entanto, a variação da dose não teve efeito sobre o pH. A dose do produto e o tempo de coleta da amostra tiveram um impacto significativo (p = 0,00) na capacidade tamponante das fezes em pH 6. A queda mais dramática no pH ocorreu dentro de 24 a 36 horas da administração do produto, exceto em cavalos que receberam a dose de 0% (água). Em pH 5, a capacidade tamponante das fezes foi afetada pela dose, mas não pelo tempo de coleta da amostra. Consistência fecal mole, aumento da motilidade intestinal e gotículas de gordura nas amostras fecais foram observados na maioria dos cavalos. A avaliação do pH fecal e da capacidade de tamponante são testes indiretos. Ainda assim, os resultados obtidos com essas análises foram considerados úteis para a detecção de alterações intestinais, principalmente quando combinados com o exame físico. O produto teve impacto no pH fecal, capacidade tamponante das fezes e motilidade intestinal, portanto, recomenda-se que a formulação seja revisada.UEL2021-10-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/4309910.5433/1679-0359.2021v42n6SUPL2p3793Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 42 No. 6SUPL2 (2021); 3793-3802Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 42 n. 6SUPL2 (2021); 3793-38021679-03591676-546Xreponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELenghttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/43099/30365Copyright (c) 2021 Semina: Ciências Agráriashttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBaumhak, Marina JulianiMichima, Lilian Emy dos SantosAndrioli, Beatriz MoreiraBrandi, Roberta AriboniWeigel, Rebeca AlvesNichi, MarcílioBelli, Carla BargiSiqueira, Renata Farinelli de2022-09-29T16:38:18Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/43099Revistahttp://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrariasPUBhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/oaisemina.agrarias@uel.br1679-03591676-546Xopendoar:2022-09-29T16:38:18Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Buffering capacity and fecal pH in healthy horses submitted to experimental enteral nutrition
Capacidade tamponante e pH fecal de equinos sadios submetidos a teste clínico de nutrição enteral
title Buffering capacity and fecal pH in healthy horses submitted to experimental enteral nutrition
spellingShingle Buffering capacity and fecal pH in healthy horses submitted to experimental enteral nutrition
Buffering capacity and fecal pH in healthy horses submitted to experimental enteral nutrition
Baumhak, Marina Juliani
Acidosis
Carbohydrates
Colic
Equine
Intestine.
Acidose
Carboidratos
Cólica
Equinos
Intestino.
Baumhak, Marina Juliani
Acidosis
Carbohydrates
Colic
Equine
Intestine.
Acidose
Carboidratos
Cólica
Equinos
Intestino.
title_short Buffering capacity and fecal pH in healthy horses submitted to experimental enteral nutrition
title_full Buffering capacity and fecal pH in healthy horses submitted to experimental enteral nutrition
title_fullStr Buffering capacity and fecal pH in healthy horses submitted to experimental enteral nutrition
Buffering capacity and fecal pH in healthy horses submitted to experimental enteral nutrition
title_full_unstemmed Buffering capacity and fecal pH in healthy horses submitted to experimental enteral nutrition
Buffering capacity and fecal pH in healthy horses submitted to experimental enteral nutrition
title_sort Buffering capacity and fecal pH in healthy horses submitted to experimental enteral nutrition
author Baumhak, Marina Juliani
author_facet Baumhak, Marina Juliani
Baumhak, Marina Juliani
Michima, Lilian Emy dos Santos
Andrioli, Beatriz Moreira
Brandi, Roberta Ariboni
Weigel, Rebeca Alves
Nichi, Marcílio
Belli, Carla Bargi
Siqueira, Renata Farinelli de
Michima, Lilian Emy dos Santos
Andrioli, Beatriz Moreira
Brandi, Roberta Ariboni
Weigel, Rebeca Alves
Nichi, Marcílio
Belli, Carla Bargi
Siqueira, Renata Farinelli de
author_role author
author2 Michima, Lilian Emy dos Santos
Andrioli, Beatriz Moreira
Brandi, Roberta Ariboni
Weigel, Rebeca Alves
Nichi, Marcílio
Belli, Carla Bargi
Siqueira, Renata Farinelli de
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Baumhak, Marina Juliani
Michima, Lilian Emy dos Santos
Andrioli, Beatriz Moreira
Brandi, Roberta Ariboni
Weigel, Rebeca Alves
Nichi, Marcílio
Belli, Carla Bargi
Siqueira, Renata Farinelli de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Acidosis
Carbohydrates
Colic
Equine
Intestine.
Acidose
Carboidratos
Cólica
Equinos
Intestino.
topic Acidosis
Carbohydrates
Colic
Equine
Intestine.
Acidose
Carboidratos
Cólica
Equinos
Intestino.
description This study set out to determine the impacts of a commercial equine enteral nutrition product on fecal pH, buffering capacity (BC) and physical examination variables. Eight healthy horses were randomly allocated to one of two simultaneous experimental groups in a 4×4 Latin square design. Horses were submitted to 12 hours of solid fasting, then fed increasing doses of the test product via nasogastric tube, as follows: 0% (pure water), 50%, 75% and 100% of the daily recommended dose. Test product doses were diluted in water (1:3) and delivered by bolus feeding. Fecal samples were taken directly from the rectal ampulla prior to (T0) and within 3, 6, 12, 24, 36 and 48 hours of product administration (T3, T6, T12, T24, T36 and T48 respectively). Within 24 to 36 hours of product administration, fecal pH was near 6 (p = 0.01). However, dose variation had no effect on pH. Product dose and sample collection time had a significant impact (p = 0.00) on buffering capacity at pH 6. The more dramatic drop in pH occurred within 24 to 36 hours of product administration, except in horses receiving the 0% dose (water). At pH 5, buffering capacity was affected by dose but not by sample collection time. Soft fecal consistency, increased intestinal motility and fat droplets in fecal samples were noted in most horses. Fecal pH and buffering capacity assessment are indirect tests. Still, results obtained from these tests were deemed useful for detection of intestinal changes, particularly when combined with physical examination. The product had an impact on faecal pH, buffering capacity and intestinal motility, therefore, it is recommended that the formulation be revised.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-10-08
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/43099
10.5433/1679-0359.2021v42n6SUPL2p3793
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/43099
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/1679-0359.2021v42n6SUPL2p3793
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/43099/30365
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Semina: Ciências Agrárias
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Semina: Ciências Agrárias
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 42 No. 6SUPL2 (2021); 3793-3802
Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 42 n. 6SUPL2 (2021); 3793-3802
1679-0359
1676-546X
reponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
collection Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv semina.agrarias@uel.br
_version_ 1822182691805593600
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv 10.5433/1679-0359.2021v42n6SUPL2p3793