Multiple supplements for beef heifers on pasture in dry season

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Silva-Marques, Renata Pereira da
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Zervoudakis, Joanis Tilemahos, Hatamoto-Zervoudakis, Luciana Keiko, Cabral, Luciano da Silva, Alexandrino, Emerson, Melo, Alan Carlos Barboza, Soares, Juliane Quenoizoré, Donida, Everton Riva, Silva, Lilian Chambo Rondena Pesqueira
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/15573
Resumo: The objective was to evaluate levels of multiple supplement for beef heifers in restricted grazing on average daily gain (ADG), economic analysis and intakes of total dry matter (TDMI), forage dry matter (FDMI), crude protein (CPI) and total digestible nutrients (TDNI). For evaluation of performance and economic analysis, twenty Nellore heifers (328.45 kg) were used. The following supplements were evaluated as fed to the animals: control (mineral supplement) and supplementation levels of 2, 4 and 6 kg/animal/day, composing the following percentages of average body weight (ABW): 0.55, 1.11 and 1.66%, respectively. To evaluate the nutrient intake, additional five Nellore heifers with 344 kg, were used, which were submitted to same supplements previously mentioned, in addition to the level of 2.22% of ABW (8 kg/animal/day). Average daily gain showed quadratic behavior; TDMI, CPI and TDNI had increasing linear behavior; and FDMI showed decreasing linear behavior in function of the supplementation levels. The strategy of supplying 0.55, 1.11 and 1.66% of the ABW to heifers on restricted grazing provides additional weight gains of 608, 762 and 943 g/day, respectively, which are effective in promoting similar productive and economic performance to those obtained in grazing systems in the rainy period.
id UEL-11_d40446d48ea6efc255bde041cea576aa
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/15573
network_acronym_str UEL-11
network_name_str Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Multiple supplements for beef heifers on pasture in dry seasonSuplementos múltiplos para novilhas de corte em pastejo no período secoSoybean hullsBrachiaria brizanthaReplacement effectWeight gainSupplementation.Casca de sojaBrachiaria brizanthaEfeito substitutivoGanho de pesoSuplementação.Produção AnimalNutrição e Alimentação AnimalThe objective was to evaluate levels of multiple supplement for beef heifers in restricted grazing on average daily gain (ADG), economic analysis and intakes of total dry matter (TDMI), forage dry matter (FDMI), crude protein (CPI) and total digestible nutrients (TDNI). For evaluation of performance and economic analysis, twenty Nellore heifers (328.45 kg) were used. The following supplements were evaluated as fed to the animals: control (mineral supplement) and supplementation levels of 2, 4 and 6 kg/animal/day, composing the following percentages of average body weight (ABW): 0.55, 1.11 and 1.66%, respectively. To evaluate the nutrient intake, additional five Nellore heifers with 344 kg, were used, which were submitted to same supplements previously mentioned, in addition to the level of 2.22% of ABW (8 kg/animal/day). Average daily gain showed quadratic behavior; TDMI, CPI and TDNI had increasing linear behavior; and FDMI showed decreasing linear behavior in function of the supplementation levels. The strategy of supplying 0.55, 1.11 and 1.66% of the ABW to heifers on restricted grazing provides additional weight gains of 608, 762 and 943 g/day, respectively, which are effective in promoting similar productive and economic performance to those obtained in grazing systems in the rainy period.Objetivou-se avaliar níveis de suplementos múltiplos para novilhas de corte em pastejo restrito, sobre ganho médio diário (GMD), análise econômica e consumo de matéria seca (CMS), consumo de forragem (CFO), consumo de proteína bruta (CPB) e consumo de nutrientes digestíveis totais (CNDT). Para avaliação do desempenho e análise econômica foram utilizadas 20 novilhas Nelore com 328,45 ± 35,32 kg, em que foram avaliados os seguintes suplementos: controle (SAL) e níveis de suplementação de 2, 4 e 6 kg/animal/dia, perfazendo as seguintes proporções em % do peso corporal (PC): 0,55; 1,11 e 1,66%, respectivamente. Para avaliação do consumo de nutrientes foram utilizadas outras 5 novilhas Nelore com 344 ± 21,10 kg, em que foram avaliados os mesmos suplementos supracitados além do nível 2,22%PCM (8 kg/animal/dia). O GMD apresentou comportamento quadrático; os CMST, PB e CNDT apresentaram comportamento linear crescente e o CMSF linear decrescente em função dos níveis de suplementos. A estratégia de fornecimento de 0,55% do PCM proporcionou o melhor retorno econômico. A suplementação de 0,55; 1,11 e 1,66% do PCM para novilhas em pastejo restrito proporciona ganhos adicionais de peso de 608; 762 e 943 g/dia, respectivamente, os quais são efetivos em promover desempenhos produtivos e econômicos semelhantes aos obtidos em sistemas a pasto no período das águas.UEL2015-02-28info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/1557310.5433/1679-0359.2015v36n1p525Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 36 No. 1 (2015); 525-540Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 36 n. 1 (2015); 525-5401679-03591676-546Xreponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/15573/pdf_605Copyright (c) 2015 Semina: Ciências Agráriashttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilva-Marques, Renata Pereira daZervoudakis, Joanis TilemahosHatamoto-Zervoudakis, Luciana KeikoCabral, Luciano da SilvaAlexandrino, EmersonMelo, Alan Carlos BarbozaSoares, Juliane QuenoizoréDonida, Everton RivaSilva, Lilian Chambo Rondena Pesqueira2023-01-13T15:36:05Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/15573Revistahttp://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrariasPUBhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/oaisemina.agrarias@uel.br1679-03591676-546Xopendoar:2023-01-13T15:36:05Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Multiple supplements for beef heifers on pasture in dry season
Suplementos múltiplos para novilhas de corte em pastejo no período seco
title Multiple supplements for beef heifers on pasture in dry season
spellingShingle Multiple supplements for beef heifers on pasture in dry season
Silva-Marques, Renata Pereira da
Soybean hulls
Brachiaria brizantha
Replacement effect
Weight gain
Supplementation.
Casca de soja
Brachiaria brizantha
Efeito substitutivo
Ganho de peso
Suplementação.
Produção Animal
Nutrição e Alimentação Animal
title_short Multiple supplements for beef heifers on pasture in dry season
title_full Multiple supplements for beef heifers on pasture in dry season
title_fullStr Multiple supplements for beef heifers on pasture in dry season
title_full_unstemmed Multiple supplements for beef heifers on pasture in dry season
title_sort Multiple supplements for beef heifers on pasture in dry season
author Silva-Marques, Renata Pereira da
author_facet Silva-Marques, Renata Pereira da
Zervoudakis, Joanis Tilemahos
Hatamoto-Zervoudakis, Luciana Keiko
Cabral, Luciano da Silva
Alexandrino, Emerson
Melo, Alan Carlos Barboza
Soares, Juliane Quenoizoré
Donida, Everton Riva
Silva, Lilian Chambo Rondena Pesqueira
author_role author
author2 Zervoudakis, Joanis Tilemahos
Hatamoto-Zervoudakis, Luciana Keiko
Cabral, Luciano da Silva
Alexandrino, Emerson
Melo, Alan Carlos Barboza
Soares, Juliane Quenoizoré
Donida, Everton Riva
Silva, Lilian Chambo Rondena Pesqueira
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Silva-Marques, Renata Pereira da
Zervoudakis, Joanis Tilemahos
Hatamoto-Zervoudakis, Luciana Keiko
Cabral, Luciano da Silva
Alexandrino, Emerson
Melo, Alan Carlos Barboza
Soares, Juliane Quenoizoré
Donida, Everton Riva
Silva, Lilian Chambo Rondena Pesqueira
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Soybean hulls
Brachiaria brizantha
Replacement effect
Weight gain
Supplementation.
Casca de soja
Brachiaria brizantha
Efeito substitutivo
Ganho de peso
Suplementação.
Produção Animal
Nutrição e Alimentação Animal
topic Soybean hulls
Brachiaria brizantha
Replacement effect
Weight gain
Supplementation.
Casca de soja
Brachiaria brizantha
Efeito substitutivo
Ganho de peso
Suplementação.
Produção Animal
Nutrição e Alimentação Animal
description The objective was to evaluate levels of multiple supplement for beef heifers in restricted grazing on average daily gain (ADG), economic analysis and intakes of total dry matter (TDMI), forage dry matter (FDMI), crude protein (CPI) and total digestible nutrients (TDNI). For evaluation of performance and economic analysis, twenty Nellore heifers (328.45 kg) were used. The following supplements were evaluated as fed to the animals: control (mineral supplement) and supplementation levels of 2, 4 and 6 kg/animal/day, composing the following percentages of average body weight (ABW): 0.55, 1.11 and 1.66%, respectively. To evaluate the nutrient intake, additional five Nellore heifers with 344 kg, were used, which were submitted to same supplements previously mentioned, in addition to the level of 2.22% of ABW (8 kg/animal/day). Average daily gain showed quadratic behavior; TDMI, CPI and TDNI had increasing linear behavior; and FDMI showed decreasing linear behavior in function of the supplementation levels. The strategy of supplying 0.55, 1.11 and 1.66% of the ABW to heifers on restricted grazing provides additional weight gains of 608, 762 and 943 g/day, respectively, which are effective in promoting similar productive and economic performance to those obtained in grazing systems in the rainy period.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-02-28
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/15573
10.5433/1679-0359.2015v36n1p525
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/15573
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/1679-0359.2015v36n1p525
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/15573/pdf_605
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2015 Semina: Ciências Agrárias
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2015 Semina: Ciências Agrárias
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 36 No. 1 (2015); 525-540
Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 36 n. 1 (2015); 525-540
1679-0359
1676-546X
reponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
collection Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv semina.agrarias@uel.br
_version_ 1799306070296887296