Technical and economic efficiency of bovine weighing methods
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/27810 |
Resumo: | The objective of this study was to evaluate the technical and economic efficiency of different methods of cattle weighing, and to develop mathematical equations to estimate the breakeven point for the adoption of electronic weighing, i.e., to estimate how many animals are required for the acquisition and use of an electronic scale to be economically viable. The survey was conducted in confined beef cattle, from the Federal Institute of Education, Science and Technology in the south of Minas Gerais, IFSUL DE MINAS, Muzambinho Campus, from July to December 2014. Two methods of weighing cattle were evaluated: an electronic scale and a tape measure, using a barimetric tape for dairy cattle and a barimetric tape for beef cattle, and a conventional tape measure involving the conversion of centimeters into body weight using a specific table. Thirty-three animals identified with plastic ear tags were weighed using each method. Animals of the Nellore, Senepol, Girolando, and Red-angus breeds, aged 0–1, 1–2, and 2–3 years, were weighed 402 times in total. The time taken to weigh animals with the electronic scale was the lowest, followed by that with the barimetric tape, and that with conventional tape measure with conversion. The electronic scale exhibited the greatest technical efficiency, owing to the lack of error and the lowest time required to weigh animals. However, the costs associated with the use of this equipment were the highest, which depended on the purchasing cost. The mathematical equations developed will help technicians and cattle farmers to rapidly and precisely estimate the minimum number of animals that should compose a production system to ensure economic viability for the adoption of an electronic method to weigh cattle. |
id |
UEL-11_d7455e82e6e582ee133e8463145c60d2 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/27810 |
network_acronym_str |
UEL-11 |
network_name_str |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Technical and economic efficiency of bovine weighing methodsEficiência técnica e econômica de diferentes métodos de pesagem de bovinosAutomationCattle raisingAnimals handlingMorphometryPrecision animal science.AutomaçãoBovinoculturaManejo de animaisMorfometriaZootecnia de precisão.The objective of this study was to evaluate the technical and economic efficiency of different methods of cattle weighing, and to develop mathematical equations to estimate the breakeven point for the adoption of electronic weighing, i.e., to estimate how many animals are required for the acquisition and use of an electronic scale to be economically viable. The survey was conducted in confined beef cattle, from the Federal Institute of Education, Science and Technology in the south of Minas Gerais, IFSUL DE MINAS, Muzambinho Campus, from July to December 2014. Two methods of weighing cattle were evaluated: an electronic scale and a tape measure, using a barimetric tape for dairy cattle and a barimetric tape for beef cattle, and a conventional tape measure involving the conversion of centimeters into body weight using a specific table. Thirty-three animals identified with plastic ear tags were weighed using each method. Animals of the Nellore, Senepol, Girolando, and Red-angus breeds, aged 0–1, 1–2, and 2–3 years, were weighed 402 times in total. The time taken to weigh animals with the electronic scale was the lowest, followed by that with the barimetric tape, and that with conventional tape measure with conversion. The electronic scale exhibited the greatest technical efficiency, owing to the lack of error and the lowest time required to weigh animals. However, the costs associated with the use of this equipment were the highest, which depended on the purchasing cost. The mathematical equations developed will help technicians and cattle farmers to rapidly and precisely estimate the minimum number of animals that should compose a production system to ensure economic viability for the adoption of an electronic method to weigh cattle.Objetivou-se avaliar a eficiência técnica e econômica da implantação e utilização de diferentes métodos de pesagem de bovinos e desenvolver equações matemáticas que permitam estimar o ponto de equilíbrio para utilização do método eletrônico de pesagem, ou seja, estimar a partir de quantos animais é viável economicamente a aquisição e utilização da balança eletrônica. A pesquisa foi realizada no setor de gado de corte, em regime de confinamento, do Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia do Sul de Minas Gerais, IFSUL DE MINAS-Campus Muzambinho, no período de julho a dezembro de 2014. Foram avaliados dois métodos de pesagem de bovinos: balança eletrônica e fita métrica, sendo essa nas modalidades fita barimétrica para gado de leite e fita barimétrica para gado de corte e fita métrica convencional com conversão de centímetro em peso vivo (PV), utilizando-se tabela específica para essa finalidade. Cada método foi aplicado em 33 animais, identificados com brincos plásticos auriculares, das raças Nelore, Senepol, Girolando e Red-angus, com diferentes faixas etárias (0 a 1; 1 a 2; 2 a 3 anos), sendo realizadas 402 pesagens. O tempo necessário para pesagem dos animais pelo método balança eletrônica foi o mais rápido, seguido pela fita barimétrica e fita métrica convencional com conversão de centímetro em tabela de PV. O método que apresentou maior eficiência técnica, em função de não ter apresentado erro e menor tempo gasto na pesagem dos animais, foi a balança eletrônica. No entanto, o custo da utilização deste equipamento foi o mais alto, principalmente em função do valor de sua aquisição. As equações matemáticas desenvolvidas auxiliam os técnicos e pecuaristas a estimar, com precisão e considerável rapidez, a quantidade mínima de animais que devem compor um sistema de produção para tornar economicamente viável a adoção do método eletrônico de pesagem animal.UEL2018-05-04info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPesquisa Empírica de Campoapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/2781010.5433/1679-0359.2018v39n3p1167Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 39 No. 3 (2018); 1167-1180Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 39 n. 3 (2018); 1167-11801679-03591676-546Xreponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELenghttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/27810/23513Copyright (c) 2018 Semina: Ciências Agráriashttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLopes, Marcos AurélioVieira, Juliana AparecidaLima, Francisco Helton Sá deDemeu, Fabiana AlvesBruhn, Fábio Raphael PascotiPereira, AdrianoVicente, Fabio HenriqueCasas, Pedro Salermo2022-10-20T20:51:40Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/27810Revistahttp://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrariasPUBhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/oaisemina.agrarias@uel.br1679-03591676-546Xopendoar:2022-10-20T20:51:40Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Technical and economic efficiency of bovine weighing methods Eficiência técnica e econômica de diferentes métodos de pesagem de bovinos |
title |
Technical and economic efficiency of bovine weighing methods |
spellingShingle |
Technical and economic efficiency of bovine weighing methods Lopes, Marcos Aurélio Automation Cattle raising Animals handling Morphometry Precision animal science. Automação Bovinocultura Manejo de animais Morfometria Zootecnia de precisão. |
title_short |
Technical and economic efficiency of bovine weighing methods |
title_full |
Technical and economic efficiency of bovine weighing methods |
title_fullStr |
Technical and economic efficiency of bovine weighing methods |
title_full_unstemmed |
Technical and economic efficiency of bovine weighing methods |
title_sort |
Technical and economic efficiency of bovine weighing methods |
author |
Lopes, Marcos Aurélio |
author_facet |
Lopes, Marcos Aurélio Vieira, Juliana Aparecida Lima, Francisco Helton Sá de Demeu, Fabiana Alves Bruhn, Fábio Raphael Pascoti Pereira, Adriano Vicente, Fabio Henrique Casas, Pedro Salermo |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Vieira, Juliana Aparecida Lima, Francisco Helton Sá de Demeu, Fabiana Alves Bruhn, Fábio Raphael Pascoti Pereira, Adriano Vicente, Fabio Henrique Casas, Pedro Salermo |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Lopes, Marcos Aurélio Vieira, Juliana Aparecida Lima, Francisco Helton Sá de Demeu, Fabiana Alves Bruhn, Fábio Raphael Pascoti Pereira, Adriano Vicente, Fabio Henrique Casas, Pedro Salermo |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Automation Cattle raising Animals handling Morphometry Precision animal science. Automação Bovinocultura Manejo de animais Morfometria Zootecnia de precisão. |
topic |
Automation Cattle raising Animals handling Morphometry Precision animal science. Automação Bovinocultura Manejo de animais Morfometria Zootecnia de precisão. |
description |
The objective of this study was to evaluate the technical and economic efficiency of different methods of cattle weighing, and to develop mathematical equations to estimate the breakeven point for the adoption of electronic weighing, i.e., to estimate how many animals are required for the acquisition and use of an electronic scale to be economically viable. The survey was conducted in confined beef cattle, from the Federal Institute of Education, Science and Technology in the south of Minas Gerais, IFSUL DE MINAS, Muzambinho Campus, from July to December 2014. Two methods of weighing cattle were evaluated: an electronic scale and a tape measure, using a barimetric tape for dairy cattle and a barimetric tape for beef cattle, and a conventional tape measure involving the conversion of centimeters into body weight using a specific table. Thirty-three animals identified with plastic ear tags were weighed using each method. Animals of the Nellore, Senepol, Girolando, and Red-angus breeds, aged 0–1, 1–2, and 2–3 years, were weighed 402 times in total. The time taken to weigh animals with the electronic scale was the lowest, followed by that with the barimetric tape, and that with conventional tape measure with conversion. The electronic scale exhibited the greatest technical efficiency, owing to the lack of error and the lowest time required to weigh animals. However, the costs associated with the use of this equipment were the highest, which depended on the purchasing cost. The mathematical equations developed will help technicians and cattle farmers to rapidly and precisely estimate the minimum number of animals that should compose a production system to ensure economic viability for the adoption of an electronic method to weigh cattle. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-05-04 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Pesquisa Empírica de Campo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/27810 10.5433/1679-0359.2018v39n3p1167 |
url |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/27810 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5433/1679-0359.2018v39n3p1167 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/27810/23513 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Semina: Ciências Agrárias http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Semina: Ciências Agrárias http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UEL |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UEL |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 39 No. 3 (2018); 1167-1180 Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 39 n. 3 (2018); 1167-1180 1679-0359 1676-546X reponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) instacron:UEL |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
instacron_str |
UEL |
institution |
UEL |
reponame_str |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
collection |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
semina.agrarias@uel.br |
_version_ |
1799306077199663104 |