Physico-chemical, microbiological and rheological evaluation of dairy beverage and fermented milk added of probiotics

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Cunha, Thiago Meurer
Data de Publicação: 2008
Outros Autores: Castro, Fabiane Picinin de, Barreto, Pedro Luiz Manique, Benedet, Honório Domingos, Prudêncio, Elane Schwinden
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/2860
Resumo: Lactic beverage (sample 1), with 70% of milk and 30% of cheese whey, and fermented milk (sample 2), with 100% of milk, added of Lactobacillus acidophilus La-5, Bifidobacterium Bb-12 and Streptococcus thermophilus, were evaluated about physico-chemical composition, enumeration of viable cells of probiotic bacteria and rheological measurements, in the temperatures of 2.0 ± 0.1 ºC; 4.0 ± 0.1 ºC; 6.0 ± 0.1 ºC and 8.0 ± 0.1 ºC. The whey addition resulted in lactic beverage with lesser contents (p < 0.05) of total solids (18.08 ± 0.08% m/m), proteins (2,23 ± 0.10% m/m), lipids (1.91 ± 0.02% m/m) and caloric value (79.27 ± 0.37 Kcal/ 100 g), when compared with those presented in fermented milk, respectively. While, the contents of ashes, carbohydrates, the acidity and pH of the lactic beverage and fermented milk weren’t different (p > 0.05). According to Brazilian legislation the lactic beverage and fermented milk were considered probiotic (> 106 CFU/mL). The two samples (1 and 2) had behaved as pseudoplastic fluids, confirming the non- Newtonian behavior and had presented thixotropy. The values for the activation energy were equal to 1.89 Kcal.mol-1, for the lactic beverage, and 1.84 Kcal.mol-1, for the fermented milk, indicating that the activation energy was not influenced by the amount of whey used, as well as the temperature also did not influence on the apparent viscosity of samples 1 and 2.
id UEL-11_da6ccbe8885259ab2906eb4bab877211
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/2860
network_acronym_str UEL-11
network_name_str Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Physico-chemical, microbiological and rheological evaluation of dairy beverage and fermented milk added of probioticsAvaliação físico-química, microbiológica e reológica de bebida láctea e leite fermentado adicionados de probióticosWheyFermentationCentesimal compositionFunctional foodViscosity.Soro de queijoFermentaçãoComposição centesimalAlimento funcionalViscosidade.Lactic beverage (sample 1), with 70% of milk and 30% of cheese whey, and fermented milk (sample 2), with 100% of milk, added of Lactobacillus acidophilus La-5, Bifidobacterium Bb-12 and Streptococcus thermophilus, were evaluated about physico-chemical composition, enumeration of viable cells of probiotic bacteria and rheological measurements, in the temperatures of 2.0 ± 0.1 ºC; 4.0 ± 0.1 ºC; 6.0 ± 0.1 ºC and 8.0 ± 0.1 ºC. The whey addition resulted in lactic beverage with lesser contents (p < 0.05) of total solids (18.08 ± 0.08% m/m), proteins (2,23 ± 0.10% m/m), lipids (1.91 ± 0.02% m/m) and caloric value (79.27 ± 0.37 Kcal/ 100 g), when compared with those presented in fermented milk, respectively. While, the contents of ashes, carbohydrates, the acidity and pH of the lactic beverage and fermented milk weren’t different (p > 0.05). According to Brazilian legislation the lactic beverage and fermented milk were considered probiotic (> 106 CFU/mL). The two samples (1 and 2) had behaved as pseudoplastic fluids, confirming the non- Newtonian behavior and had presented thixotropy. The values for the activation energy were equal to 1.89 Kcal.mol-1, for the lactic beverage, and 1.84 Kcal.mol-1, for the fermented milk, indicating that the activation energy was not influenced by the amount of whey used, as well as the temperature also did not influence on the apparent viscosity of samples 1 and 2.Bebida láctea (amostra 1), com 70 % de leite e 30 % de soro de queijo, e leite fermentado (amostra 2), com 100% de leite, adicionados de Lactobacillus acidophilus La-5, Bifidobacterium Bb-12 e Streptococcus thermophilus, foram avaliados quanto à composição físico-química, contagem de células viáveis de bactérias probióticas e medidas reológicas, nas temperaturas de 2,0 ± 0,1ºC; 4,0 ± 0,1 ºC; 6,0 ± 0,1 ºC e 8,0± 0,1 ºC. A adição de soro resultou em uma bebida láctea com menores teores (p < 0,05) de sólidos totais (18,08 ± 0,08 % m/m), proteínas (2,23 ± 0,10 % m/m), lipídios (1,91 ± 0,02 % m/m) e valor calórico (79,27 ± 0,37 Kcal/100 g), quando comparados aos teores apresentados no leite fermentado, respectivamente iguais a 19,44 ± 0,02 % m/m; 2,80 ± 0,23 % m/m; 3,03 ± 0,08 % m/m e 90,47 ± 0,53 Kcal/100 g. Já, os teores de cinzas, carboidratos, acidez e pH da bebida láctea e do leite fermentado não diferiram (p > 0,05). De acordo com a legislação brasileira, a bebida láctea e o leite fermentado foram considerados probióticos (> 106 UFC/mL). As duas amostras (1 e 2) comportaram-se como fluidos pseudoplásticos, confirmando o comportamento não-Newtoniano e apresentaram tixotropia. Os valores para a energia de ativação foram iguais a 1,89 Kcal.mol-1, para a bebida láctea, e 1,84 Kcal.mol-1, para o leite fermentado, indicando que a energia de ativação não foi influenciada pelo teor de soro empregado, bem como a temperatura também não teve influencia sobre a viscosidade aparente das amostras 1 e 2.UEL2008-08-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/286010.5433/1679-0359.2008v29n1p103Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 29 No. 1 (2008); 103-116Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 29 n. 1 (2008); 103-1161679-03591676-546Xreponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/2860/2425Cunha, Thiago MeurerCastro, Fabiane Picinin deBarreto, Pedro Luiz ManiqueBenedet, Honório DomingosPrudêncio, Elane Schwindeninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2015-11-19T18:38:51Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/2860Revistahttp://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrariasPUBhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/oaisemina.agrarias@uel.br1679-03591676-546Xopendoar:2015-11-19T18:38:51Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Physico-chemical, microbiological and rheological evaluation of dairy beverage and fermented milk added of probiotics
Avaliação físico-química, microbiológica e reológica de bebida láctea e leite fermentado adicionados de probióticos
title Physico-chemical, microbiological and rheological evaluation of dairy beverage and fermented milk added of probiotics
spellingShingle Physico-chemical, microbiological and rheological evaluation of dairy beverage and fermented milk added of probiotics
Cunha, Thiago Meurer
Whey
Fermentation
Centesimal composition
Functional food
Viscosity.
Soro de queijo
Fermentação
Composição centesimal
Alimento funcional
Viscosidade.
title_short Physico-chemical, microbiological and rheological evaluation of dairy beverage and fermented milk added of probiotics
title_full Physico-chemical, microbiological and rheological evaluation of dairy beverage and fermented milk added of probiotics
title_fullStr Physico-chemical, microbiological and rheological evaluation of dairy beverage and fermented milk added of probiotics
title_full_unstemmed Physico-chemical, microbiological and rheological evaluation of dairy beverage and fermented milk added of probiotics
title_sort Physico-chemical, microbiological and rheological evaluation of dairy beverage and fermented milk added of probiotics
author Cunha, Thiago Meurer
author_facet Cunha, Thiago Meurer
Castro, Fabiane Picinin de
Barreto, Pedro Luiz Manique
Benedet, Honório Domingos
Prudêncio, Elane Schwinden
author_role author
author2 Castro, Fabiane Picinin de
Barreto, Pedro Luiz Manique
Benedet, Honório Domingos
Prudêncio, Elane Schwinden
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Cunha, Thiago Meurer
Castro, Fabiane Picinin de
Barreto, Pedro Luiz Manique
Benedet, Honório Domingos
Prudêncio, Elane Schwinden
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Whey
Fermentation
Centesimal composition
Functional food
Viscosity.
Soro de queijo
Fermentação
Composição centesimal
Alimento funcional
Viscosidade.
topic Whey
Fermentation
Centesimal composition
Functional food
Viscosity.
Soro de queijo
Fermentação
Composição centesimal
Alimento funcional
Viscosidade.
description Lactic beverage (sample 1), with 70% of milk and 30% of cheese whey, and fermented milk (sample 2), with 100% of milk, added of Lactobacillus acidophilus La-5, Bifidobacterium Bb-12 and Streptococcus thermophilus, were evaluated about physico-chemical composition, enumeration of viable cells of probiotic bacteria and rheological measurements, in the temperatures of 2.0 ± 0.1 ºC; 4.0 ± 0.1 ºC; 6.0 ± 0.1 ºC and 8.0 ± 0.1 ºC. The whey addition resulted in lactic beverage with lesser contents (p < 0.05) of total solids (18.08 ± 0.08% m/m), proteins (2,23 ± 0.10% m/m), lipids (1.91 ± 0.02% m/m) and caloric value (79.27 ± 0.37 Kcal/ 100 g), when compared with those presented in fermented milk, respectively. While, the contents of ashes, carbohydrates, the acidity and pH of the lactic beverage and fermented milk weren’t different (p > 0.05). According to Brazilian legislation the lactic beverage and fermented milk were considered probiotic (> 106 CFU/mL). The two samples (1 and 2) had behaved as pseudoplastic fluids, confirming the non- Newtonian behavior and had presented thixotropy. The values for the activation energy were equal to 1.89 Kcal.mol-1, for the lactic beverage, and 1.84 Kcal.mol-1, for the fermented milk, indicating that the activation energy was not influenced by the amount of whey used, as well as the temperature also did not influence on the apparent viscosity of samples 1 and 2.
publishDate 2008
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2008-08-30
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/2860
10.5433/1679-0359.2008v29n1p103
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/2860
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/1679-0359.2008v29n1p103
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/2860/2425
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 29 No. 1 (2008); 103-116
Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 29 n. 1 (2008); 103-116
1679-0359
1676-546X
reponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
collection Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv semina.agrarias@uel.br
_version_ 1799306055384039424