Development and physical-chemical, microbiological and sensory characterization of fermented dairy beverage prepared with different stabilizers/thickener
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2013 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/12368 |
Resumo: | This study was conducted to evaluate the physical-chemical, sensory and microbiological characteristics of fermented dairy beverages prepared with 10% sucrose, 50% milk and 50% whey and added five different stabilizers/thickeners in two concentrations (0,50% and 1,00% in relation to the final formulation). Ten treatments have been developed: PCPS 1,00% = protein (0,50%) and whey protein concentrate (0,50%); GP 1,00% = powdered gelatin (1,00%); GG 1,00% = guar gum (1,00%); AM 1.00% = corn starch (1,00%); GGCMC 1,00% = guar gum (0,50%) and carboxymethylcellulose (0,50%); PCPS 0,50 % = protein (0,25%) and whey protein concentrate (0,25%); GP 0.50% = powdered gelatin (0,50%); GG 0.50% = guar (0,50%); AM 0,50% = corn starch (0,50%); GGCMC 0,50% = guar gum (0,25%) and carboxymethylcellulose (0,25%). The fermented dairy beverages were evaluated for pH, acidity in lactic acid, moisture, ash, fat, protein, viscosity, syneresis, sensory acceptance (in a nine-point hedonic scale) and count of coliforms at 35ºC and 45°C. The results were submitted to ANOVA and mean test with significance level of 5%. It was observed that the types and percentages of stabilizers/thickeners mainly influenced the values of syneresis, viscosity and acceptance of samples. Those of the treatments containing protein and whey protein concentrate (1,00%), guar gum (1,00%) and gelatin (0,50%) showed viscosity/consistency similiar/compatible with yogurt and commercial fermented dairy beverages and showed no syneresis, after processing. All formulations were safe to be consumed considering the microbiological results and according to the legislation. The treatment with 0,50% gelatin stood out for the best acceptance for appearance, aroma, color and texture. |
id |
UEL-11_4b71dc8f03b53207d07e30aa677482e7 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/12368 |
network_acronym_str |
UEL-11 |
network_name_str |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Development and physical-chemical, microbiological and sensory characterization of fermented dairy beverage prepared with different stabilizers/thickenerDesenvolvimento e caracterização físico-química, microbiológica e sensorial de bebida láctea fermentada elaborada com diferentes estabilizantes/espessantesHydrocolloidsMilkRetentionWheyViscosity.HidrocolóidesLeiteRetençãoSoro LácteoViscosidade.Ciências AgráriasThis study was conducted to evaluate the physical-chemical, sensory and microbiological characteristics of fermented dairy beverages prepared with 10% sucrose, 50% milk and 50% whey and added five different stabilizers/thickeners in two concentrations (0,50% and 1,00% in relation to the final formulation). Ten treatments have been developed: PCPS 1,00% = protein (0,50%) and whey protein concentrate (0,50%); GP 1,00% = powdered gelatin (1,00%); GG 1,00% = guar gum (1,00%); AM 1.00% = corn starch (1,00%); GGCMC 1,00% = guar gum (0,50%) and carboxymethylcellulose (0,50%); PCPS 0,50 % = protein (0,25%) and whey protein concentrate (0,25%); GP 0.50% = powdered gelatin (0,50%); GG 0.50% = guar (0,50%); AM 0,50% = corn starch (0,50%); GGCMC 0,50% = guar gum (0,25%) and carboxymethylcellulose (0,25%). The fermented dairy beverages were evaluated for pH, acidity in lactic acid, moisture, ash, fat, protein, viscosity, syneresis, sensory acceptance (in a nine-point hedonic scale) and count of coliforms at 35ºC and 45°C. The results were submitted to ANOVA and mean test with significance level of 5%. It was observed that the types and percentages of stabilizers/thickeners mainly influenced the values of syneresis, viscosity and acceptance of samples. Those of the treatments containing protein and whey protein concentrate (1,00%), guar gum (1,00%) and gelatin (0,50%) showed viscosity/consistency similiar/compatible with yogurt and commercial fermented dairy beverages and showed no syneresis, after processing. All formulations were safe to be consumed considering the microbiological results and according to the legislation. The treatment with 0,50% gelatin stood out for the best acceptance for appearance, aroma, color and texture.Este trabalho foi realizado com o objetivo de avaliar as características físico-químicas, sensoriais e a qualidade microbiológica de bebidas lácteas fermentadas elaboradas com 10% de sacarose, 50% de leite e 50% de soro de queijo e adicionadas de cinco diferentes estabilizantes/espessantes em duas concentrações (0,50% e 1,00% em relação à formulação final), propondo uma formulação com boa aceitação. Foram desenvolvidos dez tratamentos: PCPS 1,00% = proteína (0,50%) e concentrado proteico de soro (0,50%); GP 1,00% = gelatina em pó (1,00%); GG 1,00% = goma guar (1,00%); AM 1,00% = amido de milho (1,00%); GGCMC 1,00% = goma guar (0,50%) e carboximetilcelulose (0,50%); PCPS 0,50% = proteína (0,25%) e concentrado proteico de soro (0,25%); GP 0,50% = gelatina em pó (0,50%); GG 0,50% = goma guar (0,50%); AM 0,50% = amido de milho (0,50%); GGCMC 0,50% = goma guar (0,25%) e carboximetilcelulose (0,25%). As bebidas lácteas fermentadas foram avaliadas quanto ao pH, acidez em ácido lático, umidade, cinzas, lipídios, proteína, viscosidade, sinérese, aceitação sensorial (escala hedônica de nove pontos) e contagem de coliformes a 35ºC e 45°C. Os resultados obtidos, submetidos a ANOVA e teste de médias (nível de significância a 5%), revelaram que os tipos e as porcentagens dos estabilizantes/espessantes influenciaram principalmente os valores de sinérese, viscosidade e aceitação das amostras. Dos tratamentos estudados aqueles contendo proteína e concentrado proteico de soro (1,00%), goma guar (1,00%) e gelatina (0,50%) apresentaram viscosidade/consistência similiar/compatível com iogurte e bebidas lácteas fermentadas comerciais e não apresentaram sinérese, após processamento. Sob o ponto de vista microbiológico, todas as amostras estavam aptas para serem consumidas, segundo a legislação vigente. O tratamento com 0,50% de gelatina destacou-se pelos melhores resultados de aceitação para a aparência, aroma, cor e textura.UEL2013-03-04info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/1236810.5433/1679-0359.2013v34n1p209Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 34 No. 1 (2013); 209-226Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 34 n. 1 (2013); 209-2261679-03591676-546Xreponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/12368/pdfCopyright (c) 2013 Semina: Ciências Agráriashttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCosta, Alexsandra Valéria SousaNicolau, Edmar SoaresTorres, Maria Célia LopesFernandes, Patrícia RodriguesRosa, Sarah Inês RodriguesNascimento, Rakel Cândido2023-01-26T14:23:48Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/12368Revistahttp://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrariasPUBhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/oaisemina.agrarias@uel.br1679-03591676-546Xopendoar:2023-01-26T14:23:48Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Development and physical-chemical, microbiological and sensory characterization of fermented dairy beverage prepared with different stabilizers/thickener Desenvolvimento e caracterização físico-química, microbiológica e sensorial de bebida láctea fermentada elaborada com diferentes estabilizantes/espessantes |
title |
Development and physical-chemical, microbiological and sensory characterization of fermented dairy beverage prepared with different stabilizers/thickener |
spellingShingle |
Development and physical-chemical, microbiological and sensory characterization of fermented dairy beverage prepared with different stabilizers/thickener Costa, Alexsandra Valéria Sousa Hydrocolloids Milk Retention Whey Viscosity. Hidrocolóides Leite Retenção Soro Lácteo Viscosidade. Ciências Agrárias |
title_short |
Development and physical-chemical, microbiological and sensory characterization of fermented dairy beverage prepared with different stabilizers/thickener |
title_full |
Development and physical-chemical, microbiological and sensory characterization of fermented dairy beverage prepared with different stabilizers/thickener |
title_fullStr |
Development and physical-chemical, microbiological and sensory characterization of fermented dairy beverage prepared with different stabilizers/thickener |
title_full_unstemmed |
Development and physical-chemical, microbiological and sensory characterization of fermented dairy beverage prepared with different stabilizers/thickener |
title_sort |
Development and physical-chemical, microbiological and sensory characterization of fermented dairy beverage prepared with different stabilizers/thickener |
author |
Costa, Alexsandra Valéria Sousa |
author_facet |
Costa, Alexsandra Valéria Sousa Nicolau, Edmar Soares Torres, Maria Célia Lopes Fernandes, Patrícia Rodrigues Rosa, Sarah Inês Rodrigues Nascimento, Rakel Cândido |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Nicolau, Edmar Soares Torres, Maria Célia Lopes Fernandes, Patrícia Rodrigues Rosa, Sarah Inês Rodrigues Nascimento, Rakel Cândido |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Costa, Alexsandra Valéria Sousa Nicolau, Edmar Soares Torres, Maria Célia Lopes Fernandes, Patrícia Rodrigues Rosa, Sarah Inês Rodrigues Nascimento, Rakel Cândido |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Hydrocolloids Milk Retention Whey Viscosity. Hidrocolóides Leite Retenção Soro Lácteo Viscosidade. Ciências Agrárias |
topic |
Hydrocolloids Milk Retention Whey Viscosity. Hidrocolóides Leite Retenção Soro Lácteo Viscosidade. Ciências Agrárias |
description |
This study was conducted to evaluate the physical-chemical, sensory and microbiological characteristics of fermented dairy beverages prepared with 10% sucrose, 50% milk and 50% whey and added five different stabilizers/thickeners in two concentrations (0,50% and 1,00% in relation to the final formulation). Ten treatments have been developed: PCPS 1,00% = protein (0,50%) and whey protein concentrate (0,50%); GP 1,00% = powdered gelatin (1,00%); GG 1,00% = guar gum (1,00%); AM 1.00% = corn starch (1,00%); GGCMC 1,00% = guar gum (0,50%) and carboxymethylcellulose (0,50%); PCPS 0,50 % = protein (0,25%) and whey protein concentrate (0,25%); GP 0.50% = powdered gelatin (0,50%); GG 0.50% = guar (0,50%); AM 0,50% = corn starch (0,50%); GGCMC 0,50% = guar gum (0,25%) and carboxymethylcellulose (0,25%). The fermented dairy beverages were evaluated for pH, acidity in lactic acid, moisture, ash, fat, protein, viscosity, syneresis, sensory acceptance (in a nine-point hedonic scale) and count of coliforms at 35ºC and 45°C. The results were submitted to ANOVA and mean test with significance level of 5%. It was observed that the types and percentages of stabilizers/thickeners mainly influenced the values of syneresis, viscosity and acceptance of samples. Those of the treatments containing protein and whey protein concentrate (1,00%), guar gum (1,00%) and gelatin (0,50%) showed viscosity/consistency similiar/compatible with yogurt and commercial fermented dairy beverages and showed no syneresis, after processing. All formulations were safe to be consumed considering the microbiological results and according to the legislation. The treatment with 0,50% gelatin stood out for the best acceptance for appearance, aroma, color and texture. |
publishDate |
2013 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2013-03-04 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/12368 10.5433/1679-0359.2013v34n1p209 |
url |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/12368 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5433/1679-0359.2013v34n1p209 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/12368/pdf |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2013 Semina: Ciências Agrárias http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2013 Semina: Ciências Agrárias http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UEL |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UEL |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 34 No. 1 (2013); 209-226 Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 34 n. 1 (2013); 209-226 1679-0359 1676-546X reponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) instacron:UEL |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
instacron_str |
UEL |
institution |
UEL |
reponame_str |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
collection |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
semina.agrarias@uel.br |
_version_ |
1799306067379748864 |