Evaluation of the content of neutral detergent fiber and acid through different procedures applied to forage plants
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2014 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/13523 |
Resumo: | This study aimed to evaluate the content of neutral detergent fiber (NDF) and acid (FDA) of Marandu, Humidicula; Massai; Mombaça grass obtained by three different procedures with the conventional method (CON), the Filter Bag Technique Ankom® (FBT) and adapted by EMBRAPA (EMB). The forage plants were obtained in the Southwest region of Mato Grosso in the September; the samples were collected from pastures planted the three years. There were three batteries (runs) for each procedure (method) for the determination of NDF and ADF of different forages. There were realised three batteries (runs) for each procedure (method) for the determination of NDF and ADF of different forages. We used a completely randomized design with three replications for each methodology. Statistical analysis of the variables studied was performed by analysis of variance and the differences obtained were analyzed by Tukey test, considering 5% significance level. It was observed that the different procedures (CON, FBT and EMB) to determine the content NDF did not differ between them for different forages plants, with average values of 78.61% and 74.96% for the Marandu and Humidicula grass, respectively and 76.78% and 73.08% for Massai and Mombaça grass, respectively. The ADF content obtained by different procedures (CON, FBT and EMB) showed no difference between them, with average values of 50.95% and 44.86% for Marandu and Humidicula grass, respectively and 52.21% and 51.56% for Massai and Mombaça grass, respectively. Thus, it is concluded that the content of neutral detergent fiber and acid Marandu, Humidicula; Massai and Mombaça grass can be determined by the procedure adapted by EMBRAPA, since this was not different compared to conventional methodology and the Filter Bag Technique Ankom®, besides having a lower waste of reagents and consequently lower cost. |
id |
UEL-11_e3353c38ba3b1e6d189c37b0f79aa7fc |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/13523 |
network_acronym_str |
UEL-11 |
network_name_str |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Evaluation of the content of neutral detergent fiber and acid through different procedures applied to forage plantsAvaliação do teor de fibra em detergente neutro e ácido por meio de diferentes procedimentos aplicados às plantas forrageirasCarbohydrateCelluloseDietary fiberForage.CarboidratoCeluloseFibra alimentarForrageiras.Avaliação de alimentos para animais (5.04.03.02-8)This study aimed to evaluate the content of neutral detergent fiber (NDF) and acid (FDA) of Marandu, Humidicula; Massai; Mombaça grass obtained by three different procedures with the conventional method (CON), the Filter Bag Technique Ankom® (FBT) and adapted by EMBRAPA (EMB). The forage plants were obtained in the Southwest region of Mato Grosso in the September; the samples were collected from pastures planted the three years. There were three batteries (runs) for each procedure (method) for the determination of NDF and ADF of different forages. There were realised three batteries (runs) for each procedure (method) for the determination of NDF and ADF of different forages. We used a completely randomized design with three replications for each methodology. Statistical analysis of the variables studied was performed by analysis of variance and the differences obtained were analyzed by Tukey test, considering 5% significance level. It was observed that the different procedures (CON, FBT and EMB) to determine the content NDF did not differ between them for different forages plants, with average values of 78.61% and 74.96% for the Marandu and Humidicula grass, respectively and 76.78% and 73.08% for Massai and Mombaça grass, respectively. The ADF content obtained by different procedures (CON, FBT and EMB) showed no difference between them, with average values of 50.95% and 44.86% for Marandu and Humidicula grass, respectively and 52.21% and 51.56% for Massai and Mombaça grass, respectively. Thus, it is concluded that the content of neutral detergent fiber and acid Marandu, Humidicula; Massai and Mombaça grass can be determined by the procedure adapted by EMBRAPA, since this was not different compared to conventional methodology and the Filter Bag Technique Ankom®, besides having a lower waste of reagents and consequently lower cost.Objetivou-se avaliar o teor de fibra em detergente neutro (FDN) e ácido (FDA) dos capins Marandu, Humidicola; Massai e Mombaça obtidos por três procedimentos diferentes, sendo o método convencional (CON), o Filter Bag Technique da Ankom® (FBT) e o adaptado pela EMBRAPA (EMB). As plantas forrageiras foram obtidas de pastagens implantadas a três anos, no período de setembro na região Sudoeste do Mato Grosso. Foram realizadas três baterias (corridas) de cada procedimento (metodologia) para a determinação da FDN e da FDA das diferentes forrageiras. Utilizou-se um delineamento inteiramente casualizado com três repetições de cada forrageira para cada metodologia nas diferentes baterias. A análise estatística das variáveis estudadas foi interpretada por meio de análise de variância e as diferenças obtidas foram analisadas por meio de teste de Tukey, considerando 5% de significância. Foi observado que os diferentes procedimentos (CON, FBT e EMB) de determinação do teor FDN não diferiram entre si para as diferentes plantas forrageiras avaliadas, com valores médios de 78,61% e 74,96% para os Capins Marandu e Humidicola, respectivamente e de 76,78% e 73,08% para os Capins Massai e Mombaça, respectivamente. O teor de FDA obtido pelos diferentes procedimentos (CON, FBT e EMB) não apresentaram diferença entre si, com valores médios de 50,95% e 44,86% para os capins Marandu e Humidicola, respectivamente e de 52,21% e 51,56% para os cultivares do gênero Panicum, respectivamente Massai e Mombaça. Assim, conclui-se que os teores de fibra em detergente neutro e ácido dos capins Marandu, Humidicola; Massai e Mombaça podem ser determinados pelo procedimento adaptado pela EMBRAPA, uma vez que este não diferiu em relação a metodologia convencional e a do Filter Bag Technique da Ankom®, além de apresentar menor gasto de reagentes e consequentemente menor custo. UEL2014-06-25info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPesquisa empírica de campoapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/1352310.5433/1679-0359.2014v35n3p1533Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 35 No. 3 (2014); 1533-1542Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 35 n. 3 (2014); 1533-15421679-03591676-546Xreponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/13523/pdf_349Copyright (c) 2014 Semina: Ciências Agráriashttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGeron, Luiz Juliano ValérioCabral, Luciano da SilvaTrautmann-Machado, Raquel JoanaZeoula, Lúcia MariaOliveira, Edimar BarbosaGarcia, JocilaineGonçalves, Matheus RibeiroAguiar, Rodrigo Penha Soares2023-01-16T15:21:04Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/13523Revistahttp://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrariasPUBhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/oaisemina.agrarias@uel.br1679-03591676-546Xopendoar:2023-01-16T15:21:04Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Evaluation of the content of neutral detergent fiber and acid through different procedures applied to forage plants Avaliação do teor de fibra em detergente neutro e ácido por meio de diferentes procedimentos aplicados às plantas forrageiras |
title |
Evaluation of the content of neutral detergent fiber and acid through different procedures applied to forage plants |
spellingShingle |
Evaluation of the content of neutral detergent fiber and acid through different procedures applied to forage plants Geron, Luiz Juliano Valério Carbohydrate Cellulose Dietary fiber Forage. Carboidrato Celulose Fibra alimentar Forrageiras. Avaliação de alimentos para animais (5.04.03.02-8) |
title_short |
Evaluation of the content of neutral detergent fiber and acid through different procedures applied to forage plants |
title_full |
Evaluation of the content of neutral detergent fiber and acid through different procedures applied to forage plants |
title_fullStr |
Evaluation of the content of neutral detergent fiber and acid through different procedures applied to forage plants |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evaluation of the content of neutral detergent fiber and acid through different procedures applied to forage plants |
title_sort |
Evaluation of the content of neutral detergent fiber and acid through different procedures applied to forage plants |
author |
Geron, Luiz Juliano Valério |
author_facet |
Geron, Luiz Juliano Valério Cabral, Luciano da Silva Trautmann-Machado, Raquel Joana Zeoula, Lúcia Maria Oliveira, Edimar Barbosa Garcia, Jocilaine Gonçalves, Matheus Ribeiro Aguiar, Rodrigo Penha Soares |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Cabral, Luciano da Silva Trautmann-Machado, Raquel Joana Zeoula, Lúcia Maria Oliveira, Edimar Barbosa Garcia, Jocilaine Gonçalves, Matheus Ribeiro Aguiar, Rodrigo Penha Soares |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Geron, Luiz Juliano Valério Cabral, Luciano da Silva Trautmann-Machado, Raquel Joana Zeoula, Lúcia Maria Oliveira, Edimar Barbosa Garcia, Jocilaine Gonçalves, Matheus Ribeiro Aguiar, Rodrigo Penha Soares |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Carbohydrate Cellulose Dietary fiber Forage. Carboidrato Celulose Fibra alimentar Forrageiras. Avaliação de alimentos para animais (5.04.03.02-8) |
topic |
Carbohydrate Cellulose Dietary fiber Forage. Carboidrato Celulose Fibra alimentar Forrageiras. Avaliação de alimentos para animais (5.04.03.02-8) |
description |
This study aimed to evaluate the content of neutral detergent fiber (NDF) and acid (FDA) of Marandu, Humidicula; Massai; Mombaça grass obtained by three different procedures with the conventional method (CON), the Filter Bag Technique Ankom® (FBT) and adapted by EMBRAPA (EMB). The forage plants were obtained in the Southwest region of Mato Grosso in the September; the samples were collected from pastures planted the three years. There were three batteries (runs) for each procedure (method) for the determination of NDF and ADF of different forages. There were realised three batteries (runs) for each procedure (method) for the determination of NDF and ADF of different forages. We used a completely randomized design with three replications for each methodology. Statistical analysis of the variables studied was performed by analysis of variance and the differences obtained were analyzed by Tukey test, considering 5% significance level. It was observed that the different procedures (CON, FBT and EMB) to determine the content NDF did not differ between them for different forages plants, with average values of 78.61% and 74.96% for the Marandu and Humidicula grass, respectively and 76.78% and 73.08% for Massai and Mombaça grass, respectively. The ADF content obtained by different procedures (CON, FBT and EMB) showed no difference between them, with average values of 50.95% and 44.86% for Marandu and Humidicula grass, respectively and 52.21% and 51.56% for Massai and Mombaça grass, respectively. Thus, it is concluded that the content of neutral detergent fiber and acid Marandu, Humidicula; Massai and Mombaça grass can be determined by the procedure adapted by EMBRAPA, since this was not different compared to conventional methodology and the Filter Bag Technique Ankom®, besides having a lower waste of reagents and consequently lower cost. |
publishDate |
2014 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2014-06-25 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Pesquisa empírica de campo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/13523 10.5433/1679-0359.2014v35n3p1533 |
url |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/13523 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5433/1679-0359.2014v35n3p1533 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/13523/pdf_349 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2014 Semina: Ciências Agrárias http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2014 Semina: Ciências Agrárias http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UEL |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UEL |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 35 No. 3 (2014); 1533-1542 Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 35 n. 3 (2014); 1533-1542 1679-0359 1676-546X reponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) instacron:UEL |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
instacron_str |
UEL |
institution |
UEL |
reponame_str |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
collection |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
semina.agrarias@uel.br |
_version_ |
1799306068433567744 |