Comparative efficacy of the conventional and automated methods for determining neutral and acid detergent fiber.
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) |
Texto Completo: | http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1058046 http://doi.org/10.14295/CS.v7i1.432 |
Resumo: | Different methods are available to determine fiber content in feeds. However, information about the accuracy of this methods for neutral detergent fiber (NDF) and acid detergent fiber ADF contents estimation (obtained with the use of TNT-100 nylon filtering bags) is very limited related to the large number of ruminant feed analysis. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of the automated and conventional Van Soest methods to determine NDF and ADF contents for bovine cattle and feed supplements. Four classes of samples (tropical forage, maize silage hybrid, concentrated supplements and bovine cattlecattle) were evaluated for NDF and ADF contents using conventional and automated methods. Analysis involved a hierarchical factorial scheme with an entirely randomized design executed with repetitions. It was concluded that the automated method procedure generated similar results when compared to the conventional method for the determination of NDF contents in tropical forage, bovine cattle and maize silage samples, although is not recommended for samples with a high starch content. This system was not efficient for ADF determination in the evaluated samples. |
id |
EMBR_69dff1afc47e604148bf54404fddf140 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br:doc/1058046 |
network_acronym_str |
EMBR |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) |
repository_id_str |
2154 |
spelling |
Comparative efficacy of the conventional and automated methods for determining neutral and acid detergent fiber.Maize silageFiber analysisforageDifferent methods are available to determine fiber content in feeds. However, information about the accuracy of this methods for neutral detergent fiber (NDF) and acid detergent fiber ADF contents estimation (obtained with the use of TNT-100 nylon filtering bags) is very limited related to the large number of ruminant feed analysis. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of the automated and conventional Van Soest methods to determine NDF and ADF contents for bovine cattle and feed supplements. Four classes of samples (tropical forage, maize silage hybrid, concentrated supplements and bovine cattlecattle) were evaluated for NDF and ADF contents using conventional and automated methods. Analysis involved a hierarchical factorial scheme with an entirely randomized design executed with repetitions. It was concluded that the automated method procedure generated similar results when compared to the conventional method for the determination of NDF contents in tropical forage, bovine cattle and maize silage samples, although is not recommended for samples with a high starch content. This system was not efficient for ADF determination in the evaluated samples.Éder Cristian Malta de Lanes, UFV; FERNANDO CESAR FERRAZ LOPES, CNPGL; Núbia Ribeiro Campos; JACKSON SILVA E OLIVEIRA, CNPGL; MIRTON JOSE FROTA MORENZ, CNPGL; Roberto Frische-Neto, UFV.LANES, E. C. M. deLOPES, F. C. F.CAMPOS, N. R.OLIVEIRA, J. S. eMORENZ, M. J. F.FRISCHE-NETO, R.2016-12-06T11:11:11Z2016-12-06T11:11:11Z2016-12-0620162017-02-22T11:11:11Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleComunicata Scientiae, v. 7, n. 1, p. 30-37, 2016.http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1058046http://doi.org/10.14295/CS.v7i1.432enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)instacron:EMBRAPA2017-08-16T03:54:17Zoai:www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br:doc/1058046Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/oai/requestopendoar:21542017-08-16T03:54:17falseRepositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/oai/requestcg-riaa@embrapa.bropendoar:21542017-08-16T03:54:17Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Comparative efficacy of the conventional and automated methods for determining neutral and acid detergent fiber. |
title |
Comparative efficacy of the conventional and automated methods for determining neutral and acid detergent fiber. |
spellingShingle |
Comparative efficacy of the conventional and automated methods for determining neutral and acid detergent fiber. LANES, E. C. M. de Maize silage Fiber analysis forage |
title_short |
Comparative efficacy of the conventional and automated methods for determining neutral and acid detergent fiber. |
title_full |
Comparative efficacy of the conventional and automated methods for determining neutral and acid detergent fiber. |
title_fullStr |
Comparative efficacy of the conventional and automated methods for determining neutral and acid detergent fiber. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparative efficacy of the conventional and automated methods for determining neutral and acid detergent fiber. |
title_sort |
Comparative efficacy of the conventional and automated methods for determining neutral and acid detergent fiber. |
author |
LANES, E. C. M. de |
author_facet |
LANES, E. C. M. de LOPES, F. C. F. CAMPOS, N. R. OLIVEIRA, J. S. e MORENZ, M. J. F. FRISCHE-NETO, R. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
LOPES, F. C. F. CAMPOS, N. R. OLIVEIRA, J. S. e MORENZ, M. J. F. FRISCHE-NETO, R. |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Éder Cristian Malta de Lanes, UFV; FERNANDO CESAR FERRAZ LOPES, CNPGL; Núbia Ribeiro Campos; JACKSON SILVA E OLIVEIRA, CNPGL; MIRTON JOSE FROTA MORENZ, CNPGL; Roberto Frische-Neto, UFV. |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
LANES, E. C. M. de LOPES, F. C. F. CAMPOS, N. R. OLIVEIRA, J. S. e MORENZ, M. J. F. FRISCHE-NETO, R. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Maize silage Fiber analysis forage |
topic |
Maize silage Fiber analysis forage |
description |
Different methods are available to determine fiber content in feeds. However, information about the accuracy of this methods for neutral detergent fiber (NDF) and acid detergent fiber ADF contents estimation (obtained with the use of TNT-100 nylon filtering bags) is very limited related to the large number of ruminant feed analysis. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of the automated and conventional Van Soest methods to determine NDF and ADF contents for bovine cattle and feed supplements. Four classes of samples (tropical forage, maize silage hybrid, concentrated supplements and bovine cattlecattle) were evaluated for NDF and ADF contents using conventional and automated methods. Analysis involved a hierarchical factorial scheme with an entirely randomized design executed with repetitions. It was concluded that the automated method procedure generated similar results when compared to the conventional method for the determination of NDF contents in tropical forage, bovine cattle and maize silage samples, although is not recommended for samples with a high starch content. This system was not efficient for ADF determination in the evaluated samples. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-12-06T11:11:11Z 2016-12-06T11:11:11Z 2016-12-06 2016 2017-02-22T11:11:11Z |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
Comunicata Scientiae, v. 7, n. 1, p. 30-37, 2016. http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1058046 http://doi.org/10.14295/CS.v7i1.432 |
identifier_str_mv |
Comunicata Scientiae, v. 7, n. 1, p. 30-37, 2016. |
url |
http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1058046 http://doi.org/10.14295/CS.v7i1.432 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) instacron:EMBRAPA |
instname_str |
Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) |
instacron_str |
EMBRAPA |
institution |
EMBRAPA |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
cg-riaa@embrapa.br |
_version_ |
1794503429174853632 |