Assessment of fermented buffalo milk for Lactobacillus casei and supply with Bifidobacterium longum
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2006 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/2458 |
Resumo: | It was elaborated fermented buffalo milk for L. casei utilizing skimmed milk added with 12,00% sugar and fermented by 24 hours. After fermentation, the product was supply with B. longum and storage during 30 days at 5 and 10° C, being evaluated the acidity, pH and viability of L. casei and B. longum parameters. Were does the nutritional composition, calculate the caloric value and sensorial analysis of the flavored product. The fermented milk presented initial acidity 0.69% and pH 4.86. The L. casei initial viability was 11,00 log CFU/mL and B. longum 10,46 log CFU/mL. After storage of 30 days, the acidity and pH were adequate and the L. casei and B. longum viability was above 9.00 log CFU/mL. The composition analysis resulted (%) protein 3.63, carbohydrate 21.86, fat 0.10, ashes 0.56, wet 73.85 and dry substance 26.15, with caloric value 103 Kcal/100 g. There wasn’t significant difference to preference and acceptance between flavored samples, and have good acceptation by hedonic scale. |
id |
UEL-11_e76b819cd374562569bc45550d2ba9fa |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/2458 |
network_acronym_str |
UEL-11 |
network_name_str |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Assessment of fermented buffalo milk for Lactobacillus casei and supply with Bifidobacterium longumAnálise de leite de búfala fermentado por Lactobacillus casei e suplementado com Bifidobacterium longumFermented milkBuffalo milkProbioticsNutritional compositionLactobacillus casei.Leite fermentadoLeite de búfalaProbióticosComposição nutricionalLactobacillus.It was elaborated fermented buffalo milk for L. casei utilizing skimmed milk added with 12,00% sugar and fermented by 24 hours. After fermentation, the product was supply with B. longum and storage during 30 days at 5 and 10° C, being evaluated the acidity, pH and viability of L. casei and B. longum parameters. Were does the nutritional composition, calculate the caloric value and sensorial analysis of the flavored product. The fermented milk presented initial acidity 0.69% and pH 4.86. The L. casei initial viability was 11,00 log CFU/mL and B. longum 10,46 log CFU/mL. After storage of 30 days, the acidity and pH were adequate and the L. casei and B. longum viability was above 9.00 log CFU/mL. The composition analysis resulted (%) protein 3.63, carbohydrate 21.86, fat 0.10, ashes 0.56, wet 73.85 and dry substance 26.15, with caloric value 103 Kcal/100 g. There wasn’t significant difference to preference and acceptance between flavored samples, and have good acceptation by hedonic scale.Elaborou-se leite de búfala fermentado por Lactobacillus casei utilizando leite desnatado, adicionado de 12,00% de açúcar e fermentado por 24 horas. Após fermentação o produto foi suplementado com Bifidobacterium longum e estocado durante 30 dias a 5 e 10° C, sendo então avaliados os parâmetros de acidez, pH e viabilidade de L.casei e de B. longum. Realizou-se a análise de composição nutricional, cálculo do valor calórico e análise sensorial do produto saborizado. O leite fermentado suplementado com B. longum, apresentou acidez inicial de 0,69% e pH de 4,86. A viabilidade de L. casei inicial foi 11,00 log UFC/mL e de B. longum 10,46 log UFC/mL. Após 30 dias de estocagem refrigerada, a acidez e o pH estavam adequados e a viabilidade de L. casei e de B. longum ficou acima de 9,00 log UFC/mL. A análise da composição nutricional resultou nos valores (%): proteína 3,63, carboidrato 21,86, gordura 0,10, resíduo mineral fixo 0,56, umidade 73,85 e matéria seca 26,15, com valor calórico de 103 Kcal/100 g. Não houve diferença significativa na preferência e na aceitação das amostras de diferentes sabores, sendo que o produto apresentou boa aceitação pela escala hedônica.UEL2006-06-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/245810.5433/1679-0359.2006v27n3p407Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 27 No. 3 (2006); 407-414Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 27 n. 3 (2006); 407-4141679-03591676-546Xreponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/2458/2093Faria, Cláudia PuerariBenedet, Honório DomingosLe Guerroue, Jean-Louisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2009-10-09T14:24:35Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/2458Revistahttp://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrariasPUBhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/oaisemina.agrarias@uel.br1679-03591676-546Xopendoar:2009-10-09T14:24:35Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Assessment of fermented buffalo milk for Lactobacillus casei and supply with Bifidobacterium longum Análise de leite de búfala fermentado por Lactobacillus casei e suplementado com Bifidobacterium longum |
title |
Assessment of fermented buffalo milk for Lactobacillus casei and supply with Bifidobacterium longum |
spellingShingle |
Assessment of fermented buffalo milk for Lactobacillus casei and supply with Bifidobacterium longum Faria, Cláudia Puerari Fermented milk Buffalo milk Probiotics Nutritional composition Lactobacillus casei. Leite fermentado Leite de búfala Probióticos Composição nutricional Lactobacillus. |
title_short |
Assessment of fermented buffalo milk for Lactobacillus casei and supply with Bifidobacterium longum |
title_full |
Assessment of fermented buffalo milk for Lactobacillus casei and supply with Bifidobacterium longum |
title_fullStr |
Assessment of fermented buffalo milk for Lactobacillus casei and supply with Bifidobacterium longum |
title_full_unstemmed |
Assessment of fermented buffalo milk for Lactobacillus casei and supply with Bifidobacterium longum |
title_sort |
Assessment of fermented buffalo milk for Lactobacillus casei and supply with Bifidobacterium longum |
author |
Faria, Cláudia Puerari |
author_facet |
Faria, Cláudia Puerari Benedet, Honório Domingos Le Guerroue, Jean-Louis |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Benedet, Honório Domingos Le Guerroue, Jean-Louis |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Faria, Cláudia Puerari Benedet, Honório Domingos Le Guerroue, Jean-Louis |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Fermented milk Buffalo milk Probiotics Nutritional composition Lactobacillus casei. Leite fermentado Leite de búfala Probióticos Composição nutricional Lactobacillus. |
topic |
Fermented milk Buffalo milk Probiotics Nutritional composition Lactobacillus casei. Leite fermentado Leite de búfala Probióticos Composição nutricional Lactobacillus. |
description |
It was elaborated fermented buffalo milk for L. casei utilizing skimmed milk added with 12,00% sugar and fermented by 24 hours. After fermentation, the product was supply with B. longum and storage during 30 days at 5 and 10° C, being evaluated the acidity, pH and viability of L. casei and B. longum parameters. Were does the nutritional composition, calculate the caloric value and sensorial analysis of the flavored product. The fermented milk presented initial acidity 0.69% and pH 4.86. The L. casei initial viability was 11,00 log CFU/mL and B. longum 10,46 log CFU/mL. After storage of 30 days, the acidity and pH were adequate and the L. casei and B. longum viability was above 9.00 log CFU/mL. The composition analysis resulted (%) protein 3.63, carbohydrate 21.86, fat 0.10, ashes 0.56, wet 73.85 and dry substance 26.15, with caloric value 103 Kcal/100 g. There wasn’t significant difference to preference and acceptance between flavored samples, and have good acceptation by hedonic scale. |
publishDate |
2006 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2006-06-30 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/2458 10.5433/1679-0359.2006v27n3p407 |
url |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/2458 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5433/1679-0359.2006v27n3p407 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/2458/2093 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UEL |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UEL |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 27 No. 3 (2006); 407-414 Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 27 n. 3 (2006); 407-414 1679-0359 1676-546X reponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) instacron:UEL |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
instacron_str |
UEL |
institution |
UEL |
reponame_str |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
collection |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
semina.agrarias@uel.br |
_version_ |
1799306058115579904 |