Effect of stocking density on performance, carcass yield, productivity, and bone development in broiler chickens Cobb 500®

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Henrique, Cleoneide dos Santos
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Oliveira, Andréia Fróes Galuci, Ferreira, Thales Silva, Silva, Eduardo Santos, Mello, Bruna Finotti Fonseca Reis de, Andrade, Agner de Freitas, Martins, Vinícius da Silva Freitas, Paula, Fernando Oliveira de, Garcia, Elis Regina de Moraes, Bruno, Luís Daniel Giusti
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/27507
Resumo: This study aimed to assess the effect of stocking density of 10, 12, 14, and 16 birds m?2 on performance, carcass and cut yields, productivity, and bone development of broiler chickens Cobb 500®. The experimental design was completely randomized design with four treatments (stocking densities) and four replications. The assessments were performed weekly at 1, 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, and 42 days. The best live weight result was found at a density of 10 birds m?2 in the period from 1 to 7 days. No effect of density was observed on feed intake and weight gain. From 1 to 14 days, the best live weights were found at densities of 10, 12, and 14 birds m?2, in addition to a higher feed intake at densities of 10 and 12 birds m?2. Weight gain was better at a density of 10 birds m?2, showing no differences from densities of 12 and 14 birds m?2. In the period from 1 to 21 days, live weight and weight gain were higher at densities of 10, 12, and 14 birds m?2. The highest feed intake was observed at a density of 10 birds m?2, which showed no difference from the density of 14 birds m?2. A difference (P < 0.05) was observed for live weight, weight gain, and feed intake of animals reared at densities of 10, 12, and 14 birds m?2 for the phases from 1 to 35 days and the total phase from 1 to 42 days of bird age when compared to 16 birds m?2, which presented lower performance. However, feed conversion of 1-7, 1-14, 1-21, 1-35, and 1-42 days and carcass and cut characteristics showed no significant differences for all treatments. On the other hand, productivity was higher in the treatments with 14 and 16 birds m?2, but without difference between each other. No interaction (P > 0.05) was observed between stocking density and age for the assessed bone parameters. Similarly, no difference (P > 0.05) was observed for bone development of broiler chickens reared at different stocking densities for the studied parameters. Thus, the increased density of 10 or 12 birds m?2 to 14 birds m?2 has no influence on zootechnical performance, carcass and cut yields, and bone development, but increases broiler chicken productivity reared in a conventional shed without air conditioning.
id UEL-11_e91e6b632d5d522a7d2c0d649d745970
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/27507
network_acronym_str UEL-11
network_name_str Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Effect of stocking density on performance, carcass yield, productivity, and bone development in broiler chickens Cobb 500®Efeito da densidade de criação sobre o desempenho, rendimento de carcaça, produtividade e desenvolvimento ósseo de frangos de corte Cobb 500®Cobb 500FemurLive weightBreast meat yieldTibia.Cobb 500®FêmurPeso vivoRendimento de peitoTíbia.This study aimed to assess the effect of stocking density of 10, 12, 14, and 16 birds m?2 on performance, carcass and cut yields, productivity, and bone development of broiler chickens Cobb 500®. The experimental design was completely randomized design with four treatments (stocking densities) and four replications. The assessments were performed weekly at 1, 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, and 42 days. The best live weight result was found at a density of 10 birds m?2 in the period from 1 to 7 days. No effect of density was observed on feed intake and weight gain. From 1 to 14 days, the best live weights were found at densities of 10, 12, and 14 birds m?2, in addition to a higher feed intake at densities of 10 and 12 birds m?2. Weight gain was better at a density of 10 birds m?2, showing no differences from densities of 12 and 14 birds m?2. In the period from 1 to 21 days, live weight and weight gain were higher at densities of 10, 12, and 14 birds m?2. The highest feed intake was observed at a density of 10 birds m?2, which showed no difference from the density of 14 birds m?2. A difference (P < 0.05) was observed for live weight, weight gain, and feed intake of animals reared at densities of 10, 12, and 14 birds m?2 for the phases from 1 to 35 days and the total phase from 1 to 42 days of bird age when compared to 16 birds m?2, which presented lower performance. However, feed conversion of 1-7, 1-14, 1-21, 1-35, and 1-42 days and carcass and cut characteristics showed no significant differences for all treatments. On the other hand, productivity was higher in the treatments with 14 and 16 birds m?2, but without difference between each other. No interaction (P > 0.05) was observed between stocking density and age for the assessed bone parameters. Similarly, no difference (P > 0.05) was observed for bone development of broiler chickens reared at different stocking densities for the studied parameters. Thus, the increased density of 10 or 12 birds m?2 to 14 birds m?2 has no influence on zootechnical performance, carcass and cut yields, and bone development, but increases broiler chicken productivity reared in a conventional shed without air conditioning.O estudo teve como objetivo avaliar o efeito da densidade de criação de 10, 12, 14 e 16 aves m2 sobre o desempenho, os rendimentos de carcaça e cortes, a produtividade e o desenvolvimento ósseo de frangos de corte Cobb 500®. O delineamento experimental foi inteiramente casualizado com quatro tratamentos (densidades de criação) e quatro repetições, as avaliações foram realizadas semanalmente aos: um, sete, 14, 21, 28, 35 e 42 dias. O melhor resultado de peso vivo foi encontrado na densidade de 10 aves m2 no período de 1-7 dias, não verificou efeito das densidades sobre consumo de ração e ganho de peso. De 1-14 dias os melhores pesos vivos foram encontrados na densidade de 10, 12 e 14 aves m2, o consumo de ração na densidade 10 e 12 aves m2 foi maior. O ganho de peso foi melhor na densidade de 10 aves m2, não diferindo das densidades de 12 e 14 aves m2. No período de 1-21 dias o peso vivo e ganho de peso foram maiores nas densidades de 10, 12 e 14 aves m2. O maior consumo de ração foi na densidade 10 aves m2, que não diferiu da densidade de 14 aves m2. Houve diferença (P0,05) entre densidade de criação e idade para nenhum parâmetro ósseo avaliado. Não houve diferença (P>0,05) no desenvolvimento ósseo dos frangos de corte criados nas diferentes densidades de criação para nenhum dos parâmetros estudados. Conclui-se que o aumento no número de aves por metro quadrado de 10 ou 12 aves m2, para 14 aves m2 não compromete o desempenho zootécnico, o rendimento de carcaça e cortes e não prejudica o desenvolvimento ósseo e ainda aumenta a produtividade de frangos de corte criados em galpão convencional sem climatização.UEL2017-08-25info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPesquisa Empírica de Campoapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/2750710.5433/1679-0359.2017v38n4Supl1p2705Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 38 No. 4Supl1 (2017); 2705-2718Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 38 n. 4Supl1 (2017); 2705-27181679-03591676-546Xreponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELenghttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/27507/21516Copyright (c) 2017 Semina: Ciências Agráriashttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessHenrique, Cleoneide dos SantosOliveira, Andréia Fróes GaluciFerreira, Thales SilvaSilva, Eduardo SantosMello, Bruna Finotti Fonseca Reis deAndrade, Agner de FreitasMartins, Vinícius da Silva FreitasPaula, Fernando Oliveira deGarcia, Elis Regina de MoraesBruno, Luís Daniel Giusti2022-10-21T15:58:56Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/27507Revistahttp://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrariasPUBhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/oaisemina.agrarias@uel.br1679-03591676-546Xopendoar:2022-10-21T15:58:56Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Effect of stocking density on performance, carcass yield, productivity, and bone development in broiler chickens Cobb 500®
Efeito da densidade de criação sobre o desempenho, rendimento de carcaça, produtividade e desenvolvimento ósseo de frangos de corte Cobb 500®
title Effect of stocking density on performance, carcass yield, productivity, and bone development in broiler chickens Cobb 500®
spellingShingle Effect of stocking density on performance, carcass yield, productivity, and bone development in broiler chickens Cobb 500®
Henrique, Cleoneide dos Santos
Cobb 500
Femur
Live weight
Breast meat yield
Tibia.
Cobb 500®
Fêmur
Peso vivo
Rendimento de peito
Tíbia.
title_short Effect of stocking density on performance, carcass yield, productivity, and bone development in broiler chickens Cobb 500®
title_full Effect of stocking density on performance, carcass yield, productivity, and bone development in broiler chickens Cobb 500®
title_fullStr Effect of stocking density on performance, carcass yield, productivity, and bone development in broiler chickens Cobb 500®
title_full_unstemmed Effect of stocking density on performance, carcass yield, productivity, and bone development in broiler chickens Cobb 500®
title_sort Effect of stocking density on performance, carcass yield, productivity, and bone development in broiler chickens Cobb 500®
author Henrique, Cleoneide dos Santos
author_facet Henrique, Cleoneide dos Santos
Oliveira, Andréia Fróes Galuci
Ferreira, Thales Silva
Silva, Eduardo Santos
Mello, Bruna Finotti Fonseca Reis de
Andrade, Agner de Freitas
Martins, Vinícius da Silva Freitas
Paula, Fernando Oliveira de
Garcia, Elis Regina de Moraes
Bruno, Luís Daniel Giusti
author_role author
author2 Oliveira, Andréia Fróes Galuci
Ferreira, Thales Silva
Silva, Eduardo Santos
Mello, Bruna Finotti Fonseca Reis de
Andrade, Agner de Freitas
Martins, Vinícius da Silva Freitas
Paula, Fernando Oliveira de
Garcia, Elis Regina de Moraes
Bruno, Luís Daniel Giusti
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Henrique, Cleoneide dos Santos
Oliveira, Andréia Fróes Galuci
Ferreira, Thales Silva
Silva, Eduardo Santos
Mello, Bruna Finotti Fonseca Reis de
Andrade, Agner de Freitas
Martins, Vinícius da Silva Freitas
Paula, Fernando Oliveira de
Garcia, Elis Regina de Moraes
Bruno, Luís Daniel Giusti
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Cobb 500
Femur
Live weight
Breast meat yield
Tibia.
Cobb 500®
Fêmur
Peso vivo
Rendimento de peito
Tíbia.
topic Cobb 500
Femur
Live weight
Breast meat yield
Tibia.
Cobb 500®
Fêmur
Peso vivo
Rendimento de peito
Tíbia.
description This study aimed to assess the effect of stocking density of 10, 12, 14, and 16 birds m?2 on performance, carcass and cut yields, productivity, and bone development of broiler chickens Cobb 500®. The experimental design was completely randomized design with four treatments (stocking densities) and four replications. The assessments were performed weekly at 1, 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, and 42 days. The best live weight result was found at a density of 10 birds m?2 in the period from 1 to 7 days. No effect of density was observed on feed intake and weight gain. From 1 to 14 days, the best live weights were found at densities of 10, 12, and 14 birds m?2, in addition to a higher feed intake at densities of 10 and 12 birds m?2. Weight gain was better at a density of 10 birds m?2, showing no differences from densities of 12 and 14 birds m?2. In the period from 1 to 21 days, live weight and weight gain were higher at densities of 10, 12, and 14 birds m?2. The highest feed intake was observed at a density of 10 birds m?2, which showed no difference from the density of 14 birds m?2. A difference (P < 0.05) was observed for live weight, weight gain, and feed intake of animals reared at densities of 10, 12, and 14 birds m?2 for the phases from 1 to 35 days and the total phase from 1 to 42 days of bird age when compared to 16 birds m?2, which presented lower performance. However, feed conversion of 1-7, 1-14, 1-21, 1-35, and 1-42 days and carcass and cut characteristics showed no significant differences for all treatments. On the other hand, productivity was higher in the treatments with 14 and 16 birds m?2, but without difference between each other. No interaction (P > 0.05) was observed between stocking density and age for the assessed bone parameters. Similarly, no difference (P > 0.05) was observed for bone development of broiler chickens reared at different stocking densities for the studied parameters. Thus, the increased density of 10 or 12 birds m?2 to 14 birds m?2 has no influence on zootechnical performance, carcass and cut yields, and bone development, but increases broiler chicken productivity reared in a conventional shed without air conditioning.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-08-25
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Pesquisa Empírica de Campo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/27507
10.5433/1679-0359.2017v38n4Supl1p2705
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/27507
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/1679-0359.2017v38n4Supl1p2705
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/27507/21516
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Semina: Ciências Agrárias
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Semina: Ciências Agrárias
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 38 No. 4Supl1 (2017); 2705-2718
Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 38 n. 4Supl1 (2017); 2705-2718
1679-0359
1676-546X
reponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
collection Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv semina.agrarias@uel.br
_version_ 1799306077100048384