Effect of stocking density on performance, carcass yield, productivity, and bone development in broiler chickens Cobb 500®
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/27507 |
Resumo: | This study aimed to assess the effect of stocking density of 10, 12, 14, and 16 birds m?2 on performance, carcass and cut yields, productivity, and bone development of broiler chickens Cobb 500®. The experimental design was completely randomized design with four treatments (stocking densities) and four replications. The assessments were performed weekly at 1, 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, and 42 days. The best live weight result was found at a density of 10 birds m?2 in the period from 1 to 7 days. No effect of density was observed on feed intake and weight gain. From 1 to 14 days, the best live weights were found at densities of 10, 12, and 14 birds m?2, in addition to a higher feed intake at densities of 10 and 12 birds m?2. Weight gain was better at a density of 10 birds m?2, showing no differences from densities of 12 and 14 birds m?2. In the period from 1 to 21 days, live weight and weight gain were higher at densities of 10, 12, and 14 birds m?2. The highest feed intake was observed at a density of 10 birds m?2, which showed no difference from the density of 14 birds m?2. A difference (P < 0.05) was observed for live weight, weight gain, and feed intake of animals reared at densities of 10, 12, and 14 birds m?2 for the phases from 1 to 35 days and the total phase from 1 to 42 days of bird age when compared to 16 birds m?2, which presented lower performance. However, feed conversion of 1-7, 1-14, 1-21, 1-35, and 1-42 days and carcass and cut characteristics showed no significant differences for all treatments. On the other hand, productivity was higher in the treatments with 14 and 16 birds m?2, but without difference between each other. No interaction (P > 0.05) was observed between stocking density and age for the assessed bone parameters. Similarly, no difference (P > 0.05) was observed for bone development of broiler chickens reared at different stocking densities for the studied parameters. Thus, the increased density of 10 or 12 birds m?2 to 14 birds m?2 has no influence on zootechnical performance, carcass and cut yields, and bone development, but increases broiler chicken productivity reared in a conventional shed without air conditioning. |
id |
UEL-11_e91e6b632d5d522a7d2c0d649d745970 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/27507 |
network_acronym_str |
UEL-11 |
network_name_str |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Effect of stocking density on performance, carcass yield, productivity, and bone development in broiler chickens Cobb 500®Efeito da densidade de criação sobre o desempenho, rendimento de carcaça, produtividade e desenvolvimento ósseo de frangos de corte Cobb 500®Cobb 500FemurLive weightBreast meat yieldTibia.Cobb 500®FêmurPeso vivoRendimento de peitoTíbia.This study aimed to assess the effect of stocking density of 10, 12, 14, and 16 birds m?2 on performance, carcass and cut yields, productivity, and bone development of broiler chickens Cobb 500®. The experimental design was completely randomized design with four treatments (stocking densities) and four replications. The assessments were performed weekly at 1, 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, and 42 days. The best live weight result was found at a density of 10 birds m?2 in the period from 1 to 7 days. No effect of density was observed on feed intake and weight gain. From 1 to 14 days, the best live weights were found at densities of 10, 12, and 14 birds m?2, in addition to a higher feed intake at densities of 10 and 12 birds m?2. Weight gain was better at a density of 10 birds m?2, showing no differences from densities of 12 and 14 birds m?2. In the period from 1 to 21 days, live weight and weight gain were higher at densities of 10, 12, and 14 birds m?2. The highest feed intake was observed at a density of 10 birds m?2, which showed no difference from the density of 14 birds m?2. A difference (P < 0.05) was observed for live weight, weight gain, and feed intake of animals reared at densities of 10, 12, and 14 birds m?2 for the phases from 1 to 35 days and the total phase from 1 to 42 days of bird age when compared to 16 birds m?2, which presented lower performance. However, feed conversion of 1-7, 1-14, 1-21, 1-35, and 1-42 days and carcass and cut characteristics showed no significant differences for all treatments. On the other hand, productivity was higher in the treatments with 14 and 16 birds m?2, but without difference between each other. No interaction (P > 0.05) was observed between stocking density and age for the assessed bone parameters. Similarly, no difference (P > 0.05) was observed for bone development of broiler chickens reared at different stocking densities for the studied parameters. Thus, the increased density of 10 or 12 birds m?2 to 14 birds m?2 has no influence on zootechnical performance, carcass and cut yields, and bone development, but increases broiler chicken productivity reared in a conventional shed without air conditioning.O estudo teve como objetivo avaliar o efeito da densidade de criação de 10, 12, 14 e 16 aves m2 sobre o desempenho, os rendimentos de carcaça e cortes, a produtividade e o desenvolvimento ósseo de frangos de corte Cobb 500®. O delineamento experimental foi inteiramente casualizado com quatro tratamentos (densidades de criação) e quatro repetições, as avaliações foram realizadas semanalmente aos: um, sete, 14, 21, 28, 35 e 42 dias. O melhor resultado de peso vivo foi encontrado na densidade de 10 aves m2 no período de 1-7 dias, não verificou efeito das densidades sobre consumo de ração e ganho de peso. De 1-14 dias os melhores pesos vivos foram encontrados na densidade de 10, 12 e 14 aves m2, o consumo de ração na densidade 10 e 12 aves m2 foi maior. O ganho de peso foi melhor na densidade de 10 aves m2, não diferindo das densidades de 12 e 14 aves m2. No período de 1-21 dias o peso vivo e ganho de peso foram maiores nas densidades de 10, 12 e 14 aves m2. O maior consumo de ração foi na densidade 10 aves m2, que não diferiu da densidade de 14 aves m2. Houve diferença (P0,05) entre densidade de criação e idade para nenhum parâmetro ósseo avaliado. Não houve diferença (P>0,05) no desenvolvimento ósseo dos frangos de corte criados nas diferentes densidades de criação para nenhum dos parâmetros estudados. Conclui-se que o aumento no número de aves por metro quadrado de 10 ou 12 aves m2, para 14 aves m2 não compromete o desempenho zootécnico, o rendimento de carcaça e cortes e não prejudica o desenvolvimento ósseo e ainda aumenta a produtividade de frangos de corte criados em galpão convencional sem climatização.UEL2017-08-25info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPesquisa Empírica de Campoapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/2750710.5433/1679-0359.2017v38n4Supl1p2705Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 38 No. 4Supl1 (2017); 2705-2718Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 38 n. 4Supl1 (2017); 2705-27181679-03591676-546Xreponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELenghttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/27507/21516Copyright (c) 2017 Semina: Ciências Agráriashttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessHenrique, Cleoneide dos SantosOliveira, Andréia Fróes GaluciFerreira, Thales SilvaSilva, Eduardo SantosMello, Bruna Finotti Fonseca Reis deAndrade, Agner de FreitasMartins, Vinícius da Silva FreitasPaula, Fernando Oliveira deGarcia, Elis Regina de MoraesBruno, Luís Daniel Giusti2022-10-21T15:58:56Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/27507Revistahttp://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrariasPUBhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/oaisemina.agrarias@uel.br1679-03591676-546Xopendoar:2022-10-21T15:58:56Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Effect of stocking density on performance, carcass yield, productivity, and bone development in broiler chickens Cobb 500® Efeito da densidade de criação sobre o desempenho, rendimento de carcaça, produtividade e desenvolvimento ósseo de frangos de corte Cobb 500® |
title |
Effect of stocking density on performance, carcass yield, productivity, and bone development in broiler chickens Cobb 500® |
spellingShingle |
Effect of stocking density on performance, carcass yield, productivity, and bone development in broiler chickens Cobb 500® Henrique, Cleoneide dos Santos Cobb 500 Femur Live weight Breast meat yield Tibia. Cobb 500® Fêmur Peso vivo Rendimento de peito Tíbia. |
title_short |
Effect of stocking density on performance, carcass yield, productivity, and bone development in broiler chickens Cobb 500® |
title_full |
Effect of stocking density on performance, carcass yield, productivity, and bone development in broiler chickens Cobb 500® |
title_fullStr |
Effect of stocking density on performance, carcass yield, productivity, and bone development in broiler chickens Cobb 500® |
title_full_unstemmed |
Effect of stocking density on performance, carcass yield, productivity, and bone development in broiler chickens Cobb 500® |
title_sort |
Effect of stocking density on performance, carcass yield, productivity, and bone development in broiler chickens Cobb 500® |
author |
Henrique, Cleoneide dos Santos |
author_facet |
Henrique, Cleoneide dos Santos Oliveira, Andréia Fróes Galuci Ferreira, Thales Silva Silva, Eduardo Santos Mello, Bruna Finotti Fonseca Reis de Andrade, Agner de Freitas Martins, Vinícius da Silva Freitas Paula, Fernando Oliveira de Garcia, Elis Regina de Moraes Bruno, Luís Daniel Giusti |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Oliveira, Andréia Fróes Galuci Ferreira, Thales Silva Silva, Eduardo Santos Mello, Bruna Finotti Fonseca Reis de Andrade, Agner de Freitas Martins, Vinícius da Silva Freitas Paula, Fernando Oliveira de Garcia, Elis Regina de Moraes Bruno, Luís Daniel Giusti |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Henrique, Cleoneide dos Santos Oliveira, Andréia Fróes Galuci Ferreira, Thales Silva Silva, Eduardo Santos Mello, Bruna Finotti Fonseca Reis de Andrade, Agner de Freitas Martins, Vinícius da Silva Freitas Paula, Fernando Oliveira de Garcia, Elis Regina de Moraes Bruno, Luís Daniel Giusti |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Cobb 500 Femur Live weight Breast meat yield Tibia. Cobb 500® Fêmur Peso vivo Rendimento de peito Tíbia. |
topic |
Cobb 500 Femur Live weight Breast meat yield Tibia. Cobb 500® Fêmur Peso vivo Rendimento de peito Tíbia. |
description |
This study aimed to assess the effect of stocking density of 10, 12, 14, and 16 birds m?2 on performance, carcass and cut yields, productivity, and bone development of broiler chickens Cobb 500®. The experimental design was completely randomized design with four treatments (stocking densities) and four replications. The assessments were performed weekly at 1, 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, and 42 days. The best live weight result was found at a density of 10 birds m?2 in the period from 1 to 7 days. No effect of density was observed on feed intake and weight gain. From 1 to 14 days, the best live weights were found at densities of 10, 12, and 14 birds m?2, in addition to a higher feed intake at densities of 10 and 12 birds m?2. Weight gain was better at a density of 10 birds m?2, showing no differences from densities of 12 and 14 birds m?2. In the period from 1 to 21 days, live weight and weight gain were higher at densities of 10, 12, and 14 birds m?2. The highest feed intake was observed at a density of 10 birds m?2, which showed no difference from the density of 14 birds m?2. A difference (P < 0.05) was observed for live weight, weight gain, and feed intake of animals reared at densities of 10, 12, and 14 birds m?2 for the phases from 1 to 35 days and the total phase from 1 to 42 days of bird age when compared to 16 birds m?2, which presented lower performance. However, feed conversion of 1-7, 1-14, 1-21, 1-35, and 1-42 days and carcass and cut characteristics showed no significant differences for all treatments. On the other hand, productivity was higher in the treatments with 14 and 16 birds m?2, but without difference between each other. No interaction (P > 0.05) was observed between stocking density and age for the assessed bone parameters. Similarly, no difference (P > 0.05) was observed for bone development of broiler chickens reared at different stocking densities for the studied parameters. Thus, the increased density of 10 or 12 birds m?2 to 14 birds m?2 has no influence on zootechnical performance, carcass and cut yields, and bone development, but increases broiler chicken productivity reared in a conventional shed without air conditioning. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-08-25 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Pesquisa Empírica de Campo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/27507 10.5433/1679-0359.2017v38n4Supl1p2705 |
url |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/27507 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5433/1679-0359.2017v38n4Supl1p2705 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/27507/21516 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Semina: Ciências Agrárias http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Semina: Ciências Agrárias http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UEL |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UEL |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 38 No. 4Supl1 (2017); 2705-2718 Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 38 n. 4Supl1 (2017); 2705-2718 1679-0359 1676-546X reponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) instacron:UEL |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
instacron_str |
UEL |
institution |
UEL |
reponame_str |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
collection |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
semina.agrarias@uel.br |
_version_ |
1799306077100048384 |