Dose and application rate of fungicide to control leaf rust (Puccinia triticina) and yellow spot (Pyrenophora tritici repentis) of wheat
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2015 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/11797 |
Resumo: | The aim of this paper was to study the role of dose and rate of application, and the effect of concentration of fungicide in the spray solution resulted from the interaction of these factors, in the control of leaf rust and yellow spot of wheat. It was conducted two experiments, the first used the CD 104 cultivar (susceptible to lead rust and yellow spot). The experimental design was an factorial 3 x 3 + untreated control, that involve the factors dose (0,25, 0,30 and 0,35 L.ha-1) and application rate (143, 286 and 429 L.ha-1). The second experiment used the BRS 208 cultivar (resistant to leaf rust and moderately resistant to yellow spot). The experimental design was an factorial 2 x 2 + untreated control, consisting the factors dose (0,2 and 0,3 L.ha-1) and application rate (143 and 286 L.ha-1). The applications were made with a coastal sprayer by CO2, pressure of 250 kPa, XR 110-02 nozzle, which generated an application rate of 143 L.ha-1. The respective rates of each treatment were changed by the number of sprayers per area. It was also used a spore trap denominated Siga, associated with meteorological data and weather forecast, which detected spores of rust and yellow spot before the symptoms in the plants, helping in the identification of disease and in the timing of application. There wasn´t any interaction between dose and rate of application for any of the experiments, therefore, there wasn´t effect of concentration of fungicide in control. The dose and rate of application just influenced in the control of the yellow spot. Higher doses and rates were more effective. However, no difference was observed for yield and hectolitre weight among treatments, except untreated control. |
id |
UEL-11_ff4d630bfc3f5ba851498d65dd576791 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/11797 |
network_acronym_str |
UEL-11 |
network_name_str |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Dose and application rate of fungicide to control leaf rust (Puccinia triticina) and yellow spot (Pyrenophora tritici repentis) of wheatDose e taxa de aplicação de fungicida no controle da ferrugem da folha (Puccinia triticina) e da mancha amarela (Pyrenophora tritici repentis) do trigoApplication technologySolution concentrationFungicide absorption.Tecnologia de aplicaçãoConcentração de caldaAbsorção de fungicida.FitopatologiaThe aim of this paper was to study the role of dose and rate of application, and the effect of concentration of fungicide in the spray solution resulted from the interaction of these factors, in the control of leaf rust and yellow spot of wheat. It was conducted two experiments, the first used the CD 104 cultivar (susceptible to lead rust and yellow spot). The experimental design was an factorial 3 x 3 + untreated control, that involve the factors dose (0,25, 0,30 and 0,35 L.ha-1) and application rate (143, 286 and 429 L.ha-1). The second experiment used the BRS 208 cultivar (resistant to leaf rust and moderately resistant to yellow spot). The experimental design was an factorial 2 x 2 + untreated control, consisting the factors dose (0,2 and 0,3 L.ha-1) and application rate (143 and 286 L.ha-1). The applications were made with a coastal sprayer by CO2, pressure of 250 kPa, XR 110-02 nozzle, which generated an application rate of 143 L.ha-1. The respective rates of each treatment were changed by the number of sprayers per area. It was also used a spore trap denominated Siga, associated with meteorological data and weather forecast, which detected spores of rust and yellow spot before the symptoms in the plants, helping in the identification of disease and in the timing of application. There wasn´t any interaction between dose and rate of application for any of the experiments, therefore, there wasn´t effect of concentration of fungicide in control. The dose and rate of application just influenced in the control of the yellow spot. Higher doses and rates were more effective. However, no difference was observed for yield and hectolitre weight among treatments, except untreated control. O objetivo deste trabalho foi estudar a associação entre a dose e a taxa de aplicação e o efeito desta interação na concentração de fungicida da calda de pulverização para o controle da ferrugem da folha e mancha amarela do trigo. Realizaram-se dois experimentos, sendo que no primeiro utilizou-se a cultivar CD 104 (suscetível a ferrugem e mancha amarela), tendo como delineamento experimental o fatorial 3 x 3 + testemunha sem controle. Os fatores foram dose (0,25, 0,30 e 0,35 L.ha-1) e taxa de aplicação (143, 286 e 429 L.ha-1). Para o segundo experimento usou-se a cultivar BRS 208 (resistente a ferrugem e moderadamente resistente a mancha amarela), tendo como delineamento experimental o fatorial 2 x 2 + testemunha sem controle. Os fatores foram dose (0,2 e 0,3 L.ha-1) e taxa de aplicação (143 e 286 L.ha- 1). As aplicações foram realizadas com um pulverizador costal pressurizado via CO2, sob pressão de trabalho de 250 kPa, ponta de pulverização XR 110-02, gerando uma taxa de aplicação de 143 L.ha-1. As respectivas taxas de cada tratamento foram alteradas pelo número de vezes que a área foi pulverizada. Utilizou-se ainda o coletor de esporos SIGA associado a dados meteorológicos e de previsão de tempo, que detectou esporos da ferrugem e da mancha amarela antes da efetiva manifestação dos sintomas nas plantas, auxiliando assim na identificação das doenças e na tomada de decisão para a aplicação. Não foi evidenciada nenhuma interação entre dose e taxa de aplicação para nenhum dos experimentos, não havendo, portanto, efeito da concentração de fungicida no controle. A dose e a taxa de aplicação somente exerceram influência no controle da mancha amarela, cujo uso de maiores doses e taxas mostraram-se mais eficientes. Contudo, não foram verificadas diferenças para produtividade e peso hectolitro entre os tratamentos com fungicidas, exceto à testemunha sem aplicação.UEL2015-02-26info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/1179710.5433/1679-0359.2015v36n1p17Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 36 No. 1 (2015); 17-30Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 36 n. 1 (2015); 17-301679-03591676-546Xreponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/11797/pdf_565Copyright (c) 2015 Semina: Ciências Agráriashttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessOliveira, Gustavo Migliorini dePereira, Diego DionizioCamargo, Lênio César Moraes deBalan, Marcelo GonçalvesCanteri, Marcelo GiovanettiIgarashi, SeijiAbi Saab, Otavio Jorge Grigoli2023-01-13T15:02:42Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/11797Revistahttp://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrariasPUBhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/oaisemina.agrarias@uel.br1679-03591676-546Xopendoar:2023-01-13T15:02:42Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Dose and application rate of fungicide to control leaf rust (Puccinia triticina) and yellow spot (Pyrenophora tritici repentis) of wheat Dose e taxa de aplicação de fungicida no controle da ferrugem da folha (Puccinia triticina) e da mancha amarela (Pyrenophora tritici repentis) do trigo |
title |
Dose and application rate of fungicide to control leaf rust (Puccinia triticina) and yellow spot (Pyrenophora tritici repentis) of wheat |
spellingShingle |
Dose and application rate of fungicide to control leaf rust (Puccinia triticina) and yellow spot (Pyrenophora tritici repentis) of wheat Oliveira, Gustavo Migliorini de Application technology Solution concentration Fungicide absorption. Tecnologia de aplicação Concentração de calda Absorção de fungicida. Fitopatologia |
title_short |
Dose and application rate of fungicide to control leaf rust (Puccinia triticina) and yellow spot (Pyrenophora tritici repentis) of wheat |
title_full |
Dose and application rate of fungicide to control leaf rust (Puccinia triticina) and yellow spot (Pyrenophora tritici repentis) of wheat |
title_fullStr |
Dose and application rate of fungicide to control leaf rust (Puccinia triticina) and yellow spot (Pyrenophora tritici repentis) of wheat |
title_full_unstemmed |
Dose and application rate of fungicide to control leaf rust (Puccinia triticina) and yellow spot (Pyrenophora tritici repentis) of wheat |
title_sort |
Dose and application rate of fungicide to control leaf rust (Puccinia triticina) and yellow spot (Pyrenophora tritici repentis) of wheat |
author |
Oliveira, Gustavo Migliorini de |
author_facet |
Oliveira, Gustavo Migliorini de Pereira, Diego Dionizio Camargo, Lênio César Moraes de Balan, Marcelo Gonçalves Canteri, Marcelo Giovanetti Igarashi, Seiji Abi Saab, Otavio Jorge Grigoli |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Pereira, Diego Dionizio Camargo, Lênio César Moraes de Balan, Marcelo Gonçalves Canteri, Marcelo Giovanetti Igarashi, Seiji Abi Saab, Otavio Jorge Grigoli |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Oliveira, Gustavo Migliorini de Pereira, Diego Dionizio Camargo, Lênio César Moraes de Balan, Marcelo Gonçalves Canteri, Marcelo Giovanetti Igarashi, Seiji Abi Saab, Otavio Jorge Grigoli |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Application technology Solution concentration Fungicide absorption. Tecnologia de aplicação Concentração de calda Absorção de fungicida. Fitopatologia |
topic |
Application technology Solution concentration Fungicide absorption. Tecnologia de aplicação Concentração de calda Absorção de fungicida. Fitopatologia |
description |
The aim of this paper was to study the role of dose and rate of application, and the effect of concentration of fungicide in the spray solution resulted from the interaction of these factors, in the control of leaf rust and yellow spot of wheat. It was conducted two experiments, the first used the CD 104 cultivar (susceptible to lead rust and yellow spot). The experimental design was an factorial 3 x 3 + untreated control, that involve the factors dose (0,25, 0,30 and 0,35 L.ha-1) and application rate (143, 286 and 429 L.ha-1). The second experiment used the BRS 208 cultivar (resistant to leaf rust and moderately resistant to yellow spot). The experimental design was an factorial 2 x 2 + untreated control, consisting the factors dose (0,2 and 0,3 L.ha-1) and application rate (143 and 286 L.ha-1). The applications were made with a coastal sprayer by CO2, pressure of 250 kPa, XR 110-02 nozzle, which generated an application rate of 143 L.ha-1. The respective rates of each treatment were changed by the number of sprayers per area. It was also used a spore trap denominated Siga, associated with meteorological data and weather forecast, which detected spores of rust and yellow spot before the symptoms in the plants, helping in the identification of disease and in the timing of application. There wasn´t any interaction between dose and rate of application for any of the experiments, therefore, there wasn´t effect of concentration of fungicide in control. The dose and rate of application just influenced in the control of the yellow spot. Higher doses and rates were more effective. However, no difference was observed for yield and hectolitre weight among treatments, except untreated control. |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-02-26 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/11797 10.5433/1679-0359.2015v36n1p17 |
url |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/11797 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5433/1679-0359.2015v36n1p17 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/11797/pdf_565 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2015 Semina: Ciências Agrárias http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2015 Semina: Ciências Agrárias http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UEL |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UEL |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 36 No. 1 (2015); 17-30 Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 36 n. 1 (2015); 17-30 1679-0359 1676-546X reponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) instacron:UEL |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
instacron_str |
UEL |
institution |
UEL |
reponame_str |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
collection |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
semina.agrarias@uel.br |
_version_ |
1799306067085099008 |