The field of cultural heritage and history: conceptual itineraries and preservation practices
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2014 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Antíteses |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/antiteses/article/view/19969 |
Resumo: | The complexity that involves the new configuration in the cultural heritage field nowadays has challenged researchers to understand the social uses of the past, underpinned by the patrimonialization imperative, in perspective with the movement of memory expansion and identitarian dynamics. Despite the specificities of the instruments that support the institutionalization of cultural heritage in Brazil, although a hasty, careless look might categorize them as conceptual or methodological, in straight articulation with the material and immaterial dimension of an asset, we have tried to evidence that preservation as cultural heritage and registration are inserted in the logic of choices and value attribution, according to social and time contingencies under which they are built and located. As a writing mode from the past, reflections over the cultural heritage must consider it part of the effort by the agents (public authorities and social subjects) involved in the task of turning the time course experience into an experience which can be shared socially and collectively (GUIMARÃES, 2012). In face of the profusion of readings, appropriations and constructions of meanings around the cultural heritage, the article deals with this writing from a historical perspective, which aims at contributing to reflections over singularities in the processes of patrimonialization in its historicity. |
id |
UEL-13_1bb4394dd27f56577f61706a9d1b5a1b |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/19969 |
network_acronym_str |
UEL-13 |
network_name_str |
Antíteses |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The field of cultural heritage and history: conceptual itineraries and preservation practicesO campo do patrimônio cultural e a história: itinerários conceituais e práticas de preservaçãoHistoryCultural patrimonyMemoryIdentityFieldHistóriaPatrimônio culturalMemóriaIdentidadeCampoThe complexity that involves the new configuration in the cultural heritage field nowadays has challenged researchers to understand the social uses of the past, underpinned by the patrimonialization imperative, in perspective with the movement of memory expansion and identitarian dynamics. Despite the specificities of the instruments that support the institutionalization of cultural heritage in Brazil, although a hasty, careless look might categorize them as conceptual or methodological, in straight articulation with the material and immaterial dimension of an asset, we have tried to evidence that preservation as cultural heritage and registration are inserted in the logic of choices and value attribution, according to social and time contingencies under which they are built and located. As a writing mode from the past, reflections over the cultural heritage must consider it part of the effort by the agents (public authorities and social subjects) involved in the task of turning the time course experience into an experience which can be shared socially and collectively (GUIMARÃES, 2012). In face of the profusion of readings, appropriations and constructions of meanings around the cultural heritage, the article deals with this writing from a historical perspective, which aims at contributing to reflections over singularities in the processes of patrimonialization in its historicity.A complexidade que envolve a nova configuração do campo do patrimônio cultural na atualidade tem desafiado os pesquisadores a compreender os usos sociais do passado, consubstanciados pelo imperativo da patrimonialização, em perspectiva com o movimento de expansão da memória e as dinâmicas identitárias. A despeito das especificidades dos instrumentos que fundamentam a institucionalização do patrimônio cultural no Brasil, ainda que olhares apressados tendam a caracteriza-los de ordem conceitual e/ou metodológica, em estreita articulação com a dimensão material e imaterial do bem, procuramos evidenciar é que tombamento e registro se inserem na lógica das escolhas e atribuição de valores, segundo as contingências sociais e temporais sob as quais eles se constroem e se localizam. Enquanto uma modalidade de escrita do passado, as reflexões sobre o patrimônio cultural devem considera-lo parte do esforço dos agentes envolvidos (poder público e sujeitos sociais) de tornar a experiência do transcurso do tempo em experiência partilhável social e coletivamente (GUIMARÃES, 2012). Diante da profusão de leituras, apropriações e construções de significados em torno do patrimônio cultural, o artigo trata essa escrita a partir duma perspectiva histórica, buscando contribuir com as reflexões sobre as singularidades dos processos de patrimonialização em sua historicidade.Universidade Estadual de Londrina2014-12-19info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/antiteses/article/view/1996910.5433/1984-3356.2014v7n14p45Antíteses; Vol. 7 No. 14 (2014): Histórias e Antropologias dos Patrimônios Culturais; 45-67Antíteses; v. 7 n. 14 (2014): Histórias e Antropologias dos Patrimônios Culturais; 45-671984-3356reponame:Antítesesinstname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/antiteses/article/view/19969/15603Copyright (c) 2014 Antíteseshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessNogueira, Antonio Gilberto Ramos2022-11-03T17:22:25Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/19969Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/antitesesPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/antiteses/oaiantiteses@uel.br||1984-33561984-3356opendoar:2022-11-03T17:22:25Antíteses - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The field of cultural heritage and history: conceptual itineraries and preservation practices O campo do patrimônio cultural e a história: itinerários conceituais e práticas de preservação |
title |
The field of cultural heritage and history: conceptual itineraries and preservation practices |
spellingShingle |
The field of cultural heritage and history: conceptual itineraries and preservation practices Nogueira, Antonio Gilberto Ramos History Cultural patrimony Memory Identity Field História Patrimônio cultural Memória Identidade Campo |
title_short |
The field of cultural heritage and history: conceptual itineraries and preservation practices |
title_full |
The field of cultural heritage and history: conceptual itineraries and preservation practices |
title_fullStr |
The field of cultural heritage and history: conceptual itineraries and preservation practices |
title_full_unstemmed |
The field of cultural heritage and history: conceptual itineraries and preservation practices |
title_sort |
The field of cultural heritage and history: conceptual itineraries and preservation practices |
author |
Nogueira, Antonio Gilberto Ramos |
author_facet |
Nogueira, Antonio Gilberto Ramos |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Nogueira, Antonio Gilberto Ramos |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
History Cultural patrimony Memory Identity Field História Patrimônio cultural Memória Identidade Campo |
topic |
History Cultural patrimony Memory Identity Field História Patrimônio cultural Memória Identidade Campo |
description |
The complexity that involves the new configuration in the cultural heritage field nowadays has challenged researchers to understand the social uses of the past, underpinned by the patrimonialization imperative, in perspective with the movement of memory expansion and identitarian dynamics. Despite the specificities of the instruments that support the institutionalization of cultural heritage in Brazil, although a hasty, careless look might categorize them as conceptual or methodological, in straight articulation with the material and immaterial dimension of an asset, we have tried to evidence that preservation as cultural heritage and registration are inserted in the logic of choices and value attribution, according to social and time contingencies under which they are built and located. As a writing mode from the past, reflections over the cultural heritage must consider it part of the effort by the agents (public authorities and social subjects) involved in the task of turning the time course experience into an experience which can be shared socially and collectively (GUIMARÃES, 2012). In face of the profusion of readings, appropriations and constructions of meanings around the cultural heritage, the article deals with this writing from a historical perspective, which aims at contributing to reflections over singularities in the processes of patrimonialization in its historicity. |
publishDate |
2014 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2014-12-19 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/antiteses/article/view/19969 10.5433/1984-3356.2014v7n14p45 |
url |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/antiteses/article/view/19969 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5433/1984-3356.2014v7n14p45 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/antiteses/article/view/19969/15603 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2014 Antíteses http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2014 Antíteses http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Antíteses; Vol. 7 No. 14 (2014): Histórias e Antropologias dos Patrimônios Culturais; 45-67 Antíteses; v. 7 n. 14 (2014): Histórias e Antropologias dos Patrimônios Culturais; 45-67 1984-3356 reponame:Antíteses instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) instacron:UEL |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
instacron_str |
UEL |
institution |
UEL |
reponame_str |
Antíteses |
collection |
Antíteses |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Antíteses - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
antiteses@uel.br|| |
_version_ |
1797069046530703360 |