The Secular State and Religious Freedom as election proposal: Fernando O and Elections of 1933

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Weber, Beatriz Teixeira
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Mattos, Renan Santos
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Antíteses
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/antiteses/article/view/26594
Resumo: This text pursue the political position of Fernando do Ò, military, lawyer and spiritualist who worked in Santa Maria from 1930 to 1950 on the occasion candidate of the League Pró-Estado Leigo in Rio Grande do Sul during the Constituent Assembly of 1934. Based on the religious notion of religious field of Pierre Bourdieu, and from articles Daily Interior seeks to analyze the social role of religion and its relations with politics, In which the defense of secularity and religious freedom constituted as a point of congregation of different religious aspects.
id UEL-13_92e2878913f323dd8b76472827004105
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/26594
network_acronym_str UEL-13
network_name_str Antíteses
repository_id_str
spelling The Secular State and Religious Freedom as election proposal: Fernando O and Elections of 1933O Estado Laico e a Liberdade Religiosa como proposta eleitoral: Fernando do Ó e as eleições de 1933Religious freedomLaicityElections of 1933HistoryLiberdade religiosaLaicidadeEleições de 1933HistóriaThis text pursue the political position of Fernando do Ò, military, lawyer and spiritualist who worked in Santa Maria from 1930 to 1950 on the occasion candidate of the League Pró-Estado Leigo in Rio Grande do Sul during the Constituent Assembly of 1934. Based on the religious notion of religious field of Pierre Bourdieu, and from articles Daily Interior seeks to analyze the social role of religion and its relations with politics, In which the defense of secularity and religious freedom constituted as a point of congregation of different religious aspects.Este texto persegue a posição política de Fernando Do Ó, militar, advogado e importante liderança espírita da cidade de Santa Maria nas décadas de 1930 a 1950, por ocasião de sua candidatura como Deputado Federal pela Liga Pró-Estado Leigo para a Assembleia Nacional Constituinte de 1934. Tendo por base a noção de campo religioso de Pierre Bourdieu, e a partir de artigos do Diário do Interior, busca-se analisar o papel social da religião e suas relações com a política, em que a defesa da laicidade e da liberdade religiosa constituía-se como ponto de congregação de diferentes vertentes religiosas.Universidade Estadual de Londrina2017-07-28info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionHistorical researchPesquisa históricaapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/antiteses/article/view/2659410.5433/1984-3356.2017v10n19p496Antíteses; Vol. 10 No. 19 (2017): história e imprensa; 496-520Antíteses; v. 10 n. 19 (2017): história e imprensa; 496-5201984-3356reponame:Antítesesinstname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/antiteses/article/view/26594/21282Copyright (c) 2017 Antítesesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessWeber, Beatriz TeixeiraMattos, Renan Santos2021-09-20T17:40:59Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/26594Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/antitesesPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/antiteses/oaiantiteses@uel.br||1984-33561984-3356opendoar:2021-09-20T17:40:59Antíteses - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The Secular State and Religious Freedom as election proposal: Fernando O and Elections of 1933
O Estado Laico e a Liberdade Religiosa como proposta eleitoral: Fernando do Ó e as eleições de 1933
title The Secular State and Religious Freedom as election proposal: Fernando O and Elections of 1933
spellingShingle The Secular State and Religious Freedom as election proposal: Fernando O and Elections of 1933
Weber, Beatriz Teixeira
Religious freedom
Laicity
Elections of 1933
History
Liberdade religiosa
Laicidade
Eleições de 1933
História
title_short The Secular State and Religious Freedom as election proposal: Fernando O and Elections of 1933
title_full The Secular State and Religious Freedom as election proposal: Fernando O and Elections of 1933
title_fullStr The Secular State and Religious Freedom as election proposal: Fernando O and Elections of 1933
title_full_unstemmed The Secular State and Religious Freedom as election proposal: Fernando O and Elections of 1933
title_sort The Secular State and Religious Freedom as election proposal: Fernando O and Elections of 1933
author Weber, Beatriz Teixeira
author_facet Weber, Beatriz Teixeira
Mattos, Renan Santos
author_role author
author2 Mattos, Renan Santos
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Weber, Beatriz Teixeira
Mattos, Renan Santos
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Religious freedom
Laicity
Elections of 1933
History
Liberdade religiosa
Laicidade
Eleições de 1933
História
topic Religious freedom
Laicity
Elections of 1933
History
Liberdade religiosa
Laicidade
Eleições de 1933
História
description This text pursue the political position of Fernando do Ò, military, lawyer and spiritualist who worked in Santa Maria from 1930 to 1950 on the occasion candidate of the League Pró-Estado Leigo in Rio Grande do Sul during the Constituent Assembly of 1934. Based on the religious notion of religious field of Pierre Bourdieu, and from articles Daily Interior seeks to analyze the social role of religion and its relations with politics, In which the defense of secularity and religious freedom constituted as a point of congregation of different religious aspects.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-07-28
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Historical research
Pesquisa histórica
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/antiteses/article/view/26594
10.5433/1984-3356.2017v10n19p496
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/antiteses/article/view/26594
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/1984-3356.2017v10n19p496
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/antiteses/article/view/26594/21282
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Antíteses
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Antíteses
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Antíteses; Vol. 10 No. 19 (2017): história e imprensa; 496-520
Antíteses; v. 10 n. 19 (2017): história e imprensa; 496-520
1984-3356
reponame:Antíteses
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Antíteses
collection Antíteses
repository.name.fl_str_mv Antíteses - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv antiteses@uel.br||
_version_ 1797069047369564160

Registros relacionados