Psychometric validity of the Exercise Benefits/Barriers Scale, Brazilian version, in adults and older adults with cardiovascular diseases: Psychometric validity of the Exercise Benefits/Barriers Scale, Brazilian version
| Autor(a) principal: | |
|---|---|
| Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
| Outros Autores: | , , , |
| Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
| Idioma: | eng por |
| Título da fonte: | Advances in Nursing and Health |
| Texto Completo: | https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/anh/article/view/46392 |
Resumo: | Objective: to describe the internal consistency and construct validity of the Exercise Benefits/Barriers Scale, Brazilian version, for adults and older adults with cardiovascular disease. Methods: this is a methodological study with 121 participants. The scale has 42 items divided into barriers (14 items) and benefits (28) subscales. The total score was between 42 and 168. Higher values indicate greater perception of benefits and lower perception of barriers to exercise. Internal consistency, construct validity (convergent and divergent) and the presence of ceiling and floor effects were described. Results: among the participants, 58.7% were male, with a mean age of 58.2 years (SD = 13.2) and low education (mean = 7.9 years; SD = 4.5). Cronbach’s alpha values were 0.92 (total scale), 0.95 (benefits) and 0.65 (barriers). A negative and moderate linear correlation was verified between the total scores of the scale and the Cardiac Rehabilitation Barriers Scale (r=-0.513; p<0.001). Convergent and divergent validity were satisfactory according to multitrait-multimethod analysis. The presence of a ceiling effect was observed in 75% of benefits subscale items and a floor effect in item 12 of the barriers subscale. Conclusion: the instrument showed satisfactory internal consistency and construct validity in a sample of Brazilian adults and older adults with cardiovascular diseases. Future investigations are recommended with the performance of confirmatory factor analysis, assessing individuals with cardiovascular diseases, higher education, undergoing different therapeutic modalities and coming from different regions of the country. |
| id |
UEL-14_5d2a889b806c76f2aa868ffa87cb440d |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/46392 |
| network_acronym_str |
UEL-14 |
| network_name_str |
Advances in Nursing and Health |
| repository_id_str |
|
| spelling |
Psychometric validity of the Exercise Benefits/Barriers Scale, Brazilian version, in adults and older adults with cardiovascular diseases: Psychometric validity of the Exercise Benefits/Barriers Scale, Brazilian versionValidación psicométrica de la versión brasileña de la ExerciseBenefits/BarriersScale en adultos y ancianos con enfermedades cardiovasculares : Validación psicométrica de la versión brasileña de la ExerciseBenefits/BarriersScalevalidação psicométrica da versão brasileira da exercise benefits/barriers scale em indivíduos com doenças cardiovasculares: validação psicométrica da versão brasileira da exercise benefits/barriers scaleEstudo de validaçãoPesquisa metodológica em enfermagemExercício físicoPercepçãoDoenças cardiovascularesPsicometriaEstudio de ValidaciónInvestigación Metodológica en EnfermeríaEjercicio FísicoPercepciónEnfermedades CardiovascularesPsicometríaValidation StudyNursing Methodology ResearchExercisePerceptionCardiovascular DiseasesPsychometricsObjective: to describe the internal consistency and construct validity of the Exercise Benefits/Barriers Scale, Brazilian version, for adults and older adults with cardiovascular disease. Methods: this is a methodological study with 121 participants. The scale has 42 items divided into barriers (14 items) and benefits (28) subscales. The total score was between 42 and 168. Higher values indicate greater perception of benefits and lower perception of barriers to exercise. Internal consistency, construct validity (convergent and divergent) and the presence of ceiling and floor effects were described. Results: among the participants, 58.7% were male, with a mean age of 58.2 years (SD = 13.2) and low education (mean = 7.9 years; SD = 4.5). Cronbach’s alpha values were 0.92 (total scale), 0.95 (benefits) and 0.65 (barriers). A negative and moderate linear correlation was verified between the total scores of the scale and the Cardiac Rehabilitation Barriers Scale (r=-0.513; p<0.001). Convergent and divergent validity were satisfactory according to multitrait-multimethod analysis. The presence of a ceiling effect was observed in 75% of benefits subscale items and a floor effect in item 12 of the barriers subscale. Conclusion: the instrument showed satisfactory internal consistency and construct validity in a sample of Brazilian adults and older adults with cardiovascular diseases. Future investigations are recommended with the performance of confirmatory factor analysis, assessing individuals with cardiovascular diseases, higher education, undergoing different therapeutic modalities and coming from different regions of the country.Objetivo: describir la consistencia interna y la validez de constructo de la versión brasileña de la ExerciseBenefits/BarriersScale para adultos y ancianos con enfermedades cardiovasculares. Métodos: estudio metodológico con 121 participantes. La escala tiene 42 ítems, divididos en subescalas de barreras (14 ítems) y beneficios (28). La puntuación total estuvo entre 42 y 168. Valores más altos indican mayor percepción de beneficios y menor percepción de barreras para los ejercicios. Se describieron la consistencia interna, la validez de constructo (convergente y divergente) y la presencia de efectos techo y suelo. Resultados: entre los participantes, 58,7% eran del sexo masculino, con una edad media de 58,2 años (DE = 13,2) y baja escolaridad (media = 7,9 años; DE = 4,5). Los valores alfa de Cronbach fueron 0,92 (escala total), 0,95 (beneficios) y 0,65 (barreras). Se verificó una correlación lineal negativa y moderada entre los puntajes totales de la escala y la CardiacRehabilitationBarriersScale (r=-0,513; p<0,001). La validez convergente y divergente fue satisfactoria según el análisis multirrasgo-multimétodo. Se observó la presencia de un efecto techo en el 75% de los ítems de la subescala beneficios y un efecto suelo en el ítem 12 de la subescala barreras. Conclusión: el instrumento mostró consistencia interna satisfactoria y validez de constructo en una muestra de adultos y ancianos brasileños con enfermedades cardiovasculares. Se recomiendan futuras investigaciones con la realización de análisis factorial confirmatorio, evaluando individuos con enfermedades cardiovasculares, con estudios superiores, en diferentes modalidades terapéuticas y provenientes de diferentes regiones del país.Objetivo: descrever a consistência interna e a validade de construto da versão brasileira da ExerciseBenefits/BarriersScale para adultos e idosos com doenças cardiovasculares. Métodos: estudo metodológico com 121 participantes. A escala tem42 itens, divididos nas subescalas de barreiras (14 itens) e benefícios (28). O escore total foi entre 42 e 168. Maiores valores indicam maior percepção dos benefícios, e menores, de barreiras aos exercícios. Foram descritas a consistência interna, a validade de construto(convergente e divergente) e a presença dos efeitos teto e chão. Resultados: entre os participantes, 58,7% eram do sexo masculino, com média de idade igual a 58,2 anos (DP = 13,2) e baixa escolaridade (média = 7,9 anos; DP = 4,5). Os valores dos alfas de Cronbach foram 0,92 (escala total), 0,95 (benefícios) e 0,65 (barreiras). Foi verificada correlação linear negativa e moderada entre os escores totais da escala e da CardiacRehabilitationBarriersScale (r=-0,513; p<0,001). Validades convergente e divergente foram satisfatórias segundo análise multitraço-multimétodo. Foi observada presença de efeito teto em 75% dos itens da subescala de benefícios, e efeito chão, no item 12 da subescala de barreiras. Conclusão: o instrumento apresentou consistência interna e validade de construto satisfatórios em amostra de adultos e idosos brasileiros com doenças cardiovasculares. Recomendam-se investigações futuras com a realização da análise fatorial confirmatória, avaliando-se indivíduos com doenças cardiovasculares, com maior escolaridade, submetidos a diferentes modalidades terapêuticas e provenientes de distintas regiões do país.Universidade Estadual de Londrina2023-05-15info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/anh/article/view/4639210.5433/anh.2023v5.id46392Advances in Nursing and Health; Vol. 5 No. 1 (2023): Advances in Nursing and Health; 33-44Advances in Nursing and Health; Vol. 5 Núm. 1 (2023): Advances in Nursing and Health; 33-44Advances in Nursing and Health; v. 5 n. 1 (2023): Advances in Nursing and Health; 33-442675-1798reponame:Advances in Nursing and Healthinstname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELengporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/anh/article/view/46392/48923https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/anh/article/view/46392/48873Copyright (c) 2023 Advances in Nursing and Healthhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRibeiro, Arthur Marco PeresTonetto, Pedro Paulo Fernandes de AguiarFerrari, Kethlen Louise Palhados Santos, Claudia BeneditaDantas, Rosana Aparecida Spadoti2024-01-24T02:06:58Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/46392Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/anh/indexPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/anh/oaianh@uel.br2675-17982675-1798opendoar:2024-01-24T02:06:58Advances in Nursing and Health - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Psychometric validity of the Exercise Benefits/Barriers Scale, Brazilian version, in adults and older adults with cardiovascular diseases: Psychometric validity of the Exercise Benefits/Barriers Scale, Brazilian version Validación psicométrica de la versión brasileña de la ExerciseBenefits/BarriersScale en adultos y ancianos con enfermedades cardiovasculares : Validación psicométrica de la versión brasileña de la ExerciseBenefits/BarriersScale validação psicométrica da versão brasileira da exercise benefits/barriers scale em indivíduos com doenças cardiovasculares: validação psicométrica da versão brasileira da exercise benefits/barriers scale |
| title |
Psychometric validity of the Exercise Benefits/Barriers Scale, Brazilian version, in adults and older adults with cardiovascular diseases: Psychometric validity of the Exercise Benefits/Barriers Scale, Brazilian version |
| spellingShingle |
Psychometric validity of the Exercise Benefits/Barriers Scale, Brazilian version, in adults and older adults with cardiovascular diseases: Psychometric validity of the Exercise Benefits/Barriers Scale, Brazilian version Ribeiro, Arthur Marco Peres Estudo de validação Pesquisa metodológica em enfermagem Exercício físico Percepção Doenças cardiovasculares Psicometria Estudio de Validación Investigación Metodológica en Enfermería Ejercicio Físico Percepción Enfermedades Cardiovasculares Psicometría Validation Study Nursing Methodology Research Exercise Perception Cardiovascular Diseases Psychometrics |
| title_short |
Psychometric validity of the Exercise Benefits/Barriers Scale, Brazilian version, in adults and older adults with cardiovascular diseases: Psychometric validity of the Exercise Benefits/Barriers Scale, Brazilian version |
| title_full |
Psychometric validity of the Exercise Benefits/Barriers Scale, Brazilian version, in adults and older adults with cardiovascular diseases: Psychometric validity of the Exercise Benefits/Barriers Scale, Brazilian version |
| title_fullStr |
Psychometric validity of the Exercise Benefits/Barriers Scale, Brazilian version, in adults and older adults with cardiovascular diseases: Psychometric validity of the Exercise Benefits/Barriers Scale, Brazilian version |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Psychometric validity of the Exercise Benefits/Barriers Scale, Brazilian version, in adults and older adults with cardiovascular diseases: Psychometric validity of the Exercise Benefits/Barriers Scale, Brazilian version |
| title_sort |
Psychometric validity of the Exercise Benefits/Barriers Scale, Brazilian version, in adults and older adults with cardiovascular diseases: Psychometric validity of the Exercise Benefits/Barriers Scale, Brazilian version |
| author |
Ribeiro, Arthur Marco Peres |
| author_facet |
Ribeiro, Arthur Marco Peres Tonetto, Pedro Paulo Fernandes de Aguiar Ferrari, Kethlen Louise Palha dos Santos, Claudia Benedita Dantas, Rosana Aparecida Spadoti |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
Tonetto, Pedro Paulo Fernandes de Aguiar Ferrari, Kethlen Louise Palha dos Santos, Claudia Benedita Dantas, Rosana Aparecida Spadoti |
| author2_role |
author author author author |
| dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Ribeiro, Arthur Marco Peres Tonetto, Pedro Paulo Fernandes de Aguiar Ferrari, Kethlen Louise Palha dos Santos, Claudia Benedita Dantas, Rosana Aparecida Spadoti |
| dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Estudo de validação Pesquisa metodológica em enfermagem Exercício físico Percepção Doenças cardiovasculares Psicometria Estudio de Validación Investigación Metodológica en Enfermería Ejercicio Físico Percepción Enfermedades Cardiovasculares Psicometría Validation Study Nursing Methodology Research Exercise Perception Cardiovascular Diseases Psychometrics |
| topic |
Estudo de validação Pesquisa metodológica em enfermagem Exercício físico Percepção Doenças cardiovasculares Psicometria Estudio de Validación Investigación Metodológica en Enfermería Ejercicio Físico Percepción Enfermedades Cardiovasculares Psicometría Validation Study Nursing Methodology Research Exercise Perception Cardiovascular Diseases Psychometrics |
| description |
Objective: to describe the internal consistency and construct validity of the Exercise Benefits/Barriers Scale, Brazilian version, for adults and older adults with cardiovascular disease. Methods: this is a methodological study with 121 participants. The scale has 42 items divided into barriers (14 items) and benefits (28) subscales. The total score was between 42 and 168. Higher values indicate greater perception of benefits and lower perception of barriers to exercise. Internal consistency, construct validity (convergent and divergent) and the presence of ceiling and floor effects were described. Results: among the participants, 58.7% were male, with a mean age of 58.2 years (SD = 13.2) and low education (mean = 7.9 years; SD = 4.5). Cronbach’s alpha values were 0.92 (total scale), 0.95 (benefits) and 0.65 (barriers). A negative and moderate linear correlation was verified between the total scores of the scale and the Cardiac Rehabilitation Barriers Scale (r=-0.513; p<0.001). Convergent and divergent validity were satisfactory according to multitrait-multimethod analysis. The presence of a ceiling effect was observed in 75% of benefits subscale items and a floor effect in item 12 of the barriers subscale. Conclusion: the instrument showed satisfactory internal consistency and construct validity in a sample of Brazilian adults and older adults with cardiovascular diseases. Future investigations are recommended with the performance of confirmatory factor analysis, assessing individuals with cardiovascular diseases, higher education, undergoing different therapeutic modalities and coming from different regions of the country. |
| publishDate |
2023 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-05-15 |
| dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/anh/article/view/46392 10.5433/anh.2023v5.id46392 |
| url |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/anh/article/view/46392 |
| identifier_str_mv |
10.5433/anh.2023v5.id46392 |
| dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng por |
| language |
eng por |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/anh/article/view/46392/48923 https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/anh/article/view/46392/48873 |
| dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Advances in Nursing and Health http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Advances in Nursing and Health http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Advances in Nursing and Health; Vol. 5 No. 1 (2023): Advances in Nursing and Health; 33-44 Advances in Nursing and Health; Vol. 5 Núm. 1 (2023): Advances in Nursing and Health; 33-44 Advances in Nursing and Health; v. 5 n. 1 (2023): Advances in Nursing and Health; 33-44 2675-1798 reponame:Advances in Nursing and Health instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) instacron:UEL |
| instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
| instacron_str |
UEL |
| institution |
UEL |
| reponame_str |
Advances in Nursing and Health |
| collection |
Advances in Nursing and Health |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Advances in Nursing and Health - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
anh@uel.br |
| _version_ |
1797047036269297664 |