Is there truth in the brazilian criminal procedure code?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista do Direito Público |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/28587 |
Resumo: | This paper searches for the ‘truth’ in the Brazilian Criminal Procedural Code; moreover, it is seen as a guarantee of the accused. Furthermore, the criminal procedure code seeks the truth at the time of a fact´s reconstruction. In addition, it characterizes a crime, and with it, there is a guarantee of a fair decision for the accused. Thus, this paper discusses the possibility or impossibility of an existing truth, which is this research´s primary focus. Nevertheless, true knowledge is a correspondence between procedural language and events that happened. Using Alexander Light’s theory, this paper presents the following hypothesis: it is not philosophically suitable to believe adequately that there is true propositional knowledge. By means of the deductive method, this paper´s first chapter is dedicated to presenting the concept of ‘criminal procedural truth’, which is the Brazilian criminal procedure code´s greatest pursuit. Sequentially, in the second chapter, this study deconstructs the idea that truth – as a mirror of reality – is the same truth of the criminal process. Therefore, if this theory is correct, one cannot admit the existence of true criminal procedure (formal or material) but only of a justified criminal procedural knowledge. |
id |
UEL-2_011d8f926849b7cc82ce20c5d9366a8f |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/28587 |
network_acronym_str |
UEL-2 |
network_name_str |
Revista do Direito Público |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Is there truth in the brazilian criminal procedure code?A verdade no processo penal: (im)possibilidades?Epistemology. Criminal Procedure. Truth. True Knowledge. Justification.Epistemologia. Processo penal. Verdade. Conhecimento verdadeiro. Justificação.This paper searches for the ‘truth’ in the Brazilian Criminal Procedural Code; moreover, it is seen as a guarantee of the accused. Furthermore, the criminal procedure code seeks the truth at the time of a fact´s reconstruction. In addition, it characterizes a crime, and with it, there is a guarantee of a fair decision for the accused. Thus, this paper discusses the possibility or impossibility of an existing truth, which is this research´s primary focus. Nevertheless, true knowledge is a correspondence between procedural language and events that happened. Using Alexander Light’s theory, this paper presents the following hypothesis: it is not philosophically suitable to believe adequately that there is true propositional knowledge. By means of the deductive method, this paper´s first chapter is dedicated to presenting the concept of ‘criminal procedural truth’, which is the Brazilian criminal procedure code´s greatest pursuit. Sequentially, in the second chapter, this study deconstructs the idea that truth – as a mirror of reality – is the same truth of the criminal process. Therefore, if this theory is correct, one cannot admit the existence of true criminal procedure (formal or material) but only of a justified criminal procedural knowledge.O artigo tem por objeto a busca da verdade no processo penal brasileiro. Visto como garantia do acusado, o processo busca a verdade à hora da reconstrução de um fato social tido supostamente como crime, como garantia de uma justa decisão ao acusado. Diante disso, o artigo problematiza a possibilidade ou impossibilidade da existência dessa verdade, ou seja, tem como problema de pesquisa a possibilidade de um conhecimento verdadeiro enquanto correspondência entre a linguagem processual e a realidade dos fatos ocorridos no mundo da vida. A partir da teoria de Alexandre Luz, o artigo apresenta a seguinte hipótese: não é adequado filosoficamente falar de um conhecimento proposicional verdadeiro. Utilizando o método dedutivo, o primeiro capítulo dedica-se a apresentar o que se entende por verdade processual penal e qual a grande busca do processo penal brasileiro. Sequencialmente, no segundo capítulo, o artigo busca desconstruir a ideia da existência de uma verdade enquanto espelhamento da realidade e da verdade do processo penal. Diante disso, se a teoria apresentada estiver correta, não se poderia falar de uma verdade processual penal, formal ou material, mas apenar de um conhecimento processual penal justificado.Universidade Estadual de Londrina2017-05-16info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/2858710.5433/1980-511X.2017v12n1p266Revista do Direito Público; v. 12 n. 1 (2017); 266-2861980-511Xreponame:Revista do Direito Públicoinstname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/28587/20915Copyright (c) 2017 Revista do Direito Públicoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGrubba, Leilane Serratine2017-05-17T21:16:54Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/28587Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopubPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/oai||rdpubuel@uel.br1980-511X1980-511Xopendoar:2017-05-17T21:16:54Revista do Direito Público - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Is there truth in the brazilian criminal procedure code? A verdade no processo penal: (im)possibilidades? |
title |
Is there truth in the brazilian criminal procedure code? |
spellingShingle |
Is there truth in the brazilian criminal procedure code? Grubba, Leilane Serratine Epistemology. Criminal Procedure. Truth. True Knowledge. Justification. Epistemologia. Processo penal. Verdade. Conhecimento verdadeiro. Justificação. |
title_short |
Is there truth in the brazilian criminal procedure code? |
title_full |
Is there truth in the brazilian criminal procedure code? |
title_fullStr |
Is there truth in the brazilian criminal procedure code? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Is there truth in the brazilian criminal procedure code? |
title_sort |
Is there truth in the brazilian criminal procedure code? |
author |
Grubba, Leilane Serratine |
author_facet |
Grubba, Leilane Serratine |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Grubba, Leilane Serratine |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Epistemology. Criminal Procedure. Truth. True Knowledge. Justification. Epistemologia. Processo penal. Verdade. Conhecimento verdadeiro. Justificação. |
topic |
Epistemology. Criminal Procedure. Truth. True Knowledge. Justification. Epistemologia. Processo penal. Verdade. Conhecimento verdadeiro. Justificação. |
description |
This paper searches for the ‘truth’ in the Brazilian Criminal Procedural Code; moreover, it is seen as a guarantee of the accused. Furthermore, the criminal procedure code seeks the truth at the time of a fact´s reconstruction. In addition, it characterizes a crime, and with it, there is a guarantee of a fair decision for the accused. Thus, this paper discusses the possibility or impossibility of an existing truth, which is this research´s primary focus. Nevertheless, true knowledge is a correspondence between procedural language and events that happened. Using Alexander Light’s theory, this paper presents the following hypothesis: it is not philosophically suitable to believe adequately that there is true propositional knowledge. By means of the deductive method, this paper´s first chapter is dedicated to presenting the concept of ‘criminal procedural truth’, which is the Brazilian criminal procedure code´s greatest pursuit. Sequentially, in the second chapter, this study deconstructs the idea that truth – as a mirror of reality – is the same truth of the criminal process. Therefore, if this theory is correct, one cannot admit the existence of true criminal procedure (formal or material) but only of a justified criminal procedural knowledge. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-05-16 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artigo avaliado pelos Pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/28587 10.5433/1980-511X.2017v12n1p266 |
url |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/28587 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5433/1980-511X.2017v12n1p266 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/28587/20915 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Revista do Direito Público info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Revista do Direito Público |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista do Direito Público; v. 12 n. 1 (2017); 266-286 1980-511X reponame:Revista do Direito Público instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) instacron:UEL |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
instacron_str |
UEL |
institution |
UEL |
reponame_str |
Revista do Direito Público |
collection |
Revista do Direito Público |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista do Direito Público - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||rdpubuel@uel.br |
_version_ |
1799305932067307520 |