Neoconstitutionalism or paleoconstitucionalism? Notes about the understanding of the contemporary legal phenomenon

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Cella, José Renato Gaziero
Data de Publicação: 2014
Outros Autores: Rodrigues, Renê Chiquetti
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista do Direito Público
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/19431
Resumo: The expression neoconstitutionalism joined permanently in our legal lexicon as a way to explain the recent changes experienced inBrazil after the advent of the 1988 Constitution. The present study aimed to investigate the significant density of this word and its value in explaining this new legal reality that presents itself in our day. For this, the study conducts an argumentative analysis of two relevant studies on the topic, contrasting the understanding of the authors: “Neoconstitutionalism and the constitutionalization of law. The late triumph of constitutional law inBrazil” by Luis Roberto Barroso and “Neoconstitutionalism and legal moralism” by Dimitri Dimoulis. At the end, it is concluded that, despite the undeniable changes and significant social and political contributions provided by the 1988 Constitution, the phenomenon widely referred to the term "neoconstitutionalism" claims in questionable premises of historical, theoretical and philosophical view, being an overly imprecise expression to explain the contemporary legal reality.
id UEL-2_16bfe3da9f7b229027438a91e188bf76
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/19431
network_acronym_str UEL-2
network_name_str Revista do Direito Público
repository_id_str
spelling Neoconstitutionalism or paleoconstitucionalism? Notes about the understanding of the contemporary legal phenomenonNeoconstitucionalismo ou paleoconstitucionalismo? Apontamentos acerca da compreensão do fenômeno jurídico contemporâneoConstitutiontheory of lawmoralityhermeneutics.ConstituiçãoTeoria do DireitoMoralHermeneutica.The expression neoconstitutionalism joined permanently in our legal lexicon as a way to explain the recent changes experienced inBrazil after the advent of the 1988 Constitution. The present study aimed to investigate the significant density of this word and its value in explaining this new legal reality that presents itself in our day. For this, the study conducts an argumentative analysis of two relevant studies on the topic, contrasting the understanding of the authors: “Neoconstitutionalism and the constitutionalization of law. The late triumph of constitutional law inBrazil” by Luis Roberto Barroso and “Neoconstitutionalism and legal moralism” by Dimitri Dimoulis. At the end, it is concluded that, despite the undeniable changes and significant social and political contributions provided by the 1988 Constitution, the phenomenon widely referred to the term "neoconstitutionalism" claims in questionable premises of historical, theoretical and philosophical view, being an overly imprecise expression to explain the contemporary legal reality.A expressão neoconstitucionalismo ingressou definitivamente em nosso léxico jurídico como modo de explicar as recentes mudanças experienciadas no Brasil após o advento da Constituição de 1988. O presente estudo visa investigar a densidade significativa do respectivo termo e sua valia na explicação dessa nova realidade jurídica que se apresenta em nossos dias. Para tanto, o estudo realiza uma análise argumentativa de dois relevantes estudos sobre o tema, contrapondo a compreensão dos autores: “Neoconstitucionalismo e a Constitucionalização do Direito. O triunfo tardio do direito constitucional no Brasil” de Luis Roberto Barroso e “Neoconstitucionalismo e moralismo jurídico” de Dimitri Dimoulis. Ao final, conclui-se que, em que pese as inegáveis mudanças e significativas contribuições sociais e políticas proporcionadas pela Constituição de 1988, o fenômeno amplamente denominado com o termo “neoconstitucionalismo” sustenta-se em premissas questionáveis do ponto de vista histórico, teórico e filosófico, sendo uma expressão demasiadamente imprecisa para explicar a realidade jurídica contemporânea.Universidade Estadual de Londrina2014-08-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/1943110.5433/1980-511X.2014v9n2p93Revista do Direito Público; v. 9 n. 2 (2014); 93-1141980-511Xreponame:Revista do Direito Públicoinstname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/19431/14919Cella, José Renato GazieroRodrigues, Renê Chiquettiinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2015-12-18T20:14:24Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/19431Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopubPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/oai||rdpubuel@uel.br1980-511X1980-511Xopendoar:2015-12-18T20:14:24Revista do Direito Público - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Neoconstitutionalism or paleoconstitucionalism? Notes about the understanding of the contemporary legal phenomenon
Neoconstitucionalismo ou paleoconstitucionalismo? Apontamentos acerca da compreensão do fenômeno jurídico contemporâneo
title Neoconstitutionalism or paleoconstitucionalism? Notes about the understanding of the contemporary legal phenomenon
spellingShingle Neoconstitutionalism or paleoconstitucionalism? Notes about the understanding of the contemporary legal phenomenon
Cella, José Renato Gaziero
Constitution
theory of law
morality
hermeneutics.
Constituição
Teoria do Direito
Moral
Hermeneutica.
title_short Neoconstitutionalism or paleoconstitucionalism? Notes about the understanding of the contemporary legal phenomenon
title_full Neoconstitutionalism or paleoconstitucionalism? Notes about the understanding of the contemporary legal phenomenon
title_fullStr Neoconstitutionalism or paleoconstitucionalism? Notes about the understanding of the contemporary legal phenomenon
title_full_unstemmed Neoconstitutionalism or paleoconstitucionalism? Notes about the understanding of the contemporary legal phenomenon
title_sort Neoconstitutionalism or paleoconstitucionalism? Notes about the understanding of the contemporary legal phenomenon
author Cella, José Renato Gaziero
author_facet Cella, José Renato Gaziero
Rodrigues, Renê Chiquetti
author_role author
author2 Rodrigues, Renê Chiquetti
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Cella, José Renato Gaziero
Rodrigues, Renê Chiquetti
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Constitution
theory of law
morality
hermeneutics.
Constituição
Teoria do Direito
Moral
Hermeneutica.
topic Constitution
theory of law
morality
hermeneutics.
Constituição
Teoria do Direito
Moral
Hermeneutica.
description The expression neoconstitutionalism joined permanently in our legal lexicon as a way to explain the recent changes experienced inBrazil after the advent of the 1988 Constitution. The present study aimed to investigate the significant density of this word and its value in explaining this new legal reality that presents itself in our day. For this, the study conducts an argumentative analysis of two relevant studies on the topic, contrasting the understanding of the authors: “Neoconstitutionalism and the constitutionalization of law. The late triumph of constitutional law inBrazil” by Luis Roberto Barroso and “Neoconstitutionalism and legal moralism” by Dimitri Dimoulis. At the end, it is concluded that, despite the undeniable changes and significant social and political contributions provided by the 1988 Constitution, the phenomenon widely referred to the term "neoconstitutionalism" claims in questionable premises of historical, theoretical and philosophical view, being an overly imprecise expression to explain the contemporary legal reality.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-08-31
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artigo avaliado pelos Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/19431
10.5433/1980-511X.2014v9n2p93
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/19431
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/1980-511X.2014v9n2p93
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/19431/14919
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista do Direito Público; v. 9 n. 2 (2014); 93-114
1980-511X
reponame:Revista do Direito Público
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Revista do Direito Público
collection Revista do Direito Público
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista do Direito Público - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||rdpubuel@uel.br
_version_ 1799305930998808576

Registros relacionados