Spontaneous retirement and their effects on employment contract
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2008 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista do Direito Público |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/10901 |
Resumo: | The effects of spontaneous retirement employee in the employment contract trigger legal disputes and come causing controversies in Brazilian courts. Spontaneous retirement, according to a recent decision of the Supreme Court, does not imply termination of the employment contract, providing, yes, the permanence of regular exercise the duties of the employee without any change in the contract it has with your employer. It follows therefore that Article 453, caput, of the Labor Code, does not lend itself to the discipline of the effects of retirement on the continuity of the contract, which requires a more extensive interpretation of matter and its effects, especially because the rule of law can not be considered in isolation, especially when there are other legal provisions that guide the subject. |
id |
UEL-2_281b013314ff39c25af365c958f97a98 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/10901 |
network_acronym_str |
UEL-2 |
network_name_str |
Revista do Direito Público |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Spontaneous retirement and their effects on employment contractAposentadoria espontânea e seus efeitos no contrato de trabalhoAposentadoria espontâneaContrato de trabalhoExtinção.The effects of spontaneous retirement employee in the employment contract trigger legal disputes and come causing controversies in Brazilian courts. Spontaneous retirement, according to a recent decision of the Supreme Court, does not imply termination of the employment contract, providing, yes, the permanence of regular exercise the duties of the employee without any change in the contract it has with your employer. It follows therefore that Article 453, caput, of the Labor Code, does not lend itself to the discipline of the effects of retirement on the continuity of the contract, which requires a more extensive interpretation of matter and its effects, especially because the rule of law can not be considered in isolation, especially when there are other legal provisions that guide the subject.Os efeitos da aposentadoria espontânea do empregado no contrato de trabalho desencadeiam discussões jurídicas e vêm acarretando controvérsias nos Tribunais brasileiros. A aposentadoria espontânea, conforme recente decisão do Supremo Tribunal Federal, não implica rescisão do contrato de trabalho, facultando, sim, a permanência do regular exercício das funções desempenhadas pelo empregado, sem qualquer alteração no contrato que mantém com seu empregador. Depreende-se, pois, que o artigo 453, caput, da CLT, não se presta à disciplina dos efeitos da aposentadoria na continuidade do contrato, sendo necessária uma interpretação mais extensiva da matéria e seus efeitos, sobretudo porque a norma jurídica não pode ser considerada isoladamente, ainda mais quando existem dispositivos legais outros que norteiam o tema.Universidade Estadual de Londrina2008-07-15info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/1090110.5433/1980-511X.2008v3n1p91Revista do Direito Público; v. 3 n. 1 (2008); 91 - 1061980-511Xreponame:Revista do Direito Públicoinstname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/10901/9533Terrin, Kátia Alessandra PastoriOliveira, Lourival José deinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2017-03-16T16:44:28Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/10901Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopubPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/oai||rdpubuel@uel.br1980-511X1980-511Xopendoar:2017-03-16T16:44:28Revista do Direito Público - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Spontaneous retirement and their effects on employment contract Aposentadoria espontânea e seus efeitos no contrato de trabalho |
title |
Spontaneous retirement and their effects on employment contract |
spellingShingle |
Spontaneous retirement and their effects on employment contract Terrin, Kátia Alessandra Pastori Aposentadoria espontânea Contrato de trabalho Extinção. |
title_short |
Spontaneous retirement and their effects on employment contract |
title_full |
Spontaneous retirement and their effects on employment contract |
title_fullStr |
Spontaneous retirement and their effects on employment contract |
title_full_unstemmed |
Spontaneous retirement and their effects on employment contract |
title_sort |
Spontaneous retirement and their effects on employment contract |
author |
Terrin, Kátia Alessandra Pastori |
author_facet |
Terrin, Kátia Alessandra Pastori Oliveira, Lourival José de |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Oliveira, Lourival José de |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Terrin, Kátia Alessandra Pastori Oliveira, Lourival José de |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Aposentadoria espontânea Contrato de trabalho Extinção. |
topic |
Aposentadoria espontânea Contrato de trabalho Extinção. |
description |
The effects of spontaneous retirement employee in the employment contract trigger legal disputes and come causing controversies in Brazilian courts. Spontaneous retirement, according to a recent decision of the Supreme Court, does not imply termination of the employment contract, providing, yes, the permanence of regular exercise the duties of the employee without any change in the contract it has with your employer. It follows therefore that Article 453, caput, of the Labor Code, does not lend itself to the discipline of the effects of retirement on the continuity of the contract, which requires a more extensive interpretation of matter and its effects, especially because the rule of law can not be considered in isolation, especially when there are other legal provisions that guide the subject. |
publishDate |
2008 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2008-07-15 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artigo avaliado pelos Pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/10901 10.5433/1980-511X.2008v3n1p91 |
url |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/10901 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5433/1980-511X.2008v3n1p91 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/10901/9533 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista do Direito Público; v. 3 n. 1 (2008); 91 - 106 1980-511X reponame:Revista do Direito Público instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) instacron:UEL |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
instacron_str |
UEL |
institution |
UEL |
reponame_str |
Revista do Direito Público |
collection |
Revista do Direito Público |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista do Direito Público - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||rdpubuel@uel.br |
_version_ |
1799305930078158848 |