Political rights of expanding universal suffrage and direct election in Brazil
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2012 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista do Direito Público |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/10825 |
Resumo: | This article aims to investigate the possibility of reflexive application of Habermas' paradigm of deliberative politics in the Brazilian democratic practice, aimed at further expansion of human rights. This paradigm has as assumptions: (a) the communicative act; (b) in the large direct political participation and individual of all concerned in decision-making; (c) normative consensus, which admits and feeds of dissent as a possibility to transcend the factual; (d) district and non-district of the communication mechanism; and (e) institutionalization of communicative power by universal suffrage and direct vote. It analyzes the need for expansion of referendum guarantees, considering: art. 81§1º of the 1988 Federal Constitution (CF / 88), according to which the vacancy occurring in the last two years of the presidential term, the election for the positions of President and Vice-President of the Republic shall be made by Congress, conflicting with the entrenchment clause of art. 60§4º of CF / 88; art. 100 of CF / 88 and its flagrant violation of Presidential Decree by the logic that have been used to postpone payments on prolatados decisions of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights ignoring the procedure and the queue of the writ; and the art. 49 item I of CF / 88, which, in practice, international treaties not validated by the National Congress have been often replicated by the President in domestic law and also reissued by Provisional Measure; and the Management Councils, which perpetuate the logic of political domination of the representative system. For these possibilities is proposed to proceed by referendum, under item I of Article 14 of the Constitution of 1988 and Law 9.709/98. |
id |
UEL-2_3544fdcd6e715a175c7358eb706b3f2e |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/10825 |
network_acronym_str |
UEL-2 |
network_name_str |
Revista do Direito Público |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Political rights of expanding universal suffrage and direct election in BrazilAmpliação de direitos políticos de sufrágio universal e voto direto no BrasilDemocracia ProcedimentalPolítica deliberativaSufrágio universal e voto diretoConstituição Federal de 1988.This article aims to investigate the possibility of reflexive application of Habermas' paradigm of deliberative politics in the Brazilian democratic practice, aimed at further expansion of human rights. This paradigm has as assumptions: (a) the communicative act; (b) in the large direct political participation and individual of all concerned in decision-making; (c) normative consensus, which admits and feeds of dissent as a possibility to transcend the factual; (d) district and non-district of the communication mechanism; and (e) institutionalization of communicative power by universal suffrage and direct vote. It analyzes the need for expansion of referendum guarantees, considering: art. 81§1º of the 1988 Federal Constitution (CF / 88), according to which the vacancy occurring in the last two years of the presidential term, the election for the positions of President and Vice-President of the Republic shall be made by Congress, conflicting with the entrenchment clause of art. 60§4º of CF / 88; art. 100 of CF / 88 and its flagrant violation of Presidential Decree by the logic that have been used to postpone payments on prolatados decisions of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights ignoring the procedure and the queue of the writ; and the art. 49 item I of CF / 88, which, in practice, international treaties not validated by the National Congress have been often replicated by the President in domestic law and also reissued by Provisional Measure; and the Management Councils, which perpetuate the logic of political domination of the representative system. For these possibilities is proposed to proceed by referendum, under item I of Article 14 of the Constitution of 1988 and Law 9.709/98.Este artigo tem por objetivo investigar a possibilidade de aplicação reflexiva do paradigma habermasiano da política deliberativa na prática democrática brasileira, visando uma ampliação ainda maior dos direitos humanos. Esse paradigma, tem como pressupostos: (a) no agir comunicativo; (b) na ampla participação política direta e individual de todos os concernidos nas decisões; (c) consenso normativo, que admite e se alimenta do dissenso como possibilidade de transceder ao factual; (d) circunscrição e não-circunscrição do mecanismo comunicativo; e (e) institucionalização do poder comunicativo pelo sufrágio universal e voto direto. Para tanto, analisa a necessidade de ampliação de garantias de consulta popular, considerando: o art. 81§1º da Constituição Federal de 1988 (CF/88), segundo o qual ocorrendo a vacância nos últimos dois anos do período presidencial, a eleição para os cargos de Presidente e Vice-Presidente da República será feita pelo Congresso Nacional, conflitando com a cláusula pétrea do art. 60§4º da CF/88; o art. 100 da CF/88 e sua flagrante violação pela lógica dos Decretos Presidenciais que vêm sendo utilizados para preterir pagamentos prolatados em decisões da Corte Interamericana de Direitos Humanos ignorando o procedimento e a fila dos precatórios; e o art. 49 inciso I da CF/88, que, na prática, tratados internacionais não convalidados pelo Congresso Nacional vêm sendo, muitas vezes, replicados pelo Presidente da República no ordenamento jurídico interno e, ainda reeditados, por Medida Provisória; e os Conselhos de Gestão, que perpetuam a lógica de dominação política do sistema representativo. Para essas possibilidades propõe-se proceder mediante plebiscito, na forma do inciso I do artigo 14 da Constituição Federal de 1988, e da Lei 9.709/98.Universidade Estadual de Londrina2012-05-09info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/1082510.5433/1980-511X.2012v7n1p125Revista do Direito Público; v. 7 n. 1 (2012); 125-1481980-511Xreponame:Revista do Direito Públicoinstname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/10825/10429Ferraz, Andre Mendes da Fonsecainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2016-05-20T16:39:22Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/10825Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopubPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/oai||rdpubuel@uel.br1980-511X1980-511Xopendoar:2016-05-20T16:39:22Revista do Direito Público - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Political rights of expanding universal suffrage and direct election in Brazil Ampliação de direitos políticos de sufrágio universal e voto direto no Brasil |
title |
Political rights of expanding universal suffrage and direct election in Brazil |
spellingShingle |
Political rights of expanding universal suffrage and direct election in Brazil Ferraz, Andre Mendes da Fonseca Democracia Procedimental Política deliberativa Sufrágio universal e voto direto Constituição Federal de 1988. |
title_short |
Political rights of expanding universal suffrage and direct election in Brazil |
title_full |
Political rights of expanding universal suffrage and direct election in Brazil |
title_fullStr |
Political rights of expanding universal suffrage and direct election in Brazil |
title_full_unstemmed |
Political rights of expanding universal suffrage and direct election in Brazil |
title_sort |
Political rights of expanding universal suffrage and direct election in Brazil |
author |
Ferraz, Andre Mendes da Fonseca |
author_facet |
Ferraz, Andre Mendes da Fonseca |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Ferraz, Andre Mendes da Fonseca |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Democracia Procedimental Política deliberativa Sufrágio universal e voto direto Constituição Federal de 1988. |
topic |
Democracia Procedimental Política deliberativa Sufrágio universal e voto direto Constituição Federal de 1988. |
description |
This article aims to investigate the possibility of reflexive application of Habermas' paradigm of deliberative politics in the Brazilian democratic practice, aimed at further expansion of human rights. This paradigm has as assumptions: (a) the communicative act; (b) in the large direct political participation and individual of all concerned in decision-making; (c) normative consensus, which admits and feeds of dissent as a possibility to transcend the factual; (d) district and non-district of the communication mechanism; and (e) institutionalization of communicative power by universal suffrage and direct vote. It analyzes the need for expansion of referendum guarantees, considering: art. 81§1º of the 1988 Federal Constitution (CF / 88), according to which the vacancy occurring in the last two years of the presidential term, the election for the positions of President and Vice-President of the Republic shall be made by Congress, conflicting with the entrenchment clause of art. 60§4º of CF / 88; art. 100 of CF / 88 and its flagrant violation of Presidential Decree by the logic that have been used to postpone payments on prolatados decisions of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights ignoring the procedure and the queue of the writ; and the art. 49 item I of CF / 88, which, in practice, international treaties not validated by the National Congress have been often replicated by the President in domestic law and also reissued by Provisional Measure; and the Management Councils, which perpetuate the logic of political domination of the representative system. For these possibilities is proposed to proceed by referendum, under item I of Article 14 of the Constitution of 1988 and Law 9.709/98. |
publishDate |
2012 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2012-05-09 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artigo avaliado pelos Pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/10825 10.5433/1980-511X.2012v7n1p125 |
url |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/10825 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5433/1980-511X.2012v7n1p125 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/10825/10429 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista do Direito Público; v. 7 n. 1 (2012); 125-148 1980-511X reponame:Revista do Direito Público instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) instacron:UEL |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
instacron_str |
UEL |
institution |
UEL |
reponame_str |
Revista do Direito Público |
collection |
Revista do Direito Público |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista do Direito Público - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||rdpubuel@uel.br |
_version_ |
1799305930027827200 |