Political rights of expanding universal suffrage and direct election in Brazil

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ferraz, Andre Mendes da Fonseca
Data de Publicação: 2012
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista do Direito Público
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/10825
Resumo: This article aims to investigate the possibility of reflexive application of Habermas' paradigm of deliberative politics in the Brazilian democratic practice, aimed at further expansion of human rights. This paradigm has as assumptions: (a) the communicative act; (b) in the large direct political participation and individual of all concerned in decision-making; (c) normative consensus, which admits and feeds of dissent as a possibility to transcend the factual; (d) district and non-district of the communication mechanism; and (e) institutionalization of communicative power by universal suffrage and direct vote. It analyzes the need for expansion of referendum guarantees, considering: art. 81§1º of the 1988 Federal Constitution (CF / 88), according to which the vacancy occurring in the last two years of the presidential term, the election for the positions of President and Vice-President of the Republic shall be made by Congress, conflicting with the entrenchment clause of art. 60§4º of CF / 88; art. 100 of CF / 88 and its flagrant violation of Presidential Decree by the logic that have been used to postpone payments on prolatados decisions of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights ignoring the procedure and the queue of the writ; and the art. 49 item I of CF / 88, which, in practice, international treaties not validated by the National Congress have been often replicated by the President in domestic law and also reissued by Provisional Measure; and the Management Councils, which perpetuate the logic of political domination of the representative system. For these possibilities is proposed to proceed by referendum, under item I of Article 14 of the Constitution of 1988 and Law 9.709/98.
id UEL-2_3544fdcd6e715a175c7358eb706b3f2e
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/10825
network_acronym_str UEL-2
network_name_str Revista do Direito Público
repository_id_str
spelling Political rights of expanding universal suffrage and direct election in BrazilAmpliação de direitos políticos de sufrágio universal e voto direto no BrasilDemocracia ProcedimentalPolítica deliberativaSufrágio universal e voto diretoConstituição Federal de 1988.This article aims to investigate the possibility of reflexive application of Habermas' paradigm of deliberative politics in the Brazilian democratic practice, aimed at further expansion of human rights. This paradigm has as assumptions: (a) the communicative act; (b) in the large direct political participation and individual of all concerned in decision-making; (c) normative consensus, which admits and feeds of dissent as a possibility to transcend the factual; (d) district and non-district of the communication mechanism; and (e) institutionalization of communicative power by universal suffrage and direct vote. It analyzes the need for expansion of referendum guarantees, considering: art. 81§1º of the 1988 Federal Constitution (CF / 88), according to which the vacancy occurring in the last two years of the presidential term, the election for the positions of President and Vice-President of the Republic shall be made by Congress, conflicting with the entrenchment clause of art. 60§4º of CF / 88; art. 100 of CF / 88 and its flagrant violation of Presidential Decree by the logic that have been used to postpone payments on prolatados decisions of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights ignoring the procedure and the queue of the writ; and the art. 49 item I of CF / 88, which, in practice, international treaties not validated by the National Congress have been often replicated by the President in domestic law and also reissued by Provisional Measure; and the Management Councils, which perpetuate the logic of political domination of the representative system. For these possibilities is proposed to proceed by referendum, under item I of Article 14 of the Constitution of 1988 and Law 9.709/98.Este artigo tem por objetivo investigar a possibilidade de aplicação reflexiva do paradigma habermasiano da política deliberativa na prática democrática brasileira, visando uma ampliação ainda maior dos direitos humanos. Esse paradigma, tem como pressupostos: (a) no agir comunicativo; (b) na ampla participação política direta e individual de todos os concernidos nas decisões; (c) consenso normativo, que admite e se alimenta do dissenso como possibilidade de transceder ao factual; (d) circunscrição e não-circunscrição do mecanismo comunicativo; e (e) institucionalização do poder comunicativo pelo sufrágio universal e voto direto. Para tanto, analisa a necessidade de ampliação de garantias de consulta popular, considerando: o art. 81§1º da Constituição Federal de 1988 (CF/88), segundo o qual ocorrendo a vacância nos últimos dois anos do período presidencial, a eleição para os cargos de Presidente e Vice-Presidente da República será feita pelo Congresso Nacional, conflitando com a cláusula pétrea do art. 60§4º da CF/88; o art. 100 da CF/88 e sua flagrante violação pela lógica dos Decretos Presidenciais que vêm sendo utilizados para preterir pagamentos prolatados em decisões da Corte Interamericana de Direitos Humanos ignorando o procedimento e a fila dos precatórios; e o art. 49 inciso I da CF/88, que, na prática, tratados internacionais não convalidados pelo Congresso Nacional vêm sendo, muitas vezes, replicados pelo Presidente da República no ordenamento jurídico interno e, ainda reeditados, por Medida Provisória; e os Conselhos de Gestão, que perpetuam a lógica de dominação política do sistema representativo. Para essas possibilidades propõe-se proceder mediante plebiscito, na forma do inciso I do artigo 14 da Constituição Federal de 1988, e da Lei 9.709/98.Universidade Estadual de Londrina2012-05-09info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/1082510.5433/1980-511X.2012v7n1p125Revista do Direito Público; v. 7 n. 1 (2012); 125-1481980-511Xreponame:Revista do Direito Públicoinstname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/10825/10429Ferraz, Andre Mendes da Fonsecainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2016-05-20T16:39:22Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/10825Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopubPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/oai||rdpubuel@uel.br1980-511X1980-511Xopendoar:2016-05-20T16:39:22Revista do Direito Público - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Political rights of expanding universal suffrage and direct election in Brazil
Ampliação de direitos políticos de sufrágio universal e voto direto no Brasil
title Political rights of expanding universal suffrage and direct election in Brazil
spellingShingle Political rights of expanding universal suffrage and direct election in Brazil
Ferraz, Andre Mendes da Fonseca
Democracia Procedimental
Política deliberativa
Sufrágio universal e voto direto
Constituição Federal de 1988.
title_short Political rights of expanding universal suffrage and direct election in Brazil
title_full Political rights of expanding universal suffrage and direct election in Brazil
title_fullStr Political rights of expanding universal suffrage and direct election in Brazil
title_full_unstemmed Political rights of expanding universal suffrage and direct election in Brazil
title_sort Political rights of expanding universal suffrage and direct election in Brazil
author Ferraz, Andre Mendes da Fonseca
author_facet Ferraz, Andre Mendes da Fonseca
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ferraz, Andre Mendes da Fonseca
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Democracia Procedimental
Política deliberativa
Sufrágio universal e voto direto
Constituição Federal de 1988.
topic Democracia Procedimental
Política deliberativa
Sufrágio universal e voto direto
Constituição Federal de 1988.
description This article aims to investigate the possibility of reflexive application of Habermas' paradigm of deliberative politics in the Brazilian democratic practice, aimed at further expansion of human rights. This paradigm has as assumptions: (a) the communicative act; (b) in the large direct political participation and individual of all concerned in decision-making; (c) normative consensus, which admits and feeds of dissent as a possibility to transcend the factual; (d) district and non-district of the communication mechanism; and (e) institutionalization of communicative power by universal suffrage and direct vote. It analyzes the need for expansion of referendum guarantees, considering: art. 81§1º of the 1988 Federal Constitution (CF / 88), according to which the vacancy occurring in the last two years of the presidential term, the election for the positions of President and Vice-President of the Republic shall be made by Congress, conflicting with the entrenchment clause of art. 60§4º of CF / 88; art. 100 of CF / 88 and its flagrant violation of Presidential Decree by the logic that have been used to postpone payments on prolatados decisions of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights ignoring the procedure and the queue of the writ; and the art. 49 item I of CF / 88, which, in practice, international treaties not validated by the National Congress have been often replicated by the President in domestic law and also reissued by Provisional Measure; and the Management Councils, which perpetuate the logic of political domination of the representative system. For these possibilities is proposed to proceed by referendum, under item I of Article 14 of the Constitution of 1988 and Law 9.709/98.
publishDate 2012
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2012-05-09
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artigo avaliado pelos Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/10825
10.5433/1980-511X.2012v7n1p125
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/10825
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/1980-511X.2012v7n1p125
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/10825/10429
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista do Direito Público; v. 7 n. 1 (2012); 125-148
1980-511X
reponame:Revista do Direito Público
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Revista do Direito Público
collection Revista do Direito Público
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista do Direito Público - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||rdpubuel@uel.br
_version_ 1799305930027827200