Jury: a historical and principled analysis of their decisions on the prism of legal certainty
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2012 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista do Direito Público |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/10250 |
Resumo: | The study lies in the research of history and the evolution of the jury. Therefore exposes the lack of motivation of the jury's sentence as a consequence of the problems between the jurors. Reports the need to discuss changes in order to ensure greater legal security procedure to the accused in order to preserve the Greek conception of the institute. You can not deprive the jurors to discuss and analyze each other crime that are judging, it is one of the main tools of democracy: the dialectic. The result of long discussions in committee, the scholars came to suggest the legislator a new text for the procedure in the jury, which will appear in the New Code of Criminal Procedure, currently under discussion in the House of Representatives. The new article will allow jurors debate each other for a whole hour before uttering the verdict, meaning the resumption of a fundamental right overshadowed with the shadows of dictatorship. |
id |
UEL-2_4e7459293003e7daa09ad78bc013a56c |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/10250 |
network_acronym_str |
UEL-2 |
network_name_str |
Revista do Direito Público |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Jury: a historical and principled analysis of their decisions on the prism of legal certaintyTribunal do Júri: uma análise histórica e principiológica às suas decisões sobre o prisma da segurança jurídicaJury courtincommunicadoLegal Security.Tribunal do JúriIncomunicabilidadeSegurança Jurídica.The study lies in the research of history and the evolution of the jury. Therefore exposes the lack of motivation of the jury's sentence as a consequence of the problems between the jurors. Reports the need to discuss changes in order to ensure greater legal security procedure to the accused in order to preserve the Greek conception of the institute. You can not deprive the jurors to discuss and analyze each other crime that are judging, it is one of the main tools of democracy: the dialectic. The result of long discussions in committee, the scholars came to suggest the legislator a new text for the procedure in the jury, which will appear in the New Code of Criminal Procedure, currently under discussion in the House of Representatives. The new article will allow jurors debate each other for a whole hour before uttering the verdict, meaning the resumption of a fundamental right overshadowed with the shadows of dictatorship.O estudo repousa na pesquisa do histórico e da evolução do Tribunal do Júri. Por conseguinte, expõe a ausência de motivação da sentença do Tribunal do Júri por conseqüência da incomunicabilidade entre os jurados. Relata a necessidade de se discutir mudanças no procedimento de modo a garantir maior segurança jurídica aos acusados, a fim de preservar a concepção grega do instituto. Não se podem privar os jurados de discutirem e analisarem entre si o crime que estão julgando, trata-se de uma das principais ferramentas da democracia: a dialética. Fruto de longos debates em comissões, os doutrinadores vieram por sugerir ao legislador um novo texto para o procedimento no Tribunal do Júri, o qual passará a constar do Novo Código de Processo Penal, em discussão atualmente na Câmara dos Deputados. O novo artigo permitirá aos jurados o debate entre si por uma hora inteira antes de proferirem o veredito, significando a retomada de um direito fundamental ofuscado com as sombras da ditadura.Universidade Estadual de Londrina2012-05-17info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/1025010.5433/1980-511X.2012v7n1p183Revista do Direito Público; v. 7 n. 1 (2012); 183-2041980-511Xreponame:Revista do Direito Públicoinstname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/10250/10575Rodrigues, DaniloTonello, Camila Martinsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2016-05-20T16:00:16Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/10250Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopubPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/oai||rdpubuel@uel.br1980-511X1980-511Xopendoar:2016-05-20T16:00:16Revista do Direito Público - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Jury: a historical and principled analysis of their decisions on the prism of legal certainty Tribunal do Júri: uma análise histórica e principiológica às suas decisões sobre o prisma da segurança jurídica |
title |
Jury: a historical and principled analysis of their decisions on the prism of legal certainty |
spellingShingle |
Jury: a historical and principled analysis of their decisions on the prism of legal certainty Rodrigues, Danilo Jury court incommunicado Legal Security. Tribunal do Júri Incomunicabilidade Segurança Jurídica. |
title_short |
Jury: a historical and principled analysis of their decisions on the prism of legal certainty |
title_full |
Jury: a historical and principled analysis of their decisions on the prism of legal certainty |
title_fullStr |
Jury: a historical and principled analysis of their decisions on the prism of legal certainty |
title_full_unstemmed |
Jury: a historical and principled analysis of their decisions on the prism of legal certainty |
title_sort |
Jury: a historical and principled analysis of their decisions on the prism of legal certainty |
author |
Rodrigues, Danilo |
author_facet |
Rodrigues, Danilo Tonello, Camila Martins |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Tonello, Camila Martins |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Rodrigues, Danilo Tonello, Camila Martins |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Jury court incommunicado Legal Security. Tribunal do Júri Incomunicabilidade Segurança Jurídica. |
topic |
Jury court incommunicado Legal Security. Tribunal do Júri Incomunicabilidade Segurança Jurídica. |
description |
The study lies in the research of history and the evolution of the jury. Therefore exposes the lack of motivation of the jury's sentence as a consequence of the problems between the jurors. Reports the need to discuss changes in order to ensure greater legal security procedure to the accused in order to preserve the Greek conception of the institute. You can not deprive the jurors to discuss and analyze each other crime that are judging, it is one of the main tools of democracy: the dialectic. The result of long discussions in committee, the scholars came to suggest the legislator a new text for the procedure in the jury, which will appear in the New Code of Criminal Procedure, currently under discussion in the House of Representatives. The new article will allow jurors debate each other for a whole hour before uttering the verdict, meaning the resumption of a fundamental right overshadowed with the shadows of dictatorship. |
publishDate |
2012 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2012-05-17 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artigo avaliado pelos Pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/10250 10.5433/1980-511X.2012v7n1p183 |
url |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/10250 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5433/1980-511X.2012v7n1p183 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/10250/10575 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista do Direito Público; v. 7 n. 1 (2012); 183-204 1980-511X reponame:Revista do Direito Público instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) instacron:UEL |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
instacron_str |
UEL |
institution |
UEL |
reponame_str |
Revista do Direito Público |
collection |
Revista do Direito Público |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista do Direito Público - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||rdpubuel@uel.br |
_version_ |
1799305929967009792 |