The role of the judge and hermeneut partially positive
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2015 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista do Direito Público |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/22335 |
Resumo: | The article describes the dynamic work of the legal operators, especially the interpreter judge considering the hermeneutic circle and the expansion of pre-designed way the normative text to culminate in the reconstruction of the standard. Points to the partially positive judge as the protagonist of this scenario reconstruction of senses, primarily as a concretizing of the Republic objectives enshrined in the Federal Constitution. Analyzes the instructive powers of the judge as a legitimate means provided by the order for performance of the partially positive judge and ensuring the contradictory and the duty of the reasons for decisions as limiting this reconstructive operations. |
id |
UEL-2_593549654fadab0a88f3204b861fa7df |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/22335 |
network_acronym_str |
UEL-2 |
network_name_str |
Revista do Direito Público |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The role of the judge and hermeneut partially positiveO papel do juiz hermeneuta e parcialmente positivoLegal hermeneutics. Impartiality. Positive partiality.Hermenêutica Jurídica. Imparcialidade. Parcialidade PositivaThe article describes the dynamic work of the legal operators, especially the interpreter judge considering the hermeneutic circle and the expansion of pre-designed way the normative text to culminate in the reconstruction of the standard. Points to the partially positive judge as the protagonist of this scenario reconstruction of senses, primarily as a concretizing of the Republic objectives enshrined in the Federal Constitution. Analyzes the instructive powers of the judge as a legitimate means provided by the order for performance of the partially positive judge and ensuring the contradictory and the duty of the reasons for decisions as limiting this reconstructive operations.O artigo descreve o trabalho dinâmico do operador do direito, sobretudo do interprete juiz, considerando o círculo hermenêutico e a ampliação de sentidos pré-concebidos pelo texto normativo a culminar na reconstrução da norma. Aponta para o juiz parcialmente positivo como protagonista deste cenário de reconstrução de sentidos, principalmente como concretizador dos objetivos da República consagrados na Constituição Federal. Analisa os poderes instrutórios do juiz como meio legítimo previsto pelo ordenamento para atuação do juiz parcialmente positivo e a garantia ao contraditório e o dever da motivação das decisões como limitadores dessa atuação reconstrutiva.Universidade Estadual de Londrina2015-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/2233510.5433/1980-511X.2015v10n2p111Revista do Direito Público; v. 10 n. 2 (2015); 111-1261980-511Xreponame:Revista do Direito Públicoinstname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/22335/16906Striquer Soares, Marcos AntônioVanzella, Pedro Krelinginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2016-06-06T17:54:19Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/22335Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopubPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/oai||rdpubuel@uel.br1980-511X1980-511Xopendoar:2016-06-06T17:54:19Revista do Direito Público - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The role of the judge and hermeneut partially positive O papel do juiz hermeneuta e parcialmente positivo |
title |
The role of the judge and hermeneut partially positive |
spellingShingle |
The role of the judge and hermeneut partially positive Striquer Soares, Marcos Antônio Legal hermeneutics. Impartiality. Positive partiality. Hermenêutica Jurídica. Imparcialidade. Parcialidade Positiva |
title_short |
The role of the judge and hermeneut partially positive |
title_full |
The role of the judge and hermeneut partially positive |
title_fullStr |
The role of the judge and hermeneut partially positive |
title_full_unstemmed |
The role of the judge and hermeneut partially positive |
title_sort |
The role of the judge and hermeneut partially positive |
author |
Striquer Soares, Marcos Antônio |
author_facet |
Striquer Soares, Marcos Antônio Vanzella, Pedro Kreling |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Vanzella, Pedro Kreling |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Striquer Soares, Marcos Antônio Vanzella, Pedro Kreling |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Legal hermeneutics. Impartiality. Positive partiality. Hermenêutica Jurídica. Imparcialidade. Parcialidade Positiva |
topic |
Legal hermeneutics. Impartiality. Positive partiality. Hermenêutica Jurídica. Imparcialidade. Parcialidade Positiva |
description |
The article describes the dynamic work of the legal operators, especially the interpreter judge considering the hermeneutic circle and the expansion of pre-designed way the normative text to culminate in the reconstruction of the standard. Points to the partially positive judge as the protagonist of this scenario reconstruction of senses, primarily as a concretizing of the Republic objectives enshrined in the Federal Constitution. Analyzes the instructive powers of the judge as a legitimate means provided by the order for performance of the partially positive judge and ensuring the contradictory and the duty of the reasons for decisions as limiting this reconstructive operations. |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-09-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artigo avaliado pelos Pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/22335 10.5433/1980-511X.2015v10n2p111 |
url |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/22335 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5433/1980-511X.2015v10n2p111 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/22335/16906 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista do Direito Público; v. 10 n. 2 (2015); 111-126 1980-511X reponame:Revista do Direito Público instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) instacron:UEL |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
instacron_str |
UEL |
institution |
UEL |
reponame_str |
Revista do Direito Público |
collection |
Revista do Direito Público |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista do Direito Público - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||rdpubuel@uel.br |
_version_ |
1799305931469619200 |