The judge's role in the democratic rule of law : by a garantista perspective in case the judgment of termination of pregnancy of anencephalic fetus submitted to constitutional jurisdiction
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2006 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista do Direito Público |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/11551 |
Resumo: | It aims to analyze, from the case of termination of pregnancy of anencephalic fetus, today submitted to the constitutional court, the judge's stance noEstado Democratic Right. Used doctrinal material, eartigos jurisprudence published in magazines and on the Internet. It displays the current legislation in paísno that pertine the initial term and end of life; the divergent positions adopted by the courts in the analysis of the case; the impact of the debate on sociedadee the legal and philosophical issues faced by the judge in daquestão appreciation. It stands as a starting point two analytical axes: Proceduralism and substantialism. Explains the general theory of garantismo eminently substantialist, exposing the three meanings of the term. Indicates that the main results, north to solve the problem: a) the required option in Brazil by substantialist view, since it brings the Constitution fundamental rights seremconcretizados regardless of the will of the majority group; b) the reinterpretation of democracy in the democratic rule of law, as a synthesis of substantial democracy and formal; c) the legitimacy of the exercise of guided naconcretização power of fundamental rights. It follows that the adoption of Law Democratic state model implies the active role of the judge seeking aoalargamento the protective action of fundamental rights. |
id |
UEL-2_5a3db1792f39fe6b040193f68030a4f5 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/11551 |
network_acronym_str |
UEL-2 |
network_name_str |
Revista do Direito Público |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The judge's role in the democratic rule of law : by a garantista perspective in case the judgment of termination of pregnancy of anencephalic fetus submitted to constitutional jurisdictionO papel do juiz no Estado Democrático de Direito: por uma perspectiva garantista no julgamento do caso da interrupção da gestação do concepto anencefálico submetido à jurisdição constitucionalDemocratic statesubstantialismguaranteeismFundamental rightsDemocracyAnencephalic fetus .Estado Democrático de DireitoSubstancialismoGarantismoDireitos FundamentaisDemocraciaConcepto anencefálico.It aims to analyze, from the case of termination of pregnancy of anencephalic fetus, today submitted to the constitutional court, the judge's stance noEstado Democratic Right. Used doctrinal material, eartigos jurisprudence published in magazines and on the Internet. It displays the current legislation in paísno that pertine the initial term and end of life; the divergent positions adopted by the courts in the analysis of the case; the impact of the debate on sociedadee the legal and philosophical issues faced by the judge in daquestão appreciation. It stands as a starting point two analytical axes: Proceduralism and substantialism. Explains the general theory of garantismo eminently substantialist, exposing the three meanings of the term. Indicates that the main results, north to solve the problem: a) the required option in Brazil by substantialist view, since it brings the Constitution fundamental rights seremconcretizados regardless of the will of the majority group; b) the reinterpretation of democracy in the democratic rule of law, as a synthesis of substantial democracy and formal; c) the legitimacy of the exercise of guided naconcretização power of fundamental rights. It follows that the adoption of Law Democratic state model implies the active role of the judge seeking aoalargamento the protective action of fundamental rights.Objetiva analisar, a partir do caso da interrupção da gravidez do conceptoanencefálico, hoje submetido à jurisdição constitucional, a postura do julgador noEstado Democrático de Direito. Utiliza-se de material doutrinário, jurisprudências eartigos divulgados em revistas e na Internet. Apresenta a legislação vigente no paísno que pertine ao termo inicial e final da vida; os posicionamentos divergentesadotados pelo Judiciário na análise do caso; a repercussão do debate na sociedadee os aspectos jurídico-filosóficos enfrentados pelo julgador na apreciação daquestão. Destaca como ponto de partida dois eixos analíticos: procedimentalismo esubstancialismo. Explicita a teoria geral do garantismo, eminentementesubstancialista, expondo as três acepções do termo. Aponta como principaisresultados, norte para solução do problema: a) a necessária opção, no Brasil, pelavisão substancialista, já que traz a Constituição direitos fundamentais a seremconcretizados independentemente da vontade do grupo majoritário; b) a releiturada democracia no Estado Democrático de Direito, como síntese da democraciasubstancial e da formal; c) a legitimidade do exercício do poder pautada naconcretização dos direitos fundamentais. Conclui-se que a adoção do modelo deEstado Democrático de Direito implica na postura ativa do juiz visando aoalargamento da ação protetiva dos direitos fundamentais.Universidade Estadual de Londrina2006-12-15info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/1155110.5433/1980-511X.2006v1n3p199Revista do Direito Público; v. 1 n. 3 (2006); 199-2161980-511Xreponame:Revista do Direito Públicoinstname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/11551/10254http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessTeixeira, Liliam Cristina de Souza2022-10-06T03:48:22Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/11551Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopubPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/oai||rdpubuel@uel.br1980-511X1980-511Xopendoar:2022-10-06T03:48:22Revista do Direito Público - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The judge's role in the democratic rule of law : by a garantista perspective in case the judgment of termination of pregnancy of anencephalic fetus submitted to constitutional jurisdiction O papel do juiz no Estado Democrático de Direito: por uma perspectiva garantista no julgamento do caso da interrupção da gestação do concepto anencefálico submetido à jurisdição constitucional |
title |
The judge's role in the democratic rule of law : by a garantista perspective in case the judgment of termination of pregnancy of anencephalic fetus submitted to constitutional jurisdiction |
spellingShingle |
The judge's role in the democratic rule of law : by a garantista perspective in case the judgment of termination of pregnancy of anencephalic fetus submitted to constitutional jurisdiction Teixeira, Liliam Cristina de Souza Democratic state substantialism guaranteeism Fundamental rights Democracy Anencephalic fetus . Estado Democrático de Direito Substancialismo Garantismo Direitos Fundamentais Democracia Concepto anencefálico. |
title_short |
The judge's role in the democratic rule of law : by a garantista perspective in case the judgment of termination of pregnancy of anencephalic fetus submitted to constitutional jurisdiction |
title_full |
The judge's role in the democratic rule of law : by a garantista perspective in case the judgment of termination of pregnancy of anencephalic fetus submitted to constitutional jurisdiction |
title_fullStr |
The judge's role in the democratic rule of law : by a garantista perspective in case the judgment of termination of pregnancy of anencephalic fetus submitted to constitutional jurisdiction |
title_full_unstemmed |
The judge's role in the democratic rule of law : by a garantista perspective in case the judgment of termination of pregnancy of anencephalic fetus submitted to constitutional jurisdiction |
title_sort |
The judge's role in the democratic rule of law : by a garantista perspective in case the judgment of termination of pregnancy of anencephalic fetus submitted to constitutional jurisdiction |
author |
Teixeira, Liliam Cristina de Souza |
author_facet |
Teixeira, Liliam Cristina de Souza |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Teixeira, Liliam Cristina de Souza |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Democratic state substantialism guaranteeism Fundamental rights Democracy Anencephalic fetus . Estado Democrático de Direito Substancialismo Garantismo Direitos Fundamentais Democracia Concepto anencefálico. |
topic |
Democratic state substantialism guaranteeism Fundamental rights Democracy Anencephalic fetus . Estado Democrático de Direito Substancialismo Garantismo Direitos Fundamentais Democracia Concepto anencefálico. |
description |
It aims to analyze, from the case of termination of pregnancy of anencephalic fetus, today submitted to the constitutional court, the judge's stance noEstado Democratic Right. Used doctrinal material, eartigos jurisprudence published in magazines and on the Internet. It displays the current legislation in paísno that pertine the initial term and end of life; the divergent positions adopted by the courts in the analysis of the case; the impact of the debate on sociedadee the legal and philosophical issues faced by the judge in daquestão appreciation. It stands as a starting point two analytical axes: Proceduralism and substantialism. Explains the general theory of garantismo eminently substantialist, exposing the three meanings of the term. Indicates that the main results, north to solve the problem: a) the required option in Brazil by substantialist view, since it brings the Constitution fundamental rights seremconcretizados regardless of the will of the majority group; b) the reinterpretation of democracy in the democratic rule of law, as a synthesis of substantial democracy and formal; c) the legitimacy of the exercise of guided naconcretização power of fundamental rights. It follows that the adoption of Law Democratic state model implies the active role of the judge seeking aoalargamento the protective action of fundamental rights. |
publishDate |
2006 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2006-12-15 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artigo avaliado pelos Pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/11551 10.5433/1980-511X.2006v1n3p199 |
url |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/11551 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5433/1980-511X.2006v1n3p199 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/11551/10254 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista do Direito Público; v. 1 n. 3 (2006); 199-216 1980-511X reponame:Revista do Direito Público instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) instacron:UEL |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
instacron_str |
UEL |
institution |
UEL |
reponame_str |
Revista do Direito Público |
collection |
Revista do Direito Público |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista do Direito Público - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||rdpubuel@uel.br |
_version_ |
1799305930531143680 |