The judge's role in the democratic rule of law : by a garantista perspective in case the judgment of termination of pregnancy of anencephalic fetus submitted to constitutional jurisdiction

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Teixeira, Liliam Cristina de Souza
Data de Publicação: 2006
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista do Direito Público
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/11551
Resumo: It aims to analyze, from the case of termination of pregnancy of anencephalic fetus, today submitted to the constitutional court, the judge's stance noEstado Democratic Right. Used doctrinal material, eartigos jurisprudence published in magazines and on the Internet. It displays the current legislation in paísno that pertine the initial term and end of life; the divergent positions adopted by the courts in the analysis of the case; the impact of the debate on sociedadee the legal and philosophical issues faced by the judge in daquestão appreciation. It stands as a starting point two analytical axes: Proceduralism and substantialism. Explains the general theory of garantismo eminently substantialist, exposing the three meanings of the term. Indicates that the main results, north to solve the problem: a) the required option in Brazil by substantialist view, since it brings the Constitution fundamental rights seremconcretizados regardless of the will of the majority group; b) the reinterpretation of democracy in the democratic rule of law, as a synthesis of substantial democracy and formal; c) the legitimacy of the exercise of guided naconcretização power of fundamental rights. It follows that the adoption of Law Democratic state model implies the active role of the judge seeking aoalargamento the protective action of fundamental rights.
id UEL-2_5a3db1792f39fe6b040193f68030a4f5
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/11551
network_acronym_str UEL-2
network_name_str Revista do Direito Público
repository_id_str
spelling The judge's role in the democratic rule of law : by a garantista perspective in case the judgment of termination of pregnancy of anencephalic fetus submitted to constitutional jurisdictionO papel do juiz no Estado Democrático de Direito: por uma perspectiva garantista no julgamento do caso da interrupção da gestação do concepto anencefálico submetido à jurisdição constitucionalDemocratic statesubstantialismguaranteeismFundamental rightsDemocracyAnencephalic fetus .Estado Democrático de DireitoSubstancialismoGarantismoDireitos FundamentaisDemocraciaConcepto anencefálico.It aims to analyze, from the case of termination of pregnancy of anencephalic fetus, today submitted to the constitutional court, the judge's stance noEstado Democratic Right. Used doctrinal material, eartigos jurisprudence published in magazines and on the Internet. It displays the current legislation in paísno that pertine the initial term and end of life; the divergent positions adopted by the courts in the analysis of the case; the impact of the debate on sociedadee the legal and philosophical issues faced by the judge in daquestão appreciation. It stands as a starting point two analytical axes: Proceduralism and substantialism. Explains the general theory of garantismo eminently substantialist, exposing the three meanings of the term. Indicates that the main results, north to solve the problem: a) the required option in Brazil by substantialist view, since it brings the Constitution fundamental rights seremconcretizados regardless of the will of the majority group; b) the reinterpretation of democracy in the democratic rule of law, as a synthesis of substantial democracy and formal; c) the legitimacy of the exercise of guided naconcretização power of fundamental rights. It follows that the adoption of Law Democratic state model implies the active role of the judge seeking aoalargamento the protective action of fundamental rights.Objetiva analisar, a partir do caso da interrupção da gravidez do conceptoanencefálico, hoje submetido à jurisdição constitucional, a postura do julgador noEstado Democrático de Direito. Utiliza-se de material doutrinário, jurisprudências eartigos divulgados em revistas e na Internet. Apresenta a legislação vigente no paísno que pertine ao termo inicial e final da vida; os posicionamentos divergentesadotados pelo Judiciário na análise do caso; a repercussão do debate na sociedadee os aspectos jurídico-filosóficos enfrentados pelo julgador na apreciação daquestão. Destaca como ponto de partida dois eixos analíticos: procedimentalismo esubstancialismo. Explicita a teoria geral do garantismo, eminentementesubstancialista, expondo as três acepções do termo. Aponta como principaisresultados, norte para solução do problema: a) a necessária opção, no Brasil, pelavisão substancialista, já que traz a Constituição direitos fundamentais a seremconcretizados independentemente da vontade do grupo majoritário; b) a releiturada democracia no Estado Democrático de Direito, como síntese da democraciasubstancial e da formal; c) a legitimidade do exercício do poder pautada naconcretização dos direitos fundamentais. Conclui-se que a adoção do modelo deEstado Democrático de Direito implica na postura ativa do juiz visando aoalargamento da ação protetiva dos direitos fundamentais.Universidade Estadual de Londrina2006-12-15info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/1155110.5433/1980-511X.2006v1n3p199Revista do Direito Público; v. 1 n. 3 (2006); 199-2161980-511Xreponame:Revista do Direito Públicoinstname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/11551/10254http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessTeixeira, Liliam Cristina de Souza2022-10-06T03:48:22Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/11551Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopubPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/oai||rdpubuel@uel.br1980-511X1980-511Xopendoar:2022-10-06T03:48:22Revista do Direito Público - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The judge's role in the democratic rule of law : by a garantista perspective in case the judgment of termination of pregnancy of anencephalic fetus submitted to constitutional jurisdiction
O papel do juiz no Estado Democrático de Direito: por uma perspectiva garantista no julgamento do caso da interrupção da gestação do concepto anencefálico submetido à jurisdição constitucional
title The judge's role in the democratic rule of law : by a garantista perspective in case the judgment of termination of pregnancy of anencephalic fetus submitted to constitutional jurisdiction
spellingShingle The judge's role in the democratic rule of law : by a garantista perspective in case the judgment of termination of pregnancy of anencephalic fetus submitted to constitutional jurisdiction
Teixeira, Liliam Cristina de Souza
Democratic state
substantialism
guaranteeism
Fundamental rights
Democracy
Anencephalic fetus .
Estado Democrático de Direito
Substancialismo
Garantismo
Direitos Fundamentais
Democracia
Concepto anencefálico.
title_short The judge's role in the democratic rule of law : by a garantista perspective in case the judgment of termination of pregnancy of anencephalic fetus submitted to constitutional jurisdiction
title_full The judge's role in the democratic rule of law : by a garantista perspective in case the judgment of termination of pregnancy of anencephalic fetus submitted to constitutional jurisdiction
title_fullStr The judge's role in the democratic rule of law : by a garantista perspective in case the judgment of termination of pregnancy of anencephalic fetus submitted to constitutional jurisdiction
title_full_unstemmed The judge's role in the democratic rule of law : by a garantista perspective in case the judgment of termination of pregnancy of anencephalic fetus submitted to constitutional jurisdiction
title_sort The judge's role in the democratic rule of law : by a garantista perspective in case the judgment of termination of pregnancy of anencephalic fetus submitted to constitutional jurisdiction
author Teixeira, Liliam Cristina de Souza
author_facet Teixeira, Liliam Cristina de Souza
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Teixeira, Liliam Cristina de Souza
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Democratic state
substantialism
guaranteeism
Fundamental rights
Democracy
Anencephalic fetus .
Estado Democrático de Direito
Substancialismo
Garantismo
Direitos Fundamentais
Democracia
Concepto anencefálico.
topic Democratic state
substantialism
guaranteeism
Fundamental rights
Democracy
Anencephalic fetus .
Estado Democrático de Direito
Substancialismo
Garantismo
Direitos Fundamentais
Democracia
Concepto anencefálico.
description It aims to analyze, from the case of termination of pregnancy of anencephalic fetus, today submitted to the constitutional court, the judge's stance noEstado Democratic Right. Used doctrinal material, eartigos jurisprudence published in magazines and on the Internet. It displays the current legislation in paísno that pertine the initial term and end of life; the divergent positions adopted by the courts in the analysis of the case; the impact of the debate on sociedadee the legal and philosophical issues faced by the judge in daquestão appreciation. It stands as a starting point two analytical axes: Proceduralism and substantialism. Explains the general theory of garantismo eminently substantialist, exposing the three meanings of the term. Indicates that the main results, north to solve the problem: a) the required option in Brazil by substantialist view, since it brings the Constitution fundamental rights seremconcretizados regardless of the will of the majority group; b) the reinterpretation of democracy in the democratic rule of law, as a synthesis of substantial democracy and formal; c) the legitimacy of the exercise of guided naconcretização power of fundamental rights. It follows that the adoption of Law Democratic state model implies the active role of the judge seeking aoalargamento the protective action of fundamental rights.
publishDate 2006
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2006-12-15
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artigo avaliado pelos Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/11551
10.5433/1980-511X.2006v1n3p199
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/11551
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/1980-511X.2006v1n3p199
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/11551/10254
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista do Direito Público; v. 1 n. 3 (2006); 199-216
1980-511X
reponame:Revista do Direito Público
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Revista do Direito Público
collection Revista do Direito Público
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista do Direito Público - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||rdpubuel@uel.br
_version_ 1799305930531143680