Systemic interpretation and the possibility of bankruptcy for the companies in common

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Costa, Juliana Hinterlang dos Santos
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Kempfer, Marlene
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista do Direito Público
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/21226
Resumo: The Company in common was introduced by Brazilian law from the 2002 Civil Code in Articles 986 to 990. In the previous period it was analyzed from the irregular company name or company and fact. The first was characterized by having written contract, but this had not been brought to registration with the competent body and the second when there was no social contract. This study aims to analyze the figure of the Company in common, in the current legal system, from the majority interpretation that does not recognize the right to judicial recovery. It points out that this interpretation ignores: i) principles governing the legal system and the economic subsystem; and ii) that the current legislation allows their accountability before legal duties in labor spheres, tax, competitive and consumerist. Under these main arguments is that they have highlighted the systematic interpretation to defend the right to judicial or extrajudicial recovery. So effective is the legal security material.
id UEL-2_5acd148ee23a4aa979ce20a92b03589d
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/21226
network_acronym_str UEL-2
network_name_str Revista do Direito Público
repository_id_str
spelling Systemic interpretation and the possibility of bankruptcy for the companies in commonInterpretação sistêmica e a possibilidade de recuperaç!ao judicial para as sociedades em comumSystemic AnalysisEnterprise Recovery Society in CommonAnálise SistêmicaRecuperação de EmpresaSociedade em ComumThe Company in common was introduced by Brazilian law from the 2002 Civil Code in Articles 986 to 990. In the previous period it was analyzed from the irregular company name or company and fact. The first was characterized by having written contract, but this had not been brought to registration with the competent body and the second when there was no social contract. This study aims to analyze the figure of the Company in common, in the current legal system, from the majority interpretation that does not recognize the right to judicial recovery. It points out that this interpretation ignores: i) principles governing the legal system and the economic subsystem; and ii) that the current legislation allows their accountability before legal duties in labor spheres, tax, competitive and consumerist. Under these main arguments is that they have highlighted the systematic interpretation to defend the right to judicial or extrajudicial recovery. So effective is the legal security material.A Sociedade em Comum foi introduzida na legislação brasileira a partir do Código Civil de 2002 em seus artigos 986 a 990. Em período anterior ela era analisada sob a denominação sociedade irregular ou sociedade e fato. A primeira se caracterizava por haver contrato escrito, mas, este não havia sido levado a registro perante o órgão competente e a segunda quando não havia o contrato social.  Este estudo tem por objetivo analisar a figura da Sociedade em Comum, no atual ordenamento jurídico, a partir da interpretação majoritária que não reconhece o direito à recuperação judicial. Aponta-se que esta interpretação desconsidera: i) princípios que regem a ordem jurídica e o subsistema econômico;  e,  ii) que a legislação atual permite a sua responsabilização diante de deveres jurídicos nas esferas trabalhista, tributária, concorrencial e consumerista. Sob estes principais argumentos é que têm destaque a interpretação sistemática para defender o direito à recuperação judicial ou extrajudicial. Assim, efetiva-se a segurança jurídica material.Universidade Estadual de Londrina2015-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/2122610.5433/1980-511X.2015v10n2p65Revista do Direito Público; v. 10 n. 2 (2015); 65-881980-511Xreponame:Revista do Direito Públicoinstname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/21226/16904Costa, Juliana Hinterlang dos SantosKempfer, Marleneinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2016-06-06T17:56:32Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/21226Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopubPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/oai||rdpubuel@uel.br1980-511X1980-511Xopendoar:2016-06-06T17:56:32Revista do Direito Público - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Systemic interpretation and the possibility of bankruptcy for the companies in common
Interpretação sistêmica e a possibilidade de recuperaç!ao judicial para as sociedades em comum
title Systemic interpretation and the possibility of bankruptcy for the companies in common
spellingShingle Systemic interpretation and the possibility of bankruptcy for the companies in common
Costa, Juliana Hinterlang dos Santos
Systemic Analysis
Enterprise Recovery Society in Common
Análise Sistêmica
Recuperação de Empresa
Sociedade em Comum
title_short Systemic interpretation and the possibility of bankruptcy for the companies in common
title_full Systemic interpretation and the possibility of bankruptcy for the companies in common
title_fullStr Systemic interpretation and the possibility of bankruptcy for the companies in common
title_full_unstemmed Systemic interpretation and the possibility of bankruptcy for the companies in common
title_sort Systemic interpretation and the possibility of bankruptcy for the companies in common
author Costa, Juliana Hinterlang dos Santos
author_facet Costa, Juliana Hinterlang dos Santos
Kempfer, Marlene
author_role author
author2 Kempfer, Marlene
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Costa, Juliana Hinterlang dos Santos
Kempfer, Marlene
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Systemic Analysis
Enterprise Recovery Society in Common
Análise Sistêmica
Recuperação de Empresa
Sociedade em Comum
topic Systemic Analysis
Enterprise Recovery Society in Common
Análise Sistêmica
Recuperação de Empresa
Sociedade em Comum
description The Company in common was introduced by Brazilian law from the 2002 Civil Code in Articles 986 to 990. In the previous period it was analyzed from the irregular company name or company and fact. The first was characterized by having written contract, but this had not been brought to registration with the competent body and the second when there was no social contract. This study aims to analyze the figure of the Company in common, in the current legal system, from the majority interpretation that does not recognize the right to judicial recovery. It points out that this interpretation ignores: i) principles governing the legal system and the economic subsystem; and ii) that the current legislation allows their accountability before legal duties in labor spheres, tax, competitive and consumerist. Under these main arguments is that they have highlighted the systematic interpretation to defend the right to judicial or extrajudicial recovery. So effective is the legal security material.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-09-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artigo avaliado pelos Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/21226
10.5433/1980-511X.2015v10n2p65
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/21226
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/1980-511X.2015v10n2p65
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/21226/16904
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista do Direito Público; v. 10 n. 2 (2015); 65-88
1980-511X
reponame:Revista do Direito Público
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Revista do Direito Público
collection Revista do Direito Público
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista do Direito Público - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||rdpubuel@uel.br
_version_ 1799305931453890560

Registros relacionados