The right to happiness: a principiological analysis and its unfolding in the Brazilian legal order

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Souza, Erik Almeida Rodrigues de
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Ramos, Zélia Maria Xavier, Cordeiro, Chirley Vanuyre Vianna
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista do Direito Público
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/29986
Resumo: This paper analyzes the right to happiness as a constitutional principle implicit in the Brazilian legal order. Furthermore, this study explores its unfolding and application from a judicial perspective; in order to reach this objective, this researchcollected data, notes and answers from various legal scholars regarding the following question: what is the definitionof happiness, as it is, today, an ambiguous legal concept. Within this context, this research presents the right to happiness’ principiological undertakings, and studies the evolution of its normative principles – steadily obtained with the postpositivism movement. Furthermore, this paper concludes that the right tohappiness, encompassing the right to pursuit happiness, needs be guaranteed as a teleological motive in judicial decisions, only then can it be exercised freely. In conclusion, the right to happiness is guaranteed in innumerous constitutions–e.g. Bhutan, South Korea, United States of America, France andJapan; yet, in Brazil it is frequently present as a rationale in judicial decisions.
id UEL-2_7076d5ab433a3f87434ce4a5a5b1aac5
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/29986
network_acronym_str UEL-2
network_name_str Revista do Direito Público
repository_id_str
spelling The right to happiness: a principiological analysis and its unfolding in the Brazilian legal orderDireito à felicidade: análise principiológica e desdobramento no ordenamento jurídico brasileiroRight to Happiness. Constitutional Law. Hermeneutics. Implicit Constitutional Principle.Direito à FelicidadeDireito ConstitucionalHermenêuticaPrincípio Constitucional ImplícitoThis paper analyzes the right to happiness as a constitutional principle implicit in the Brazilian legal order. Furthermore, this study explores its unfolding and application from a judicial perspective; in order to reach this objective, this researchcollected data, notes and answers from various legal scholars regarding the following question: what is the definitionof happiness, as it is, today, an ambiguous legal concept. Within this context, this research presents the right to happiness’ principiological undertakings, and studies the evolution of its normative principles – steadily obtained with the postpositivism movement. Furthermore, this paper concludes that the right tohappiness, encompassing the right to pursuit happiness, needs be guaranteed as a teleological motive in judicial decisions, only then can it be exercised freely. In conclusion, the right to happiness is guaranteed in innumerous constitutions–e.g. Bhutan, South Korea, United States of America, France andJapan; yet, in Brazil it is frequently present as a rationale in judicial decisions.O presente artigo visa analisar a existência do direito à elicidade como um princípio constitucional implícito no ordenamento  jurídico brasileiro e seus desdobramentos a partir de sua aplicação. Para chegar nesse objetivo, calcado em coleta de dados bibliográfica, este trabalho começa trazendo pontamentos de diversos pensadores sobre a definição de felicidade e o seu encaixe como conceito jurídico indeterminado. Perpassada estas questões, há a demonstração do revestimento principiológico do direito à felicidade, assim como a presentação da evolução da normatividade dos princípios, obtida com o pós-positivismo. Prosseguindo, segue-se indicando os desdobramentos do direito à felicidade, consistentes em direito à busca da felicidade, direito prestacional à felicidade e como telos das decisões judiciais. Após, há a exposição do direito ora em estudo positivado em constituições mundiais, quais sejam em Butão, Coréia do Sul, Estados Unidos, França e Japão, e, por fim, parte da experiência jurisprudencial brasileira, que traz a felicidade em decisões diversas.Universidade Estadual de Londrina2018-08-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/2998610.5433/1980-511X.2018v13n2p100Revista do Direito Público; v. 13 n. 2 (2018); 100-1371980-511Xreponame:Revista do Direito Públicoinstname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/29986/24155Copyright (c) 2018 Revista do Direito Públicoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSouza, Erik Almeida Rodrigues deRamos, Zélia Maria XavierCordeiro, Chirley Vanuyre Vianna2018-08-31T18:11:02Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/29986Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopubPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/oai||rdpubuel@uel.br1980-511X1980-511Xopendoar:2018-08-31T18:11:02Revista do Direito Público - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The right to happiness: a principiological analysis and its unfolding in the Brazilian legal order
Direito à felicidade: análise principiológica e desdobramento no ordenamento jurídico brasileiro
title The right to happiness: a principiological analysis and its unfolding in the Brazilian legal order
spellingShingle The right to happiness: a principiological analysis and its unfolding in the Brazilian legal order
Souza, Erik Almeida Rodrigues de
Right to Happiness. Constitutional Law. Hermeneutics. Implicit Constitutional Principle.
Direito à Felicidade
Direito Constitucional
Hermenêutica
Princípio Constitucional Implícito
title_short The right to happiness: a principiological analysis and its unfolding in the Brazilian legal order
title_full The right to happiness: a principiological analysis and its unfolding in the Brazilian legal order
title_fullStr The right to happiness: a principiological analysis and its unfolding in the Brazilian legal order
title_full_unstemmed The right to happiness: a principiological analysis and its unfolding in the Brazilian legal order
title_sort The right to happiness: a principiological analysis and its unfolding in the Brazilian legal order
author Souza, Erik Almeida Rodrigues de
author_facet Souza, Erik Almeida Rodrigues de
Ramos, Zélia Maria Xavier
Cordeiro, Chirley Vanuyre Vianna
author_role author
author2 Ramos, Zélia Maria Xavier
Cordeiro, Chirley Vanuyre Vianna
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Souza, Erik Almeida Rodrigues de
Ramos, Zélia Maria Xavier
Cordeiro, Chirley Vanuyre Vianna
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Right to Happiness. Constitutional Law. Hermeneutics. Implicit Constitutional Principle.
Direito à Felicidade
Direito Constitucional
Hermenêutica
Princípio Constitucional Implícito
topic Right to Happiness. Constitutional Law. Hermeneutics. Implicit Constitutional Principle.
Direito à Felicidade
Direito Constitucional
Hermenêutica
Princípio Constitucional Implícito
description This paper analyzes the right to happiness as a constitutional principle implicit in the Brazilian legal order. Furthermore, this study explores its unfolding and application from a judicial perspective; in order to reach this objective, this researchcollected data, notes and answers from various legal scholars regarding the following question: what is the definitionof happiness, as it is, today, an ambiguous legal concept. Within this context, this research presents the right to happiness’ principiological undertakings, and studies the evolution of its normative principles – steadily obtained with the postpositivism movement. Furthermore, this paper concludes that the right tohappiness, encompassing the right to pursuit happiness, needs be guaranteed as a teleological motive in judicial decisions, only then can it be exercised freely. In conclusion, the right to happiness is guaranteed in innumerous constitutions–e.g. Bhutan, South Korea, United States of America, France andJapan; yet, in Brazil it is frequently present as a rationale in judicial decisions.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-08-31
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artigo avaliado pelos Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/29986
10.5433/1980-511X.2018v13n2p100
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/29986
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/1980-511X.2018v13n2p100
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/29986/24155
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Revista do Direito Público
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Revista do Direito Público
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista do Direito Público; v. 13 n. 2 (2018); 100-137
1980-511X
reponame:Revista do Direito Público
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Revista do Direito Público
collection Revista do Direito Público
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista do Direito Público - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||rdpubuel@uel.br
_version_ 1799305932098764800

Registros relacionados