Administrative discretion: limitations and jurisdictional control

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Rodrigues, Rubia Carolina dos Santos
Data de Publicação: 2006
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista do Direito Público
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/11545
Resumo: The judicial review of administrative discretion is allowed when managing Public overflowing the limits prescribed by vigent juridic order and since the judicial review does not encroach on the administrative merit a vezque the administrator is subject to the principle of legality in the finalidadenormativa, the decisive reasons which led to practice administrativoe to act because of it. These are ceilings that limit the margin of liberdadeconferida by law the administrator for this, according to personal and deacordo with the opportunity and convenience of the act criteria, can achieve legal.A transgression purpose of these limits allows the action of the judiciary towards deajustar administrative conduct again the law, having a relationship deproporcionalidade between administrative discretion and controlejurisdicional, so that the scope of that control in relation to the Management atosdiscricionários can not go beyond legality and normative ends, being prohibited the judiciary to discuss the merits the decision.
id UEL-2_8b7fe198bb8fc5f5a6555786d6f86a41
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/11545
network_acronym_str UEL-2
network_name_str Revista do Direito Público
repository_id_str
spelling Administrative discretion: limitations and jurisdictional controlDiscricionariedade administrativa: limites e controle jurisdicionalAdministrative discretionmisuse of powerscompelling reasonsBecause of the administrative and judicial control act.Discricionariedade administrativaDesvio de poderMotivos determinantesCausa do ato administrativo e controle jurisdicional.The judicial review of administrative discretion is allowed when managing Public overflowing the limits prescribed by vigent juridic order and since the judicial review does not encroach on the administrative merit a vezque the administrator is subject to the principle of legality in the finalidadenormativa, the decisive reasons which led to practice administrativoe to act because of it. These are ceilings that limit the margin of liberdadeconferida by law the administrator for this, according to personal and deacordo with the opportunity and convenience of the act criteria, can achieve legal.A transgression purpose of these limits allows the action of the judiciary towards deajustar administrative conduct again the law, having a relationship deproporcionalidade between administrative discretion and controlejurisdicional, so that the scope of that control in relation to the Management atosdiscricionários can not go beyond legality and normative ends, being prohibited the judiciary to discuss the merits the decision.O controle jurisdicional da discricionariedade administrativa é permitido quando aAdministração Pública transbordar os limites prescritos pelo ordenamento jurídicovigente e desde que a revisão judicial não invada o mérito administrativo, uma vezque o administrador está subordinado ao princípio da legalidade, à finalidadenormativa, aos motivos determinantes que levaram à prática do ato administrativoe à causa do mesmo. São esses limites que condicionam a margem de liberdadeconferida por lei ao administrador para que este, segundo critérios pessoais e deacordo com a oportunidade e conveniência do ato, possa atingir a finalidade legal.A transgressão a tais limites possibilita a ação do Poder Judiciário no sentido deajustar a conduta administrativa novamente à lei, havendo uma relação deproporcionalidade entre a discricionariedade administrativa e o controlejurisdicional, de tal modo que o alcance desse controle em relação aos atosdiscricionários da Administração não pode ir além da legalidade e da finalidadenormativa, sendo vedado ao Judiciário discutir o mérito da decisão.Universidade Estadual de Londrina2006-12-15info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/1154510.5433/1980-511X.2006v1n3p101Revista do Direito Público; v. 1 n. 3 (2006); 101-1161980-511Xreponame:Revista do Direito Públicoinstname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/11545/30190Rodrigues, Rubia Carolina dos Santosinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-08-31T16:32:21Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/11545Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopubPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/oai||rdpubuel@uel.br1980-511X1980-511Xopendoar:2021-08-31T16:32:21Revista do Direito Público - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Administrative discretion: limitations and jurisdictional control
Discricionariedade administrativa: limites e controle jurisdicional
title Administrative discretion: limitations and jurisdictional control
spellingShingle Administrative discretion: limitations and jurisdictional control
Rodrigues, Rubia Carolina dos Santos
Administrative discretion
misuse of powers
compelling reasons
Because of the administrative and judicial control act.
Discricionariedade administrativa
Desvio de poder
Motivos determinantes
Causa do ato administrativo e controle jurisdicional.
title_short Administrative discretion: limitations and jurisdictional control
title_full Administrative discretion: limitations and jurisdictional control
title_fullStr Administrative discretion: limitations and jurisdictional control
title_full_unstemmed Administrative discretion: limitations and jurisdictional control
title_sort Administrative discretion: limitations and jurisdictional control
author Rodrigues, Rubia Carolina dos Santos
author_facet Rodrigues, Rubia Carolina dos Santos
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Rodrigues, Rubia Carolina dos Santos
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Administrative discretion
misuse of powers
compelling reasons
Because of the administrative and judicial control act.
Discricionariedade administrativa
Desvio de poder
Motivos determinantes
Causa do ato administrativo e controle jurisdicional.
topic Administrative discretion
misuse of powers
compelling reasons
Because of the administrative and judicial control act.
Discricionariedade administrativa
Desvio de poder
Motivos determinantes
Causa do ato administrativo e controle jurisdicional.
description The judicial review of administrative discretion is allowed when managing Public overflowing the limits prescribed by vigent juridic order and since the judicial review does not encroach on the administrative merit a vezque the administrator is subject to the principle of legality in the finalidadenormativa, the decisive reasons which led to practice administrativoe to act because of it. These are ceilings that limit the margin of liberdadeconferida by law the administrator for this, according to personal and deacordo with the opportunity and convenience of the act criteria, can achieve legal.A transgression purpose of these limits allows the action of the judiciary towards deajustar administrative conduct again the law, having a relationship deproporcionalidade between administrative discretion and controlejurisdicional, so that the scope of that control in relation to the Management atosdiscricionários can not go beyond legality and normative ends, being prohibited the judiciary to discuss the merits the decision.
publishDate 2006
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2006-12-15
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artigo avaliado pelos Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/11545
10.5433/1980-511X.2006v1n3p101
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/11545
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/1980-511X.2006v1n3p101
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/11545/30190
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista do Direito Público; v. 1 n. 3 (2006); 101-116
1980-511X
reponame:Revista do Direito Público
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Revista do Direito Público
collection Revista do Direito Público
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista do Direito Público - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||rdpubuel@uel.br
_version_ 1818373182442176512