Administrative discretion: limitations and jurisdictional control
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2006 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista do Direito Público |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/11545 |
Resumo: | The judicial review of administrative discretion is allowed when managing Public overflowing the limits prescribed by vigent juridic order and since the judicial review does not encroach on the administrative merit a vezque the administrator is subject to the principle of legality in the finalidadenormativa, the decisive reasons which led to practice administrativoe to act because of it. These are ceilings that limit the margin of liberdadeconferida by law the administrator for this, according to personal and deacordo with the opportunity and convenience of the act criteria, can achieve legal.A transgression purpose of these limits allows the action of the judiciary towards deajustar administrative conduct again the law, having a relationship deproporcionalidade between administrative discretion and controlejurisdicional, so that the scope of that control in relation to the Management atosdiscricionários can not go beyond legality and normative ends, being prohibited the judiciary to discuss the merits the decision. |
id |
UEL-2_8b7fe198bb8fc5f5a6555786d6f86a41 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/11545 |
network_acronym_str |
UEL-2 |
network_name_str |
Revista do Direito Público |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Administrative discretion: limitations and jurisdictional controlDiscricionariedade administrativa: limites e controle jurisdicionalAdministrative discretionmisuse of powerscompelling reasonsBecause of the administrative and judicial control act.Discricionariedade administrativaDesvio de poderMotivos determinantesCausa do ato administrativo e controle jurisdicional.The judicial review of administrative discretion is allowed when managing Public overflowing the limits prescribed by vigent juridic order and since the judicial review does not encroach on the administrative merit a vezque the administrator is subject to the principle of legality in the finalidadenormativa, the decisive reasons which led to practice administrativoe to act because of it. These are ceilings that limit the margin of liberdadeconferida by law the administrator for this, according to personal and deacordo with the opportunity and convenience of the act criteria, can achieve legal.A transgression purpose of these limits allows the action of the judiciary towards deajustar administrative conduct again the law, having a relationship deproporcionalidade between administrative discretion and controlejurisdicional, so that the scope of that control in relation to the Management atosdiscricionários can not go beyond legality and normative ends, being prohibited the judiciary to discuss the merits the decision.O controle jurisdicional da discricionariedade administrativa é permitido quando aAdministração Pública transbordar os limites prescritos pelo ordenamento jurídicovigente e desde que a revisão judicial não invada o mérito administrativo, uma vezque o administrador está subordinado ao princípio da legalidade, à finalidadenormativa, aos motivos determinantes que levaram à prática do ato administrativoe à causa do mesmo. São esses limites que condicionam a margem de liberdadeconferida por lei ao administrador para que este, segundo critérios pessoais e deacordo com a oportunidade e conveniência do ato, possa atingir a finalidade legal.A transgressão a tais limites possibilita a ação do Poder Judiciário no sentido deajustar a conduta administrativa novamente à lei, havendo uma relação deproporcionalidade entre a discricionariedade administrativa e o controlejurisdicional, de tal modo que o alcance desse controle em relação aos atosdiscricionários da Administração não pode ir além da legalidade e da finalidadenormativa, sendo vedado ao Judiciário discutir o mérito da decisão.Universidade Estadual de Londrina2006-12-15info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/1154510.5433/1980-511X.2006v1n3p101Revista do Direito Público; v. 1 n. 3 (2006); 101-1161980-511Xreponame:Revista do Direito Públicoinstname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/11545/30190Rodrigues, Rubia Carolina dos Santosinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-08-31T16:32:21Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/11545Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopubPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/oai||rdpubuel@uel.br1980-511X1980-511Xopendoar:2021-08-31T16:32:21Revista do Direito Público - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Administrative discretion: limitations and jurisdictional control Discricionariedade administrativa: limites e controle jurisdicional |
title |
Administrative discretion: limitations and jurisdictional control |
spellingShingle |
Administrative discretion: limitations and jurisdictional control Rodrigues, Rubia Carolina dos Santos Administrative discretion misuse of powers compelling reasons Because of the administrative and judicial control act. Discricionariedade administrativa Desvio de poder Motivos determinantes Causa do ato administrativo e controle jurisdicional. |
title_short |
Administrative discretion: limitations and jurisdictional control |
title_full |
Administrative discretion: limitations and jurisdictional control |
title_fullStr |
Administrative discretion: limitations and jurisdictional control |
title_full_unstemmed |
Administrative discretion: limitations and jurisdictional control |
title_sort |
Administrative discretion: limitations and jurisdictional control |
author |
Rodrigues, Rubia Carolina dos Santos |
author_facet |
Rodrigues, Rubia Carolina dos Santos |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Rodrigues, Rubia Carolina dos Santos |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Administrative discretion misuse of powers compelling reasons Because of the administrative and judicial control act. Discricionariedade administrativa Desvio de poder Motivos determinantes Causa do ato administrativo e controle jurisdicional. |
topic |
Administrative discretion misuse of powers compelling reasons Because of the administrative and judicial control act. Discricionariedade administrativa Desvio de poder Motivos determinantes Causa do ato administrativo e controle jurisdicional. |
description |
The judicial review of administrative discretion is allowed when managing Public overflowing the limits prescribed by vigent juridic order and since the judicial review does not encroach on the administrative merit a vezque the administrator is subject to the principle of legality in the finalidadenormativa, the decisive reasons which led to practice administrativoe to act because of it. These are ceilings that limit the margin of liberdadeconferida by law the administrator for this, according to personal and deacordo with the opportunity and convenience of the act criteria, can achieve legal.A transgression purpose of these limits allows the action of the judiciary towards deajustar administrative conduct again the law, having a relationship deproporcionalidade between administrative discretion and controlejurisdicional, so that the scope of that control in relation to the Management atosdiscricionários can not go beyond legality and normative ends, being prohibited the judiciary to discuss the merits the decision. |
publishDate |
2006 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2006-12-15 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artigo avaliado pelos Pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/11545 10.5433/1980-511X.2006v1n3p101 |
url |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/11545 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5433/1980-511X.2006v1n3p101 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/11545/30190 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista do Direito Público; v. 1 n. 3 (2006); 101-116 1980-511X reponame:Revista do Direito Público instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) instacron:UEL |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
instacron_str |
UEL |
institution |
UEL |
reponame_str |
Revista do Direito Público |
collection |
Revista do Direito Público |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista do Direito Público - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||rdpubuel@uel.br |
_version_ |
1799305930519609344 |