THE REASONING BEHIND THE DECISION AND THE GUARANTEES OF THE ADVERSARY PROCESS IN THE JUDGMENT OF THE EXTRAORDINARY APPEAL REPRESENTATIVE OF CONTROVERSY N° 566.622

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Gonzaga, André dos Santos
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Brasil, Deilton Ribeiro
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista do Direito Público
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/37971
Resumo: This research focuses on the rationale ofthe decision and guarantees of theadversarial process in the judgment of theExtraordinary Appeal Representative ofControversy No. 566.622, by the FederalSupreme Court. The methodologyutilized was bibliographical review,based on primary and secondary sources,using the inductive method. This researchwas developed with an analysis of theExtraordinary Appeal Representative ofControversy No. 566.622, specificallyJustice Marco Aurélio decision. Toachieve this study’s objective, it exploredthe constitutional process and jurisdictionin a Democratic State of Law, as well asthe participation of amicus curiae in thetrial of Extraordinary AppealRepresentative of Controversy No.566.622.
id UEL-2_8ec3926c29f1b428f8b551db8b366120
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/37971
network_acronym_str UEL-2
network_name_str Revista do Direito Público
repository_id_str
spelling THE REASONING BEHIND THE DECISION AND THE GUARANTEES OF THE ADVERSARY PROCESS IN THE JUDGMENT OF THE EXTRAORDINARY APPEAL REPRESENTATIVE OF CONTROVERSY N° 566.622A fundamentação da decisão e as garantias do contraditório no julgamento do recurso extraordinário representativo da controvérsia n° 566.622Contradictory GuaranteeRationale for DecisionsParticipation of the PartiesAmicus CuriaeExtraordinary Appeal Representing Controversy No. 566622Garantia do ContraditórioFundamentação das DecisõesParticipação das PartesAmicus CuriaeRecurso Extraordinário Representativo da Controvérsia n°566.622This research focuses on the rationale ofthe decision and guarantees of theadversarial process in the judgment of theExtraordinary Appeal Representative ofControversy No. 566.622, by the FederalSupreme Court. The methodologyutilized was bibliographical review,based on primary and secondary sources,using the inductive method. This researchwas developed with an analysis of theExtraordinary Appeal Representative ofControversy No. 566.622, specificallyJustice Marco Aurélio decision. Toachieve this study’s objective, it exploredthe constitutional process and jurisdictionin a Democratic State of Law, as well asthe participation of amicus curiae in thetrial of Extraordinary AppealRepresentative of Controversy No.566.622.A presente pesquisa tem como centro a fundamentação da decisão e as garantias do contraditório no julgamento do Recurso Extraordinário Representativo da Controvérsia nº566.622, pelo Supremo Tribunal Federal. A metodologia adotada foi a revisão bibliográfica,baseada em fontes primárias e secundárias, sendo utilizado o método indutivo. A pesquisa foi desenvolvida com a realização da análise do Recurso Extraordinário Representativo da Controvérsia nº 566.622, sobre o voto do relator Ministro Marco Aurélio. Para alcançar os objetivos propostos foi realizado um estudo sobre o processo constitucional e jurisdição no Estado Democrático de Direito, bem como a participação do amicus curiae no julgamento do recurso extraordinário representativo da controvérsia nº 566.622.Universidade Estadual de Londrina2021-05-05info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/3797110.5433/1980-511X.2021v16n1p171Revista do Direito Público; v. 16 n. 1 (2021); 171-1851980-511Xreponame:Revista do Direito Públicoinstname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/37971/29596Copyright (c) 2021 Revista do Direito Públicoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGonzaga, André dos SantosBrasil, Deilton Ribeiro2022-01-19T19:19:45Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/37971Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopubPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/oai||rdpubuel@uel.br1980-511X1980-511Xopendoar:2022-01-19T19:19:45Revista do Direito Público - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv THE REASONING BEHIND THE DECISION AND THE GUARANTEES OF THE ADVERSARY PROCESS IN THE JUDGMENT OF THE EXTRAORDINARY APPEAL REPRESENTATIVE OF CONTROVERSY N° 566.622
A fundamentação da decisão e as garantias do contraditório no julgamento do recurso extraordinário representativo da controvérsia n° 566.622
title THE REASONING BEHIND THE DECISION AND THE GUARANTEES OF THE ADVERSARY PROCESS IN THE JUDGMENT OF THE EXTRAORDINARY APPEAL REPRESENTATIVE OF CONTROVERSY N° 566.622
spellingShingle THE REASONING BEHIND THE DECISION AND THE GUARANTEES OF THE ADVERSARY PROCESS IN THE JUDGMENT OF THE EXTRAORDINARY APPEAL REPRESENTATIVE OF CONTROVERSY N° 566.622
Gonzaga, André dos Santos
Contradictory Guarantee
Rationale for Decisions
Participation of the Parties
Amicus Curiae
Extraordinary Appeal Representing Controversy No. 566
622
Garantia do Contraditório
Fundamentação das Decisões
Participação das Partes
Amicus Curiae
Recurso Extraordinário Representativo da Controvérsia n°566.622
title_short THE REASONING BEHIND THE DECISION AND THE GUARANTEES OF THE ADVERSARY PROCESS IN THE JUDGMENT OF THE EXTRAORDINARY APPEAL REPRESENTATIVE OF CONTROVERSY N° 566.622
title_full THE REASONING BEHIND THE DECISION AND THE GUARANTEES OF THE ADVERSARY PROCESS IN THE JUDGMENT OF THE EXTRAORDINARY APPEAL REPRESENTATIVE OF CONTROVERSY N° 566.622
title_fullStr THE REASONING BEHIND THE DECISION AND THE GUARANTEES OF THE ADVERSARY PROCESS IN THE JUDGMENT OF THE EXTRAORDINARY APPEAL REPRESENTATIVE OF CONTROVERSY N° 566.622
title_full_unstemmed THE REASONING BEHIND THE DECISION AND THE GUARANTEES OF THE ADVERSARY PROCESS IN THE JUDGMENT OF THE EXTRAORDINARY APPEAL REPRESENTATIVE OF CONTROVERSY N° 566.622
title_sort THE REASONING BEHIND THE DECISION AND THE GUARANTEES OF THE ADVERSARY PROCESS IN THE JUDGMENT OF THE EXTRAORDINARY APPEAL REPRESENTATIVE OF CONTROVERSY N° 566.622
author Gonzaga, André dos Santos
author_facet Gonzaga, André dos Santos
Brasil, Deilton Ribeiro
author_role author
author2 Brasil, Deilton Ribeiro
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Gonzaga, André dos Santos
Brasil, Deilton Ribeiro
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Contradictory Guarantee
Rationale for Decisions
Participation of the Parties
Amicus Curiae
Extraordinary Appeal Representing Controversy No. 566
622
Garantia do Contraditório
Fundamentação das Decisões
Participação das Partes
Amicus Curiae
Recurso Extraordinário Representativo da Controvérsia n°566.622
topic Contradictory Guarantee
Rationale for Decisions
Participation of the Parties
Amicus Curiae
Extraordinary Appeal Representing Controversy No. 566
622
Garantia do Contraditório
Fundamentação das Decisões
Participação das Partes
Amicus Curiae
Recurso Extraordinário Representativo da Controvérsia n°566.622
description This research focuses on the rationale ofthe decision and guarantees of theadversarial process in the judgment of theExtraordinary Appeal Representative ofControversy No. 566.622, by the FederalSupreme Court. The methodologyutilized was bibliographical review,based on primary and secondary sources,using the inductive method. This researchwas developed with an analysis of theExtraordinary Appeal Representative ofControversy No. 566.622, specificallyJustice Marco Aurélio decision. Toachieve this study’s objective, it exploredthe constitutional process and jurisdictionin a Democratic State of Law, as well asthe participation of amicus curiae in thetrial of Extraordinary AppealRepresentative of Controversy No.566.622.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-05-05
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artigo avaliado pelos Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/37971
10.5433/1980-511X.2021v16n1p171
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/37971
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/1980-511X.2021v16n1p171
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/37971/29596
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Revista do Direito Público
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Revista do Direito Público
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista do Direito Público; v. 16 n. 1 (2021); 171-185
1980-511X
reponame:Revista do Direito Público
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Revista do Direito Público
collection Revista do Direito Público
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista do Direito Público - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||rdpubuel@uel.br
_version_ 1799305933029900288

Registros relacionados