Public contracting: the integrity program as a requirement in the state of Rio Grande do Sul

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Boff, Salete Oro
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Leal, Dionis Janner
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista do Direito Público
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/39781
Resumo: This article analyzes the contours of Law 12.846, of 2013, commonly known as the Corporate Anti Corruption Law, which establishes the integrity program as a requirement for contracting services and purchasing products with the Government, based on its regulation by Decree no 11.129, 2022, and other state and municipal regulations, such as State Law No.15,228, 2018, of the State of Rio Grande do Sul, the legal effectsof such a requirement and its constitutionality as a qualification requirement or not, in order to mitigate the effects of corrupt acts before the Public Administration through public contracts. The dialectical method, based on doctrine, law and articles, was sought to address the regulation of integrity programs in accordance with the new Anti-Corruption Law (Law 12.846 / 2013) and its regulatory decree. The study made it possible to verify that the requirement for public procurement of integrity mechanisms by private corporations has a constitutional bias and does not conflict with the general law on public procurement, allowing the Government to have greater security in the design of contractual links with the private sector.
id UEL-2_b4b0a1c5b69f94ced2cc25559d2168de
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/39781
network_acronym_str UEL-2
network_name_str Revista do Direito Público
repository_id_str
spelling Public contracting: the integrity program as a requirement in the state of Rio Grande do SulContratação pública: o programa de integridade como requisito no estado do Rio Grande do SulCompliancecontratação públicalei anticorrupçãoprograma de integridadeRio Grande do Sul.This article analyzes the contours of Law 12.846, of 2013, commonly known as the Corporate Anti Corruption Law, which establishes the integrity program as a requirement for contracting services and purchasing products with the Government, based on its regulation by Decree no 11.129, 2022, and other state and municipal regulations, such as State Law No.15,228, 2018, of the State of Rio Grande do Sul, the legal effectsof such a requirement and its constitutionality as a qualification requirement or not, in order to mitigate the effects of corrupt acts before the Public Administration through public contracts. The dialectical method, based on doctrine, law and articles, was sought to address the regulation of integrity programs in accordance with the new Anti-Corruption Law (Law 12.846 / 2013) and its regulatory decree. The study made it possible to verify that the requirement for public procurement of integrity mechanisms by private corporations has a constitutional bias and does not conflict with the general law on public procurement, allowing the Government to have greater security in the design of contractual links with the private sector.O presente artigo analisa os contornos da Lei nº 12.846, de 2013, comumente conhecida como Lei Anticorrupção Empresarial, que estabelece o programa de integridade como requisito para contratação de serviços e aquisição de produtos com o Poder Público, a partir da sua regulamentação pelo Decreto nº 8.420, de 2015, e outros regulamentos estaduais e municipais, a exemplo da Lei Estadual nº 15.228, de 2018, do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul, os efeitos jurídicos de tal exigência e sua constitucionalidade como requisito de habilitação ou não, a fim de atenuar os efeitos de atos corruptivos perante a Administração Pública por intermédio de contratos públicos. Buscou-se pelo método dialético, com base na doutrina, na lei e artigos, abordar a regulamentação dos programas de integridade de acordo com a nova Lei Anticorrupção (Lei 12.846/2013) e seu decreto regulamentador. O estudo permitiu verificar que a exigibilidade na contratação pública de mecanismos de integridade pelas corporações privadas tem viés constitucional e não vai de encontro a lei geral de contratação pública, permitindo que o Poder Público tenha maior segurança na concepção de vínculos contratuais com a iniciativa privada.Universidade Estadual de Londrina2023-09-03info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/3978110.5433/1980-511X.2023v18n2p101Revista do Direito Público; v. 18 n. 2 (2023); 101-1181980-511Xreponame:Revista do Direito Públicoinstname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/39781/49337Copyright (c) 2023 Revista do Direito Públicohttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBoff, Salete OroLeal, Dionis Janner2023-09-12T17:27:21Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/39781Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopubPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/oai||rdpubuel@uel.br1980-511X1980-511Xopendoar:2023-09-12T17:27:21Revista do Direito Público - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Public contracting: the integrity program as a requirement in the state of Rio Grande do Sul
Contratação pública: o programa de integridade como requisito no estado do Rio Grande do Sul
title Public contracting: the integrity program as a requirement in the state of Rio Grande do Sul
spellingShingle Public contracting: the integrity program as a requirement in the state of Rio Grande do Sul
Boff, Salete Oro
Compliance
contratação pública
lei anticorrupção
programa de integridade
Rio Grande do Sul.
title_short Public contracting: the integrity program as a requirement in the state of Rio Grande do Sul
title_full Public contracting: the integrity program as a requirement in the state of Rio Grande do Sul
title_fullStr Public contracting: the integrity program as a requirement in the state of Rio Grande do Sul
title_full_unstemmed Public contracting: the integrity program as a requirement in the state of Rio Grande do Sul
title_sort Public contracting: the integrity program as a requirement in the state of Rio Grande do Sul
author Boff, Salete Oro
author_facet Boff, Salete Oro
Leal, Dionis Janner
author_role author
author2 Leal, Dionis Janner
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Boff, Salete Oro
Leal, Dionis Janner
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Compliance
contratação pública
lei anticorrupção
programa de integridade
Rio Grande do Sul.
topic Compliance
contratação pública
lei anticorrupção
programa de integridade
Rio Grande do Sul.
description This article analyzes the contours of Law 12.846, of 2013, commonly known as the Corporate Anti Corruption Law, which establishes the integrity program as a requirement for contracting services and purchasing products with the Government, based on its regulation by Decree no 11.129, 2022, and other state and municipal regulations, such as State Law No.15,228, 2018, of the State of Rio Grande do Sul, the legal effectsof such a requirement and its constitutionality as a qualification requirement or not, in order to mitigate the effects of corrupt acts before the Public Administration through public contracts. The dialectical method, based on doctrine, law and articles, was sought to address the regulation of integrity programs in accordance with the new Anti-Corruption Law (Law 12.846 / 2013) and its regulatory decree. The study made it possible to verify that the requirement for public procurement of integrity mechanisms by private corporations has a constitutional bias and does not conflict with the general law on public procurement, allowing the Government to have greater security in the design of contractual links with the private sector.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-09-03
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artigo avaliado pelos Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/39781
10.5433/1980-511X.2023v18n2p101
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/39781
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/1980-511X.2023v18n2p101
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/39781/49337
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Revista do Direito Público
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Revista do Direito Público
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista do Direito Público; v. 18 n. 2 (2023); 101-118
1980-511X
reponame:Revista do Direito Público
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Revista do Direito Público
collection Revista do Direito Público
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista do Direito Público - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||rdpubuel@uel.br
_version_ 1799305933078134784