POST-MORTEM ASSISTED HUMAN REPRODUCTION AND BRAZILIAN COURTS:: ANALYSIS OF SPECIAL APPEAL 1.918.421/SP

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Carvalho Pavão, Juliana
Data de Publicação: 2024
Outros Autores: Resquetti Tarifa Espolador, Rita de Cássia
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista do Direito Público
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/47163
Resumo: Assisted human reproduction (AHR) techniques arebeing increasingly used, however, over time, conflicts arise anddemands are proposed before the Judiciary, which must providea response. In view of this, the present work aims to analyze thejudgments of the Brazilian courts on the subject of post mortemRHA, mainly the Special Appeal n. 1.918.421/SP of the SuperiorCourt of Justice (STJ), with the purpose of tracing what has beenthe jurisprudential understanding on the subject and how thelegal system has been used. The work uses the deductive method,performing the analysis of the main cases on the subject. Thus,it is concluded that the Brazilian legal system has not adequatelyregulated procedures involving RHA, in view of this, courtshave often used technical regulations from other bodies to basetheir decision. With regard to post mortem RHA, the courts havealways observed the existence or not of the deceased’s will,in order to then authorize the procedure. With this research, itis clear that the decision of the STJ is in accordance with thedecisions of other courts, however, it should be noted that theexpression of will does not necessarily need to be written,and can be proved by other means. Finally, it is clear that it isessential that the Terms of Free and Informed Consent properlycontemplate the destination of the embryos/genetic material indifferent situations, since they can be used as a means of proofof the manifestation of will.
id UEL-2_cd424f2a913e30947e8f89bf3d755a6f
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/47163
network_acronym_str UEL-2
network_name_str Revista do Direito Público
repository_id_str
spelling POST-MORTEM ASSISTED HUMAN REPRODUCTION AND BRAZILIAN COURTS:: ANALYSIS OF SPECIAL APPEAL 1.918.421/SPREPRODUÇÃO HUMANA ASSISTIDA POST MORTEM E ATUAÇÃO DOS TRIBUNAIS BRASILEIROS:: ANÁLISE DO RECURSO ESPECIAL 1.918.421/SPBiotechnologyFamily lawManifestation of WillPost Mortem Assisted Human ReproductionBiotecnologiaDireito das FamíliasManifestação de VontadeReprodução Humana Assistida Post MortemAssisted human reproduction (AHR) techniques arebeing increasingly used, however, over time, conflicts arise anddemands are proposed before the Judiciary, which must providea response. In view of this, the present work aims to analyze thejudgments of the Brazilian courts on the subject of post mortemRHA, mainly the Special Appeal n. 1.918.421/SP of the SuperiorCourt of Justice (STJ), with the purpose of tracing what has beenthe jurisprudential understanding on the subject and how thelegal system has been used. The work uses the deductive method,performing the analysis of the main cases on the subject. Thus,it is concluded that the Brazilian legal system has not adequatelyregulated procedures involving RHA, in view of this, courtshave often used technical regulations from other bodies to basetheir decision. With regard to post mortem RHA, the courts havealways observed the existence or not of the deceased’s will,in order to then authorize the procedure. With this research, itis clear that the decision of the STJ is in accordance with thedecisions of other courts, however, it should be noted that theexpression of will does not necessarily need to be written,and can be proved by other means. Finally, it is clear that it isessential that the Terms of Free and Informed Consent properlycontemplate the destination of the embryos/genetic material indifferent situations, since they can be used as a means of proofof the manifestation of will.As técnicas de reprodução humana assistida (RHA)estão sendo cada vez mais utilizadas. Por isso, com o decorrerdo tempo, conflitos surgem e demandas são propostas peranteo Poder Judiciário que deve apresentar uma resposta. Diantedisso, o presente trabalho tem como objetivo analisar osjulgados dos tribunais brasileiros sobre a temática da RHA postmortem, principalmente o Recurso Especial n. 1.918.421/SP doSuperior Tribunal de Justiça (STJ), com a finalidade de traçarqual tem sido o entendimento jurisprudencial sobre o assuntoe como o ordenamento jurídico tem sido utilizado. O trabalhoutiliza o método dedutivo, realizando a análise dos principaiscasos sobre a temática. Assim, conclui-se que o ordenamentojurídico brasileiro não tem regulamentado adequadamente osprocedimentos envolvendo RHA, diante disso, os tribunaistêm muitas vezes utilizado regulamentações técnicas de outrosórgãos para fundamentar sua decisão. No tocante a RHA postmortem, os tribunais têm observado sempre a existência ou nãode manifestação de vontade do falecido, para então, autorizaro procedimento. Por meio dessa pesquisa, percebe-se quea decisão do STJ está em conformidade com as decisões dosdemais tribunais, entretanto, deve-se destacar que a manifestaçãode vontade não precisa ser necessariamente escrita, podendo serprovada por outro meio. Por fim, percebe-se que é essencial queos Termos de Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido contemplemadequadamente o destino dos embriões/material genético emdiversas situações, uma vez que podem ser utilizados como meio de prova da manifestação de vontade.Universidade Estadual de Londrina2024-04-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/4716310.5433/1980-511X.2024.v19.n1.47163Revista do Direito Público; v. 19 n. 1 (2024): Revista do Direito Público ; 220-2391980-511Xreponame:Revista do Direito Públicoinstname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/47163/50345Copyright (c) 2024 Juliana Carvalho Pavão, Rita de Cássia Resquetti Tarifa Espoladorhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCarvalho Pavão, JulianaResquetti Tarifa Espolador, Rita de Cássia2024-05-16T12:13:17Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/47163Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopubPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/oai||rdpubuel@uel.br1980-511X1980-511Xopendoar:2024-05-16T12:13:17Revista do Direito Público - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv POST-MORTEM ASSISTED HUMAN REPRODUCTION AND BRAZILIAN COURTS:: ANALYSIS OF SPECIAL APPEAL 1.918.421/SP
REPRODUÇÃO HUMANA ASSISTIDA POST MORTEM E ATUAÇÃO DOS TRIBUNAIS BRASILEIROS:: ANÁLISE DO RECURSO ESPECIAL 1.918.421/SP
title POST-MORTEM ASSISTED HUMAN REPRODUCTION AND BRAZILIAN COURTS:: ANALYSIS OF SPECIAL APPEAL 1.918.421/SP
spellingShingle POST-MORTEM ASSISTED HUMAN REPRODUCTION AND BRAZILIAN COURTS:: ANALYSIS OF SPECIAL APPEAL 1.918.421/SP
Carvalho Pavão, Juliana
Biotechnology
Family law
Manifestation of Will
Post Mortem Assisted Human Reproduction
Biotecnologia
Direito das Famílias
Manifestação de Vontade
Reprodução Humana Assistida Post Mortem
title_short POST-MORTEM ASSISTED HUMAN REPRODUCTION AND BRAZILIAN COURTS:: ANALYSIS OF SPECIAL APPEAL 1.918.421/SP
title_full POST-MORTEM ASSISTED HUMAN REPRODUCTION AND BRAZILIAN COURTS:: ANALYSIS OF SPECIAL APPEAL 1.918.421/SP
title_fullStr POST-MORTEM ASSISTED HUMAN REPRODUCTION AND BRAZILIAN COURTS:: ANALYSIS OF SPECIAL APPEAL 1.918.421/SP
title_full_unstemmed POST-MORTEM ASSISTED HUMAN REPRODUCTION AND BRAZILIAN COURTS:: ANALYSIS OF SPECIAL APPEAL 1.918.421/SP
title_sort POST-MORTEM ASSISTED HUMAN REPRODUCTION AND BRAZILIAN COURTS:: ANALYSIS OF SPECIAL APPEAL 1.918.421/SP
author Carvalho Pavão, Juliana
author_facet Carvalho Pavão, Juliana
Resquetti Tarifa Espolador, Rita de Cássia
author_role author
author2 Resquetti Tarifa Espolador, Rita de Cássia
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Carvalho Pavão, Juliana
Resquetti Tarifa Espolador, Rita de Cássia
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Biotechnology
Family law
Manifestation of Will
Post Mortem Assisted Human Reproduction
Biotecnologia
Direito das Famílias
Manifestação de Vontade
Reprodução Humana Assistida Post Mortem
topic Biotechnology
Family law
Manifestation of Will
Post Mortem Assisted Human Reproduction
Biotecnologia
Direito das Famílias
Manifestação de Vontade
Reprodução Humana Assistida Post Mortem
description Assisted human reproduction (AHR) techniques arebeing increasingly used, however, over time, conflicts arise anddemands are proposed before the Judiciary, which must providea response. In view of this, the present work aims to analyze thejudgments of the Brazilian courts on the subject of post mortemRHA, mainly the Special Appeal n. 1.918.421/SP of the SuperiorCourt of Justice (STJ), with the purpose of tracing what has beenthe jurisprudential understanding on the subject and how thelegal system has been used. The work uses the deductive method,performing the analysis of the main cases on the subject. Thus,it is concluded that the Brazilian legal system has not adequatelyregulated procedures involving RHA, in view of this, courtshave often used technical regulations from other bodies to basetheir decision. With regard to post mortem RHA, the courts havealways observed the existence or not of the deceased’s will,in order to then authorize the procedure. With this research, itis clear that the decision of the STJ is in accordance with thedecisions of other courts, however, it should be noted that theexpression of will does not necessarily need to be written,and can be proved by other means. Finally, it is clear that it isessential that the Terms of Free and Informed Consent properlycontemplate the destination of the embryos/genetic material indifferent situations, since they can be used as a means of proofof the manifestation of will.
publishDate 2024
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024-04-30
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artigo avaliado pelos Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/47163
10.5433/1980-511X.2024.v19.n1.47163
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/47163
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/1980-511X.2024.v19.n1.47163
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/47163/50345
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2024 Juliana Carvalho Pavão, Rita de Cássia Resquetti Tarifa Espolador
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2024 Juliana Carvalho Pavão, Rita de Cássia Resquetti Tarifa Espolador
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista do Direito Público; v. 19 n. 1 (2024): Revista do Direito Público ; 220-239
1980-511X
reponame:Revista do Direito Público
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Revista do Direito Público
collection Revista do Direito Público
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista do Direito Público - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||rdpubuel@uel.br
_version_ 1799305929456353280