Consequentialism and legal arguments in brazilian court decisions
| Autor(a) principal: | |
|---|---|
| Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
| Outros Autores: | |
| Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
| Idioma: | por |
| Título da fonte: | Revista do Direito Público |
| Texto Completo: | https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/35871 |
Resumo: | This article seeks to carry out a study on different theories of the judicial decision: that of consequentialism, which brings the need to observe the existing consequences of a given decision; and that of legal argumentation, which brings criteria to be observed for the construction of a decision. Both these theories have their aspects of convergence that this paper will address. Moreover, these theories were received in Brazil although under different perspectives. In spite of the complexity and relevance of these theories, the national reception by doctrine and jurisprudence always brings an innovative element, signaling the capacity for intellectual reformulation, in the sense of offering other perspectives. This paper highlights the Brazilian intellectual attention on the international reflection of Law and democratic policy. |
| id |
UEL-2_f2f45aa5542e40a6b37d28e3ff4eefca |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/35871 |
| network_acronym_str |
UEL-2 |
| network_name_str |
Revista do Direito Público |
| repository_id_str |
|
| spelling |
Consequentialism and legal arguments in brazilian court decisionsO consequencialismo e a argumentação jurídica nas decisões dos tribunais brasileirosConsequentialism. Legal Argumentation. Judicial Decision Theory. Constitutional Hermeneutics. Brazilian Legal Thought.Consequencialismo. Argumentação Jurídica. Teoria da Decisão Judicial. Hermenêutica Constitucional. Pensamento Jurídico Brasileiro.This article seeks to carry out a study on different theories of the judicial decision: that of consequentialism, which brings the need to observe the existing consequences of a given decision; and that of legal argumentation, which brings criteria to be observed for the construction of a decision. Both these theories have their aspects of convergence that this paper will address. Moreover, these theories were received in Brazil although under different perspectives. In spite of the complexity and relevance of these theories, the national reception by doctrine and jurisprudence always brings an innovative element, signaling the capacity for intellectual reformulation, in the sense of offering other perspectives. This paper highlights the Brazilian intellectual attention on the international reflection of Law and democratic policy.O presente artigo procura realizar um estudo a respeito de distintas teorias da decisão judicial: a do consequencialismo, que traz a necessidade de observar as consequências existentes de uma determinada decisão; e a da argumentação jurídica, que traz critérios a serem observados para a construção de uma decisão. Ambas as teorias possuem aspectos de convergência a serem abordados nesta proposta de análise. As teorias foram recepcionadas no Brasil, embora sob perspectivas diferentes. No que pesem a complexidade e relevância das teorias, a recepção nacional por doutrina e jurisprudência traz sempre o elemento inovador, sinalando a capacidade de reformulação intelectual, no sentido de oferecer outros olhares. O texto se desenvolve neste sentido a fim de destacar a atenção intelectual brasileira sobre a reflexão internacional do Direito e da política democrática.Universidade Estadual de Londrina2020-08-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/3587110.5433/1980-511X.2020v15n1p137Revista do Direito Público; v. 15 n. 1 (2020); 137-1521980-511Xreponame:Revista do Direito Públicoinstname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/35871/27281Copyright (c) 2020 Revista do Direito Públicohttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessChaves, Ana Karina MendesLima, Martonio Mont'Alverne Barreto2022-09-23T16:30:06Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/35871Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopubPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/oai||rdpubuel@uel.br1980-511X1980-511Xopendoar:2022-09-23T16:30:06Revista do Direito Público - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Consequentialism and legal arguments in brazilian court decisions O consequencialismo e a argumentação jurídica nas decisões dos tribunais brasileiros |
| title |
Consequentialism and legal arguments in brazilian court decisions |
| spellingShingle |
Consequentialism and legal arguments in brazilian court decisions Chaves, Ana Karina Mendes Consequentialism. Legal Argumentation. Judicial Decision Theory. Constitutional Hermeneutics. Brazilian Legal Thought. Consequencialismo. Argumentação Jurídica. Teoria da Decisão Judicial. Hermenêutica Constitucional. Pensamento Jurídico Brasileiro. |
| title_short |
Consequentialism and legal arguments in brazilian court decisions |
| title_full |
Consequentialism and legal arguments in brazilian court decisions |
| title_fullStr |
Consequentialism and legal arguments in brazilian court decisions |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Consequentialism and legal arguments in brazilian court decisions |
| title_sort |
Consequentialism and legal arguments in brazilian court decisions |
| author |
Chaves, Ana Karina Mendes |
| author_facet |
Chaves, Ana Karina Mendes Lima, Martonio Mont'Alverne Barreto |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
Lima, Martonio Mont'Alverne Barreto |
| author2_role |
author |
| dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Chaves, Ana Karina Mendes Lima, Martonio Mont'Alverne Barreto |
| dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Consequentialism. Legal Argumentation. Judicial Decision Theory. Constitutional Hermeneutics. Brazilian Legal Thought. Consequencialismo. Argumentação Jurídica. Teoria da Decisão Judicial. Hermenêutica Constitucional. Pensamento Jurídico Brasileiro. |
| topic |
Consequentialism. Legal Argumentation. Judicial Decision Theory. Constitutional Hermeneutics. Brazilian Legal Thought. Consequencialismo. Argumentação Jurídica. Teoria da Decisão Judicial. Hermenêutica Constitucional. Pensamento Jurídico Brasileiro. |
| description |
This article seeks to carry out a study on different theories of the judicial decision: that of consequentialism, which brings the need to observe the existing consequences of a given decision; and that of legal argumentation, which brings criteria to be observed for the construction of a decision. Both these theories have their aspects of convergence that this paper will address. Moreover, these theories were received in Brazil although under different perspectives. In spite of the complexity and relevance of these theories, the national reception by doctrine and jurisprudence always brings an innovative element, signaling the capacity for intellectual reformulation, in the sense of offering other perspectives. This paper highlights the Brazilian intellectual attention on the international reflection of Law and democratic policy. |
| publishDate |
2020 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-08-31 |
| dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artigo avaliado pelos Pares |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/35871 10.5433/1980-511X.2020v15n1p137 |
| url |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/35871 |
| identifier_str_mv |
10.5433/1980-511X.2020v15n1p137 |
| dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
| language |
por |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/35871/27281 |
| dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Revista do Direito Público http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Revista do Direito Público http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista do Direito Público; v. 15 n. 1 (2020); 137-152 1980-511X reponame:Revista do Direito Público instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) instacron:UEL |
| instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
| instacron_str |
UEL |
| institution |
UEL |
| reponame_str |
Revista do Direito Público |
| collection |
Revista do Direito Público |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista do Direito Público - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||rdpubuel@uel.br |
| _version_ |
1799305932961742848 |