Grounds for judicial decisions, consequentialism and pandemics
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/18234 |
Resumo: | This study seeks to address the duty of reasoning in court decisions in its broad sense (motivation and justification), such as access to the Democratic Rule of Law and legal security, as well as addressing consequentialism, as it has been treated in Brazilian law and the dangers of reasons based on moral arguments. It is noteworthy that every reasoning should analyse the social bias and how the decision will affect society as a whole. For this, it will list the objectives of these institutes in procedural law from the perspective of a contemporary and constantly changing society. It is noteworthy that with the Covid-19 pandemic that devastates the country, this issue has gained more space, considering that there was an increase in decisions based on moral arguments that aim to decide in favor of collective well-being. Therefore, it lists which negative and positive results a consequentialist decision has implications for society. The present work, the deductive methodology was chosen, with bibliographical research on doctrines, infra-constitutional and constitutional legislation, in addition to analysing the decisions of the Courts. |
id |
UNIFEI_da55de57318d1623ae3058f7bb8ae624 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/18234 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Grounds for judicial decisions, consequentialism and pandemicsFundamento de las decisiones judiciales, consecuencialismo y pandemiaFundamentação das decisões judiciais, consequencialismo e pandemiaConsequencialismoFundamentação judicialMotivação.ConsecuencialismoMotivaciónRazonamiento judicial.ConsequentialismJudicial reasoningMotivation.This study seeks to address the duty of reasoning in court decisions in its broad sense (motivation and justification), such as access to the Democratic Rule of Law and legal security, as well as addressing consequentialism, as it has been treated in Brazilian law and the dangers of reasons based on moral arguments. It is noteworthy that every reasoning should analyse the social bias and how the decision will affect society as a whole. For this, it will list the objectives of these institutes in procedural law from the perspective of a contemporary and constantly changing society. It is noteworthy that with the Covid-19 pandemic that devastates the country, this issue has gained more space, considering that there was an increase in decisions based on moral arguments that aim to decide in favor of collective well-being. Therefore, it lists which negative and positive results a consequentialist decision has implications for society. The present work, the deductive methodology was chosen, with bibliographical research on doctrines, infra-constitutional and constitutional legislation, in addition to analysing the decisions of the Courts.Este estudio busca abordar el deber de razonamiento en las decisiones judiciales en su sentido amplio (motivación y justificación), como el acceso al Estado de Derecho Democrático y la seguridad jurídica, así como abordar el consecuencialismo, tal como ha sido tratado en la legislación brasileña y los peligros de las razones basadas en argumentos morales. Es de destacar que todo razonamiento debe analizar el sesgo social y cómo la decisión afectará a la sociedad en su conjunto. Para ello, enumerará los objetivos de estos institutos en derecho procesal desde la perspectiva de una sociedad contemporánea y en constante cambio. Es de destacar que con la pandemia Covid-19 que arrasa el país, este tema ha ganado más espacio, considerando que hubo un aumento de decisiones basadas en argumentos morales que apuntan a decidir a favor del bienestar colectivo. Por lo tanto, enumera los resultados negativos y positivos que una decisión consecuencialista tiene implicaciones para la sociedad. El presente trabajo se optó por la metodología deductiva, con investigación bibliográfica sobre doctrinas, legislación infraconstitucional y constitucional, además de analizar las decisiones de los Tribunales.O presente estudo busca abordar o dever de fundamentação nas decisões judiciais em seu sentido amplo (motivação e justificação), como acesso ao Estado de Democrático de Direito e a segurança jurídica, bem como abordar o consequencialismo, como vem sendo tratado no direito brasileiro e os perigos das fundamentações baseadas em argumentos morais. Destaca-se que toda fundamentação deverá analisar o viés social e como a decisão afetará a sociedade como todo. Para isso, elencará quais os objetivos desses institutos no direito processual sob a ótica de uma sociedade contemporânea e em constante mudança. Ressalta-se que com a pandemia do Covid-19 que assola o país, tal temática ganhou mais espaço, considerando que houve aumento nas decisões baseadas em argumentos morais que visam decidir em favor do bem-estar coletivo. Portanto, elenca quais os resultados negativos e positivos uma decisão consequencialista implica para a sociedade. O presente trabalho optou-se pela metodologia dedutiva, com pesquisas bibliográficas em doutrinas, legislação infraconstitucional e constitucional, além de analisar as decisões dos Tribunais.Research, Society and Development2021-08-02info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/1823410.33448/rsd-v10i9.18234Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 9; e53910918234Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 9; e53910918234Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 9; e539109182342525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/18234/16457Copyright (c) 2021 Natan Galves Santana; Letícia Bianca Pinheiro; José Miguel Garcia Medinahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSantana, Natan GalvesPinheiro, Letícia BiancaMedina, José Miguel Garcia 2021-09-12T14:28:06Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/18234Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:38:24.371664Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Grounds for judicial decisions, consequentialism and pandemics Fundamento de las decisiones judiciales, consecuencialismo y pandemia Fundamentação das decisões judiciais, consequencialismo e pandemia |
title |
Grounds for judicial decisions, consequentialism and pandemics |
spellingShingle |
Grounds for judicial decisions, consequentialism and pandemics Santana, Natan Galves Consequencialismo Fundamentação judicial Motivação. Consecuencialismo Motivación Razonamiento judicial. Consequentialism Judicial reasoning Motivation. |
title_short |
Grounds for judicial decisions, consequentialism and pandemics |
title_full |
Grounds for judicial decisions, consequentialism and pandemics |
title_fullStr |
Grounds for judicial decisions, consequentialism and pandemics |
title_full_unstemmed |
Grounds for judicial decisions, consequentialism and pandemics |
title_sort |
Grounds for judicial decisions, consequentialism and pandemics |
author |
Santana, Natan Galves |
author_facet |
Santana, Natan Galves Pinheiro, Letícia Bianca Medina, José Miguel Garcia |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Pinheiro, Letícia Bianca Medina, José Miguel Garcia |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Santana, Natan Galves Pinheiro, Letícia Bianca Medina, José Miguel Garcia |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Consequencialismo Fundamentação judicial Motivação. Consecuencialismo Motivación Razonamiento judicial. Consequentialism Judicial reasoning Motivation. |
topic |
Consequencialismo Fundamentação judicial Motivação. Consecuencialismo Motivación Razonamiento judicial. Consequentialism Judicial reasoning Motivation. |
description |
This study seeks to address the duty of reasoning in court decisions in its broad sense (motivation and justification), such as access to the Democratic Rule of Law and legal security, as well as addressing consequentialism, as it has been treated in Brazilian law and the dangers of reasons based on moral arguments. It is noteworthy that every reasoning should analyse the social bias and how the decision will affect society as a whole. For this, it will list the objectives of these institutes in procedural law from the perspective of a contemporary and constantly changing society. It is noteworthy that with the Covid-19 pandemic that devastates the country, this issue has gained more space, considering that there was an increase in decisions based on moral arguments that aim to decide in favor of collective well-being. Therefore, it lists which negative and positive results a consequentialist decision has implications for society. The present work, the deductive methodology was chosen, with bibliographical research on doctrines, infra-constitutional and constitutional legislation, in addition to analysing the decisions of the Courts. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-08-02 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/18234 10.33448/rsd-v10i9.18234 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/18234 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v10i9.18234 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/18234/16457 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Natan Galves Santana; Letícia Bianca Pinheiro; José Miguel Garcia Medina https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Natan Galves Santana; Letícia Bianca Pinheiro; José Miguel Garcia Medina https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 9; e53910918234 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 9; e53910918234 Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 9; e53910918234 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797052833659355136 |