New forms of entities arising family in the Federal Constitution of 1988 and human assisted reproduction as a tool for the formation of homosexual families

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ferrari, Geala Geslaine
Data de Publicação: 2013
Outros Autores: França, Loreanne Manuella de Castro
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista do Direito Público
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/15866
Resumo: With the advent of the Federal Constitution of 1988 there was an expansion in the concept of family, due to the recognition of new family entities beyond that coming from the marriage. So the family came to be defined as a pluralistic institution, always intertwined with the values of dignity, equality and solidarity, in order to affection, regardless of their sexual choice. After the Supreme Court decision that equated the homoafective relationship as the heterosexual relationship, new rights were secured for homosexuals. Since then, based on the constitutional principles of family planning and responsible parenthood, homosexual couples are seeking, through the techniques of assisted human reproduction, the possibility of expanding family. In such cases the technique to be applied must always be in vitro fertilization (heterologous human assisted reproduction), in view of the necessity of the presence of an odd person to the relationship, the donor: in female pairs, the sperm is donated by the third, the transfer of the egg by one of the partners and the assignment of the uterus by another; in men couples, the egg is donated by the third, the transfer of sperm by one partner and the achievement of pregnancy is by substitution, commonly called “surrogacy”, in which another person outside the homoafective relationship offers her uterus for pregnancy development and should be complied with the requirements set forth in Resolution No. 1957/2010 of the Federal Council of Medicine. The realization of this project of homoparenthood family generates rights and duties for the couple, from the obligation to exercise responsible parenthood and the exercise of family power. In this environment, many achievements have been reached by homosexual couples, especially the possibility of double registration in the birth certificate of the children - father and father, mother and mother. However, there are still controversies and uncertainties due to the lack of specific legislation on such techniques of artificial fertilization, fitting, then, to the Judiciary resolve any conflicts, based on analysis of cases and applying the fundamental principles of family law.
id UEL-2_f86062694ceeaec778f37f84722baec2
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/15866
network_acronym_str UEL-2
network_name_str Revista do Direito Público
repository_id_str
spelling New forms of entities arising family in the Federal Constitution of 1988 and human assisted reproduction as a tool for the formation of homosexual familiesAs novas formas de entidades familiares advindas com a Constituição Federal de 1988 e a reprodução humana assistida como instrumento facilitador para a formação das familílias homoafetivasHomosexual familyfamily extensionassisted human reproduction.Família homoafetivaampliação familiarreprodução humana assistida.With the advent of the Federal Constitution of 1988 there was an expansion in the concept of family, due to the recognition of new family entities beyond that coming from the marriage. So the family came to be defined as a pluralistic institution, always intertwined with the values of dignity, equality and solidarity, in order to affection, regardless of their sexual choice. After the Supreme Court decision that equated the homoafective relationship as the heterosexual relationship, new rights were secured for homosexuals. Since then, based on the constitutional principles of family planning and responsible parenthood, homosexual couples are seeking, through the techniques of assisted human reproduction, the possibility of expanding family. In such cases the technique to be applied must always be in vitro fertilization (heterologous human assisted reproduction), in view of the necessity of the presence of an odd person to the relationship, the donor: in female pairs, the sperm is donated by the third, the transfer of the egg by one of the partners and the assignment of the uterus by another; in men couples, the egg is donated by the third, the transfer of sperm by one partner and the achievement of pregnancy is by substitution, commonly called “surrogacy”, in which another person outside the homoafective relationship offers her uterus for pregnancy development and should be complied with the requirements set forth in Resolution No. 1957/2010 of the Federal Council of Medicine. The realization of this project of homoparenthood family generates rights and duties for the couple, from the obligation to exercise responsible parenthood and the exercise of family power. In this environment, many achievements have been reached by homosexual couples, especially the possibility of double registration in the birth certificate of the children - father and father, mother and mother. However, there are still controversies and uncertainties due to the lack of specific legislation on such techniques of artificial fertilization, fitting, then, to the Judiciary resolve any conflicts, based on analysis of cases and applying the fundamental principles of family law.Com o advento da Constituição Federal de 1988 houve uma ampliação no conceito de família, devido ao reconhecimento de novas entidades familiares além daquela oriunda do matrimônio. Assim, a família passou a ser definida como uma instituição pluralista, sempre entrelaçada aos valores da dignidade, igualdade e solidariedade, tendo como fim o afeto, independentemente de sua escolha sexual. Após a decisão do Supremo Tribunal Federal que equiparou a união estável homoafetiva à heterossexual, novos direitos foram assegurados aos homossexuais. Desde então, com base no planejamento familiar e princípio constitucional da paternidade responsável, os casais homossexuais estão buscando, através das técnicas de reprodução humana assistida, a possibilidade de ampliação familiar. Nesses casos, a técnica a ser aplicada deverá ser sempre a fertilização in vitro (reprodução humana assistida heteróloga), tendo em vista a necessidade da presença de um terceiro, estranho à relação, o doador: em casais femininos há a doação do esperma pelo terceiro, a cessão do óvulo por uma das parceiras e a cessão do útero por outra; em casais masculinos, há a doação do óvulo por uma terceira, a cessão do esperma por um dos parceiros e a realização da gestação por substituição, comumente denominada “barriga de aluguel”, na qual mais uma pessoa fora da relação homoafetiva oferece seu útero para o desenvolvimento da gravidez, devendo ser observados os requisitos estabelecidos na Resolução nº 1957/2010 do Conselho Federal de Medicina. A realização desse projeto de família homoparental gera direitos e deveres ao casal homoafetivo, oriundos da obrigação de exercerem uma paternidade responsável e do exercício do poder familiar. Nesse meio, muitas conquistas já foram alcançadas pelos casais homossexuais, especialmente a possibilidade de registro duplo na Certidão de Nascimento dos filhos – pai e pai, mãe e mãe. Porém, ainda restam controvérsias e indefinições em razão da falta de legislação específica sobre tais técnicas de fecundação artificial, cabendo, então, ao Poder Judiciário dirimir eventuais conflitos, com base na análise dos casos concretos e aplicação dos princípios fundamentais do Direito de Família.Universidade Estadual de Londrina2013-09-02info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/1586610.5433/1980-511X.2013v8n2p139Revista do Direito Público; v. 8 n. 2 (2013); 139-1581980-511Xreponame:Revista do Direito Públicoinstname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/15866/13119Ferrari, Geala GeslaineFrança, Loreanne Manuella de Castroinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2016-01-14T04:36:39Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/15866Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopubPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/oai||rdpubuel@uel.br1980-511X1980-511Xopendoar:2016-01-14T04:36:39Revista do Direito Público - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv New forms of entities arising family in the Federal Constitution of 1988 and human assisted reproduction as a tool for the formation of homosexual families
As novas formas de entidades familiares advindas com a Constituição Federal de 1988 e a reprodução humana assistida como instrumento facilitador para a formação das familílias homoafetivas
title New forms of entities arising family in the Federal Constitution of 1988 and human assisted reproduction as a tool for the formation of homosexual families
spellingShingle New forms of entities arising family in the Federal Constitution of 1988 and human assisted reproduction as a tool for the formation of homosexual families
Ferrari, Geala Geslaine
Homosexual family
family extension
assisted human reproduction.
Família homoafetiva
ampliação familiar
reprodução humana assistida.
title_short New forms of entities arising family in the Federal Constitution of 1988 and human assisted reproduction as a tool for the formation of homosexual families
title_full New forms of entities arising family in the Federal Constitution of 1988 and human assisted reproduction as a tool for the formation of homosexual families
title_fullStr New forms of entities arising family in the Federal Constitution of 1988 and human assisted reproduction as a tool for the formation of homosexual families
title_full_unstemmed New forms of entities arising family in the Federal Constitution of 1988 and human assisted reproduction as a tool for the formation of homosexual families
title_sort New forms of entities arising family in the Federal Constitution of 1988 and human assisted reproduction as a tool for the formation of homosexual families
author Ferrari, Geala Geslaine
author_facet Ferrari, Geala Geslaine
França, Loreanne Manuella de Castro
author_role author
author2 França, Loreanne Manuella de Castro
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ferrari, Geala Geslaine
França, Loreanne Manuella de Castro
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Homosexual family
family extension
assisted human reproduction.
Família homoafetiva
ampliação familiar
reprodução humana assistida.
topic Homosexual family
family extension
assisted human reproduction.
Família homoafetiva
ampliação familiar
reprodução humana assistida.
description With the advent of the Federal Constitution of 1988 there was an expansion in the concept of family, due to the recognition of new family entities beyond that coming from the marriage. So the family came to be defined as a pluralistic institution, always intertwined with the values of dignity, equality and solidarity, in order to affection, regardless of their sexual choice. After the Supreme Court decision that equated the homoafective relationship as the heterosexual relationship, new rights were secured for homosexuals. Since then, based on the constitutional principles of family planning and responsible parenthood, homosexual couples are seeking, through the techniques of assisted human reproduction, the possibility of expanding family. In such cases the technique to be applied must always be in vitro fertilization (heterologous human assisted reproduction), in view of the necessity of the presence of an odd person to the relationship, the donor: in female pairs, the sperm is donated by the third, the transfer of the egg by one of the partners and the assignment of the uterus by another; in men couples, the egg is donated by the third, the transfer of sperm by one partner and the achievement of pregnancy is by substitution, commonly called “surrogacy”, in which another person outside the homoafective relationship offers her uterus for pregnancy development and should be complied with the requirements set forth in Resolution No. 1957/2010 of the Federal Council of Medicine. The realization of this project of homoparenthood family generates rights and duties for the couple, from the obligation to exercise responsible parenthood and the exercise of family power. In this environment, many achievements have been reached by homosexual couples, especially the possibility of double registration in the birth certificate of the children - father and father, mother and mother. However, there are still controversies and uncertainties due to the lack of specific legislation on such techniques of artificial fertilization, fitting, then, to the Judiciary resolve any conflicts, based on analysis of cases and applying the fundamental principles of family law.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013-09-02
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artigo avaliado pelos Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/15866
10.5433/1980-511X.2013v8n2p139
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/15866
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/1980-511X.2013v8n2p139
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/15866/13119
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista do Direito Público; v. 8 n. 2 (2013); 139-158
1980-511X
reponame:Revista do Direito Público
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Revista do Direito Público
collection Revista do Direito Público
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista do Direito Público - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||rdpubuel@uel.br
_version_ 1799305930930651136