New forms of entities arising family in the Federal Constitution of 1988 and human assisted reproduction as a tool for the formation of homosexual families
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2013 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista do Direito Público |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/15866 |
Resumo: | With the advent of the Federal Constitution of 1988 there was an expansion in the concept of family, due to the recognition of new family entities beyond that coming from the marriage. So the family came to be defined as a pluralistic institution, always intertwined with the values of dignity, equality and solidarity, in order to affection, regardless of their sexual choice. After the Supreme Court decision that equated the homoafective relationship as the heterosexual relationship, new rights were secured for homosexuals. Since then, based on the constitutional principles of family planning and responsible parenthood, homosexual couples are seeking, through the techniques of assisted human reproduction, the possibility of expanding family. In such cases the technique to be applied must always be in vitro fertilization (heterologous human assisted reproduction), in view of the necessity of the presence of an odd person to the relationship, the donor: in female pairs, the sperm is donated by the third, the transfer of the egg by one of the partners and the assignment of the uterus by another; in men couples, the egg is donated by the third, the transfer of sperm by one partner and the achievement of pregnancy is by substitution, commonly called “surrogacy”, in which another person outside the homoafective relationship offers her uterus for pregnancy development and should be complied with the requirements set forth in Resolution No. 1957/2010 of the Federal Council of Medicine. The realization of this project of homoparenthood family generates rights and duties for the couple, from the obligation to exercise responsible parenthood and the exercise of family power. In this environment, many achievements have been reached by homosexual couples, especially the possibility of double registration in the birth certificate of the children - father and father, mother and mother. However, there are still controversies and uncertainties due to the lack of specific legislation on such techniques of artificial fertilization, fitting, then, to the Judiciary resolve any conflicts, based on analysis of cases and applying the fundamental principles of family law. |
id |
UEL-2_f86062694ceeaec778f37f84722baec2 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/15866 |
network_acronym_str |
UEL-2 |
network_name_str |
Revista do Direito Público |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
New forms of entities arising family in the Federal Constitution of 1988 and human assisted reproduction as a tool for the formation of homosexual familiesAs novas formas de entidades familiares advindas com a Constituição Federal de 1988 e a reprodução humana assistida como instrumento facilitador para a formação das familílias homoafetivasHomosexual familyfamily extensionassisted human reproduction.Família homoafetivaampliação familiarreprodução humana assistida.With the advent of the Federal Constitution of 1988 there was an expansion in the concept of family, due to the recognition of new family entities beyond that coming from the marriage. So the family came to be defined as a pluralistic institution, always intertwined with the values of dignity, equality and solidarity, in order to affection, regardless of their sexual choice. After the Supreme Court decision that equated the homoafective relationship as the heterosexual relationship, new rights were secured for homosexuals. Since then, based on the constitutional principles of family planning and responsible parenthood, homosexual couples are seeking, through the techniques of assisted human reproduction, the possibility of expanding family. In such cases the technique to be applied must always be in vitro fertilization (heterologous human assisted reproduction), in view of the necessity of the presence of an odd person to the relationship, the donor: in female pairs, the sperm is donated by the third, the transfer of the egg by one of the partners and the assignment of the uterus by another; in men couples, the egg is donated by the third, the transfer of sperm by one partner and the achievement of pregnancy is by substitution, commonly called “surrogacy”, in which another person outside the homoafective relationship offers her uterus for pregnancy development and should be complied with the requirements set forth in Resolution No. 1957/2010 of the Federal Council of Medicine. The realization of this project of homoparenthood family generates rights and duties for the couple, from the obligation to exercise responsible parenthood and the exercise of family power. In this environment, many achievements have been reached by homosexual couples, especially the possibility of double registration in the birth certificate of the children - father and father, mother and mother. However, there are still controversies and uncertainties due to the lack of specific legislation on such techniques of artificial fertilization, fitting, then, to the Judiciary resolve any conflicts, based on analysis of cases and applying the fundamental principles of family law.Com o advento da Constituição Federal de 1988 houve uma ampliação no conceito de família, devido ao reconhecimento de novas entidades familiares além daquela oriunda do matrimônio. Assim, a família passou a ser definida como uma instituição pluralista, sempre entrelaçada aos valores da dignidade, igualdade e solidariedade, tendo como fim o afeto, independentemente de sua escolha sexual. Após a decisão do Supremo Tribunal Federal que equiparou a união estável homoafetiva à heterossexual, novos direitos foram assegurados aos homossexuais. Desde então, com base no planejamento familiar e princípio constitucional da paternidade responsável, os casais homossexuais estão buscando, através das técnicas de reprodução humana assistida, a possibilidade de ampliação familiar. Nesses casos, a técnica a ser aplicada deverá ser sempre a fertilização in vitro (reprodução humana assistida heteróloga), tendo em vista a necessidade da presença de um terceiro, estranho à relação, o doador: em casais femininos há a doação do esperma pelo terceiro, a cessão do óvulo por uma das parceiras e a cessão do útero por outra; em casais masculinos, há a doação do óvulo por uma terceira, a cessão do esperma por um dos parceiros e a realização da gestação por substituição, comumente denominada “barriga de aluguel”, na qual mais uma pessoa fora da relação homoafetiva oferece seu útero para o desenvolvimento da gravidez, devendo ser observados os requisitos estabelecidos na Resolução nº 1957/2010 do Conselho Federal de Medicina. A realização desse projeto de família homoparental gera direitos e deveres ao casal homoafetivo, oriundos da obrigação de exercerem uma paternidade responsável e do exercício do poder familiar. Nesse meio, muitas conquistas já foram alcançadas pelos casais homossexuais, especialmente a possibilidade de registro duplo na Certidão de Nascimento dos filhos – pai e pai, mãe e mãe. Porém, ainda restam controvérsias e indefinições em razão da falta de legislação específica sobre tais técnicas de fecundação artificial, cabendo, então, ao Poder Judiciário dirimir eventuais conflitos, com base na análise dos casos concretos e aplicação dos princípios fundamentais do Direito de Família.Universidade Estadual de Londrina2013-09-02info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/1586610.5433/1980-511X.2013v8n2p139Revista do Direito Público; v. 8 n. 2 (2013); 139-1581980-511Xreponame:Revista do Direito Públicoinstname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/15866/13119Ferrari, Geala GeslaineFrança, Loreanne Manuella de Castroinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2016-01-14T04:36:39Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/15866Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopubPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/oai||rdpubuel@uel.br1980-511X1980-511Xopendoar:2016-01-14T04:36:39Revista do Direito Público - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
New forms of entities arising family in the Federal Constitution of 1988 and human assisted reproduction as a tool for the formation of homosexual families As novas formas de entidades familiares advindas com a Constituição Federal de 1988 e a reprodução humana assistida como instrumento facilitador para a formação das familílias homoafetivas |
title |
New forms of entities arising family in the Federal Constitution of 1988 and human assisted reproduction as a tool for the formation of homosexual families |
spellingShingle |
New forms of entities arising family in the Federal Constitution of 1988 and human assisted reproduction as a tool for the formation of homosexual families Ferrari, Geala Geslaine Homosexual family family extension assisted human reproduction. Família homoafetiva ampliação familiar reprodução humana assistida. |
title_short |
New forms of entities arising family in the Federal Constitution of 1988 and human assisted reproduction as a tool for the formation of homosexual families |
title_full |
New forms of entities arising family in the Federal Constitution of 1988 and human assisted reproduction as a tool for the formation of homosexual families |
title_fullStr |
New forms of entities arising family in the Federal Constitution of 1988 and human assisted reproduction as a tool for the formation of homosexual families |
title_full_unstemmed |
New forms of entities arising family in the Federal Constitution of 1988 and human assisted reproduction as a tool for the formation of homosexual families |
title_sort |
New forms of entities arising family in the Federal Constitution of 1988 and human assisted reproduction as a tool for the formation of homosexual families |
author |
Ferrari, Geala Geslaine |
author_facet |
Ferrari, Geala Geslaine França, Loreanne Manuella de Castro |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
França, Loreanne Manuella de Castro |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Ferrari, Geala Geslaine França, Loreanne Manuella de Castro |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Homosexual family family extension assisted human reproduction. Família homoafetiva ampliação familiar reprodução humana assistida. |
topic |
Homosexual family family extension assisted human reproduction. Família homoafetiva ampliação familiar reprodução humana assistida. |
description |
With the advent of the Federal Constitution of 1988 there was an expansion in the concept of family, due to the recognition of new family entities beyond that coming from the marriage. So the family came to be defined as a pluralistic institution, always intertwined with the values of dignity, equality and solidarity, in order to affection, regardless of their sexual choice. After the Supreme Court decision that equated the homoafective relationship as the heterosexual relationship, new rights were secured for homosexuals. Since then, based on the constitutional principles of family planning and responsible parenthood, homosexual couples are seeking, through the techniques of assisted human reproduction, the possibility of expanding family. In such cases the technique to be applied must always be in vitro fertilization (heterologous human assisted reproduction), in view of the necessity of the presence of an odd person to the relationship, the donor: in female pairs, the sperm is donated by the third, the transfer of the egg by one of the partners and the assignment of the uterus by another; in men couples, the egg is donated by the third, the transfer of sperm by one partner and the achievement of pregnancy is by substitution, commonly called “surrogacy”, in which another person outside the homoafective relationship offers her uterus for pregnancy development and should be complied with the requirements set forth in Resolution No. 1957/2010 of the Federal Council of Medicine. The realization of this project of homoparenthood family generates rights and duties for the couple, from the obligation to exercise responsible parenthood and the exercise of family power. In this environment, many achievements have been reached by homosexual couples, especially the possibility of double registration in the birth certificate of the children - father and father, mother and mother. However, there are still controversies and uncertainties due to the lack of specific legislation on such techniques of artificial fertilization, fitting, then, to the Judiciary resolve any conflicts, based on analysis of cases and applying the fundamental principles of family law. |
publishDate |
2013 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2013-09-02 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artigo avaliado pelos Pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/15866 10.5433/1980-511X.2013v8n2p139 |
url |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/15866 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5433/1980-511X.2013v8n2p139 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/15866/13119 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista do Direito Público; v. 8 n. 2 (2013); 139-158 1980-511X reponame:Revista do Direito Público instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) instacron:UEL |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
instacron_str |
UEL |
institution |
UEL |
reponame_str |
Revista do Direito Público |
collection |
Revista do Direito Público |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista do Direito Público - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||rdpubuel@uel.br |
_version_ |
1799305930930651136 |