The critical education of English teachers and students: a relationship between writing, argumentation and critical literacy

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Campbell, Raphaela Priscylla Barros
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Ifa, Sérgio
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Entretextos
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/entretextos/article/view/23954
Resumo: As teachers and researchers, we intend to promote our university’s students’ critical education through language teaching. Seeking this education while trying not to cause damage to the development of linguistic skills, we have decided to conduct an action research (BURNS, 2009) to understand the processes of written argumentation and critical education. Brydon (2010), Duboc (2012) and Jordão (2013) guide our study in terms of critical literacy, whereas we find support mainly in Liberali (2009) and Harmer (2007) to write about argumentation and writing. We have collected data through the teaching assistant’s notes, the texts written by students, lesson plans and journals. The data interpretation revealed that the argumentation development process has become more relevant than a possible agreement that could result from it, better contributing for critical education. Besides, combining teaching and research has resulted in observation that might cause changes in our teaching practices.
id UEL-5_5fdc78be1d0e602f2be3224536f80cfa
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/23954
network_acronym_str UEL-5
network_name_str Revista Entretextos
repository_id_str
spelling The critical education of English teachers and students: a relationship between writing, argumentation and critical literacyA formação crítica de alunos e professores de inglês: uma relação entre escrita, argumentação e letramento críticoCritical literacyArgumentationProcess writingLetramento críticoArgumentaçãoProcess writingAs teachers and researchers, we intend to promote our university’s students’ critical education through language teaching. Seeking this education while trying not to cause damage to the development of linguistic skills, we have decided to conduct an action research (BURNS, 2009) to understand the processes of written argumentation and critical education. Brydon (2010), Duboc (2012) and Jordão (2013) guide our study in terms of critical literacy, whereas we find support mainly in Liberali (2009) and Harmer (2007) to write about argumentation and writing. We have collected data through the teaching assistant’s notes, the texts written by students, lesson plans and journals. The data interpretation revealed that the argumentation development process has become more relevant than a possible agreement that could result from it, better contributing for critical education. Besides, combining teaching and research has resulted in observation that might cause changes in our teaching practices.Como professores e pesquisadores, pretendemos promover a formação crítica dos alunos da nossa universidade por meio do ensino de línguas. Ao almejar essa formação, tentando não prejudicar o desenvolvimento das habilidades linguísticas, decidimos conduzir uma pesquisa-ação (BURNS, 2009) para compreender os processos de argumentação escrita e da formação crítica. Brydon (2010), Duboc (2012) e Jordão (2013) norteiam nosso estudo com relação ao letramento crítico, enquanto fundamentamo-nos principalmente em Liberali (2009) e Harmer (2007) para escrever sobre argumentação e escrita. Coletamos os dados por meio de anotações da professora observadora, dos textos escritos pelos alunos e dos planos e diários de aula. A interpretação de dados revelou que o processo de desenvolvimento da argumentação se fez mais relevante que uma possível adesão recorrente dela, contribuindo melhor para a formação crítica. Além disso, combinar docência com pesquisa resultou em reflexões que poderão ocasionar mudanças em nossas práticas docentes.Universidade Estadual de Londrina2016-11-25info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionResearch-actionPesquisa-açãoapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/entretextos/article/view/2395410.5433/1519-5392.2016v16n2p127Entretextos; v. 16 n. 2 (2016); 127-1522764-08091519-5392reponame:Revista Entretextosinstname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/entretextos/article/view/23954/20765Copyright (c) 2016 Entretextosinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCampbell, Raphaela Priscylla BarrosIfa, Sérgio2021-03-29T20:01:57Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/23954Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/entretextosPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/entretextos/oai||entretextos.uel@gmail.com|| ppgel@uel.br|| laudi@uel.br1519-53922764-0809opendoar:2021-03-29T20:01:57Revista Entretextos - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The critical education of English teachers and students: a relationship between writing, argumentation and critical literacy
A formação crítica de alunos e professores de inglês: uma relação entre escrita, argumentação e letramento crítico
title The critical education of English teachers and students: a relationship between writing, argumentation and critical literacy
spellingShingle The critical education of English teachers and students: a relationship between writing, argumentation and critical literacy
Campbell, Raphaela Priscylla Barros
Critical literacy
Argumentation
Process writing
Letramento crítico
Argumentação
Process writing
title_short The critical education of English teachers and students: a relationship between writing, argumentation and critical literacy
title_full The critical education of English teachers and students: a relationship between writing, argumentation and critical literacy
title_fullStr The critical education of English teachers and students: a relationship between writing, argumentation and critical literacy
title_full_unstemmed The critical education of English teachers and students: a relationship between writing, argumentation and critical literacy
title_sort The critical education of English teachers and students: a relationship between writing, argumentation and critical literacy
author Campbell, Raphaela Priscylla Barros
author_facet Campbell, Raphaela Priscylla Barros
Ifa, Sérgio
author_role author
author2 Ifa, Sérgio
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Campbell, Raphaela Priscylla Barros
Ifa, Sérgio
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Critical literacy
Argumentation
Process writing
Letramento crítico
Argumentação
Process writing
topic Critical literacy
Argumentation
Process writing
Letramento crítico
Argumentação
Process writing
description As teachers and researchers, we intend to promote our university’s students’ critical education through language teaching. Seeking this education while trying not to cause damage to the development of linguistic skills, we have decided to conduct an action research (BURNS, 2009) to understand the processes of written argumentation and critical education. Brydon (2010), Duboc (2012) and Jordão (2013) guide our study in terms of critical literacy, whereas we find support mainly in Liberali (2009) and Harmer (2007) to write about argumentation and writing. We have collected data through the teaching assistant’s notes, the texts written by students, lesson plans and journals. The data interpretation revealed that the argumentation development process has become more relevant than a possible agreement that could result from it, better contributing for critical education. Besides, combining teaching and research has resulted in observation that might cause changes in our teaching practices.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-11-25
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Research-action
Pesquisa-ação
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/entretextos/article/view/23954
10.5433/1519-5392.2016v16n2p127
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/entretextos/article/view/23954
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/1519-5392.2016v16n2p127
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/entretextos/article/view/23954/20765
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Entretextos
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Entretextos
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Entretextos; v. 16 n. 2 (2016); 127-152
2764-0809
1519-5392
reponame:Revista Entretextos
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Revista Entretextos
collection Revista Entretextos
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Entretextos - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||entretextos.uel@gmail.com|| ppgel@uel.br|| laudi@uel.br
_version_ 1799315388847095808