Ideology in brazilian judicial discourse
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Scientia Iuris (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/35517 |
Resumo: | Based on the definition of law as “a vehicle for transferring bourgeois illusions”, formulated by Márcio B. Naves, this study investigates the dominant (bourgeois) aimed at protecting and preserving privileges, supported by a legal language in national legislation. These elements will be recognized by analyzing a case study (Case / law court), where vehicles that defines class institutes are exemplarily marked. One aspect of this discursive protection is observed in the legal language whose vocabulary is based on a framework of understanding far popular and protected by a linguistic normalization that sets up in a very specific universe this domain, and the reform of the Institute of property, in modernity, without letting go of its classic attributes. |
id |
UEL-6_33b2246b8cd1135638a00817457a84bd |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/35517 |
network_acronym_str |
UEL-6 |
network_name_str |
Scientia Iuris (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Ideology in brazilian judicial discourseA ideologia no discurso jurídico brasileiroideologyclass speechjurisprudencepropertyIdeologiaDiscurso de ClasseJurisprudênciaPropriedadeBased on the definition of law as “a vehicle for transferring bourgeois illusions”, formulated by Márcio B. Naves, this study investigates the dominant (bourgeois) aimed at protecting and preserving privileges, supported by a legal language in national legislation. These elements will be recognized by analyzing a case study (Case / law court), where vehicles that defines class institutes are exemplarily marked. One aspect of this discursive protection is observed in the legal language whose vocabulary is based on a framework of understanding far popular and protected by a linguistic normalization that sets up in a very specific universe this domain, and the reform of the Institute of property, in modernity, without letting go of its classic attributes.Fundamentados na definição de jurisprudência enquanto “veículo de disseminação das ilusões burguesas”, formulado por Márcio B. Naves, investigaremos o discurso dominante (burguês) voltado à proteção e manutenção de privilégios, sustentados por uma linguagem jurídica propalaga na legislação nacional. Estes elementos serão reconhecidos pela análise tecida a um estudo de caso (acórdão/jurisprudência de tribunal), onde os veículos de cautelamento aos institutos de classe estão exemplarmente demarcados. Conforme apontado nas análises, um aspecto desta proteção discursiva será observada na linguagem jurídica cujo léxico se sustenta em um arcabouço distante da compreensão popular e protegido por uma normatização linguística que configura-se de forma muito particular a este universo de domínio e a reforma do instituto da propriedade, na modernidade, sem desprender-se de seus atributos clássicos.Universidade Estadual de Londrina2022-03-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/3551710.5433/2178-8189.2022v26n1p10Scientia Iuris; v. 26 n. 1 (2022); 10-282178-81891415-6490reponame:Scientia Iuris (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/35517/31693Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iurishttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.pt_BRinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPlatt, Adreana DulcinaBalthazar, Ubaldo CesarFernandes, Frederico Augusto Garcia2023-01-17T19:51:30Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/35517Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iurisPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/oairevistamdireito@uel.br2178-81891415-6490opendoar:2023-01-17T19:51:30Scientia Iuris (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Ideology in brazilian judicial discourse A ideologia no discurso jurídico brasileiro |
title |
Ideology in brazilian judicial discourse |
spellingShingle |
Ideology in brazilian judicial discourse Platt, Adreana Dulcina ideology class speech jurisprudence property Ideologia Discurso de Classe Jurisprudência Propriedade |
title_short |
Ideology in brazilian judicial discourse |
title_full |
Ideology in brazilian judicial discourse |
title_fullStr |
Ideology in brazilian judicial discourse |
title_full_unstemmed |
Ideology in brazilian judicial discourse |
title_sort |
Ideology in brazilian judicial discourse |
author |
Platt, Adreana Dulcina |
author_facet |
Platt, Adreana Dulcina Balthazar, Ubaldo Cesar Fernandes, Frederico Augusto Garcia |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Balthazar, Ubaldo Cesar Fernandes, Frederico Augusto Garcia |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Platt, Adreana Dulcina Balthazar, Ubaldo Cesar Fernandes, Frederico Augusto Garcia |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
ideology class speech jurisprudence property Ideologia Discurso de Classe Jurisprudência Propriedade |
topic |
ideology class speech jurisprudence property Ideologia Discurso de Classe Jurisprudência Propriedade |
description |
Based on the definition of law as “a vehicle for transferring bourgeois illusions”, formulated by Márcio B. Naves, this study investigates the dominant (bourgeois) aimed at protecting and preserving privileges, supported by a legal language in national legislation. These elements will be recognized by analyzing a case study (Case / law court), where vehicles that defines class institutes are exemplarily marked. One aspect of this discursive protection is observed in the legal language whose vocabulary is based on a framework of understanding far popular and protected by a linguistic normalization that sets up in a very specific universe this domain, and the reform of the Institute of property, in modernity, without letting go of its classic attributes. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-03-31 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artigo avaliado pelos Pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/35517 10.5433/2178-8189.2022v26n1p10 |
url |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/35517 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5433/2178-8189.2022v26n1p10 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/35517/31693 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iuris https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.pt_BR info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iuris https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.pt_BR |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scientia Iuris; v. 26 n. 1 (2022); 10-28 2178-8189 1415-6490 reponame:Scientia Iuris (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) instacron:UEL |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
instacron_str |
UEL |
institution |
UEL |
reponame_str |
Scientia Iuris (Online) |
collection |
Scientia Iuris (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Scientia Iuris (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revistamdireito@uel.br |
_version_ |
1799306015567511552 |